Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Water

We're Paying the Price Today for Decades of Relentless Dam Building

By Rachel Olivieri, AlterNet. Posted September 18, 2008.


Decades ago three new dams were started every day. But the debts of temporary prosperity are all coming due and payable today.
Advertisement

Between 1950 and 1970, three new dam projects were started every single day in the world. Today, primarily in China, Turkey, Brazil, Japan and India, one new dam project begins daily with an average completion date of four years. Fifteen hundred dams are currently under construction worldwide.

Dams fragment, divert and subjugate the world's rivers. In one long lifespan, beginning with the inauguration of Hoover Dam in 1936, the engineering marvel of the 20th century, civilization has altered the most important function that makes the earth work, water. Thus, transmuting humanity into something foreign to the earth it inhabits -- a stranger to the very system which gave rise to our species.

The late Carl Sagan was among precious few visionary humans who shared the extraordinary ability to differentiate between deep thought and deep nonsense and recognized the persistence of a satisfying delusion to perpetuate the latter. Dr. Sagan wrote, "We go about our daily lives understanding almost nothing of the world. We give little thought to the machinery that generates the sunlight that makes life possible, to the gravity that glues us to an earth that otherwise sends us spinning off into space or to the atoms of which we are made and on whose stability we fundamentally depend."

Without some sense, some outline of how the earth works and our relationship to it, one is deprived of knowing, let alone of asking, the really important questions that promote regenerative life and prevent massive-scale destruction and degeneration.

It is only in blindness that ignorance can find engineering arrogance and feed the certainty of human expediency -- that millions of dams can exist worldwide strangling the lubricant of life itself. It is true that dams have created a seemingly unlimited oasis in arid and semi-arid regions of the world and have produced unimaginable population centers in water-stressed locations, made possible food production on marginal arid lands, and provided cheap taxpayer subsidized water and artificial lakes aplenty for fishing, camping and boating.

It seems a good thing, yet, what isn't accounted for is the short-term duration and ecological costs. It has created this artificial bonanza by short-circuiting the natural system of limitations much as the one time wonder of fossil fuels has short-circuited and driven the industrial revolution. The debts of temporary prosperity are all due and payable in the 21st century.

In the present state of affairs, water, energy, population, war, global economic expansionism, and failing ecological systems are sending shockwaves throughout the vulnerable global community while staggering the biosphere which keeps us among the living tentatively.

Earth Recycling

The world's water budget is a fixed volume and has remained unchanged for roughly 2.2 billion years in its present state. About 1 percent of the world's total water circulates as freshwater while oceans represent 97 percent of the world's stores and the remaining 2 percent is tied up in glaciers and polar ice caps. This finite water pie divides ever more thinly as population, agriculture and the industrial economy expands.

The uninterrupted Earth is a dynamic solar and geothermal energy system which powers the hydrologic and rock cycles. It conducts and convects energy flows from the earth's 10,000 degree iron core outward through the mantle and lithosphere (crust) generating plate collisions that move continents and trip earthquakes. Magma driven plate collisions uplift mountain ranges and setoff volcanoes recycling lava and gases on land and underwater replenishing both with life-producing minerals.

Solar energy evaporates surface water primarily from oceans to atmosphere to land as water or snow. Erosive rainfall or expanding ice in rock crevices tears down mountains as fast as they rise. The Earth's lumpy land surface is a massive drainage system. From high to low, meandering and networked creeks and rivers drive the rock and mineral cycle. A river system operates on the principle of erosion and deposition. As a river gains water volume and speeds up it erodes and picks up rock and sediment. As it loses volume and slows down it drops some of its load. Large pulses of water flush sediments onto the rivers floodplain creating fertile soil before arriving at its delta entry to the sea.

Remaining sediments combine with the heavy basalt sea floor at the shoreline which is being subducted under the lighter continental plate from volcanic spreading forces at the Mid-Oceanic Ridge. This continuous underwater volcanic ridge runs like the seams of a baseball throughout the world's oceans. Everything cycles like a big conveyor; from Mid-Oceanic Ridge pushing the sea floor towards continental plates where it subducts back into the mantle to raise a mountain or explode through a volcano over geologic time. Dams, known as nickpoints, interrupt and distort the natural transport machinery between land and sea.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: dams, hydro power, environmental issues, water resources, developing countries

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Methane
Posted by: ahmlco on Sep 18, 2008 2:28 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
".. forming massive lakes that produce and release vast amounts of methane from rotting vegetation underwater."

Ummm. No. The bottom of many lakes is quite cold, and rather effectively prevents decomposition. In fact, many lakes are being forested for well-preserved old-growth trees that have been submerged for decades.

I also find it amusing that the author thinks any design process done by man is any less capricious than that done by nature. Let one pebble erode this way instead of that in a mountain stream, and suddenly this valley receives water and that one does not. The river forms here and not there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh please Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Oh please Posted by: gellero1
» RE: Oh please Posted by: mommaterra
» Cow Farts Posted by: gellero1
» RE: Cow Farts Posted by: Dartagnan
» RE: Cow Farts Posted by: zipoka
And your solution is.....what?
Posted by: Libsrule on Sep 18, 2008 8:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the things I hate the most about gloom and doom articles is the rare event of a solution.

Now one can indeed wonder what the world would be like had we NEVER built a single dam.

Any ideas?

I've oft wondered about those who believe every dam in America should be torn down and damn the consequences to the millions of people who rely upon the energy, water and recreation derived from said dams.

Especially the drinking water part. Oh and the energy part too. I can do without the recreation if necessary.

So tell us oh wise one, WHAT is your solution to tearing down all the dams and how do we recoup the energy and water?

Well?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Source
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Sep 19, 2008 4:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd be more worried about one of the main sources of these rivers: mountain ice. If the mountain ice melts completely, these rivers will dry down to a trickle. In many ways they are like oil. The fuel supply is the stored ice on the mountain. We use it up and then it is gone. Once it is gone we have to wait for the earth to make more.

We are leaving the age of Pisces and entering the age of Aquarius...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just Took Enviro Science 101
Posted by: bluesmanjohnson on Sep 19, 2008 4:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article reads as if it were written by some bright-eyed hippie wanna-be college kid that just took here first Envio. Science 101 class, and can't wait to tell her buddies about everything she just learned. Yes, people are bad. They consume things. Perhaps we should just off ourselves.

Indeed, except for one or two high profile engineering snafus, damming waters and harnassing their power - without burning fossil fuels - is a pretty good idea. There should be a dam in every place that can support it. Heck, the beavers do it. Your kitchen sink is a dam, and the comcept has great utility. Yes, they have downsides, but what doesn't? Are they worse than the dozens of new coal fired power plants that are spring up across the country?

This blog will apparently post any rediculous knee-jerk fluff it can. This is the kind of thing that makes liberals look like a bunch of whack jobs to middle of the road people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just Took Enviro Science 101 Posted by: hoppingfrog
» c'mon, I'm as green as you are Posted by: bluesmanjohnson
» RE: Just Took Enviro Science 101 Posted by: daniel347x
» what do you know about me? Posted by: bluesmanjohnson
» RE: Just Took Enviro Science 101 Posted by: greenPuker
WOW,
Posted by: hoppingfrog on Sep 19, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow,now you sound just like her. "The lets dam everything" is just a f*cked attitude as lets drill everything. I have worked on salmon restoration on the Columbia River, and I have worked and played in the southwest. Dams are not a fix all and in the long run, on a local scale they are more damaging than other forms of power. They encourage the twin scourges of agriculture and urban development.

And your stupid "well beavers do it" comment, WOW, I mean WOW, what a load of crap. You should probably wash you brain out after make such a moron comment. I can't wait for your next one "Well the sun irradiates Iran (Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan), So we are just doing the same with our nuclear bomb and DU weapons"

I hope this comes across as a smack down, you received the brunt for all of the previous comments

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WOW, Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: WOW, Posted by: ciccio
» RE: WOW,..Knot_Rich lies! Posted by: greenPuker
» thanks Posted by: bluesmanjohnson
Dams Are Integral To Human Civilisation - We've Had Them For Thousands of Years
Posted by: opmoc on Sep 19, 2008 5:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The earliest recorded dam in history was built 4000 years ago.

Dams of course change the environment - there are costs and benefits to everything.

If your family has been living in a fertile valley for generations and some power comes along and builds a dam and floods your valley you are unlikely to be very happy.

However most dams have been built in mountainous areas where population is extremely sparse and where very little can grow because it is too cold and the soil is too poor.

Dams offer enormous benefits - they provide a store of fresh water for protection from drought. Without them many cities throughout the World simply could not survive even short periods of drought.

Of course in some areas dams are completely inappropriate and have been built for completely the wrong reasons and their existence has had an overwhelmingly negative impact.

For example if authority decided to build a massive dam across the Thames Valley to flood the entire area of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire soley to produce cheap hydro electricity for the City of London - it would be completely inappropriate.

Such similar madness may well have occurred is some poor third world countries due to the financial corruption endemic in rich Western Nations raping and pillaging with the help of organisations such as the World Bank and the IMF. But not all such schemes have a negative effect. Its a matter of taking a reasonable fair and objective view with regards the benefits versus all the real costs to human and all life affected.

Dams can significantly improve the health of the entire eco-system if built in appropriate places.

The eco-system of the UK has improved dramatically despite us having built 2500 large raised reservoirs. Without them we could only support around 10% of the current population and such things as clean water and sewage would be impossible throughout much of the country.

The argument that they have caused overall ecological damage - simply doesn't wash.

The UK has largely cleaned up its act. The water quality of rivers, seas, natural and artifical lakes has improved enormously - even within my own lifetime. It is far better than it has been for hundreds of years.

Many environmentalists of course think the world is massively overpopulated by the virus of the human race - and such population growth cannot continue.

They can't however discuss the impacts of their solutions - because it would mean the mass genocide of over 90% of the human race.

Now, I'm not arguing that there are too many human beings having too many children - and that continued population growth is not sustainable. I just think we should be discussing sensible measures of education and empowerment such that our population can decline gracefully over coming generations rather than the currently planned mass cull.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jeff Greef
Posted by: Jeff Greef on Sep 19, 2008 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thought provoking article, but I thought it lacked supporting evidence. Author commented numerous times about the destructive effects of dams, but gave little specifics. I'd like to see a detailed fact list of negative impacts of dams on specific eco-sytems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

if dams are bad everyhting is bad
Posted by: chrisbarb on Sep 19, 2008 8:36 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the person who wrote this article should not be allowed to write for this blog. what a whack job. Next he will argue that FARMING is bad. I guess the only thing is to go back to hunting and gathering, everyhting else disturbs the "natural" background. The author even says "IF the current growing population of 6.7 billion is considered a benefit to mankind..."

IF? What are you asking for mass starvation to save a few fish?

As for dams having a 50 year life span. That is bull, many dams have been in continual operation for hundreds of years. they may have a license for 50 years, but that license could be renewed and the dam keep going with little effort or change for many many cycles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» not well written Posted by: bluesmanjohnson
OVERPOPULATION
Posted by: sirios on Sep 19, 2008 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Uh, could it be overpopulation? If we have more people, we need more water hence more dams. Relatively speaking, almost every problem we face today is the result of over population. I must emphasize the word relative here as it applies to awareness. If the collective conciousness remains in ignorance of it's non relative essence then the problem can always be reduced to over poulation. to many people to little resources. However, even if the entire world population were" enlightened", that collective wakefulness would still inherintley dictate a self regulated balance of population. So from any angle of observation, it still comes down to OVERPOPULATION!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OVERPOPULATION Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: OVERPOPULATION Posted by: sirios
» RE: OVERPOPULATION Addressed Posted by: greenPuker
» Then blow your brains out Posted by: billwald
So Typical.....
Posted by: gellero1 on Sep 19, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A writer who has never produced anything tangible criticizes the engineers, builders, and planners who create the massive projects that probably enhance human life more than any other activity.

Perhaps she should visit areas of the world where they don't have hydropower and see how they live..............girls her age foraging for wood ( if there's any left ), cooking over open fires.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So Typical..... Posted by: greenPuker
fuzzy memory
Posted by: linecrosser on Sep 19, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't remember when or where it came from, but I do have a memory of a story about damns creating a wobble in the spin of the earth by the redistribution of the weight on the surface of the planet. Maybe I was in an altered state of conscience, it doesn't matter. The geopolitical atmosphere is the more immediate threat to the survival of the species and planet as a whole.
I did get a little lost in, the rivers losing their power and then filling with sediment.
Science has done its best to make life better, but there are and have always been trade-offs. The biggest, fly in the ointment, that causes science more problems than anything else is mankind's nature to, not only want to control mother nature, but other humans also. We're all doomed, by time anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's Not as Simple As It May Appear (As It Has Been Presented By The Eco-Warriors)
Posted by: opmoc on Sep 19, 2008 2:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For example I have travelled through hundreds of miles of exceedigly obviously naturally very fertile countryside incredibly rich in Paddy Fields and all forms of Food Growing Beautifully and Naturally

And hardly seen anyone

Its like there was this mass of food growing across an enormous area of territory - and there was hardly anyone there

Supposedly in one of the most highly populated Countries in the World

So I am not convinced

I keep an open mind and find out how the World really is by travelling and finding it for myself

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Partial Explanation of a Manchester Oasis
Posted by: opmoc on Sep 19, 2008 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oasis - Mucky Fingers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Damming of 5 rivers in Patagonia...a travesty
Posted by: judyfood on Sep 19, 2008 7:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am traveling to Chile this winter to enjoy the Rio Futaleufu in Patagonia before a company called Endessa dams it and 4 other rivers for hydroelectricity. This is one of the last pristine areas left in the world which is stunningly beautiful with river water the color of turquoise and clean enough to drink without filtration. My heart breaks to think of the possible fate of the area and the people who call it home not to mention the ecology. I am shocked at the apparent lack of concern shown by most of the posters about this article and The attitude of "dam everything".
Fortunately the president of Chile may be coming to her senses and exploring solar energy as a route for her country to take instead of ruining Patagonia. If anyone is interested check out this website for more information on the destructive practice of damming rivers and what fate could await Patagonia as well as many other areas of the world.

www.internationalrivers.org.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dam, who knew?
Posted by: samosamo on Sep 20, 2008 9:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would venture to say that here is an indication of too too many people on the planet when water is 'controlled' to a point where habitat and the environment is being subverted to some distorted view that man can control anything, especially life's basic element, for increasing the human population. This is very much big time 'messin with mother nature' and it will not work.
I would say that the free flow of waters all over the planet are part of the living 'gaia' organism that it is so dependent on and the real effects of manipulating it will certainly lead to some very drastic results and is actually doing so right now.
And Carl Sagan's idea of everyone just forgetting the basics of what we are made of, what keeps us alive, why we don't just fly off the planet and the workings of the sun are just not taken seriously anymore because of modern tech has truly taken our attention away, far far away where nothing but today is important. How very obvious now the need for the elders to keep up a tradition of handing down valuable insight that only comes with age and experience. All of this by itself will surely at the least bring on depopulation of humans for the environment's sake

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

c'mon, where's the love?
Posted by: bluesmanjohnson on Sep 21, 2008 9:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, articles that are completely knee-jerk reactionary, and have no basis in reality - and the "believe everything they read" people that love them make liberals look like idiots. I am liberal, and think this kind of crap keeps Joe Sixpack and his closet liberal tendancies in the closet.

Hydorelectric, if done appropriately, is one of our best options. I understand that reality must be very hard for you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

woops - tried to reply to someone else
Posted by: bluesmanjohnson on Sep 21, 2008 9:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The post above was supposed to be a response to one of you that think I am a bad person for criticising this article. Apparently I am not smart enough to click the proper link. I should be culled for that, and for my opinion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Science writer she is not
Posted by: Johndrag on Oct 11, 2008 4:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting article, but not well researched. I'd give it a C+. Reads like a good second year college term paper

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]