Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

WireTap

Why He Went to War

By Kimi Eisele, AlterNet. Posted August 9, 2005.


A teenager's adult mentor recalls trying to convince her young friend not to enlist in the army.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Kimi Eisele

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When 18-year-old Anthony Ramirez walked into my office nearly a year ago to apply for a job with the youth magazine I edited, I knew right away I wanted to hire him. He seemed confident and brave, with hoops in his ears, a thick silver chain around his neck and steady eye contact. I sensed he had a story to tell, even if he wasn't sure what it was.

The magazine Anthony worked for, called 110 Degrees, is a program of the Tucson-based nonprofit organization Voices, Inc, which trains low-income youth to document community stories in writing and photography. As the magazine's writing director, my job was to help Anthony and 19 other teenagers research, interview for and write a story about themselves or a community issue and share it with the public.

Like many students new to the creative process, Anthony struggled for much of the year, failing to consistently contact his interview sources, flip-flopping on his story ideas, and staring at the blank computer screen. Then, just a month before the deadline, almost by accident, he wrote a remarkable first-person narrative about what it was like growing up with a dad in prison. His story reported how his anger had taken over and how he had spent the bulk of his adolescence drunk, high, in fights and juvenile detention centers before choosing to straighten out.

I was amazed by his voice, his honesty, and his willingness finally to express himself. As his mentor, I felt overjoyed by the small revolution he'd undergone at his desk. His piece was well received when it appeared in the local paper and he stole the show at our community release party when he read parts of it aloud.

When the program ended in May, Anthony told me he was taking the summer off "to kick back and relax." He'd just graduated from high school and deserved a break. When I asked him about college, he said he was thinking about it. I trusted him to stay out of trouble. He seemed transformed.

I'd seen this before. The work we do at Voices is rooted in the belief that stories can change the lives of those who tell them and those who hear them. Something about the process of researching, interviewing, writing, photographing, and publishing builds confidence in young people, particularly when they share their stories with the community. In my years of doing this work, I'd seen that the pen could be mightier than the sword.

But what happens when the sword is wielded by the U.S. military?

Six weeks into the summer, Anthony and I spoke on the phone. He had something to tell me, and wanted to know what I thought. He had enlisted in the Army.

What about college? What about your writing? What about this war? I asked, shocked. In my quivering, cracking voice, he knew where I stood.

He agreed to meet me for lunch.

I armed myself with articles and pamphlets, many of which I'd downloaded from the San Diego-based Project on Youth and Non-Military Opportunities, a nonprofit community organization that provides young people with an alternative point of view about military enlistment.

I told myself I wanted to hear Anthony's reasons for enlisting, but in the back of my mind I knew I wanted to convince him to change his mind.

I was up against a formidable force.

Anthony was a recruiter's dream. A Mexican-American teenager from a low-income home with no father figure, Anthony was pretty directionless, despite his recent publishing success. Though Anthony went to the U.S. Army recruitment office on his own, recruiters are tracking down others like him all over town: In shopping malls, as Michael Moore so deftly showed in Fahrenheit 9/11; in schools, thanks to a provision in the No Child Left Behind Act that allows military recruiters access to students and their contact information; even in the Boy Scouts: at a Boy Scout Jamboree in Fort Hill, Va earlier this month, President Bush thanked the scouts "for serving on the front lines of America's armies of compassion" and praised those who "have shown the highest form of patriotism by going on to wear the uniform of the United States."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Kimi Eisele is a freelance writer and former writing director for Voices Inc., Inc, a Tucson, Ariz.-based nonprofit that mentors teenagers in the documentary arts.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
this article is proof that liberals are anti military
Posted by: blackavenger3 on Aug 9, 2005 5:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Liberals hate the military and this article proves it. It is extremely patriotic for a young man to join the military and serve his country in time of need,but liberals loathe the military! Clinton downsized it to 50 percent and forced a political correect agenda on them. This article is part of the reason that liberals absolutely cannot be trusted with national security. They will get 1000s of us killed with there appeasement foreign relation policies. Osama bin laden publicly endorsed John Kerry in the 2004 election. There was a reason for that. If terrorists had the right to vote, we all know they would vote for soft on terror and crime liberals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: actually... Posted by: berrygoldwater2004
» RE: actually... Posted by: Tubeguru
» RE: actually... Posted by: Scott
Keep us posted
Posted by: kww355 on Aug 9, 2005 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kimi,please keep us posted if you can. Let's hope he'll be one of the lucky ones.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Keep us posted Posted by: Scott
funnyfarm
Posted by: funnyfarm12 on Aug 9, 2005 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope that Anthony makes it home with his body intact and his head on straight. We need more thinkers at home.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good luck, Anthony
Posted by: nanobubble on Aug 9, 2005 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Come back safe, god bless you, and I hope you don't have to kill anyone

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Anthony seemed completely uninformed"
Posted by: WhatNow? on Aug 9, 2005 6:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that may be a common recruiting practice. I was told of bonuses, GI bill, and all sorts nice things. I never actually knew how I was going to be trained. I can not remember how long it took me to find out my occupation, but when I did I was not happy. My thought was "Oh shit! I'm a bulletstopper. I am probably being trained similar to the guys that stormed the beaches on D-day. Boy, I sure hope we do not get into any war."

Luckily, I was enlisted in the 80s and we were not on a path of conquest. I was trained as a combat engineer. The trainees for this occupation are usually not the smartest of people. The only reason I can figure the army wanted me in this position was because of my score on the ASVAB(Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) test. There was one test in high school that I marked the little circles in a pattern to make the page look cool. I did not read any of the questions. Once I realized what my training was I thought, "damn, I guess it was the ASVAB test I never read."

Poor Anthony! Struggling through college in poverty and dependent on grants may be extremely easy compared to what he might face. I hope his desperation and ignorance do not get him killed. The way things are going unless he has an exceptional aptitude he likely will be sent into harms way.

Iraq has been such a waste. I saw a photo of one casualtie one night on the news. He was the same age as myself. I thought, "change the uniform and it could be a picture of a WWI, WWII, Korean, or Viet Nam soldier. He had probably gone through 10+ years of training and service. Now he's dead. His replacement? probably an ignorant 18-21 year old. All that training and time was pissed away for an illegal and unneccesary war."

I long for the day our soldiers are brought home ALIVE! They deserved better than to be sacrificed for greed, deceit, and imperialism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

True Patriotism
Posted by: rusrus on Aug 9, 2005 7:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As far as I can tell, being an American citizen no longer requires to you travel halfway across the world and kill strangers on the whim of one man (and his team of handlers).

Why does war make people feel that they need to go "do their part" for the country?

Sadly, there have been times when war has received popular support being deemed "necessary" and "appropriate." I think we all know that this war is not on that list.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's a story for your publication
Posted by: NoPCZone on Aug 9, 2005 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author's thinly veiled contempt for the US Army is not appreciated. Service to one's country in peace or war is a noble and honorable way to give back to one's country. The soldier does not make the policy of our government- he or she is an instrument of it. Many of the same soldiers that served under Clinton are still serving and will continue to after 'W' is out of office.
The freedoms that we take as our birthright in the US were bought through the blood, sweat, tears and sometimes lives of soldiers. Many great Americans have served a season or made a career in the Army from Washington, to Jackson, to Lincoln, to T. Roosevelt, to Truman, to Eisenhower and Reagan.
The country was established by a revolution largely fought by the Army. The Kaiser was kicked out when the Doughboys went 'Over There'. Concentration Camps were liberated by soldiers. When Central High School in Little Rock was integrated, units of the 101st Airborne were there to enforce the rule of law. Carter's work with Egypt and Israel was made possible by UN Observers staffed with many US Army troops over many years. The peace process in the Balkans was enforced and stabilized by many units from US Army Europe.
Our Army performs many humanitarian missions, large and small, all over the world that largely get little or no press attention. A MASH unit from US Army Europe is preparing even now for a mission and exercise in Africa. Again, an instrument of US Policy, not it's author.
In the Army they have a saying that 'We are here to defend democracy, not practice it'.
If you do not support the US policy in the Middle East do something about it, use your political voice, voting rights and organize. The Army can be no more or less than the nation that it is a part of. Soldiers come from every corner of the country, every race, educational background and economic level. When you see the Army you are seeing a cross-section of our nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not really Posted by: heliana
People have a responsibility for their own decisions
Posted by: SiliconDreams on Aug 9, 2005 11:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What amuses me the most about liberals is that they assume that if someone like this is making an idiotic decision, this is somehow the fault of an oppressive society, rather than the fault of, well... simply not being that bright.


Lets face it, the average person is pretty damn stupid (I personally find it hard to understand how anybody could get a sub-1300 SAT score unless they have dyslexia or ADD, yet the median score is somewhere around 1000). Certainly there are people like US military recruiters who attempt to take advantage of this stupidity, but it is the utter lack of intelligence that is to blame.


Seeing how the author cites "hoops" and a "thick silver chain" as signs of character as well as doesn't give any reasons why this guy could be considered to have an IQ above 60, I think my conclusions are reasonably correct

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey, Kim, Newsflash.
Posted by: h2oaso on Aug 9, 2005 1:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anthony was looking for the whole picture, not a "career," "college," or "money." Let me tell you one thing: the only weapon we have that is more powerful than the army isn't the arguments we possess or the power of the mind but the ability for us to reach through to the heart with love.

Do you think he would have made a different decision if you, say, supported him financially to go to college or allowed him to stay and spend time with you at your house?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One Piece of the Issue
Posted by: hhartman on Aug 9, 2005 1:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My husband got out of the Army in March of 2001. He joined because he knew it was the only way for him to get into college, scholarships weren't a possibility for him, his grades were too low, and he didn't know anything about the grants available to him for his low income status. After being discharged medically for his knees losing their cartilage, he went to work. In that time we met, and about six months later, 9/11 happened. He expressed thanks for not being in the service anymore.

One refrain we have heard repeatedly from his grandmother is how much he has changed for the better since being in the army, and I am sure this is true for many of the young men who enter. The whole reason for boot camp is to break them down to the point where they are willing to do whatever they are told, and they are instructed to trust their fellow servicemen. In many ways this is akin to the way that gangs provide a family to those who feel they are without one. No wonder the military seemed to be a good idea to the young man in the article.

The problem is that society uses the military to create this sense of "Family, structure, brotherhood, honor. All the things I don't have now." (quoted from the article) in the young men of this country who are on the edge of poverty, drug and alcohol addiction, joining gangs, committing crime etc. We don't have any other way for teaching these young men these things, for example because they grew up in the home where their father was in jail/or abandoned them in other ways, and their mother struggled daily just to make ends meet. What we need to do is provide a more viable option to give these things to these young men, that doesn't include the military.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One Piece of the Issue Posted by: berrygoldwater2004
Cannon Fodder Kids; Again
Posted by: pjrsullivan on Aug 9, 2005 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the reasons for the forced impoverishment of large sections of our population, is to be able to drain off some of the labor.

Keep them hungry could and dirty, dry up resources, and then they are easy to prey on.

The meaness of poverty does not happen by accident; it is part of an overall strategy of human predation.

America is a predatory despotism, and as such is a form of criminal terrorist organization. As many people get stuck on stupid, America is stuck on brutal. The children of the ordinary people face either getting locked up and or locked out.

The military is an abuse and misuse of labor. The children who join will go away to far distant places and meet strange exotic people, and kill them.

The others that they will kill, are really people in the same position as themselves, this is why only young people usually join the military, they have not figured it out yet and probably some never will.

From birth our old extortion murder racket plots against the mass of the population, and leaves many without an income so that they can be exploited by the criminal classes. Lack of income is at the root of the entire mobbed up state, that is America. Destruction of income sources is what our criminal classes are all about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cannon Fodder Kids; Again Posted by: berrygoldwater2004
One more thing, what about Anthony's parents?
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 9, 2005 4:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok, I'm sorry to get picky here but Kim never mentioned Anthony's parents. Sometimes parents can be convincing to their children even though chances can be 50-50 of succeeding. If Kim had been a little more prepared to reframe the debate and at least convince his parents, assuming they were open to talking Anthony out of it, to talk to him and convince him to take pride in his hard work and not throw it all away by taking a major gamble in the army, she would have likely reported a different story today of success rather than failing to save him from risking his life away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

protecting kids when parents aren't involved
Posted by: voteforpedro on Aug 9, 2005 6:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sad thing is, most of the safeguards around kids and aggressive military recruiting involve parental notification. But it's the kids with little parental involvement in their lives that are the most vulnerable to recruiters. So it's a catch 22.

For example, parents can go to www.leavemychildalone.org and fill out a form that will prevent their kid's public school from turning over their info to military recruiters. Likewise, at the same site, parents can have their kids names taken out of a scary recruiting database housed at the Pentagon.

But what about the kids that need the most protection from predatory recruiters? (and there are some horror stories--just look here. Which makes me reiterate that you can get active at www.leavemychildalone.org.

We need to change No Child Left Behind to protect minor children from unwanted military recruiting. We need sensable limits on recruiters access to our schools. We need to get involved to protect all kids -- especially the ones whose parents have totally checked out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did your background influence your vote?
Posted by: ericchil on Aug 11, 2005 1:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you voted for Bush, is it because of your background growing up in an all-white, conservative, Judeo-Christian environment, where nearly everyone thinks the same, or is it stupidity?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Critical crossroads
Posted by: imagenuitybot on Aug 17, 2005 10:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The gap between the high school assembly-line and the 'middle class promise' is cleverly filled by what seems to be a handy, available and well known alternative military 'career'.

It's high time we see civil service alternatives that actually benefit the low income communities that provide large numbers of recruits to the war machine.

For the 'military might' advocates, the simple mental exercise of role reversal is sufficient in my mind to highlight the amorality and highly offensive nature of the US against sovereign states. There are much better ways of improving the world we all share than being a very expensive weapon in the hands of deluded elitists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

support anthony
Posted by: jonny_cooper on May 15, 2006 12:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, what gives anyone the right to make or give opinions to anthony guiding him in the direction that they want him to go in life? I read everyones comments and i see a bunch of false information to a kid who already knows what he wants to do, im damn glad he still decided to go even after everyones false opinions! There is nothing but opportunity in the army, you get the bonuses you deserve with your scores on the ASVAB test. Noone is lying to Anthony his reqruiter sits down with him and he reads right off his contract what he will recieve! Just because he's in the army doesn't mean he's going to iraq! How many army soldiers do we have vs. how many in iraq? Think about it. Maybe Anthony doesn't want to sit on his ass and write stupid articles about nothing relevant to anyone. Maybe he wants security in his life knowing he'll get it in the army. Who ever said you cant get a civilian job when your out is crazy, not only will you get the job you want from your training but you'll get paid a heafty amount for having military experience. Worst case that happens he gets sent to iraq for a year as lets say a mechanic(not a writer) and while hes over there hes fixing helicopters or trucks completely out of harms way, he'll make more money in the year of being over there than you people will make in four years. He'll be verry stable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

great post
Posted by: JohnnyO on Aug 23, 2006 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
tshirts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]