WIRETAP  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 53

Iraq War Deserters Speak Out

Three young U.S. servicemen currently living in Canada explain why they refused to return to Iraq.
July 7, 2005  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest WireTap headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
Jeremy Hinzman, 26

My name is Jeremy Hinzman. I was a specialist with the 82nd Airborne division.

I'm from South Dakota, from an area where there were not many jobs. I went through school believing that you got to be part of something bigger than yourself. I was also looking for structure and a sense of focus in my life. I didn't just want to make money; I wanted to do something meaningful, and the Army fit the bill on all of those accounts.

I thought that I might be sent to places like Grenada, Honduras or Panama. I knew that something else could happen, and that I maybe would be sent to war. I wasn't naïve in that respect. What I didn't know -- or understand at the time -- was how deeply repulsed I am by the prospect of taking somebody else's life. Even after going through the Army training, all those systematic processes put in place to make you overcome your moral barriers and kill another person, no matter how hard I tried -- and I assure you I tried very hard -- I couldn't bring myself to believe that killing could ever be justified.

I really liked the Army, the people I worked with, and I wanted to be a part of it all. I was really disappointed with myself that I couldn't be part of it. I applied first for conscientious objector status. The Army turned me down based on my answers to questions that they were not even supposed to ask. They asked me if I would help defend our camp in Kandahar -- at the time of my application I was serving in Afghanistan -- if it came under attack by the Taliban. "Would you help immobilize a burglar if you discovered that your house is being burglarized?" I answered.

In my mind these were two different situations. Preparing an attack requires a different logic. You don't just happen to carry out a raid on enemy positions. You start preparing well ahead of the action, first on white screen, then on a model of the terrain, and then you drill your action in the camp over and over again, sometimes for weeks. But they used my answer about the burglary as a reason for rejecting my request.

After that, I applied for non-combatant status. You see, I didn't want to leave the Army. But that application was denied, too. So I was left with the prospect of going to Iraq, to continue killing in another country, and this based on a false pretense. There were not weapons of mass destruction in Iraq; there was not a connection between the Baathist Party, al-Qaeda and other Islamic fundamentalists. And the notion of going in to establish a government friendly toward the U.S. didn't seem to me to be very much like fighting for democracy.

I was faced with arbitrary military justice and the possibility of going to Iraq to take part in acts of human rights violations. In a series of long, painful discussion, my wife and I decided to seek refugee status in Canada, a country that has a history of welcoming war resisters. It was a momentous decision that may mean that we will never be able again to go back to America.

Now we're waiting for the result of our appeal to Canadian Federal Court to overturn the decision to reject my application for refugee status taken by Canada's Immigration and Refugee Board. They decide based on the Geneva Convention on Refugees. The convention establishes that a soldier can refuse to participate in a war condemned by the international community and deemed illegal, which I think is the case with the war in Iraq.

Daryl Anderson, 22

I'm from Lawton, Ky. I was stationed in Eastern Germany with the Army. On Jan. 15, 2004, my contingent was sent to Iraq. We stayed in Baghdad for seven months, where I was wounded and awarded a Purple Heart. After that I was sent back to Germany, where I trained for six months for another tour of duty in Iraq. On Christmas, on leave in the U.S., I decided that I couldn't go back to Germany and from there to Iraq. If I went back to Baghdad I would have been asked again to kill people, civilians, and I just couldn't do that anymore.

I got in the Army to get an education, to get out of a bad neighborhood. Yes, I eventually got it, but at a great price.

First steps you take in Baghdad, you realize that there's death and destruction all over the place. No weapons of mass destruction in sight. We're fighting people that we're supposed to help, but in fact they hate you and every time you walk down the street they shoot at you because you occupy their country. You're asked to get in their houses, in their businesses, block the roads, but you're an occupying power, you're messing up their daily life. You're not a liberator. You raid their houses and kill their family.

If I was in their position, if a foreign power had occupied the U.S., I would do the same. I don't mean to say that they should kill American soldiers, but if I were an Iraqi I would be fighting alongside my neighbor to free my country and to defend my family, my house.

Because you're in Iraq in a kind of war situation and unable to distinguish friends from foe, you adopt these drastic measures. You commit these crimes, these acts that you would never do under normal conditions. And even though in your unit everybody is against what you're doing, nobody can say anything because you'll end up in jail. That's not what I had imagined when I enlisted.

Ivan Brobeck, 19

I was in the Marines. I joined in June 2003, and after boot camp in March of 2004 I was sent directly to Iraq. This wasn't at all unsettling to me. You see, I went into the Army because I wanted to fight the bad guys. In school during history classes I learned that the Army and the Marines had done all these wonderful things, and it all sounded so patriotic and I wanted to do the same. I wanted to fight for freedom.

I didn't care, and I still don't care, if I died fighting for a good and noble cause, which is what I wanted to do.

In Iraq, I found myself being the problem instead of the solution. A problem in a normal town, in the life of normal people, like the people here in Toronto, trying to go about their life and risking getting shot at by me. Innocent people getting killed for misunderstandings, and for even more trivial things. I found myself in situations with my partners where we had to shoot at speeding cars, at people that probably were just trying to get out of our way.

All these insurgents, as they call them -- they're not. They're people who have nothing left. There was this guy who was mad at us because we had killed his family. Wife, children; everybody but him had been killed. He was seeking some kind of retribution. That is not an insurgent -- that's a desperate man.

My ethnic background is Salvadoran; my mom is from El Salvador. So the fight against tyranny is something that is dear to me, considering the history of El Salvador. I believed that the war in Iraq was a just war, and it was not. Now, before I get involved again, I really have to see somebody overcoming my country with weapons in hand.
Pacific News Service contributor Paolo Pontoniere is a correspondent for Focus, Italy's leading monthly magazine.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest WireTap headlines via email


Comments are closed-

Thank You
Posted by: expat in tokyo on Jul 7, 2005 3:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an american citizen living in Japan I would like to say THANK YOU for being so honest and brave telling your stories. You guys are the TRUE PATRIOTS!! To ask the questions and make the decisions you made takes TRUE BRAVERY that your comrads can learn from. You are no longer pawns in the grand chess game our leaders are playing. God speed and good luck!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thank You Posted by: HuckFinn
» RE: Thank You Posted by: may261989
» RE: Former marine dunce Posted by: profwoof

Comments are closed-

Peachy I
Posted by: bonapartist on Jul 7, 2005 5:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, isn’t this just peachy. It seems that non - Americans again have a privilege of assisting US in clearing its own mess. In this case Canada has an honour of giving refuge to Caesar’s disgruntled legionaries. It reminds me of a ruckus some time ago when offers of support were pouring from Canada, and some other countries, in regard to American gay doctors and nurses facing oppression in US. There were at least a few dozen organizations loudly voicing their support. Interestingly enough if you were, for example, Ukrainian doctor or nurse dying out of starvation nobody would give a damn. Even if you were gay Ukrainian doctor or nurse nobody would care, no matter that Ukrainians are suffering as a result of American actions.

In essence, due to good media coverage, it seemed logical to give support to Americans fleeing American made mess and, at the same time, ignoring non – Americans fleeing from American made mess. And here we have it again! If, for example, three Pakistani soldiers deserted over atrocities in Kashmir, the whole incident would hardly be worth mentioning. Basically Canada now provides a handy escape route for Americans fleeing from problems they themselves fermented. Btw, please, don’t sell me “It is all Bush’s fault”, the fault lies with US and its system and thus with its citizens.

Canada accepts immigrants but process is by no means easy or affordable and, even if you qualify, you might have to wait between 9 and 18 months for visa. I just wonder who pays the support for these ex stormtroopers in seeking a refuge in Canada? Many of those, especially Eastern Europeans who seek to immigrate to Canada, are forced to do so due to circumstances in their own countries, circumstances that were in better part orchestrated by US. So now Ukrainians can wait in line with Americans, pure equality but the problem is one belongs to a victimized nation and the other to oppressor nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Peachy I Posted by: cyclone
» RE: Peachy I Posted by: davidt
» RE: Peachy I Posted by: djisabella
» RE: Peachy I Posted by: davidt
» RE: Peachy I Posted by: Kat144
» RE: Peachy I Posted by: Canadaarm
» RE: Peachy I Posted by: bonapartist

Comments are closed-

Peachy II
Posted by: bonapartist on Jul 7, 2005 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And let us not forget the three legionaries in the article. Case 1 is basically stating that he joined the army but he didn’t like the idea of killing people. Excuse me, but what did he expect? If you dislike violence, don’t join the army, it is a free choice. Plus I really don’t want to know a person who tried hard to find a justification for killing another human being.

Case 2 is even more interesting “If I went back to Baghdad I would have been asked again to kill people, civilians, and I just couldn't do that anymore.” Again? Anymore? If I am not mistaken this is a confession that she did kill civilians, or at least participated in it. And just when killing them became too much? Was it after the second killing? Fifth? Twenty - fifth? She admitted committing war crimes and should be treated as a war criminal and not as a refugee.

Case 3 is basically a kid who found out that war isn’t a video game and that ratio of gory to glory is 9:1. Good for him, he might have thought about it before he volunteered.

Btw, I am writing this after the news is in that a terrorist attack shook London with seven bomb blasts, leaving at least 2 dead and 90 wounded.

Yes, I am bloody upset and I don’t care who will be offended by my comments.

That much for success of “War on Terror”, now I wouldn’t be surprised if this crime is used as perfect pretext for invading Syria and/or Iran very soon. Basically these blasts are just handy for the terrorists to show what they can do and for Bush – Blair dynamic duo as an excuse to go to war.

In conclusion I think that the international community should pressure Americans to deal with Iraqi mess and denying the escape route and sympathy should be the part of that pressure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Peachy II Posted by: nickbk
» RE: Peachy II Posted by: Pepper
» RE: Peachy II Posted by: AmericanVictim
» RE: Peachy II Posted by: philame
» RE: Peachy II Posted by: philame
» RE: Peachy II Posted by: AnarchX
» RE: Peachy II Posted by: bonapartist

Comments are closed-

There is not near enough deserting!
Posted by: Pepper on Jul 7, 2005 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, one of those three has a real reason for not going back to Iraq and that is his view that there was & is no threat to the US, therefore we are an occupying army of a sovereign nation who has been invaded for their natural resources, theft of the wealth of their nation (gold was shipped out of Iraq from its bank the same day the war was declared over, 19 billion dollars worth to be exact), and the incredible pillaging of their national heritage/artifacts. I think that bothered me the most.

Remember this is the oldest civilization in the world, its mentioned in the Bible the 2nd most number of times behind Isreal, its history is one of exceptional art, culture and science before it was basically destroyed as all arrogant nations are eventually (like America is in the process of being destroyed by the internationalists).

I wish the soldiers had a broader view (with the exception of the one) of what they are doing that is so immoral. Be that as it may, its better they desert regardless of the reason, than to continue the slaughter of a third world nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: thelfs! Posted by: Scott
» RE: thelfs! Posted by: shel

Comments are closed-

Facts and Findings
Posted by: susan9390 on Jul 7, 2005 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Facts? In the commercial media? I doubt it!

Findings? Google World Tribunal on Iraq and find the findings. Then take as much personal action as your conscience allows.

The Tribunal has addressed itself to the disillusioned soldier. They say you are not deserters. They say you need not wait for the military to "grant" you CO status. They say you are not responsible for the decisions and orders of your superiors. GET OUT!!

The Tribunal has addressed itself to the other nations of the world. They have asked that you accept our soldiers and give them refuge until the dust settles in our moribund nation and we can sort out this sorry mess. I apologize for the inconvenience, but please don't deny them sanctuary just because others have been denied in the past. I think that's what's meant by cutting off your nose to spite your face.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

They are not deserters
Posted by: apodapa on Jul 7, 2005 9:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are following in the footsteps of their Commander in thief. Now all they have to do is suck out alot of money from their millionaire families, get involved in several financial scams and rake in millions of dollars, get drunk, alot, snort cocaine, alot, admit their sins and convert to Evangelical Christianity. Then they will have a legitimate shot at being President of the United States.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They are not deserters Posted by: philame
» RE: Doh! Posted by: apodapa
» RE: They are not deserters Posted by: christenxx
» RE: Desperate Posted by: Emmyl

Comments are closed-

Supporting the Troops
Posted by: christenxx on Jul 7, 2005 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of why they enlisted or what they thought was going to happen, these men and all of the other ones deserve our support. The struggle between the desire to serve your country and the desire not to be a heartless killing machine must be a tough one. I feel for these men and their plight, but I feel even more for the physically and mentally wounded veterans coming home every day to face drastic cuts in our government's veterans benefits and support networks. I see these "Support Our Troops" bumper stickers everywhere I look, but how many of these people realize Bush just doesn't care about you or your family once you have served his purpose?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Supporting the Troops Posted by: AmericanVictim

Comments are closed-

Assylum - does this help?
Posted by: DaftAida on Jul 7, 2005 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I picked up a copy of 'Steal THis Book' by an Abbie Hoffman in the library yesterday and whilst it's very '70's it has an update of where best to seek political assylum. In chapter 7 'Hip-pocket Law' Join the Army of Your Choice; Canada, Sweden and political assylum. From above comments, looks like Canada is not the place but how's about Sweden?

It lists The American Deserters Committee Upplandsgaten 18 Stockholm phone 08-3444663. On page 195 is also listed individual contacts for further help.

ISBN: 1-56858-217-X

There's a website for the British publisher: www.4w8w.com

I don't really like Mr Hoffman's book but in today's world we need combat tools!

Here in the UK I've often wondered that, as an ordinary citizen used to huge influxes of assylum seekers worldwide where I would go to obtain assylum from the increasingly repressive UK government!

I feel for you guys. You see, the trouble with us Goyims is that we are a decent lot at heart. We'll gladly sacrafice ourselves on behalf of our brothers in the name of decency and freedom. And this our archiles heel when controlled by those of no such honour. Thank you for speaking up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Asylum - does this help? Posted by: djisabella
» RE: Asylum - does this help? Posted by: wannabersc
» RE: Asylum - does this help? Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Asylum - does this help? Posted by: AmericanVictim
» AmericanVictim - just a few notes Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Asylum - does this help? Posted by: DaftAida
» RE: Asylum - does this help? Posted by: DaftAida
» Tag! We're watching you! Posted by: mrsmagoo
» RE: Tag! We're watching you! Posted by: DaftAida

Comments are closed-

TRUTH NOW
Posted by: TRUTH NOW on Jul 7, 2005 7:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hats off to these brave troops in Canada.....they are the real Americans of old..Too bad more won't do the same--Keep strong...you are right!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

American Soldiers in Canada
Posted by: davidt on Jul 7, 2005 10:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am sure that their are Bush supporters who have read these stories and they are saying these guys are cowards, maybe even terrorists.

These men have left the safety of their country to go fight in another because they believed it was their duty or it was a bargain that they made toward a better life that they have kept. Their lives are far from secure, they may be deported and face desertion charges from an unforgiving military that has only one form of justice--just ask the underlings who took the fall for following orders at Abu Graib.

Now I am sure you have formed an opinion of me, it doesn't mean anything. What you should be thinking about is the man who sent them over there, our Born-Again Christian who calls himself a War President.

When it came time for him to serve he was sheltered in the Texas Air National Guard, known to Texans as a haven for rich sons, Dallas Cowboys and anyone else who wants to avoid military service.

Taxpayers spent about $300,000 on his pilot training, when it came time for him to select to see combat he declined. Instead he became a roaring drunk hanging around country clubs swinging from whatever was handy. He became such an embarassment to his father that through a friend he was whisked away to Alabama to work on a Republican campaign. He failed to report for a physical in Denver and when HE entered politics another "friend", who is in the White House with him now, made sure his military records in Texas were trashed.

Now this man sees no sin in denying his AWOL status, I am sure he thinks he flew missions in Vietnam-the Mission Accomplished incident proves this.

When he makes a speech he further insults ALL those in uniform by going to a military base and preening like an emperor expecting to be crowned. The media treats him lilke royalty, accepting all of his lies, day after day after day.

He coldly inflicts pain and misery upon millions of innocent people while labeling this fighting terrorism or being Christian, whatever his handlers think will be swallowed by his rabid, ignorant and irrational "admirers"--no matter how his policies have hurt them physically, mentally and economically they STILL accept him, blind to his evil.

Question.

What Bible is he reading from to live life as he does while taking everything away from others without any shred of remorse or conscience?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: American Soldiers in Canada Posted by: royrogers
» RE: American Soldiers in Canada Posted by: royrogers

Comments are closed-

Jesse Winchester, subliminal voice for 'dodgers'
Posted by: neilemac on Jul 10, 2005 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Am having a problem understanding linking tags, backtracks, hyperlinks, etc. but am certain you'll connect with the following observation at this constantly vigilent Canadian's perspective on a possibly forgotten American born hero and subliminal anti-war voice, Jesse Winchester!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Help for neilemac
Posted by: davidt on Jul 10, 2005 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The two blue-outlined statements explain it all.

If you want to reply to a specific statement you have the option at the end of the comment. This will be linked to the comment in blue. One has to click on it to read it. Your username will be indicated after the COMMENT you replied to. The original comment will be in blue, your name will not.

If you want to post a comment independent of any specific comment click on "post a new comment" at the end of the comment listed.

Then your comment will be added to the bulk comments page and the viewers will be able to see your comment without having to click on it.

It is a dual-option process: You either post to a specific comment that needs a click to read, or you add a comment to all of the comments listed, not needing a link.

Hope this helps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

History keeps repeating itself
Posted by: Delilah on Jul 25, 2005 4:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1952, there was a young man aged 18 raised on the red hills of Georgia in a poor rural county there. He had just received a letter from the US gov., telling him he was drafted for the war in Korea.

This young man did not want to go to war to kill people 'as poor as I am'. He talked to his folks and while his mother was quite supportive (she did not want to see her son die), his father and other kin disagreed, stating that he should go to do his 'patriotic chore' as this young man said later.

Remember, that was the draft, McCarthy's witchhunt was in full swing and the KKK was around... The young man was labelled as a pinko of some sorts and in rural Georgia, well, that was not very good. The young man felt threatened. So he packed up his things, bid goodbye to his folks and left to Canada.

But as he was coming from sunny Georgia, well, he didn't get along well with Canada weather... so, first chance he had, he left for Europe. He chose to go to France as he had learnt some French with French-speaking Canadians. He landed in Paris... and there we are. I'm a Southerner too as we now live in the South of France. Some things never change apparently.

This young man was my father. He died 20 years ago without never seeing again his folks, his county, his native Georgia he loved so much despite everything...

When I read the stories of these young men, I could not help thinking about my father. I cried, weeping over the trials and tribulations these young people are facing. Never been able to come back to your place - exile - is probably one of the harshest decision to make and to implement. It requires a great deal of courage, much more than going to war I guess.

History teaches many things provided we listen to it. Should we learn one day ? Otherwise history will only keep repeating itself over and over again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Rhyme and Reason
Posted by: pridesfoe on Apr 6, 2006 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that it is very easy to blast soldiers and deserters for their actions and those they follow into combat (or out of it as the case may be). Its very easy to take them for Dodo Birds and mock them for realizing the true price of war far too late. And although I am not one to make excuses for others, I think that for many non americans it is hard to understand the mindset that goes into deciding to becoming a soldier in todays world. Yes, being a soldier means you are going to kill, yes being a soldier means following orders, etc. However, post 9-11, many of us americans felt that some action needed to be taken. Now I agree, war on Iraq was probably no the smartest of ideas. However, you must understand that as it was being advertised, Iraq was a very real threat. We had underestimated other extremists before, and it cost us 3,000 lives. That being said, I would like to say the following: Shame on those who used our fears to manipulate us, Shame on those whom made villains out of innocents, Shame on those whom made criminals out of regular citizens with misplace patriotism, and last but not least Shame on those who so easily judge the actions of others without vision of anything but their own hubris. And just to clarify the record.....Illigal war?! If you believe the war on Iraq is illegal, then I have a bridge to sell you. Post Desert Storm, Iraq agreed that if they failed to have UN inspectors they would get invaded. They stopped allowing UN inspectors......guess what happened?! There is nothing wrong in having a stance against this war, there is plenty wrong in having such a stance for the wrong reason and then propagating it. That makes you no better than those that used misinformation to get us there in the first place

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Thank You
Posted by: expat in tokyo on Jul 7, 2005 3:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an american citizen living in Japan I would like to say THANK YOU for being so honest and brave telling your stories. You guys are the TRUE PATRIOTS!! To ask the questions and make the decisions you made takes TRUE BRAVERY that your comrads can learn from. You are no longer pawns in the grand chess game our leaders are playing. God speed and good luck!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thank You Posted by: HuckFinn
» RE: Thank You Posted by: may261989
» RE: Former marine dunce Posted by: profwoof

Comments are closed-

Peachy I
Posted by: bonapartist on Jul 7, 2005 5:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, isn’t this just peachy. It seems that non - Americans again have a privilege of assisting US in clearing its own mess. In this case Canada has an honour of giving refuge to Caesar’s disgruntled legionaries. It reminds me of a ruckus some time ago when offers of support were pouring from Canada, and some other countries, in regard to American gay doctors and nurses facing oppression in US. There were at least a few dozen organizations loudly voicing their support. Interestingly enough if you were, for example, Ukrainian doctor or nurse dying out of starvation nobody would give a damn. Even if you were gay Ukrainian doctor or nurse nobody would care, no matter that Ukrainians are suffering as a result of American actions.

In essence, due to good media coverage, it seemed logical to give support to Americans fleeing American made mess and, at the same time, ignoring non – Americans fleeing from American made mess. And here we have it again! If, for example, three Pakistani soldiers deserted over atrocities in Kashmir, the whole incident would hardly be worth mentioning. Basically Canada now provides a handy escape route for Americans fleeing from problems they themselves fermented. Btw, please, don’t sell me “It is all Bush’s fault”, the fault lies with US and its system and thus with its citizens.

Canada accepts immigrants but process is by no means easy or affordable and, even if you qualify, you might have to wait between 9 and 18 months for visa. I just wonder who pays the support for these ex stormtroopers in seeking a refuge in Canada? Many of those, especially Eastern Europeans who seek to immigrate to Canada, are forced to do so due to circumstances in their own countries, circumstances that were in better part orchestrated by US. So now Ukrainians can wait in line with Americans, pure equality but the problem is one belongs to a victimized nation and the other to oppressor nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Peachy I Posted by: cyclone
» RE: Peachy I Posted by: davidt
» RE: Peachy I Posted by: djisabella
» RE: Peachy I Posted by: davidt
» RE: Peachy I Posted by: Kat144
» RE: Peachy I Posted by: Canadaarm
» RE: Peachy I Posted by: bonapartist

Comments are closed-

Peachy II
Posted by: bonapartist on Jul 7, 2005 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And let us not forget the three legionaries in the article. Case 1 is basically stating that he joined the army but he didn’t like the idea of killing people. Excuse me, but what did he expect? If you dislike violence, don’t join the army, it is a free choice. Plus I really don’t want to know a person who tried hard to find a justification for killing another human being.

Case 2 is even more interesting “If I went back to Baghdad I would have been asked again to kill people, civilians, and I just couldn't do that anymore.” Again? Anymore? If I am not mistaken this is a confession that she did kill civilians, or at least participated in it. And just when killing them became too much? Was it after the second killing? Fifth? Twenty - fifth? She admitted committing war crimes and should be treated as a war criminal and not as a refugee.

Case 3 is basically a kid who found out that war isn’t a video game and that ratio of gory to glory is 9:1. Good for him, he might have thought about it before he volunteered.

Btw, I am writing this after the news is in that a terrorist attack shook London with seven bomb blasts, leaving at least 2 dead and 90 wounded.

Yes, I am bloody upset and I don’t care who will be offended by my comments.

That much for success of “War on Terror”, now I wouldn’t be surprised if this crime is used as perfect pretext for invading Syria and/or Iran very soon. Basically these blasts are just handy for the terrorists to show what they can do and for Bush – Blair dynamic duo as an excuse to go to war.

In conclusion I think that the international community should pressure Americans to deal with Iraqi mess and denying the escape route and sympathy should be the part of that pressure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Peachy II Posted by: nickbk
» RE: Peachy II Posted by: Pepper
» RE: Peachy II Posted by: AmericanVictim
» RE: Peachy II Posted by: philame
» RE: Peachy II Posted by: philame
» RE: Peachy II Posted by: AnarchX
» RE: Peachy II Posted by: bonapartist

Comments are closed-

There is not near enough deserting!
Posted by: Pepper on Jul 7, 2005 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, one of those three has a real reason for not going back to Iraq and that is his view that there was & is no threat to the US, therefore we are an occupying army of a sovereign nation who has been invaded for their natural resources, theft of the wealth of their nation (gold was shipped out of Iraq from its bank the same day the war was declared over, 19 billion dollars worth to be exact), and the incredible pillaging of their national heritage/artifacts. I think that bothered me the most.

Remember this is the oldest civilization in the world, its mentioned in the Bible the 2nd most number of times behind Isreal, its history is one of exceptional art, culture and science before it was basically destroyed as all arrogant nations are eventually (like America is in the process of being destroyed by the internationalists).

I wish the soldiers had a broader view (with the exception of the one) of what they are doing that is so immoral. Be that as it may, its better they desert regardless of the reason, than to continue the slaughter of a third world nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: thelfs! Posted by: Scott
» RE: thelfs! Posted by: shel

Comments are closed-

Facts and Findings
Posted by: susan9390 on Jul 7, 2005 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Facts? In the commercial media? I doubt it!

Findings? Google World Tribunal on Iraq and find the findings. Then take as much personal action as your conscience allows.

The Tribunal has addressed itself to the disillusioned soldier. They say you are not deserters. They say you need not wait for the military to "grant" you CO status. They say you are not responsible for the decisions and orders of your superiors. GET OUT!!

The Tribunal has addressed itself to the other nations of the world. They have asked that you accept our soldiers and give them refuge until the dust settles in our moribund nation and we can sort out this sorry mess. I apologize for the inconvenience, but please don't deny them sanctuary just because others have been denied in the past. I think that's what's meant by cutting off your nose to spite your face.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

They are not deserters
Posted by: apodapa on Jul 7, 2005 9:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are following in the footsteps of their Commander in thief. Now all they have to do is suck out alot of money from their millionaire families, get involved in several financial scams and rake in millions of dollars, get drunk, alot, snort cocaine, alot, admit their sins and convert to Evangelical Christianity. Then they will have a legitimate shot at being President of the United States.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They are not deserters Posted by: philame
» RE: Doh! Posted by: apodapa
» RE: They are not deserters Posted by: christenxx
» RE: Desperate Posted by: Emmyl

Comments are closed-

Supporting the Troops
Posted by: christenxx on Jul 7, 2005 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of why they enlisted or what they thought was going to happen, these men and all of the other ones deserve our support. The struggle between the desire to serve your country and the desire not to be a heartless killing machine must be a tough one. I feel for these men and their plight, but I feel even more for the physically and mentally wounded veterans coming home every day to face drastic cuts in our government's veterans benefits and support networks. I see these "Support Our Troops" bumper stickers everywhere I look, but how many of these people realize Bush just doesn't care about you or your family once you have served his purpose?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Supporting the Troops Posted by: AmericanVictim

Comments are closed-

Assylum - does this help?
Posted by: DaftAida on Jul 7, 2005 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I picked up a copy of 'Steal THis Book' by an Abbie Hoffman in the library yesterday and whilst it's very '70's it has an update of where best to seek political assylum. In chapter 7 'Hip-pocket Law' Join the Army of Your Choice; Canada, Sweden and political assylum. From above comments, looks like Canada is not the place but how's about Sweden?

It lists The American Deserters Committee Upplandsgaten 18 Stockholm phone 08-3444663. On page 195 is also listed individual contacts for further help.

ISBN: 1-56858-217-X

There's a website for the British publisher: www.4w8w.com

I don't really like Mr Hoffman's book but in today's world we need combat tools!

Here in the UK I've often wondered that, as an ordinary citizen used to huge influxes of assylum seekers worldwide where I would go to obtain assylum from the increasingly repressive UK government!

I feel for you guys. You see, the trouble with us Goyims is that we are a decent lot at heart. We'll gladly sacrafice ourselves on behalf of our brothers in the name of decency and freedom. And this our archiles heel when controlled by those of no such honour. Thank you for speaking up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Asylum - does this help? Posted by: djisabella
» RE: Asylum - does this help? Posted by: wannabersc
» RE: Asylum - does this help? Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Asylum - does this help? Posted by: AmericanVictim
» AmericanVictim - just a few notes Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Asylum - does this help? Posted by: DaftAida
» RE: Asylum - does this help? Posted by: DaftAida
» Tag! We're watching you! Posted by: mrsmagoo
» RE: Tag! We're watching you! Posted by: DaftAida

Comments are closed-

TRUTH NOW
Posted by: TRUTH NOW on Jul 7, 2005 7:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hats off to these brave troops in Canada.....they are the real Americans of old..Too bad more won't do the same--Keep strong...you are right!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

American Soldiers in Canada
Posted by: davidt on Jul 7, 2005 10:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am sure that their are Bush supporters who have read these stories and they are saying these guys are cowards, maybe even terrorists.

These men have left the safety of their country to go fight in another because they believed it was their duty or it was a bargain that they made toward a better life that they have kept. Their lives are far from secure, they may be deported and face desertion charges from an unforgiving military that has only one form of justice--just ask the underlings who took the fall for following orders at Abu Graib.

Now I am sure you have formed an opinion of me, it doesn't mean anything. What you should be thinking about is the man who sent them over there, our Born-Again Christian who calls himself a War President.

When it came time for him to serve he was sheltered in the Texas Air National Guard, known to Texans as a haven for rich sons, Dallas Cowboys and anyone else who wants to avoid military service.

Taxpayers spent about $300,000 on his pilot training, when it came time for him to select to see combat he declined. Instead he became a roaring drunk hanging around country clubs swinging from whatever was handy. He became such an embarassment to his father that through a friend he was whisked away to Alabama to work on a Republican campaign. He failed to report for a physical in Denver and when HE entered politics another "friend", who is in the White House with him now, made sure his military records in Texas were trashed.

Now this man sees no sin in denying his AWOL status, I am sure he thinks he flew missions in Vietnam-the Mission Accomplished incident proves this.

When he makes a speech he further insults ALL those in uniform by going to a military base and preening like an emperor expecting to be crowned. The media treats him lilke royalty, accepting all of his lies, day after day after day.

He coldly inflicts pain and misery upon millions of innocent people while labeling this fighting terrorism or being Christian, whatever his handlers think will be swallowed by his rabid, ignorant and irrational "admirers"--no matter how his policies have hurt them physically, mentally and economically they STILL accept him, blind to his evil.

Question.

What Bible is he reading from to live life as he does while taking everything away from others without any shred of remorse or conscience?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: American Soldiers in Canada Posted by: royrogers
» RE: American Soldiers in Canada Posted by: royrogers

Comments are closed-

Jesse Winchester, subliminal voice for 'dodgers'
Posted by: neilemac on Jul 10, 2005 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Am having a problem understanding linking tags, backtracks, hyperlinks, etc. but am certain you'll connect with the following observation at this constantly vigilent Canadian's perspective on a possibly forgotten American born hero and subliminal anti-war voice, Jesse Winchester!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Help for neilemac
Posted by: davidt on Jul 10, 2005 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The two blue-outlined statements explain it all.

If you want to reply to a specific statement you have the option at the end of the comment. This will be linked to the comment in blue. One has to click on it to read it. Your username will be indicated after the COMMENT you replied to. The original comment will be in blue, your name will not.

If you want to post a comment independent of any specific comment click on "post a new comment" at the end of the comment listed.

Then your comment will be added to the bulk comments page and the viewers will be able to see your comment without having to click on it.

It is a dual-option process: You either post to a specific comment that needs a click to read, or you add a comment to all of the comments listed, not needing a link.

Hope this helps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

History keeps repeating itself
Posted by: Delilah on Jul 25, 2005 4:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1952, there was a young man aged 18 raised on the red hills of Georgia in a poor rural county there. He had just received a letter from the US gov., telling him he was drafted for the war in Korea.

This young man did not want to go to war to kill people 'as poor as I am'. He talked to his folks and while his mother was quite supportive (she did not want to see her son die), his father and other kin disagreed, stating that he should go to do his 'patriotic chore' as this young man said later.

Remember, that was the draft, McCarthy's witchhunt was in full swing and the KKK was around... The young man was labelled as a pinko of some sorts and in rural Georgia, well, that was not very good. The young man felt threatened. So he packed up his things, bid goodbye to his folks and left to Canada.

But as he was coming from sunny Georgia, well, he didn't get along well with Canada weather... so, first chance he had, he left for Europe. He chose to go to France as he had learnt some French with French-speaking Canadians. He landed in Paris... and there we are. I'm a Southerner too as we now live in the South of France. Some things never change apparently.

This young man was my father. He died 20 years ago without never seeing again his folks, his county, his native Georgia he loved so much despite everything...

When I read the stories of these young men, I could not help thinking about my father. I cried, weeping over the trials and tribulations these young people are facing. Never been able to come back to your place - exile - is probably one of the harshest decision to make and to implement. It requires a great deal of courage, much more than going to war I guess.

History teaches many things provided we listen to it. Should we learn one day ? Otherwise history will only keep repeating itself over and over again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Rhyme and Reason
Posted by: pridesfoe on Apr 6, 2006 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that it is very easy to blast soldiers and deserters for their actions and those they follow into combat (or out of it as the case may be). Its very easy to take them for Dodo Birds and mock them for realizing the true price of war far too late. And although I am not one to make excuses for others, I think that for many non americans it is hard to understand the mindset that goes into deciding to becoming a soldier in todays world. Yes, being a soldier means you are going to kill, yes being a soldier means following orders, etc. However, post 9-11, many of us americans felt that some action needed to be taken. Now I agree, war on Iraq was probably no the smartest of ideas. However, you must understand that as it was being advertised, Iraq was a very real threat. We had underestimated other extremists before, and it cost us 3,000 lives. That being said, I would like to say the following: Shame on those who used our fears to manipulate us, Shame on those whom made villains out of innocents, Shame on those whom made criminals out of regular citizens with misplace patriotism, and last but not least Shame on those who so easily judge the actions of others without vision of anything but their own hubris. And just to clarify the record.....Illigal war?! If you believe the war on Iraq is illegal, then I have a bridge to sell you. Post Desert Storm, Iraq agreed that if they failed to have UN inspectors they would get invaded. They stopped allowing UN inspectors......guess what happened?! There is nothing wrong in having a stance against this war, there is plenty wrong in having such a stance for the wrong reason and then propagating it. That makes you no better than those that used misinformation to get us there in the first place

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS