Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

WireTap

Don’t Call Us Apathetic

By Tanzila Ahmed, WireTap. Posted January 9, 2006.


Contrary to popular belief, young people are more politically engaged than ever.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Tanzila Ahmed

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

I've had it up to here with these danged rumors. 'Young people don't vote,' 'Youth don't care about politics.' Here's the truth: Young people turned out in greater numbers than they ever have before in the 2004 elections. In fact, according to the Center for Information and Civic Learning & Engagement (CIRCLE), youth voting surged by 11 percentage points and 47 percent of 18- to 24-year-old citizens voted. This means young people raised turnout twice more than any other age group.

As a youth organizer in the youth voting movement, people are always telling me these rumors. The most common one that I'm sick of hearing, "Aren't young people apathetic?" I find myself constantly challenging these folks with all the accomplishments that the youth movement has achieved as a result of the 2004 elections.

I think that we can finally prove these rumors wrong with the incredible turnout in 2004. According to the Youth Vote 2004 Fact Sheet released by CIRCLE, no other age group increased turnout by more than 5 percentage points. The 2004 campaign brought out the largest percentage of young voters in 32 years. Studies suggest that once a young person is involved in the political process, they are more likely to continue to be involved in it. 35.5 percent of 18- to 25-year-old Asian American citizens turned out to vote in 2004, the largest percentage since data started being collected in 1972.

But these are just numbers and statistics that I've learned to prattle in a nanny nana kind of way. What does this all really mean? It means that all the hours we spent organizing campus campaigns, getting people to talk to students, time spent going dorm to dorm, worked.

It means that we have successfully shifted the political paradigm of the youth movement, and though some may have said that we "lost" the election in 2004, well, in my eyes, we won. We were successful in creating a new political generation. (I would even argue that we, as a youth movement, are more successful than the numbers prove, because these stats don't take into consideration youth lifestyle, i.e., the high relocation rate and the lapse in re-registration when attending an out-of-state school.)

Can We Keep It Up?

But as we turn the corner and 2005 has passed us by, now what? Are the youth still excited, still involved? Will they be too jaded to partake in the 2006 elections of this year? As a poorly funded movement, the youth voting groups were hardly able to sustain after 2004. Of course, another problem with the arrival of a new year is the constant influx of people turning 18 who have never registered to vote. Can we keep it up?

According to a survey taken by the Institute of Politics at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government this year, my feelings are justified. There was a drop in political interest from 2004 to now. Out of a pool of 5.1 million, 1,204 students were surveyed for the study, which states that "while 90 percent of college students said political engagement is an effective way to solve problems facing the country in the fall of 2004, only 82 percent feel the same way today." The same survey also shows that 87 percent of students say they need more information before they can get involved, which is an increase of 22 percentage points from last fall. OK, so the youth are more jaded and more hesitant about politics than they were from last fall. But contrary to popular belief, young people are not apathetic -- they are just skeptical of the current political process.

What is political involvement to a youth these days? Back in our grandparents' generation, being "political" meant you had to go to a rally or a protest, or join a union. Today's youth has a whole new definition, according to this survey; 22 percent have worn a wristband, 36 percent have signed an online petition, and 30 percent have written an email or letter advocating a position. Eighteen percent have contributed to a political blog. i.e., 918,000 young people are "political bloggers," which is fascinating since the blogs are a product of only the past few years. How is it possible that people can say there is a generation of apathetic youth? College students are, in fact, on top of national politics. (68 percent follow the news closely, with 79 percent reporting they get their news from national TV networks, and 34 percent saying they turn to blogs.)

Despite Being Skeptical, Young People are More Engaged

As a returning student, I am back to being a part of the "college student youth" demographic, which I've had a hand in politically organizing for the past eight years. On the days when I take my headphones off and listen in on the conversations that my peers are having, there is a 50 percent chance (un-statistically speaking, of course) that someone is talking about some version of politics. I know my eavesdropping is no Harvard survey, but I do feel there is a big difference in the college youth today and their political interests compared to those of eight years ago.

Finally, the last myth to bust, "Aren't all young people democrats?" No. According to the study from Harvard, youth are the most skeptical of party politics, and 72 percent of college students believe politics today has become too partisan, and 64 percent believe that the political tone in D.C. is too negative. Only 41 percent of college students approve of the job George W. Bush is doing as president, and even worse, only 11 percent trust the president to do the right thing at all times, down from 22 percent in 2001.

Young people are political, but they are skeptical of partisan politics, skeptical of the politicians in charge and skeptical of the process. In my eyes, this is not a bad thing. It means parties will have to work harder on the issues that are important to young people, or we hope that the politicians in power get that message. It means that young people are more likely to make an educated decision about their engagement in the political process. And it is our job as citizens and organizers to bring accurate and helpful political information into the daily lives of young people.

We are not a generation of the apathetic youth. We are a generation of politically charged, educated, skeptical, involved and civically engaged youth. Recognize.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Tanzila "Taz" Ahmed is the founder of South Asian American Voting Youth, a national nonprofit organization that politically empowers young South Asian Americans. She is currently pursuing her master's degree in Public Policy at UCLA. To get involved, email her.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Responsibility That Goes with the Right
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jan 9, 2006 12:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, let me say that I hope everyone votes in ALL elections. That said, every voter needs to vote from a position of knowledge-- not tradition. Just because your parents or family tends to vote a particular way is not a reason for you to.

The thought of voting by people who do not know who their Senators and Representatives are (and what they stand for) scares the !$#@ out of me. I'm constantly amazed at people who will vote based upon a few sound bites, a slogan, family tradition and what some teacher/preacher/spin-meister told
them.

How you should vote will not come from Al Franken, Rush, MTV's Rock the Vote or some joint press conference that passes for a debate these days. PLEASE, Do your homework. It's more important to all of us that you vote on knowledge and not on impulse.

Please #2-- follow up on your elected officials by tracking how they vote and hold them accountable. e-Mails, letters and phone calls do work if you are polite and articulate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Statistics
Posted by: LMNOP on Jan 9, 2006 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't see a figure comparing the fraction of eligible young voters that registered and voted, just a comparison of that group with itself to show a relative increase of 11%, and an unbelievable report that 47% of 18-24 year olds voted. BULL! This piece didn't change my opinion that the youth didn't turn out in representative numbers, a factor that may have been relevant to the outcome of that election.

But I believe that entirely too much emphasis is placed on voting relative to other forms of citizen participation in the political process. Voting may be the least important of the ways that one can participate in the political process. The others include running for office or becoming an activist in one or more campaigns, political contributions, and becoming and staying informed and then educating others in daily conversation.

Of these, I believe that the last of them is the most important. In that manner, I can potentially sway fifty votes from Republican to (forgive me) Democrat for a swing of 100 votes, 100 times more influence than merely voting.

Actually, voting is probably less important than the process whereby candidates are chosen for whom to vote. If we didn't have such poor candidates (Dems and Reps), voting might matter more, but still not as much as self-education and political intercourse with the undecided.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Statistics Posted by: Taz
» RE: Statistics Posted by: Kristina Rizga
i certainly wasn't thinking about it...
Posted by: natiyouthcenter on Jan 9, 2006 9:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what i will say is this: regardless of what the stats say, i'm with taz that more young people are talking about politics than they were, say 5 years ago. period. i certainly wasn't thinking about it. and i know i'm not alone. great stats, great perspective - and i hope people pay attention, because young people are becoming more engaged and empowered on many different levels...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement