Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Voting Young
Also in WireTap
Do You Have a Minute to Save Progressive Politics?
Greg Bloom
A Different Breed of Tutor
Adam McKibbin
Post-9/11 America is a Tough Place for Young Desis
Worst. Congress. Ever.
Scott Thill
Exploring Christopher Columbus Day
Elias Lawless
Freaky Fridays
Sex Goddess

In most states, 17-year olds can legally drive, drop out of school, and have consensual sex with their peers. But nowhere in the United States can anyone under 18 walk into a voting booth and cast a ballot without breaking the law. Now, thanks to an 8-1 vote by their city council, some high school students in Massachusetts are one step closer to changing that.
It started two years ago when a group of politically active students at Rindge and Latin High School in Cambridge, Massachusetts, one of the nation's most diverse small cities and home to Harvard and MIT, began questioning the 18-year old minimum voting age most mindlessly assume is set in stone.
In the 1960s, when most people assumed the voting age of 21 to be unchangeable, students began asking the same questions. Their argument: if we are mature enough to be sent off to serve in Vietnam, aren't we mature enough to vote for (or against) those sending us there? In fact, Georgia and Kentucky, not exactly radical left wing states, had already lowered the voting age for their state elections to 18 during World War II. But amidst society's contempt and mockery, young people built a movement strong enough to make Congress realize the practicality of lowering the voting age. And in 1971, the Twenty-sixth Amendment was ratified, and the minimum voting age for national and state elections changed from 21 to 18.
In Cambridge, most Harvard and MIT students (nearly all over 18) can vote for members to the Cambridge school committee and in other municipal elections. But students one year younger who actually go to public high school in Cambridge can not vote to elect those making the decisions that affect them most.
So some Cambridge students are overcoming the vicious stereotype of the apathetic and immature teenager and organizing to gain the fundamental right of citizenship in a democracy: the right to vote. But convincing the Cambridge city council to vote almost unanimously this March 25th to lower the voting age even one year, has been far from easy.
A year ago the future of democracy in Cambridge was less promising than it is now. Last June, in a 6-3 vote, the city council rejected a proposal to lower Cambridge's voting age for local elections to 16, which would have given most students the opportunity to vote in at least one election while in high school.
The irony is, college students who are in the area get to vote on local issues that affect young residents, while "many 16 and 17 year olds are more familiar with local issues and candidates than their siblings who are off at college," pointed out City Counselor Henrietta Davis in a Boston Globe article last Fall.
The original group behind the effort, comprised mostly of white male students, did not come close to reflecting the diversity of Rindge and Latin, where many students are immigrants and nearly half live in public housing (Cambridge's wealthier residents tend to go to private schools). Fortunately, student organizations like the Black Student Union took a leading role in the coalition, which brought dozens of students to a city council hearing on the initiative, endorsed a slate of supportive city council candidates (five were elected) and lobbied the others.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from WireTap! Sign up now »
| More News and Analysis: | ||
|
Huron, California May not Exist in a Year Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace: The unemployment rate in Huron in recent months is “off the charts.” By Viji Sundaram, New America Media. July 9, 2009. |
Energy Industry Threatens Water Quality, Sways Congress With Misleading Data Water: The industry is misleading the public into a false choice between the economy and the environment. By Abrahm Lustgarten, ProPublica. July 9, 2009. |
Summer Downsizing: 31 Ways to Jumpstart Your Local Economy Environment: Here's how to make more with less, put people before profits and cut down on waste. By Sarah van Gelder, YES! Magazine. July 9, 2009. |