Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

WireTap

U.S. Politics in "A Galaxy Far, Far Away"

By Brian Fanelli, WireTap. Posted June 22, 2005.


The original 'Star Wars' trilogy was revolutionary, but decidedly apolitical. Lucas' latest take is awash in political meaning, some of it quite relevant to the present day.
Star Wars

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Brian Fanelli

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Not so long ago, in the not-so distant galaxy of California, a young filmmaker named George Lucas created a compelling space opera involving talking robots, deep space dog fights, intense lightsaber duels, and an epic struggle between "The Rebellion" and the Galactic Empire. As a new take on the timeless story of good versus evil, Lucas' fascinating tale changed pop culture and cinema forever.

The "Star Wars" saga spawned the most successful movie and marketing franchise in history, as well as some of cinema's most memorable characters, including noble Luke Skywalker, cocky Han Solo, the radiant Princess Leia, widely reviled Jar Jar Binks, and of course, Darth Vader, perhaps the most recognizable movie villain of all time.

Revolutionary as the original "Star Wars" trilogy was, it was decidedly apolitical. Such is not the case with Lucas' latest films, three prequels to the original 1977 film. "Revenge of the Sith," the last film in the "Star Wars" saga, is awash in political meaning, both general and quite specific to the present day United States.

"Revenge of the Sith" is the keystone to the entire "Star Wars" series: in two and a half hours of screen time we learn how the good Jedi Anakin Skywalker becomes evil Sith Lord Darth Vader, paralleled by the metamorphosis of a democratic Republic into the Galactic Empire. Through subtle and not so subtle language and imagery, George Lucas compares the events in the movie to what is happening at home and abroad.

In the "Star Wars" prequels, the snaky Chancellor Palpatine, leader of the Senate, absorbs power by promising to restore peace to the democratic Republic, which is under attack by separatist forces that Palpatine secretly controls.

To gain absolute power, Palpatine convinces senators from across the galaxy that the Jedi are plotting to overthrow him. His lies fool the politicians, as well as the young Jedi Anakin Skywalker. Palpatine lures Anakin to the dark side by promising to save Anakin's wife Padme from a death Anakin envisions in his nightmares. After becoming Palpatine's new apprentice, Anakin slaughters the Jedi and separatists with Palpatine's army of human clone warriors.

Since 9/11, the Bush administration has used our collective fear of terrorism just as Emperor Palpatine used the Clone Wars: to increase the executive branch's power at home, and increase America's power abroad.

Like Palpatine, the Bush administration has been able to feed on people's fears to gain more power. The regular (and many think politically motivated) changing of the color-coded terror "threat advisory" level system is just one telling example.

The Bush administration has also toyed with citizens' emotions by using 9/11 images constantly in speeches, invoking images of burning buildings and grieving families to promote the war in Iraq and various domestic policies, such as the Patriot Act, that often limit freedoms in the name of national security.

In the "Star Wars" universe, Palpatine spent years plotting to launch a war and build a massive, unstoppable army to dominate the Republic. Now, it is becoming more obvious that the Bush administration planned to invade Iraq since coming to office.

Journalist Greg Palast recently published a timeline that shows the State Department began planning to remove Saddam Hussein from power as early as February of 2001. The recently publicized and much debated Downing Street memos also argue that the Bush administration hungered to topple Saddam far before any bombs fell in Baghdad.

The memos state that British and U.S. officials met in July of 2002, months before Congress was consulted about the war. According to the memos, intelligence was being "fixed around the policy."

Among the many shifting reasons President Bush and his staff gave for launching a war on Iraq, fear played a large part in the perceived threat of Saddam Hussein's WMDs. And just as Palpatine claimed that waging the Clone Wars and killing the Jedi would "restore peace to the galaxy," so has Bush announced that ousting Saddam would allow peace, democracy, and prosperity to blossom throughout the Middle East.

Some of the dialogue in "Revenge of the Sith" also seems inspired by post-9/11 United States policy. "You're either with me, or you're my enemy," Anakin tells his former mentor Obi-Wan Kenobi at the end of the film, while the Jedi Knights clash in a lightsaber duel. And soon after 9/11, Bush declared to the world, "you are either with us or against us."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Brian Fanelli, 20, is a peace and global justice activist. He is also a student at West Chester University majoring in comparative literature with minoring in creative writing and journalism.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Great Prophet George Lucas
Posted by: bonapartist on Jun 22, 2005 1:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a very good article but after reading it all I could do is groan.

The fan pages have been discussing its political implications since "Revenge of the Sith" was released.

I am going to limit myself to a few comments. For starters, if we really need George Lucas’ overused franchise to motivate our political thinking we are really one sorry excuse for intelligent beings.

That being said, I have problems accepting that Lucas has any other agenda then selling his movie for as much profit as possible. If an average viewer wants to believe that there is something more behind the movie then the wooden acting and overuse of special effects Lucas really has no reason to claim differently. Hey, if it sells more tickets - he is game. The Star Wars franchise is running out and he has to milk out as much money as possible. It is a war for profit and as the saying goes; all is fair in love and war. And there is certainly no better advertisement for any movie then being labelled as “controversial”.

Even if we accept that he intentionally inserted the critique of the contemporary US politics in his movie, two big problems remain. One, for an average politically ignorant viewer the message is too vague to motivate any response. Two, anybody with a tad more information would regard the movie as hopelessly simplistic. In Europe that is precisely how “Sith” was viewed for most parts, as a watered down version of reality. Unfortunately the truth is weirder then any fiction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great Prophet George Lucas Posted by: nickptar
A man willing to destroy EVERYTHING to protect his family...
Posted by: owlbear1 on Jun 23, 2005 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is that really a political statement or simply a cautionary tale?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmmm, looks like the Christian Right are only successful in boycotting......
Posted by: Pepper on Jun 23, 2005 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.........when the voting is rigged, huh? I love those numbers and I don't care why Lucas did the analogy with todays situation, HE DID IT ANYWAY! Someone has to speak up for cryin out loud.

As for it being too subtle, well, that is because we no longer teach our children to "think". We teach them to watch TV and have it do the thinking for them. Remember, parents used to use this same TV to "babysit" their kids so they wouldn't have to give them any attention. Sorry lot!!!!!

That plasma screen and those that used it to raise their children are the reason we are in the position we are today. They can take great pride in that. I have little hope that the young people will fight for their rights. I am sorry to say that! They don't even know what they are! Sad!!!! P

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Couldn't help noticing.....
Posted by: Asses of Evil on Jun 23, 2005 2:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the echoes of Bush-speak in the film. Anakin lost his mother while she gave birth to kids and so Palpatine plays on the increasing fear, however irrational, in Anakin, that the same thing might happen to Padme. There is no indication that the death during childbirth is hereditary or that this is a trend in their world. It is simply an irrational fear that, however understandably, plagues Anakin. So when Palpatine cleverly plays on these (ungrounded) fears, I couldn't help but parallel Monkey Boy's cultivation of fear, as among people via the Terror Level threat reaching different levels, as in highlighting raised levels of "chatter" among insurgents (if they're really dangerous or you've reason to be concerned, why not arrest them?), as in when Monkey Prez talks about the increased threat of terror or bombings or whatnot, and before you know it, Anakin is on the Dark Side. What got me was how quickly he turned. First of all he questioned whether he could turn to the Dark Side and then he just flipped. There was no looking back. He gave himself over to Darth Maul (or whatever his name was) and he was gone. There didn't seem to be a whole lot of reflection. I would have thought there might have been a bit more ambivalence, but one minute he was committed to upholding the ideals of the Force and then he was so quickly convinced of the powers of Evil to protect a supposedly threatened interest. And living in a Redneck part of California there didn't seem to be much sort of recognition of the irony of some of this dialogue in the audience, at least not vocally, while I'm sure in other places there must surely have been some recognition of the eerie parallels between the weaknesses of Anakin and the susceptibility of Joe Q. Public.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Similarities to Presidents living or dead are extremely tenuous
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Jun 24, 2005 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, we all loved the visuals and the sword play. The graphic design was like a slide show of the whole e Golden Age of SF's pulp magazine covers. The word "gorgeous" was invented to describe the Brothers Hildebrand's paintings and George Lucas' space operas.

But if this was political commentary ... the Kingston Trio sang protest music on purpose.

No, the historical basis for Lucas' Chancelor is probably closer to Roman strongmen Sulla or Giaus Marius (who?) ... than to corporate sponsored charmers like Reagan and Bush -- and dare I say it: Alouis Shickelgrubers grandson.

I guess what dissapointed me most was: In Episodes 4-6 had I liked and cared about Luke Dogwalker and his B9-K9s. Episodes 1-3 only proved that you no longer need actors or much of a plot to make movies -- and today, two whole lines of dialog are enough political content for anyone to deal with

But "Howl's Moving Castle' ... 'anti-war' in a generalized sentimenal sort of way ... doesn't bear a lot of close analysis either. I'd hate to be the one to try to explain that one's plot or characters to a bright 11 year old -- but the visual invention is (for adults) worth the price of admission.

So let it be with Star Wars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lucas you visionary, the "neocons" protest because they recognize their guilt!
Posted by: neilemac on Jun 30, 2005 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lucas was quoted at the Cannes opening as saying:

"... one of the main features of the back story was to tell how the Republic became the Empire, I hope this doesn't come true in our country. Maybe the film will awaken people to how dangerous this situation is!"....

Is it too late? It's already coming true in your country. Any viewer of Lucas' latest endeavor of his Star Wars' prequel, "Revenge of the Sith,"who can't see the obvious poke at the present administration must have slept through it. That or else had their head stuck in the proverbial sand to stop at the analogy of seeing only "a stronger resemblance between the Galactic Empire and Nazi Germany."

Put a stern part in his hair, slap on a black squared mustache, Nazi uniform (but remove the smug smile), and there you have him, America's tyrant Bush. Except it's really Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, (Daddy and cronies), etc. whom are the metaphorical SS enforcing dictives that the puppet in power delivers. Bravo Lucas for bringing understanding to how the Republic became the Empire.

Is there still time to stop the madness in the US? America better do more than argue it's parallel in fantasy, before the fantasy truly is the reality. namasté

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As Hitchcock once said...
Posted by: Alaiyo on Jun 30, 2005 5:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Hitchcock once said regarding to the consultant during the making of 'Spellbound,' "It's only a movie, May."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Political parallels
Posted by: webadict on Jul 22, 2005 12:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, yes, there are parallels between Palpy and Dubya. But in a film where the dialogue is hewn out of solid oak, the political commentary does not make much impact -- in my opinion. Except for Yoda I found it hard to care for any of the characters in Episode III. But perhaps the messages are a little mixed? As I recall, the coming of Anakin Skywalker was a virgin birth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]