WIRETAP  
comments_image -

Who Are You Voting For?: A Look at the Electoral College

Forget conspiracy theory. Who’s really behind the presidential election?
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest WireTap headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

When you fill in the box next to a candidate for president, that person gets your vote. Right?

Actually, an elite insider group — hand picked by political parties — will technically elect the next president of the United States. They’re called the Electoral College, and while there are about 186 million eligible voters in the United States, the Electoral College is composed of just 538 members. When you vote for president, your vote, along with all the other votes in your state, make up what’s known as the popular vote. Each state’s popular vote determines how its Electoral College members will vote. When you vote for a candidate, you’re also voting for your elector, whose name may or may not appear on the ballot.

ELECTORAL WHAT?

Total number of Electoral College votes: 538

Number of electoral votes needed to win a U.S.

presidential election: 270

Number of U.S. presidential elections in which no candidate received over 50 percent of the national popular vote: 15

Number of U.S. presidential elections in which the candidate who received the most popular votes was not elected to office: 4

Number of times Bill Clinton did not receive over 50 percent of the national popular vote when running for president: 2

Each state gets at least three electoral votes: one for each senator and one for each U.S. representative. The bigger a state’s population, the more representatives it has; the more representatives it has, the more electoral votes it gets. For example, California has a whopping 55 electoral votes: two for its senators and 53 for its representatives. Some states (Delaware, Wyoming and Alaska, for example) have just three electoral votes. The District of Columbia, while not technically a state, gets three electoral votes. A state’s number of representatives depends on its number of districts; its representatives, and its electors, can change due to districting or new census figures.

After the popular vote has been cast on Election Day, the members of the Electoral College meet in their respective state capitals to cast their votes for president and vice president. To prevent electors from simply voting for the candidates from their home state, each elector must cast at least one vote for a person from outside their state. This is why in 2000, Vice President Dick Cheney changed his residence from Texas to Wyoming: Electors couldn’t have voted for both Bush and Cheney if they had both been from Texas.

The Electoral College was written into the Constitution because the founders wanted a method of selecting president that would take all votes into account — this was at a time when the United States was made up of just 4 million people, who were separated by thousands of miles up and down the Atlantic seaboard with minimal transportation and communication channels to connect them. Early leaders were afraid that if the presidential election were decided by popular vote only, Americans in remote and less populated areas wouldn’t be heard; candidates would work hardest to court the votes in the most populous area, and leave too many voters behind.

Does this mean some candidates might not get more than 50 percent of the popular vote but still end up being elected president? Sure — this has happened 15 times, and even happened to Bill Clinton (twice) and, as we all know, to George W. Bush. And in four elections in U.S. history, the candidate who led the popular vote was not elected president by the Electoral College, beginning with John Quincy Adams in 1824 (he became president when the election was decided by the House of Representatives) and ending with Al Gore in 2000.

Wait a sec. Shouldn’t the popular vote determine who’s president? Well, keep in mind that we have profoundly low voter turnout — 51 percent in 2000 and 49 percent in 1996. Would a system that relied on the popular vote, not on the Electoral College, really reflect the will of all the people? Or could throwing out the Electoral College increase voter turnout by giving more people a reason to make their voices heard?

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest WireTap headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
The Dark Truth Behind the Kochs' Struggle for Control of the Cato Institute

By Ryan Cooper | Washington Monthly

 
 
Outrage: Kansas Pastor Wants the Government to Kill Gays

By Zandar | Balloon-Juice

 
 
How Right-Wing Media Pounced On Obama's 'Polish Death Camp' Gaffe

By Steve M. | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Study: Marijuana Linked to Lower Mortality Rate for Patients with Psychotic Disorders

By Paul Armentano | NORML

 
 
Planned Parenthood Endorses Obama, Eviscerates Romney With New Ad

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
WikiLeaks' Assange Loses Extradition Battle, Legal Wrangling May Continue

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker Transfers $100,000 From Recall Campaign to Legal Defense Fund

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Glenn Greenwald: Obama's Secret Kill List "The Most Radical Power a Government Can Seize"

By Amy Goodman, Nermeen Shaikh | Democracy Now!

 
 
Oops! Romney Launches New App, Misspells "America"

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Ed Schultz On Florida's Purge of 180,000 Voters

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]