Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

WireTap

Gunning for College

By Beth Shulman, TomPaine.com. Posted August 13, 2005.


Should you sacrifice your life to get a college degree in the United States?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Beth Shulman

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

What should you have to sacrifice to get a college education in the United States? Isn’t it hard enough to get good grades and high SAT scores? Should you have to risk your life as well? As back-to-school season gears up, a lot of American high schools evidently don’t think so. A growing number of parents and high schools are taking steps to limit military recruiters’ access to students. 

With casualties in Iraq past the 1,500 mark, military recruiters make many parents uneasy. High schools in California, Wisconsin, Arizona  and elsewhere are placing restrictions on how military recruiters interact with students. “Due to the realities of war, there is less encouragement today from parents, teachers and other influencers to join the military,” admitted the Pentagon’s top recruitment officer, David S. C. Chu, in a classic understatement.

As the Army and Marines continue to fall short of their recruitment targets, military recruiters are ramping up their efforts to reach teenagers. And as the cost of attending college rises, the financial benefits of enlistment in the U.S. military may entice potential recruits.

Certainly, the numbers are clear about the value of college. Without a college education, it is hard to make a good living in America today. Yet the cost of college has priced many young men and women out of the market. It is no accident that military recruiters are out scouring America’s working-class suburbs, offering enlistment bonuses to high school graduates. A promise of college tuition is very enticing to teens whose parents just don’t have much money.

America needs to find ways to guarantee college for everyone—whether they become soldiers or not. College tuition is an expensive up-front investment, and it is getting costlier. Family income and financial aid have not kept pace. And Congress isn’t helping. Instead, it has cut funds for Pell Grants and other aid programs that help people most. The Pell award has dropped from covering 84 percent of the cost of four years of college in 1976 to covering only 39 percent in 2000. This makes a college degree harder for working-class and poor students to obtain and perpetuates an already-growing economic divide

Certainly, many young men and women enlist today out of a patriotic desire to serve their country. But for others, signing up for America’s armed forces may be the only way they see to get the money they need for a college education—and for the future good job it will make possible.

A college diploma offers graduates a distinct lifelong financial advantage. According to the Social Inequality Project of the Russell Sage Foundation, a New York-based philanthropic organization that supports social science research, the average salary for U.S. high school graduates is less than half that for people with bachelors’ degrees.

The gap has been widening. As UCLA economist Tom Kane points out in his essay “College-Going and Inequality” (Social Inequality, Russell Sage Foundation, 2004), the earnings differential between college and high-school graduates more than doubled over the past 20 years. The median income of someone with only a high school degree rose just 16 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars over the same period, compared with more than 45 percent for those with advanced degrees. Just as a high school diploma was what our parents needed to get a job that would pay enough to support a middle-class life for their families, today’s young men and women need a college degree.

Although the demand for a college education has increased as its potential returns have soared, Kane shows that the increase in U.S. college attendance was disproportionately among wealthier individuals. Over the past two decades, the richest quarter of Americans increased their college enrollment by 12 percent, while those at the bottom rose by only 5 percent, expanding an already large enrollment gap .

Meanwhile, most of the increase in post-secondary education among Americans with lower incomes was at two-year community colleges or technical schools. Enrollment rates at four-year colleges, which lead to much higher paying careers, increased by 20 percent for the rich, while for those near the bottom, the rate of four-year college enrollment actually fell from levels a decade earlier.

With these large payoffs from college, the military enlistment bonuses seem like a lifeline for high school graduates who otherwise couldn’t afford to go to college. Yet do we really want a society in which the only way for young men and women to afford the cost of a college education is to agree to risk their lives ?

If we believe in equal opportunity in America, we need to ensure other options. Harvard University and some other Ivy League schools have recently guaranteed tuition for any student they admit, but that won’t help most college hopefuls. We need to ensure that all high school students who qualify for college can go, regardless of their family financial status.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Beth Shulman is the author of The Betrayal of Work:  How Low-Wage Jobs Fail 30 Million Americans (The New Press, 2003) and works with the Russell Sage Foundation’s Future of Work and Social Inequality projects.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Class War
Posted by: dancerkc on Aug 13, 2005 1:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real war is a class war. And only the rich have the resources to wage class war on the poor, and the getting poor. You would like to think that the rich would realize they need to field an industrial/business army of college graduates - given the requirements they demand - not a military army

That would seem to mandate that those in power make sure that college is available and affordable for all and that resources were not expended on wars. Just to compete. If so then logic would say that corporations should want a competitive population.

That assumes, of course, that the corporations (which claim people-hood) are really part of the community or at least the nation, the way actual flesh and blood people are.

But corporations don't care. They are totally without souls, without conscience. Their managers and owners only look out for their bank accounts. They don't even look out for the very corporations they are running, prefering to sack and gut them, then divest.

The ceo's and stockholders - those solid citizens - are in good shape financially. They have been constructing a two-part security perimeter of more and more opportunity for themselves (their class) and less and less power/opportunity for everyone else. Making college un-affordable for anyone else is right at the top of the agenda. Remember Reagan and the California Schools in the 70's.

Somehow they convinced the public at large that college education only belonged to the so-called righteous (rich) and that low-cost education was granting un-earned priviledges to the great unwashed (us).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Class War Posted by: Merchant_Of_Menace
» crackhead economics Posted by: Badlawdog
» RE: crackhead economics Posted by: janakiblum
College gives you a more liberal mind
Posted by: errandchild on Aug 13, 2005 2:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Liberal thinking is increasingly being taken away from the masses by a government becoming light on education. Apparently these politicians would prefer people get their higher education at their local church or military recruitment office rather than at a college, but I digest. (get it? [slaps knee])

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: College gives you a more liberal mind Posted by: Merchant_Of_Menace
» No. Posted by: errandchild
» Liberal GEDs Posted by: errandchild
» RE: Liberal GEDs Posted by: Olympiada
The Public School System Is Turning Out People Too Stupid For College
Posted by: iamsenstiveyellow on Aug 13, 2005 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The military cannot turn out minds ready to accept the rigors of college. That is the job of the public school system for the most part. Whether the military should offer this or not as an enticement is one thing, but to imply that there is some type of conspiracy to keep people out of college as some type of class warfare is ridiculous. The unions which control the public school systems and use their influence with the U.S. Congress are to blame. Also, many people are simply too lazy to go to college. Lazy because college is a lot of work, and lazy because you can actually work your way through college, but work means you can't party and goof off with your friends. If you really want a degree you can get it without the military. There are so many other ways of obtaining scholarships, it's a moot issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Double messages
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 13, 2005 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, I see those statistics about the relationship of income to college degree. Seems to me that they have the bias built-in that many (most?) who get the degree are already from rich families, and therefore probably have the connections to get a good paying job whether they went to college or not.

I also see the stories in the paper about how many college grads are unemployed or underemployed. That does not support the previous argument.

Educational institutions have benefitted from the belief that more education means more income. "The Other America" (1960s, yeah, way back then) disagreed with that.

I believe the more education, the better, but for the US. It's still never been an automatic thing. I have found as many a-holes with PhDs as among those lacking GEDs.

The leadership we need is "enough good men/women," and those cannot be cranked out by any kind of system. Our schools train us to be obedient more often than to think for ourselves.

"No simple answers; only simple minds."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Double messages Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: Double messages Posted by: doesmynamematter
» RE: Double messages Posted by: Olympiada
» The Other America Posted by: Michiganman
There is a better way
Posted by: middlepoint on Aug 13, 2005 10:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This insanely consumptive american culture must dump the college paradigm which focus efforts on pumping out money makers instead of compassionate,considerate,understanding human beings. Schumann laments the situation of high school grads who only make half a college grad. So what! I and people like me cannot buy as much cheap plastic crap. All education could have as its mandate; graduate students who will do no harm to the planet and seek joy. How many grads would seek the military? For starters mbas must be outlawed and marketing programs snuffed immediately. The corporate police, the military,yes be gone with them. Lets have the courage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There is a better way Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: There is a better way Posted by: Olympiada
» RE: There is a better way Posted by: lissajayne
Depressing
Posted by: Olympiada on Aug 13, 2005 5:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lord have mercy this article is timely. I face my own battle for my education, well I have since the age of 6. Oh Lord, do not get me started. What ever happened to education for the purpose of education? I am alarmed and dismayed by the apathy in the classroom from elementary school to college. What a depressing topic. And as far as the university goes, I have not made it there yet. What nihilistic apocalyptic times we live in. Yet I know a boy whose parents pay for his every move and I can not stand it. Where is this going? You speak the truth in this article. What is going to happen in 13 years when my own daughter is 18? God help!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Depressing Posted by: doesmynamematter
» RE: Depressing Posted by: Olympiada
Political Question, Not A Military One
Posted by: NoPCZone on Aug 14, 2005 10:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is only one reason people should volunteer for service in the Armed Forces of the United States. That reason is because they desire to be in the Army, Navy, Air Force or Marine Corps. Buying a mercenary force with bonus money or promised future benefits is not a wise way to build a professional force.

I do not dispute that the US should reward those willing to serve with an adequate package of benefits, but buying a force by dangling goodies in front of 18-year olds is not the answer. The reason the recruiting commands of the services can do this is because our nation has no fair and equitable way to allow people to advance their education without taking on extraordinary debt or hardship during their college years. That is an issue for the society at large, not the DoD.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The educated McJob factor
Posted by: JesseBC on Aug 14, 2005 5:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think one factor that goes unaddressed in this piece is the relative value of a bachelor's degree in a service economy. With welfare gone and the flooding of McJobs on the market, a bachelor's degree really doesn't mean that much. The local McDonald's in my town just held a job fair and they are (I shit you not) requiring bachelor's degrees. Because they can.

McDonald's used to be a good first job for high-schoolers who didn't mind working to exhaustion for little pay and who didn't need the benefits. Now the McDonalds I worked at when I first turned 16 and was sooooo proud to have my very first paying job, is staffed by single moms turned off the welfare rolls and, more recently, disgruntled college grads. I guess corporate America decided it not only didn't want to give "hand outs" to welfare moms, it now can't even be bothered to employ them if it can avoid it.

This article implies that a college degree will still guarantee a middle-class lifestyle and the problem is that it's more and more difficult to afford college. That's only half the story and, as a result, I disagree. Not only is college becoming more unaffordable, it WON'T necessarily guarantee you anything more than a job that involves wearing a funny hat and asking, "Would you like fries with that?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The educated McJob factor Posted by: Olympiada
Read the fine print!
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Aug 16, 2005 4:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am one of these poor people who managed to get a college education without having to serve in Uncle Sam's army, and I'm glad I did. I struggled all my years and gained an priceless education along the way.
Our society has it backward: It shouldn't cost a royal fortune to go to school, yet it does: Our universities are ran like businesses, pricing people out of the educational market. And now some families wrest with the cost. They know deep inside the military is not a way to finance a college education.
Before enlisting, people, you better read the fine print. At least in college you know what's going without someone telling you what to do daily. You have little controll over your life while in the service. You're like a cow in a stockyard, herded around from pen to pen.
The best solution is for colleges to change its admissions and let people attend at a lower cost. But that's impossible because colleges are driven by the profit motive and it's also NOT the "American Way".
Until America can make obtaining a college education more affordable AND accessible, the class divide will never close the gaping economic and academic chasm in society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Read the fine print! Posted by: janakiblum
Living on $10 a Day 101 (3 credits, no prerequisites)
Posted by: mymarkx on Aug 16, 2005 9:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No matter how well-prepared our college grads are, they cannot compete with people similarly well-educated in countries like India where the cost of living is lower.

The children of the rich will continue to prosper as their parents continue to outsource everyone else's jobs.

Nowadays a college diploma isn't always worth the paper it's printed on--nobody should risk their life for one.

Our education industry is a lot like our health care industry. Many people can't afford it at all, and those who can usually find that they're paying a whole lot more for a whole lot less.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New video on military recruiting available online
Posted by: emopaul on Aug 26, 2005 3:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone interested in military recruiting of high school students, and the lengths recruiters are going to sign up young people should see this new video:

http://www.leavemychildalone.org/

"LEAVE MY CHILD ALONE" — is a short, powerful film revealing the impact of military recruitment in American high schools. Interviewees whose lives have been devastated by aggressive, sophisticated recruiting tactics include Cindy Sheehan (mother of Casey Sheehan, slain in Iraq), Jim Massey (former Army recruiter and Gulf War veteran) and Terra Price (a young recruit).

The film underscores the crucial importance of taking action against aggressive recruiting in our schools, and offers simple steps for those who wish to help their local school districts protect students from unwanted military recruitment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If realitity is based on perception, then you need glasses
Posted by: tryton on Sep 11, 2005 10:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact is that college educated people make more money than high school educated people. That gap, however, is not as large as it used to be. Find this article: College: The Payoff Shrinks
Michael J. Mandel in New York. Business Week. New York: Sep 12, 2005., Iss. 3950; pg. 48.
For those of you not resoursefu enough to find it on your own, it says, : The Americans who should be prospering in a knowledge economy -- the college-educated -- are instead taking it on the chin. Real earnings for workers with only a bachelor's degree have fallen for four straight years, for the first time since the 1970s. And the decline -- about 5% since 2000 -- shows no signs of abating.
But that's only one "fact" to dispute. You are whining that one of the only good ways for people to get college money (aside for scholarships for those who actually work hard for something, such as sports, the arts, and academics) is for them to join the military. It is true that an incentive for military service is help paying for college. However there's more to it. Let's educate
Continued on next post.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

perception of reality -con't
Posted by: tryton on Sep 11, 2005 10:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, the all money is not a grant, it is a return on investment. After voluntarily selecting to participate in the Montgomery GI Bill program $100 dollars a month is deducted from the pay of the service member for the first year. So a $1200 investment returns 36 months of payments of just over a grand a month. Hey that's over $36,000! What does the service member have to do? His or her job. If they went the infantry route, then they carry a gun. If they are cooks, they make food. If they are engineers, they operate and maintain equipment. Like cops, chefs and plant workers, they do their jobs. And they get paid.
Oh by the way, the military training they did for their jobs? A lot of it is transferable for college credits - this varies based on college. Hell, even boot camp is good for a couple of PE and a history credit.
So it's the government's responsibility to give away money to those who didn't work for it? We already have something like that - it's called WELFARE. We can see how well that works. You despise all the rich kids who didn't have to work for their college money, but you want to make everyone else like them? There goes the character and work ethic of the country, right down the tube. Think about it for once. And a lot of you can't go five minutes without bitching about the stuff the government is messing up. And you want it to take on a NEW role? Because it wasn't spending and trying to manage enough already? Are you nuts?
And by the way, to close this out, I came across the article while doing research for a paper for my college class. This class is for a Bachelor's degree that is being financed by the GI BILL from my six years of service in the Navy operating high tech electrical and power systems. Which also got me the skills for my $47K a year job - not a fortune, but it pays the bills. And military credit transfers shortened a four years degree to two for me.
No I am not a recruiter. Some aspects of military life suck. It is not a free ride. But it is like any other job, you get out what you put in. Bottom line - You want to prove you can handle a college education. Do it the right way - earn it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement