Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

WireTap

Calling Activists to a Higher Standard

By Gavin Leonard and Adrienne Maree Brown, WireTap. Posted January 4, 2006.


Point-Counterpoint: Do today's organizers have what it takes to build a lasting progressive movement? Two young activists debate and disagree.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

[Editor's Note: Is it possible to lead a financially comfortable, healthy and happy life, and be an effective activist working for social justice at the same time? Gavin Leonard and Adrienne Maree Brown are both accomplished young organizers who have different views on what it really means to strike a balance and how it affects the long-term plan for transforming politics. Gavin Leonard, 25, volunteers as director of Elementz, a hip hop youth arts center, and works at an affordable housing agency. Adrienne Maree Brown, 27, is the director of communications at the League of Young Voters and a board member of the Ruckus Society.]

*******

Point: Calling to a Higher Standard By Gavin Leonard

Over a period of about a month this summer, I watched every episode of the West Wing available on DVD. I work for a nonprofit community development corporation from 9 to 5, and as the director of a nonprofit hip hop-based youth arts center on the side. I'd say I work about 100 hours a week, and I still seem to find plenty of time to watch TV. And I like it. But I'm also becoming increasingly disappointed and impatient: I can count on one hand the number of people I know personally who work more and harder than I do.

I know there are more than a handful of people -- who I don't know personally -- that work harder than I do. For instance, I listen to a lot of sports-talk radio while I'm working during the day. Every time I listen to the head coach of the Cincinnati Bengals give a press conference, I can't help but think that he works much harder at making a football team go than I do at trying to make the world a better place. It's really quite amazing how much energy is spent fine-tuning athletics -- amazing to the point of really bothering me. How is it that in the grand scheme of things such trivial pursuits occupy so much of peoples' time, money and energy?

The concept of working hard inevitably gets me thinking about the fact that, in my generation of activists, there is an overwhelming desire to "be sustainable." There is a growing tendency to take care of oneself, to successfully balance personal health, happiness and comfort with active work toward progressive social change. I want to be clear: I'm not against any of those things. But I'm really concerned about how well this strategy is going to work out for us.

I've watched more than a few active, engaged young people stop or greatly decrease their work on social justice issues to pursue "a more sustainable lifestyle." The implied assumption is that this new lifestyle will include work on issues, but they put a greater emphasis on staying healthy and happy. The problem is, I've seen a whole lot of people that end up focusing nearly exclusively on themselves -- leaving the movement one more person behind in an already uphill battle.

Fine Line between Sustainability and Selfishness

There's a very fine line between somebody ending up in their own world that's positive and ending up in their own world that's selfish, but I think it's a line worth discussing. For illustration, consider the choice to pursue a good relationship, have a child, and then spend a lot less time working and a lot more time raising that child -- a good choice, in my opinion. Put that decision somewhere on the same spectrum as the decision to take a corporate job to make more money -- a decision I'd guess most of us have watched someone make, and then we never quite see that same old friend again.

It seems pretty well agreed upon that we live in a self-centered society, and that seems to scare the hell out of people and truly bother the very people that are working to "be sustainable." But the whole concept of change has been slowed down dramatically by the selfishness of society, and activists and progressives are actually perpetuating their very own kind of bling bling while denouncing rappers and their cars.

I know it eats at me. I own what I consider to be a nice house with a deck and a hot tub. I have the hot tub so that I can be comfortable at the end of a long day of hard work. Same with my nice stereo and no longer new couches. If I at 18 could confront myself today at 25, I'm quite certain I'd end up with a black eye -- or at least a severely bruised conscience.

And that's exactly it. I am meeting me, and I've got a bruised conscience. I know I spend entirely too much money on things I don't really need. I know that with nothing more than a stronger will I could be a part of setting the even higher standard that I believe needs to be set. But every time I've ever tried to beat myself up, somebody's told me not to because it's "unhealthy and unsustainable." I'm scared to death that I'll never meet somebody who will give me a downright ass whipping, and at this point, I'd settle for someone that would just let me do it myself. I feel like we keep lowering the bar when a long, earnest look at the big picture should actually have us raising it.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Adrienne Maree Brown, 27, a writer, singer, trainer and the Director of Communications at the League of Young Voters, is producing a documentary on youth and HIV in New York. She is also a board member of The Ruckus Society.

Gavin Leonard, 25, is director of Cincinnati-based Elementz, a hip hop youth arts center, works at an affordable housing agency, the Over-the-Rhine Housing Network, and serves as the board chair of the League of Young Voters Education Fund.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Good read
Posted by: Llama11 on Jan 4, 2006 1:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not being very activist, it's interesting to see true activists take on the meaning of their work. My activism takes the form of being aware and writing letters to Congressman. I bet lots of us here feel better about ourselves for our "awareness". But yes, I want a nice home, a decent car, nicer clothes, better food, Xbox Live, and my efficient computer. I realize these luxuries most often come to me at the expense of the third world. But do I do anything about it? Not really. My life is comfortable, it's at least temporarily, "sustainable". And I think to myself, when I get a law degree then I can make change. But perhaps who will be changed is me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Looking ahead
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 4, 2006 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Life has always asked us, How much for me and how much for my fellows? Or as the Eagles sing it, “What is yours? And what is mine?” Add to that, What is ours?

Aristotle’s “golden mean” still resonates, but where we strike the balance remains a decision to be made anew every day. Plato wrote that the divine Good chooses those it loves. Nietzsche said, “Become what you already are.” Put those together, and it adds up to pray for guidance.while you do the best you can.

My imagination is stirred by such dreams as living in a community where insurance is a community responsibility, as Social Security now is. Instead of squirreling away our individual resources in a dog-eat-dog world, let the protection for personal crises become a public responsibility.

Yes, I also hate bureaucrats, but I find them in private insurance as much as public insurance. And we would be forced to spend more time beyond our families learning how to work together, to be come political. And there would be ups and downs. When has it ever been otherwise?

Realistically, I do not expect to see in the lifetimes of any American now living a radical change in our institutions. Beyond that, sometime, maybe. We cannot ignore our abuse of Mother Earth forever. We cannot ignore the danger of thermonuclear weapons forever. People will not allow themselves and their families to suffer under financial bullies forever. But the question is always, When?

A.N. Whitehead tells us that “It is the business of the future to be dangerous. And we can count on it always doing its job.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Looking ahead Posted by: Lincoln fan
Important questions
Posted by: PaulLoeb on Jan 4, 2006 4:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 35 years I've seen a lot of activists burn out as they've worked themselves so hard there's nothing left but resentment. I've also seen others turn inward, assure themselves that they're taking the best care of themselves possible, and back away from social engagement.

As both authors point out eloquently, the challenge is to keep savoring what we have, keep renewing our spirits, but also challenge ourselves to do the difficult, indeed the impossible. My cross country coach used to always push us to get out of our comfort zones--this matters for politics as well. But we also don't want to live in a desperation zone.

Here's a story about Desmond Tutu, from my book The Impossible Will Take a Little While: A Citizen's Guide to Hope in a Time of Fear... We may not all have his powerful voice, but what a voice to learn from..

A few years ago, I heard Archbishop Desmond Tutu speak at a Los Angeles benefit for a South African project. He’d been fighting prostate cancer, was tired that evening, and had taken a nap before his talk. But when Tutu addressed the audience he became animated, expressing amazement that God chose his native country, given its shameful history of racial oppression, to provide the world with an unforgettable lesson in reconciliation and hope. Afterward a few other people spoke, then a band from East L.A. took the stage and launched into an irresistibly rhythmic tune. People started dancing. Suddenly I noticed Tutu, boogying away in the middle of the crowd. I’d never seen a Nobel Peace Prize winner, still less one with a potentially fatal disease, move like that—with such joy and abandonment. Tutu, I realized, knows how to have a good time. Indeed, it dawned on me that his ability to recognize and embrace life’s pleasures helps him face its cruelties and disappointments, be they personal or political.

I think that's our challenge too

Paul Loeb
www.Paulloeb.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Perspective
Posted by: Kneel on Jan 4, 2006 7:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suggest reading In Praise of Idleness, which I just took a look at again tonight, for another perspective.

I wonder if there's a bit of misguided self-importance here. Yes, if you try to do all the work yourself, you're facing something Herculean. But since the idea is to yield a better society, it might be possible to do more to spread the work around a bit. If you see that as a goal, perhaps it turns into a sort of force multiplier.

I also wonder at a 25-year-old activist who works for a affordible housing agency owning his own house. Is that owning outright or... well, none of business. Nevermind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Perspective Posted by: natiyouthcenter
» RE: Perspective Posted by: Kneel
» RE: Perspective Posted by: Kristina Rizga
Productivity
Posted by: sjc224 on Jan 5, 2006 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks to both of you.

Before he became a columnist, Paul Krugman wrote a book with the thesis that the health of an economy depends primarily on productivity per worker. I see much of the challenge as our inability to measure productivity. As a result, we have to show productivity, which is done by demonstrating burn-out, or by showing results.

Certain positions are more results-oriented, and require more creative problem solving. For these jobs, at some point, rest is more productive than work.

Other positions are softer, harder to measure. For these jobs, long hours can increase productivity, and definitely increase perceived productivity.

As SF Organizer Nicole Derse once said, "I wish people would spend more time doing good, and less time trying to show the good they're doing."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressive are just fooling themselves...
Posted by: mati on Jan 5, 2006 5:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would seriously hesitate to call these two anything but clueless. Working 100 hours a week to own a hot-tub? Excuse me but that's FAR from activism, that's capitalism with a feel-good veneer. I mean if yer going to be a capitalist, at least admit it and enjoy it for god's sake. Although the second guy has an inkling....

The only way we change the world is to create the change. That means living as if the system doesn't matter. Create alternatives and live according to vision and eventually the seemingly powerful structure will as David Graeber puts it, "appear stupid and irrelevant".

That's what's working in the third world, in the autonomous zones of North America and Europe. Spending your time working is only working to perpetuate the system-- no matter who you work for. It's the whole money thing that is the problem in the first place-- despite what many think, you CAN live and live well without money or jobs, it's just you have to stay out of the government radar. I never had a problem living until I had to interface with the government through my wife's arrest. I lived simply, and it was simply not expensive. I didn't care about a house or a car, and frankly I still don't believe that anyone has the right to "own" a house and all the expensive stuff we fill them with to this day. Until everyone has a loaf of bread, nobody should be able to have two...

WE "belong" to the land, land cannot be "owned" by us. Our duty in life is to align ourselves to the needs of the Mother planet-- everything else is just a waste of time and resources.

At any rate, once the oil runs out and disease starts to spread, our "irresponsible" and "unrealistic" ideas will be the only thing keeping humanity from ripping each other to shreds.

Then our sustainable, simple, anarchic eco-communities in which NOONE works will be the only thing left for the people who survive the crisis. If it doesn't happen in 2012, it will just be 2112, or 2200....

Just as it always has-- anarchism is nothing more than the self-organization that arises in villages, tribes, bands, etc. From whence we came, and to thence we will return...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is your mission for your activism?
Posted by: Conan the Younger on Jan 5, 2006 9:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is your activism an end unto itself or do you have a purpose?

All of you youngters are playing the game of rolling the boulder up the hill and then don't what to do if by some miracle you make it to the top except to let it roll back to the bottom of the hill. What is the purpose of your work?

When you see an opportunity to help or make a difference, then do it! My father, 32 years in the US Army, taught me that one. I started looking for those opportunities in my early teens and am still doing it in my late fifties.

In life, you don't have one mission, but a series of missions. One of the things that I learned from the military was that I had to have sustainability of my unit if I was going to accomplish my missions. That meant that I had to keep them healthy, alive, functional, and motivated. If I don't do that, then I don't have a unit to accomplish any missions after the first one. Then I have failed to do my duty to accomplish all of my missions. I have followed that maxim in my community service and in my work as a cutting edge software engineer. And I am expecting that I will continue until I am well past 100 years old.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

activism: a vocation or avocation
Posted by: robchapman on Jan 6, 2006 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am pleased in reading that there are people who are professionally concerned with advancing a progressive agenda in this country, and recognize the need for them and for their organizations.

But I remain troubled by a couple of points.

It seems to me, living in Central NYS that the society is rapidly heading towards bannana republic status. The rich will control everything, the middle class will consist of their retainers, poverty or at least clear dependency will be the prevailing condition of the citizenry and opposition will take the form of romantic rebellion.

Activists, who are decent people with a wonderful sense of decency and public service, are too focussed on their issues, too concerned with their professional credibility and too caught with fighting fires to help combat these larger trends.

I would hope that at some point, we could make a serious effort to look at the direction society is moving in. It is vital that we combine the voluntary and professional sectors in this effort.
I feel it is equally vital that we not fall the trap of blinkered vision in this effort.

Unfortunately, few professionals or organizations have the resources to make a comprehensive survey of the terrain or to ome up with solutions based on such a survey. It is also beyond the purview of the activist community to allocate the resources or assign the work to perform these tasks.

These functions are the role of the government and there is simply on way for the activist community to substitute for the power of an abusive goverment. The political struggle to gain control of the government and set a progressive agenda must be our priority.

Robert Chapman
Lansing, New York

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

alterring conceptions of the task at hand
Posted by: maceito on Jan 6, 2006 12:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as a working class black activist/organizer who's invested over 40 years in fighting for fundamental social & political change, i found the opinions offered by Gavin Leonard & Adrienne Maree Brown symptomatic of the genral confusion among folks who have become painfully aware of the short-comings of contemporary activism, but don't quite know what to do about them.
that said, while supporting Mr. Leonard's call for a "a new and higher standard for activists and organizers," i don't think that the problem is reducible to the need to DO more, but a much-needed clarity on WHAT TO DO. case-in-point: the 2004 presidential election; thousands of hours of time, energy & attention dedicated to electing "anyone but Bush." in the aftermath of Kerry's defeat, "progressives" have been lost in debates over how to woo this reactionary middle away from the Bushwhackers. clearly, at issue here is not in the numbers or degree of effort, but questions of purpose & long-term vision.
likewise, Ms. Brown's criticism of "celebrity organizers" missed the mark: the issue is not that too few are willingly "stepping to the plate as leaders," but that too many assume that their role is to define the issues, goals & strategies of movement-building. the growth of the nonprofit sector & the notion of paid activism has contributed to the phenomenon of "professional organizers" having no organic connection to the communities they work in; the evident confusion between building a nonprofit organization (whether for advocacy or service delivery) w/building a people's movement is an unanticipated--& arguably, undesirable--consequence of these developments. indeed, today's progressive initiatives are often hostaged to the flavor-of-the-month agendas of funders, the media & IRS restrictions. as a result, the participation & leadership of true stakeholders is often secondary to considerations of funding, media access & legal liabilites.
lastly, as historian Robert Allen (1974) has noted, racism is “the final dilemma of reformism,” which “like Sisyphus…can expect neither final success nor rest, unless it fundamentally alters its conception of the task at hand.” 'nuff said?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yuppies and the working class
Posted by: Andrew Zito on Jan 7, 2006 12:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps I am losing my mind but I have no time for the Village Voice literary style of non-fiction writing because I don't have the time for that stuff and I save that for my literary and peotic style of writing so I can be ignored like the 99,000,000 people in America out there who think they have some writing ability.

Second I do what I do cause in writing and art I do what I want to because I have to and because II never mixed in well with my high class friends who were all busy jockeying for the their next fix on the job line.

Nor did I ever mix well in al the factional sects in American progressivism which I became embroiled in at practically birth, nor was I one wanting to run away and drop out.

All to often I would say that I can not express sufficient respect for people I agree with not because I disagree with them but that they disagree with the people as it is represented by what I understand.

From the get go these "Comrades" as they say in France represent an elite as part of the paid staffs of something supposedly representing something that I say if it isn't worth dying for please don't for I don't feel you represent the working class, nor will you ever represent them.

If I did what the organizer thought I should of did a long time ago when I started and it was convient to them I'd be dead, and a drop out so much for organizers, and with them movements, for I believe in only the people. If you predicate your actions based on something else other than the people bye good riddance cause we can argue what is in the peoples' interests but I won't listen to your drivel when so far as I can think it would of been better to have died for the people true interests than have to listen to the crap I so often have to liste to today.

Do we have needs? the answer obvious is yes. Do we make sacrifices? again yes but why is it that people on positions of responsibility have morale and out looks so as to inspire surrender and defeat?

But then again in their position it most probably means corruption and mismanagement as their not-for profit type of thing is something I challenge from the get go. Maybe they could try doing it like while collecting checks as so many do, rather than pay checks as only some do?

Andrew Zito http://templeofreason.org http://mplf.org
http://zito.biz http://garagemusicstudios.com http://pushedpawn.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

work smarter, fight harder
Posted by: arala on Jan 7, 2006 12:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a working class white activist who has also spent more than 40 years in the struggle for justice, peace and liberation, I was quite dismayed by the "debate". I was floored by this remark:

"I know it eats at me. I own what I consider to be a nice house with a deck and a hot tub. ... If I at 18 could confront myself today at 25, I'm quite certain I'd end up with a black eye -- or at least a severely bruised conscience."

Let's hear it for the 18 year old! I'm 58, I've never owned and probably never will own a house. The sense of entitlement in those remarks is stunning. Social change will NOT be made by people who want to make a comfortable living as "organizers," --never was, never will be.

Start by getting a real world job. Relate to neighbors, coworkers or other community. If you're not prepared to take the risks and make the sacrifices that the people you're "organizing" face, no amount of hard, holier-than-thou "work" will make a difference.

The left able to make change was destroyed by COINTELPRO, taking advantage of racism/white supremacy, sexism/male supremacy, elitism, hierarchy, authoritarianism, and in general identification with the oppresser and internalization of oppression. What replaced it was a system of bought-off NGOs, non-profits and people making a career out of "organizing." Authentic revolutionary struggle won't emerge from that milieu.

If your conscience is bruised, seize on that internal class struggle to take the blinders off and ask yourself why after three decades of "professional" environmentalism the environment is on the brink of cataclysm; why after three decades of prison "advocacy" there are 10 times as many people locked up as when people started "advocating" for prisoners, why after decades of Union Summers and paid organizers a smaller percentage of the workforce is unionized...the list could go on. The answer is the deadly grip of reformism and defeatism on our hearts, minds and imaginations. All our "work" will do nothing but strengthen the system we oppose and worsen the problems we address unless we make a fundamental break with racism, imperialism, and (settler) colonialism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: work smarter, fight harder Posted by: natiyouthcenter
More Dedicated than Thou?
Posted by: hagwind on Jan 8, 2006 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Concidence: I've just been retyping (for posting to my website) an essay I wrote more than 20 years ago. It's about the publisher of the anthology _Lesbian Nuns_ who sold several first-person stories from the book to Penthouse's _Forum_ magazine without consulting the authors then professed not to understand what the fuss was about. When pressed for explanations, she claimed she had no time to bother with responding to criticism: she was too busy working 18-hour days and 80-hour weeks for the cause.

She wasn't unique (nowhere close!) and the issue isn't new. People who work 18- or 16- or even 12-hour days in the service of a single cause don't leave themselves much time to reflect on what they're doing or to meet people who aren't up to their ears in the same sandbox. That goes for elected officials and guardians of morality, among others, as well as progressive activists. People who work, or aspire to work, or claim to work 18-hour days have this troubling tendency to equate long days with commitment -- with virtue, if you will. Often their lives are so bound up with their work that they take even the mildest criticism as a personal attack.

I bailed and went off to build myself a more "sustainable" life, one where I could devote more energy to my work and less to blocking out the craziness around me. My life these days doesn't involve a whole lot of stuff; I don't own a home, there's no hot tub in my little apartment, and I don't have health insurance. But it's a life I don't need a vacation from, either at the end of the day or for a few weeks a year, and on the whole I like it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Working ourselves to death won't work
Posted by: JamBoi on Jan 20, 2006 10:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can only do our best and then we have to trust our Higher Power to handle the results. Out of control personal lives will not advance progressive politics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]