Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

WireTap

Burying College Grads in Debt

By Elana Berkowitz and John Burton, Campus Progress. Posted November 28, 2005.


The average student now graduates with three and a half times more debt than ten years ago, but still Washington wants to cut even more student aid.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Elana Berkowitz John Burton

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Congratulations, parents of the Class of 2009! As you read this, your child is settling into the routines of college life: ill-timed early morning lectures, inevitable all-night cram sessions, and the search for parties on a now fairly familiar campus.

While the pleasures of college life remain the same, the economic security that a degree used to guarantee has disappeared. This fall, the Class of 2009 joins the ranks of an emerging debtor class composed of educated young adults.

The average student borrower now graduates with $27,600 of debt, almost three and a half times what it was a decade ago. 84 percent of black students and 66 percent of Latino students graduate with debt. And 39 percent of all student borrowers graduate with unmanageable levels of debt, according to the Department of Education.

After graduation, young people confront unaffordable rents in markets like San Francisco, Atlanta, Boston, Chicago or New York, where the majority of young adults pay between 30 and 50 percent of their income to rent.

And what income? Between 2000 and 2003, wages for college educated men and women between 23 and 29 years of age were down 3.5 percent and 1.2 percent respectively. In this flat, stagnant job market, most new opportunities are in jobs like burger flipping and jeans folding. Manpower, a temp agency, is the biggest private employer in the country. Many jobs in more desirable and competitive industries have salaries starting in the low $20,000s that offer little by way of benefits or healthcare.

Add to that young people's average credit card debt of over $4,000. Set aside your stereotypes of irresponsible youth: Over 70 percent of undergraduates use credit cards to buy school supplies, food and textbooks. 24 percent use their credit cards for tuition. Credit card companies are becoming the high-interest student loan industry of last resort. When it's all totaled up, young people spend 25 percent of every dollar earned on paying off debts and loans.

Federal policy isn't keeping pace with reality. Soaring education costs and inflation have not been met with aid increases. Caps on federal student loans have forced students to seek private loans, which were up from $1.1 billion in 1995-96 to $10.6 billion in 2003-04.These loans have much higher, often predatory, interest rates.

Today, the average Pell Grant covers only 40 percent of college tuition, compared to 77 percent 25 years ago. And under President Bush, the Department of Education revised Pell Grant eligibility guidelines, effectively excluding almost 100,000 young people from the program and reducing grant money for another 1.2 million.

This month, the U.S. Congress poured salt in the wounds: The Senate recommended slashing $14 billion in student aid programs as part of the budget reconciliation process. The House of Representatives proposed nearly $9 billion in similar cuts, forcing the average student borrower to pay an additional $5,800 in already unaffordable debt. Despite some unusual Republican dissent in the ranks, late last night, the budget bill passed by a razor thin margin. The final bill included $50 billion in cuts including $14.3 billion in cuts to federal higher education funding — the largest cuts to federal student loans in American history. (Though the reconciliation bill received much negative response from Democrats and even a few Republicans, very few people spoke out against the education cuts, focusing instead on issues like Medicare and food stamps.) Eighteen-year-olds now must borrow tens of thousands of dollars to invest in themselves — because their country will not invest in them.

Moreover, federal tax policy isn't exactly working in the favor of young people making low wages. We can't ask our buddies in the White House to just write off our student loan payments. We pay taxes on each and every dollar that we make in wages, tips, and salaries. We don't have stock portfolios, houses, and other assets to re-structure our tax liability. We bear the full brunt of life without loopholes — but forget fairness: struggling to limit the size of a hurricane-wrecked federal budget, Congress has made it clear that they are prepared to treat us a good deal worse than they already have — before they dare close the loopholes, shut down the giveaways, and trim the no-bid contracts for the well-connected and well-off.

Parents: remember that youthful knot in your stomach as you looked at the world after graduation and wondered about your place in it? We do that too. Only we look at the world as twenty-somethings sandbagged with the kind of debt that, until recently, would have taken decades to accrue. Recent surveys by the Cambridge Consumer Index and the Education Department confirm that student borrowers are deferring major life decisions like the purchase of a first home or marriage.

Energetic young college grads could soon invest in start-ups, emerging markets and new technologies if we entered adulthood burdened only by our high expectations and ideals. Educational debt hobbles the very group of risk-takers and innovators that has historically rejuvenated the American economy when, like now, it starts to flag. Love us, hate us, tolerate us — young people are your future. Fail to invest in us at your own peril. Thirty years from now we won't be able to take care of our parents if we're still living in a converted closet in a group house.

So here's our counter-offer: We need common sense policies that relieve the debt burden on students and recent graduates. Parents of students and recent graduates: tell them not to cut one dime of student aid. Tell them you'll remember how they voted and promise to hold them accountable. We'll do the heavy lifting, but we need you to let Washington to know that you're watching and that you care about the issue.

Work with us now to affect change, and we promise we'll never have to trade you into the traveling circus for a week's worth of Ramen noodles or sell you on eBay to cover the rent.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Elana Berkowitz is the editor of CampusProgress.org — a youth-oriented online magazine run by the Center for American Progress. John Burton is an economic policy research associate at the Center for American Progress. Both graduated from college in 2001.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
These are the real issues Democrats should emphasize when
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 28, 2005 5:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
reaching out to voters like these. No doubt this will also help recover the loss of votes from those who couldn't afford a degree. It's time to fight this kind of nazism that's going on and yes, even if that means replacing Democrats who play go-along-get-along on this issue itself. They don't need MTV to tell them how to reach out to swing voters as the "conservatives" have tweaked their policies to slather them with more cash, directly or indirectly. And let's not forget that these are the people who continue to suffer the most as a result of the out of control outsourcing and "free trade" endorsed by the elitists at Wall Street.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Baby boomer agrees
Posted by: apapmtz on Nov 28, 2005 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Editors: I'm glad you featured this story. My research as a writer on education confirms its truthfulness. As a baby boomer, I feel ashamed of the stingy treatment that new generations are getting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Call to Action
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 28, 2005 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Face it; the government means to destroy the middle class. I suggest that Ms. Berkowitz look into The Lincoln Initiative and that she recommend that the student members of her organization join as individuals. I would also appreciate a link from her website. This is a non-partisan grass roots movement. There are no dues, no contributions, no registration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Glad to hear something about this
Posted by: mortarthegovernment on Nov 28, 2005 8:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm currently in my 3rd year of school. My mother supports me but she can not pay a dime for college. I went to a 4 college my first 2 years but stopped going due mostly to the high cost. I took out over $20,000 in private loans the first two years combined. To save money I enrolled in a community college and will be transferring to a more affordable 4 year school. This country is truly screwed up. This could offend people, but it pisses me off that people like my cousin's wife can sit on her fat ass and not work (she could but she'd rather get free money) while constantly getting knocked up and live off of welfare. Be a drain on society get money, better yourself and get debt. I know both of these are not directly related, but it's hard to not look at both and ask, "How is this fair?" and more importantly "How is this better for our country?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

please fill me in
Posted by: ladyoracle on Nov 28, 2005 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't understand what the government is doing with student loans.

If they are slashing student loans, what does that really mean? We can borrow less from the Feds? My loans are already capped; wouldn't the reduced loan cap only effect students beginning with the incoming class? How does that mean students will pay more--except if by taking higher interest loans out instead? I have close to 50K in student loan debt and another 8K in credit card debt with a year and a half remaining to finish my Ph. D.

I accepted my severe situation of debt, and I wonder whether it's such a problem as this article makes it out to be. I think the student loan trend is like the trend of people going into severe debt to buy houses when they have no savings. I think this is just symptomatic of the goverment's excessive debt and willingness to borrow with no way to pay. It's very "American," but then again, I am very cynical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Google it, PhD Posted by: janvdb
» RE: Google it, PhD Posted by: bettsoff
» RE: please fill me in Posted by: jwg
» RE: please fill me in Posted by: nickptar
Beware education debt -- especially returning students
Posted by: janvdb on Nov 28, 2005 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a bid to "improve herself," friend of mine in her fourties quit an budding career to go back to graduate school at MIT.

There, she acquired $75,000 in debt and became enmired in a dispute between her two advisors which meant that her simple little Master's Degree turned into a frustrating process which took FAR too much time. So, her absence from the job market made her unhirable in her old field.

She's now working at temp jobs and has been forced by financial arithmetic to stop making the payments on her MIT debt -- so her credit is trashed.

She ruined her career and acquired a debt which not only can she not repay, she cannot erase it with bankruptcy. The universities have arranged for that. At least credit card debt can be.

So, she is near retirement with the career of a 24-year-old and the finances of a gambler.

DON'T QUIT A PAYING CAREER TO GO BACK TO GRAD SCHOOL unless you are young enough to recover from the financial devastation. Most Master's Degrees are worthless in the real world. Most PhDs put you into the academic job market, which has dozens of burger-flipper-level "lecturer," "RA," or 6-hours-a-week, no-benefits instructor jobs for every decent position. Tenured positions are as rare as hen's teeth -- you are literally waiting for some old coot to die so you can take his job. You end up living in Nebraska.

Hundreds of PhDs end up on the street every year, retooling themselves to start at the bottom of any of a variety of job ladders, and must compete with new 4-year grads who are younger and more attractive to employers than a disappointed older reject of the academic brownnosing contest.

Grad school is for the young, the independently weathly or their heirs. BAs remain necessary but not sufficient and the debt situation there is preventing entire classes of young from joining the middle and upper classes. They are trapped and wasted in menial jobs for their lifetimes due to a niggardly government, benighted university financial aid policies and excessive tuition hikes -- most of which is going to the surprisingly high salaries now paid to "star" profs, admin, "research" and other inside gravy.

Don't get me started on inequality in our primary and secondary school systems, which are even more to blame for the deep class divide we see developing in our country.

Jan VanDenBerg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Please stop the infighting Posted by: Drclaw
stupid kids
Posted by: poulsbo on Nov 28, 2005 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
>>After graduation, young people confront unaffordable rents in markets like San Francisco, Atlanta, Boston, Chicago or New York, where the majority of young adults pay between 30 and 50 percent of their income to rent.


Living in Chicago, I can tell you where these post-college kids end up, they do NOT need to be putting 50% of their income into rent. They CHOOSE to. Affordable/reasonable rents can be found in just about all of those cities; one doesn't have to live in the hippest locale and pay out the nose for an apartment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: stupid kids Posted by: ann83
So what can i do???
Posted by: christy0509 on Nov 28, 2005 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yup, okay, this story is me. And cutting finaid is ridiculous- if anyhting, we need more help. So can someone give me and address to write to so I can give my polite but assertive opinion? Should I write to a congressperson, or what? Please let me know; I'd like to represent my generation as a doer, not a whiner. Thanks!
email: c-schmitz@northwestern.edu

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lets be fair.
Posted by: nonameonoeneeonie on Nov 28, 2005 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your comparisons on dollar amouns between today and a decade ago fall short a bit, you forgot to account for inflation. In such a statistical analysis you can't afford to inflate numbers by not accounting for inflation.

I agree with your message, but when you omit important details it makes readers question your sources.

Ever growing...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You made an excellent case for why youth must vote
Posted by: mjacobson on Nov 28, 2005 2:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your article hit home on several fronts. I am the mother of 3 college kids who are acquiring more debt every year they are in school. I also work as a University Development officer raising funds from individual donors for student scholarships, and I have to make the case everyday why even public universities need to raise money for student support.

I will, and have, told my elected representatives, of both parties, what a terrible disservice their policies are to the future of this country. But it's not only the parents who should tell elected officials what they think. Sad to say, the majority of college age people do not vote. Until the youth vote is large enough that politicians cannot continue to ignore it, youth will be shafted by Government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a free education
Posted by: may261989 on Nov 28, 2005 3:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I studied in the U.K 4 years as an undergraduate and 1 year as a trainee teacher.
All of my fees were covered by my local council and I received a grant ( albeit minor ) to cover my expenses.
If I had to pay my fees I wouldnt have gone to Uni as a 50,00 plus debt would be unmanageable for a History Major.
I just wonder how many kids these days are not studying the Humanities because they cannot afford it.
We will be left with a bunch of accountants and economists to guide our culture through the next generation. A scary thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: a free education Posted by: nickptar
Boycott Higher Education
Posted by: eastcoker on Nov 28, 2005 6:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or apply for scholarships. My parents did not pay for my higher education, that's why I don't have one. They left home at 17 and 18 and their parents did not pay for the higher education. What's the point of higher education?
I feel very pessimistic about the useful of higher education especially if it means debt.
How many men are walking around on the planet with defaulted student loans for their junior, undergraduate and graduate school educations? What kind of social stability is this creating?
None!
Men who are in debt can not marry because they can not provide for a wife and possible children.
There is a spirit of destruction at work in society.
It takes tremendous self discipline to pay off money one borrows for school. It is far too easy to stiff the bank.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Boycott Higher Education Posted by: ShaSpirit
» RE: Boycott Higher Education Posted by: eastcoker
» RE: Boycott Higher Education Posted by: nickptar
» RE: Boycott Higher Education Posted by: nickptar
» Self Discipline Posted by: eastcoker
Endowment for Endowment's Sake?
Posted by: WAJWAZ on Nov 28, 2005 10:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's great to finally see someone somewhere question the growing costs of higher education and the corellary increase in student debt loads. I'm a little disappointed however that nobody has brought up the corolarry matter of private university endowments.

Logically, a higher endowment should mean higher income from the endowment. Higher income from the endowment should be used to cover operating expenses at the university, thereby lessening the amount of money the university needs to make up by charging tuition.

But everything suggests that this isn't happening at universities. Rather than endowments offsetting tuition, the two are rising simultaneously. Consider that tuition to Yale University in 1980 was $6,210; the endowment of the university was around $1 billion. By 2000 the endowment had grown to $10 billion, and tuition had increased to $24,500.

It's the same at all private universities. My undergraduate alma-mater, Bard College, charges over $28,000 a year in tuition, and its president had increased its endowment from a measly $313,000 in 1975 to over $130 million by 2002. As a graduate student at Rice University in Houston Texas I faced tremendous financial pressure despite the university's $3 billion endowment.

Indeed, the numbers I've found suggest to me that endowments are being grown for their own sake, and not for the welfare of the universities to which they belong. I know of only two universities where this isn't true - Emory and Cooper Union - where a high endowment covers the university's expenses and where no tuition is charged.

Taxpayer subsidized education grants and loans shouldn't be the only way to encourage people to better themselves through higher education. We should also be pushing wealthy universities to use their endowments to help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I completely agree Posted by: janvdb
Student Loan Rip-Off
Posted by: Gracie on Nov 30, 2005 2:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is a really good stories about the student loan legislation currently before congress. Read it and weep.

Grace


Let all students refinance
©The Times-Tribune 2005
11/18/2005

One of the principal ways that Americans stay afloat financially is by refinancing their existing debt when interest rates fall. The practice is most predominant regarding real estate financing.
In a shameful bit of federal legislation that is a special-interest bow not just to a particular industry, but to a particular company, Congress might actually prevent college students from reducing their debt burdens through refinancing during and after their time in school. Given that current students borrow $62 billion a year, the impact on their future indebtedness will be staggering.

Already, students and former students are allowed to refinance their college loans only once. That defies the notion of a free market. They should be allowed to refinance whenever market conditions make it advantageous, just as home owners are allowed to refinance. Student loans are federally guaranteed, but so are many home mortgages.

Now, the bill being pressed hard by Sallie Mae, a former quasi-governmental agency that is now a private entity, would drive up interest rates for current students while locking them into interest rates that are well above market rates for other types of financing.

Instead of propping up a student loan near-monopoly, Congress should try to create the same vigorously competitive market for student-loan refinancing that exists for home refinancing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is not that hard to figure out
Posted by: cyclone on Dec 1, 2005 12:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Neocons simply want to make the only route to college go through the military, as we become the worlds largest industrial military complex. We are the new Soviet Union. The original sure worked well, didn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Butter Is All Gone
Posted by: c2itok on Dec 2, 2005 4:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was lucky enough to get a bachelor's degree in the 80s before the college expenses went drastically upward. I was not lucky enough to escape Reagan retroactively retitling my "Guaranteed Student Loan" and requiring repayment regardless of income. Nor did I ever get a highly-paid job requiring a college degree. I guess I wasn't so lucky after all. I don't know how students can afford the college expenses nowadays considering the for-profit status that even the public colleges now have. Compare this with Europe (Ireland, Norway, Finland, etc.) where a college education is free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

castanero asturias
Posted by: pjohnq on Oct 3, 2006 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
0MEN
Posted by: extremist on Oct 12, 2006 11:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1
Posted by: extremist on Oct 12, 2006 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement