Get our most popular stories once a week!
I think you make really great points here, that I hope folks are making elsewhere or at least..."
Posted by blaktivist in Going Green, Part II
paydayloans posted in ICE Cold: A New Round of Raids As The Economy Sours
muruch posted in Free Association: Sound of Silence
Larisa Mann posted in Free Association: Sound of Silence
Who Needs Black History Month?
During an interview with Mike Wallace on "60 Minutes" last month, Academy Award winning actor Morgan Freeman called Black History month "ridiculous," igniting a firestorm of debate about its observance. Freeman told a visibly shocked Wallace, "I don't want a Black History month. Black History is American History. There's no white history month."
Since Freeman's statements became public, I have read numerous editorials written by black intellectuals calling for the end of the celebration of black history month. The premise is that Black History month is no longer necessary, and that a 28 day observance both confines and trivializes the historic contributions of African-Americans in this country.
Prior to even thinking about what Freeman was saying, I had to first get over my continued outrage at white people asking black actors, athletes, and entertainers what they think about issues that are outside of their areas of expertise. Publicizing the opinions of Morgan Freeman doesn't make him a spokesman for the black race. I don't see anyone seeking out Robert DeNiro for opinions about Iraq, but that's a whole different discussion.
But in response to Freeman's comments, all I can say is, "Please."
Celebrating Black History Month no more confines the history of African-Americans than the one day MLK holiday confines the achievements of Dr. Martin Luther King. Or that St. Patrick's Day confines the history of Irish-Americans to March 17th. Want to know how to trivialize African-American history? Eliminate Black History Month.
Mr. Freeman and others maintain that in place of Black History Month, black history should be incorporated into the mainstream history of America. Their thought process is that black history can be celebrated every day by its proper inclusion in American history. Mr. Freeman went so far as to ask Mike Wallace, "Which month is white history month?" The answer unfortunately, is that every month remains white history month in this country, and it is precisely for this reason that Black History month remains relevant and necessary.
Sylvia Cyrus-Albritton, director of the Association for the Study of African American Life and History, (which originated the observance of what is now Black History Month), points out that the country still has a long way to go in making its history inclusive. As she told the Baltimore Sun in December:
"We have a mission to research, promote, preserve and disseminate information about the contributions of African-Americans in history and their diaspora," she said. "When that mission is complete, maybe celebrations like Black History Month can take a different slant. American history books -- and the way it is taught -- still [do] not include the full contribution of African-Americans or other minorities for that matter.
"Dr. Woodson hoped that one day there would no longer be a need for Black History Month because it would be incorporated into American history all year round. So the goal Morgan Freeman speaks of is our goal as well."
In some ways, I can understand where Freeman is coming from. Ideally, we wouldn't have to have a special month because American history would be inclusive of all history. Freeman, however, also seems to be advocating that we shouldn't even speak of our differences. Instead, we should just pretend that not only is everyone equal, but that we are the same.
When Mike Wallace asked Freeman how we can get rid of racism, he replied:
"Stop talking about it. I'm going to stop calling you a white man. And I'm going to ask you to stop calling me a black man. I know you as Mike Wallace. You know me as Morgan Freeman. You wouldn't say, 'Well, I know this white guy named Mike Wallace.' You know what I'm sayin?"
I don't know about you, but I simply cannot agree with Freeman. We will not solve racial issues in this country by putting our collective heads in the sand and hoping they will go away. We can't run from our own racial past and delude ourselves that everything is ok in America. Our society still remains segregated in many ways, from where we live and where we worship, to who survives a hurricane. We like to think that we are a society beyond racism, but reality doesn't bear that out.
Race is America's great taboo, and the fact is that there are differences -- cultural and physical -- between people of different races. We need to acknowledge those differences. Pretending like they don't exist is ignoring the elephant in the room. Mike Wallace is a white guy. Morgan Freeman is a black guy. Why ignore the facts?
It's been said that history is written by the victors. Until American history becomes more inclusive of the contributions of all its citizens, Black History Month remains one of the few tangible ways that we can keep our nation's history accurate.
Who needs Black History Month? We all do.
Paul Hailey is a freelance writer and newspaper editor based in Dallas,Texas.
Is Black History Month really needed.
Posted by: renegade662000 on Feb 20, 2007 6:01 AM
Do we really need a black history month. Actually "Why do we need one?" If you say yes because we need to remind ourselves, or educate ourselves drives us to re-kindle the past instead of building a mutual foundation of all mankind. Too often do individuals resort to using the past to afford them the excuse to blame someone for their misfortune, miss opportunity, or lack for there of. I have lived with, worked with, slept with, ate with, helped and even put my life in the hands of, many different cultures, origins, religions, and the list goes on. My point being if this can be, and can exist in today's society then where is the need. If you want or need to know find out for yourself. I am not saying black history should not be a part of history but not used as an excuse. I was raised with limited contact with people of different races or ethinic backgrounds but have in my life time. I was not raised in a well to do family and looking back we were pretty poor. Food stamps and gov't assistance along with the common hand me downs and so forth were more common than not. We did get by on not even minimum wage with a family of eight. I guess another point I am getting at is that i did eventually go to school with minorities and I use that word loosely as there were hispanics, blacks, italians, indians, and so forth sitting right next to me in school, college, church, and every other event offered to me as well as them. I couldn't help but notice that on more than one occasion, the minority group what ever that may be. I include whites in the equation because it is the case depending on where you are. The minority group used their background as a crutch if you will. Used in a racial sence always pointed to the days of slaves and how the white man supressed them. What about the indians? If anyone has the right to feel racially discriminated against is should be them. Then the Hispanics or lets say Mexicans. Who settles for less wages and poor working conditions because of a stereo type. There are all races out there who have made names for themselves and are doing better than most whites or even hispanics or indians for that matter. What gets me is they have worked hard and busted their butts to get where they are and they are the ones to push the issues the most on racial discrimination. With all that said and please remember what i just stated here. I owe no religion, culture, race, color creed and please for give me if i missed your category, ANYTHING. People that I sat next to in life different from me that didn't apply themselves and have not prospered from the same things afforded to them as me have nothing to say. So those that stand there in the lines, groups and forums that promote using history to educate everyone should be the same ones telling EVERYONE that wants to know the history to pick up a book and read it and lets move on as one and quit keeping the void going. Should we dedicate a day or week or another month which we only have 12 of to anything we think we need to be educated on reminded of. That is why they teach reading and writing and arithmetic in our schools as the foundation to build our own self motivated continuing education in ourselves. Let me finish by saying that if we treated this like we treat a cut on our finger even if it were to leave a scar, we still have that funtionality and usefullness. Even though it doesn't look the same it still helps the finger next to it and the hand as a whole. So let us join those different hands in unity and work together like the fingers of life to overcome this rediculous notion that we need a yealy reminder that mistakes have been made and stop them from re-kindling. To answer my question in the title of this letter.......NO