Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

WireTap

Why French Youth Are Rioting -- Again

By Robin Kraft, WireTap. Posted March 20, 2006.


News: This time young people are opposing an ill-conceived new employment law that the French government is pushing to boost ratings before elections next year.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Robin Kraft

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Paris is burning, again. Well, not really -- no need to exaggerate like U.S. media did during the riots last year -- it's really just a few smoking cars and piles of garbage here and there, with tear gas and water cannons thrown in for good measure.

But it's not in the suburbs this time -- protests are happening at the Sorbonne, and at Place de la Nation, and in major cities across France. Between 500,000 and 1.5 million people were mobilized Saturday afternoon against a new youth labor contract that would, among other things, allow employees -- that are 18 to 26 years old -- to be fired without cause during the first two years of employment.

In Paris alone, between 80,000 and 350,000 people marched through the streets, with students and labor unions united against what they see as a proposition for substandard labor protections, job insecurity and inequality reminiscent of American labor conditions.

Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin has promoted the contrat premiere embauche (CPE), or First Employment Contract, as allowing employers to take a chance on someone with less education or job skills instead of waiting interminably for the ideal candidate to come along and giving that person a contrat a duree indetermine, or unlimited duration contract. Of course, rolling back hard-won labor protections is not an easy sell, and the potential for abuse has the proposal's numerous critics worried and angry.

While supporters say the CPE is justified as a measure to help poor youth from the suburbs out of poverty, critics say that vindictive or racially motivated firings would be hard to guard against, since they can be officially without cause.

Another worry is that the contract will become a favorite among employers, contributing to unemployment for older, unskilled workers as they are replaced by easy-to-fire young people, who in turn fear losing their jobs to others just before the end of the two-year trial period.

But in the face of dynamic, if brutal and unequal Anglo-American capitalism, flexibilite has become a buzzword in the French political debate. The center-right government in particular argues that the current system, in which firing an employee is difficult compared to at-will employment policies in the United States, is hardly conducive to promoting economic growth and competitiveness in the global economy. Of course, that kind of competitiveness is a priority for unloved bosses, not for employees and their families.

On the other hand, with general unemployment over 9 percent, and 22 percent for nonstudent jobseekers under 25 (between 40 percent and 50 percent in the most distressed areas), the government is trying desperately to get those numbers down before the presidential election next year. Withdrawing the proposal in the face of university shutdowns and intermittent violence would be a major setback for the presidential hopeful and current Prime Minister de Villepin, and government spokesman Jean-Francois Cope suggested that dialog to improve the contract is an option.

Of course, with both sides hardening their positions, including two-thirds of the population in favor of withdrawal and President Jacque Chirac's declaration of unconditional support for de Villepin, a mutually acceptable resolution to this political crisis is increasingly farfetched.

There have been scattered anti-protest rallies favoring reopening universities, some of which have been closed for several weeks, while the major unions are threatening strikes later this week and refusing to negotiate unless the length of the contract and no-cause firings are put back on the table.

The prime minister has reiterated his refusal to withdraw the proposal, but on Monday he met with business leaders and students in Paris.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Robin Kraft is a regular WireTap contributor living in Paris.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Think more carefully about what you say...
Posted by: kirkmc on Mar 20, 2006 11:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Geez, talk about an agenda. You are simply repeating what the Socialists have been saying about this issue. But, hey, that's the tone here.

However, you are making some glaring errors. You say:

"While supporters say the CPE is justified as a measure to help poor youth from the suburbs out of poverty, racially motivated firings would be hard to guard against, since they can be officially without cause."

Um, seriously? You think if there were racial issues anyone would bother to hire someone just so they could later fire them for "racially-motivated" reasons?

"Another danger is that the contract will become a favorite among employers, contributing to unemployment for older, unskilled workers as they are replaced by easy-to-fire young people, who in turn fear losing their jobs to others just before the end of the two-year trial period."

Yeah, that goes in the "all employers are evil" cubby-hole. Kind of obvious, isn't it? Employers all just want to exploit workers...

"On the other hand, with unemployment over 9 percent and 22 percent for non-student jobseekers under 25, the government is trying desperately to get those numbers down before the presidential election next year."

While politics are never far beneath the surface, I think this is an exaggeration. De Villepin simply wants to reduce unemployment, which is endemically high, and has been for decades. And your numbers are very strange - "between 9 and 22 percent"? What exactly does that mean? Unemployment among the underclass (French people of Arabic or African descent) is closer to 40 or 50%.

"There have been scattered anti-protest rallies favoring reopening universities, some of which have been closed for several weeks..."

Where young fascists in a minority who have blocked these universities have refused to allow votes of all the students, many of whom want to go to school...

"Robin Kraft is a contributing writer of WireTap studying in Paris."

Does your lack of objectivity come from the fact that you're a student, and only know what other students are saying? Do you have any contact with people who have jobs?

And why did you not note that the vast majority of the demonstrators (and I mean vast - more than 90% of the students demonstrating) are not the poor living in projects, but middle-class students?

(FWIW, I'm an American who has lived in France for more than twenty years, and I can see exactly how this issue is being controlled by the unions, as every demonstration involving labor issues is.)

Kirk

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Forgot something
Posted by: Robin Kraft on Mar 20, 2006 12:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read the newspaper a little more closely and you'll see that the political ramifications of this, and the riots that are certainly one motivation for this reform, are huge -- certainly greater than those of persistant unemployment. Yeah, the government wants to do something about it, but the stakes are enormous. If de Villepin and Sarkozy screw this up, they're going to have major problems for their perfectly transparent political ambitions.

Simply reducing unemployment is great. De Villepin not backing down in the face of the opposition, and the labor unions refusing to negotiate is much more politics than public policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Forgot something Posted by: kirkmc
» RE: Forgot something Posted by: Robin Kraft
» RE: Forgot something Posted by: kirkmc
» RE: Forgot something Posted by: Robin Kraft
A little more explanation
Posted by: Sandrine on Mar 20, 2006 1:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, you need to set the context right. We have two basic types of employment contracts in France, either you have a contract for an unlimited duration - in which case your employer must give you notice and a reason to bring the contract to an end - or you have a contract based on a specific duration - which can only be renewed 3 times for the same duration each time. Now this new (dreadful) law basically sets employment contracts for first time employees below the age of 26 with a 2-year period without any guarantee of duration and no justification (or notice) to end the work contract. The problem with employment is France today doesn't have to do with contract flexibility but with the cost of manpower itself. Our P&W is around 63% on the employer's side (on top of the gross salary) and 20 to 25% on the employee's side (deducted from the gross salary). Our government is playing stupid because this new "idea" isn't going to change anything but to add precarity to the employment landscape. We don't need it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A little more explanation Posted by: Robin Kraft
A little more explanation
Posted by: Sandrine on Mar 20, 2006 2:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, it's not better to simply have a job, particularly not at a time when major companies show record profits. People are tired of being the ones making efforts again and again. I'm not saying that we shouldn't make efforts, but efforts have to work both ways and so far it's only been a one-sided issue. In any case our current government is merely preparing next year's presidential election, it's all about propaganda but it resolves nothing where the main problems are concerned. Words, words and more words...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A little more explanation Posted by: Sandrine
Ya gotta love the French
Posted by: Gregor on Mar 21, 2006 7:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having lived in France for awhile I admire them way beyond the Americans. Americans sit contented while the government falls around their ears. At least the French have the balls to be activists and they won't let government get away with anything. Viva la France!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

France, Message from Anarchists in Paris
Posted by: frode on Mar 22, 2006 5:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I quote FYI:
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:52:48 +0200
Subject: (en) France, Message from Anarchists in Paris
This is a message from french/english/italian/german anarchists living in the Paris region to our sympathizers all around the world. We are independant from but friends with the French Anarchist Federation hence we will not speak in their name. We would like to clarify the situation here since it seems to us that many foreign medias seem to qualify the struggle as a purely conservative "we don't want to change anything" type of protest, just as they did when we roudly said !F--K YOU! to Pascal "WTO" Lamy, Bolkenstein and all those heartless f--ks at the European Comission and in french politics&medias. Our NO wasn't a racist no, it was an anti-liberal no whatever the medias try to say.
First we would like to thank all of those who supported us and the student's movement that's been shaking this decaying conservative country for more than a month. A special THANKS to the italians of "Contropodere" who organized themselves in less than 3 days to have a bus from Rome, Torino, Genoa and Bologna come up to Paris to help us. CPE is going to allow companies to fire employees without any justifications WHATSOEVER. It is, for now, aimed at the 15-25 years-old category which the government knows is so nihilistic that most won't even take position against them being fired.
Just as in november they used old laws to "speed" (read : bypass) the (of course pseudo) democratic process in order to pass laws that comply with their capitalistic allies and vision of the new world order. We had massive riots this autumn, which weren't manipulated or controlled by anything (this needs to be known; the french intelligence services themselves said it wasnt religious nor mafia but a population fed up with their lives) except the desire for giving back the violence poor people in the suburbs face everyday in general...
France is no heaven ; Paris may be nice to spend a few days in but it's a hard place to live because we've got too much envy for the supposed parisian golden life of before. We anarchists are trying to broaden the struggle which is being diverted to reformism by sold out student unions and to some extent autonomization has increased a lot in a month...
As of march 16th about 3/4 of the 80+ french faculties are on strike, high schools in Paris, Rouen, Caen, Toulouse, Marseille, Bordeaux, Limoges and many more are also joining the fac students. Strikes are decided by assembly voting and propositions for the strike usually amount to 3 to 1 for.
We have also rediscovered the joys of fascism, for about a week now between 50 to 100 extreme right youth section of the Front National have been patrolling the small streets of the Latin Quarter, more or less ignored by the cops, with bats and helmets, beating all anti-cpe people they cross. Needless to say we beat them up badly but they are quite motivated and scare the first comers.
For a week now more and more people are fed up of union leaders calling them to protest from 2 to 5 and then thanking them for coming and telling them to go home, that it was a good protest. We do not want negociations concerning this CPE we want its total withdrawal....
Thursday more than a thousand people bypassed the union's call and carried on protesting, attacking police and trying to infilter the fortified Sorbonne faculty to regain control after we were ousted ...Tomorrow we will be dedicating the fights of the day
to all the freedom loving people of the world who face 20x more repression than we do, people in the US, elsewhere in Europe, the peasants, students, women, children who fight everyday all over the world against religious, economical and political obscurantism, oppression and tyranny.
ONE YOUTH ONE WORLD ONE LOVE.
May, with the help of everyone, freedom and justice reign!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Government intervention
Posted by: aedwards on Mar 23, 2006 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't help but wonder what caused the unemployment rates in the first place. From reading various articles I can make a pretty good guess. I believe that the unemployment rates are a direct result of high taxes, unions, and government handouts.
High taxes are a cause of inflation. If you earn money why would you want to have it forcibly taken from you? If a person works for 10.00 a hour and only brings home 7.00 an hour they are not going to want to continue working when the government will provide them with food and housing free.
Unions try as hard as they can to improve the lives of the union members but in doing so drive businesses into bankruptcy. Quite often a union will force non union people out of a job to be replaced by less skilled union members who charge more money for their time.
The solution is to get rid of all the laws pertaining to the hiring and firing of workers. When the government passed this law they had a good idea, but because it was a law it will not work. When something is forced all people will try to use it to their advantage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Government intervention Posted by: Robin Kraft