COMMENTS: 100
A Telling Palin Scandal: Her Environmental Record
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Water headlines via email.
The guardian of this wilderness -- and Governor of Alaska -- has, this week, become one of the most recognisable faces in the world. But behind her beaming smile and wholesome family values is a woman aligned with the big oil and coal firms that are racing to exploit Alaska's vast energy reserves. In the short term, that has bought her popularity at home.
"I love the woman," the pilot on our flight shouts over the noise of the engine, "especially what she wants to do with oil, we just have to drill more, there is no alternative. What's the point of leaving it all in the ground?"
It is a stance that guaranteed John McCain's new running mate a rapturous reception at the Republican convention this week where the response to the coming energy crisis was a chant of "drill, baby, drill."
But the woman who could soon be a 72-year-old's heartbeat away from the United States presidency has an environmental policy so toxic it would make the incumbent, George Bush, blush.
Mr McCain has stressed he is concerned about global warming and has come out against drilling in the Arctic reserve. But, in recent weeks, he has wobbled on the issue. And environmentalists are describing Mrs Palin, who denies climate change is man-made, as "either grossly misinformed or intentionally misleading."
She wants to start drilling. She wants to block US moves to list the polar bear as an endangered species. And she has allowed big game hunters to shoot Alaska's bears and wolves from low-flying planes.
The 44-year-old governor says a federal government decision to protect the polar bear will cripple energy development offshore. As a result, she is suing the Bush administration, which ruled the polar bear is endangered and needs protection.
The US Geological Survey says climate change has shrunk Arctic summer sea ice to about 1.65 million sq miles, nearly 40 per cent less than the long-term average between 1979 and 2000.
In such a situation it was unconscionable for Governor Palin to ignore overwhelming evidence of global warming's threat to sea ice, says Kassie Siegel of the Centre for Biological Diversity.
"Even the Bush administration can't deny the reality of global warming," Ms Siegel said. "The governor is aligning herself and the state of Alaska with the most discredited, fringe, extreme viewpoints by denying this."
Governor Palin would also like to bring open-cast coal mining to Alaska's Brooks Range Mountains, an act of environmental vandalism in the eyes of many.
The Palin administration has allowed Chevron to triple the amount of toxic waste it pours into the waters of Cook Inlet. This, even though the number of beluga whales in the bay has collapsed from 1,300 to 350 -- the point of extinction -- because of pollution and increased ship traffic.
On the Republican convention floor she said: "We Americans need to produce more of our own oil and gas and take it from a gal who knows the North Slope of Alaska: We've got lots of both."
The fact that drilling won't solve every problem "is no excuse to do nothing at all," she said, putting the country on notice that "starting in January, in a McCain-Palin administration, we're going to lay more pipelines ... build more nuclear plants ... create jobs with clean coal ... and move forward on solar, wind, geothermal and other alternative sources."
Mrs Palin also took a swipe at Barack Obama's environmental stance saying: "What does he actually seek to accomplish, after he's done turning back the waters and healing the planet?"
Her support in Alaska relies on squeezing more money for the state from the oil companies themselves. In Alaska, every man woman and child is in line for a bonus cheque of about $2,000 (£1,100) from the state's massive oil wealth fund. This is, in effect, a vote-buying machine for the would-be Vice-President.
Governor Palin wants nothing to hinder the oil companies. She maintains that polar bears are well managed and their population has dramatically increased over 30 years as a result of conservation. And if the ice should go away, then they will adapt to living on the land.
Many oil companies abandoned Alaska when prices fell in the 1980s but they have been rushing back to drill and prospect areas that are among the least hospitable on earth. That spirit of the Klondike is already in full swing in Prudhoe Bay the epicentre of oil production and one of the world's largest industrial complexes. It's so big that BP, UPS and FedEx operate a special fleet of jets from Anchorage just to service to the region.
Hundreds of spills involving tens of thousands of gallons of crude oil and other petroleum products occur in the area each year. Decades-old spills are still a problem and 17,000 acres of wildlife and marine habitat have already been destroyed.
But Prudhoe is just a tiny fraction of the area being targeted by Governor Palin and the oil companies. A similar fate of environmental destruction awaits the entire coastal plain as well as the special areas of the western Arctic -- home to migratory caribou herds, musk oxen, wolverines, grizzly and polar bears should a McCain-Palin administration be elected.
The oil boom has attracted oilmen from across America. One of them is Todd Palin, husband to the vice-presidential candidate who works for BP on Alaska's North Slope.
It is illegal to hunt polar bears, and that is not about to change. But in an area known as "Polar Bear Seas", from Point Hope on Alaska's far western edge to the pristine coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, one tenth of the world's polar bear population is at risk, as well as beluga and bowheaded whales and bearded and spotted seals.
Big game hunters are happy to pay lots of money to shoot wolves and bears from the air. They also chase them across the snow to the point of exhaustion and then land the planes on skis, shooting them from point-blank range. The animals are considered endangered across the "lower 48" states of America, but not Alaska. The hunters keep and sell the animals' pelts.
Last year, Mrs Palin proposed offering a bounty of $150 per wolf, as long as the hunter provided the wolf's foreleg as proof of the kill. The measure did not pass. She even spent $400,000 on a state-funded campaign to block attempts to end the hunt.
Its not just wildlife conservationists who object. Many ordinary Alaskans also condemn the practice as barbaric.
Trish Rolfe, who runs the Sierra Club's Alaska office, thinks Governor Palin has been a disaster for Alaska's environment. "The idea that she stands up to the oil companies is a joke," she says.
"The governor pays lip service to the issue of global warming but denies it is man made. She will not even spend money to help the Inupiaq villages which are about to fall into the sea."
Stay up to date with the latest Water headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: writeval on Sep 10, 2008 12:13 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cannot comprehend how most blindly follow a person and/or party instead of voting on actual issues. If McCain wins this time, I suspect Canada, the UK and New Zealand will be flooded with new citizenship inquiries. Mine may be amongst them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: And yet...
Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: And yet...
Posted by: mary-alias
» RE: And yet...
Posted by: newsound
» RE: And yet...
Posted by: Roger Király
» RE: And yet...
Posted by: newsound
» RE: And yet...
Posted by: TheGoodBus
» RE: And yet...
Posted by: MisterWu
» Welcome to the Democratic Party
Posted by: jreal
» Welcome to the Democratic Party: Episode 2
Posted by: jreal
» usterroristnation
Posted by: usterroristnation
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VetAgainst McCain on Sep 10, 2008 12:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When she asked how to go about prohibiting publications containing "inappropriate" language, the shocked librarian, Mary Ellen Baker, refused to cooperate. Palin then threatened to fire Baker for not supporting her position.
Sarah inherited a city with zero debt, but left it owing over $22 million.
Although she campaigned for mayor as a "fiscal conservative," during her six years in office, Palin increased general government expenditures by over 33%.
She supported bonds for $5.5 million for road projects that could have been done in 5-7 yrs without any borrowing. Also, while she served as mayor, City Hall was extensively remodeled and her office redecorated more than once.
Because Alaska is an oil producer, the high price of crude created a budget surplus for the state. Rather than invest the extra money in technology to make the state energy independent, Governor Palin proposed distribution of the surplus cash to every individual adult Alaskan, including herself and Mr. Palin.
In a time of record state revenues and budget surpluses, Sarah recommended that the state borrow and float bonds for road projects, even while she proposed distribution of surplus state revenues.
She faces accusations of firing public safety commissioner Walt Monegan in what amounts to a messy Palin family drama dating back to her pre-gubernatorial days. Monegan had refused to terminate a state trooper who'd gone through a nasty divorce from Palin's sister.
When she became the Wasilla mayor, Palin terminated most of the experienced staff she inherited. As a mayor and governor, she hired or elevated new inexperienced, obscure people, creating a staff totally dependent on her for their jobs and eternally grateful and fiercely loyal —- loyal to the point of abusing their power to further her personal agenda, as she has acknowledged happened in the case of pressuring the State's top cop.
While mayor, Sarah fired Wasilla's Police Chief because he "intimidated" her, she told the press.
As governor, her recent firing of Alaska's top cop has the ring of familiarity about it. He served at her pleasure and she had every legal right to terminate him, but it's pretty clear that an important factor in her decision to end his employment was because he wouldn't fire her sister's ex-husband, a State Trooper.
The governor has no foreign affairs or national security experience.
Palin has made no significant decisions regarding Alaska’s National Guard even though she is technically its commander-in-chief.
She recently said that the Iraq war is "God's task." Palin even admitted she hasn't thought about the Middle East much—just last year she was quoted saying, "I've been so focused on state government, I haven't really focused much on the war in Iraq."
Finally, Palin has repeatedly claimed, "I opposed Alaska's Bridge to Nowhere." In reality, she pushed hard for the bridge during her campaign for governor, less than two years ago. Later, Palin kept the earmarked bridge money and spent some of it on a road leading to the nonexistent structure.
If America elects Hockey Mom Palin and her treasonous Manchurian Candidate running mate, this country will end up in history's trash bin of failed nation states.
Vet against McCain
To find out why, click on the links below
VietnamVeteransAgainstJohnMcCain.com
VoteVets.org
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Shara - doing vs talking!
Posted by: LionHeart
» There goes PussyHeart again -- spouting his old GOP bullshit. Get a fucking life, Ace!
Posted by: VetAgainst McCain
» RE: There goes; Lionheart is worse than you think, Vet. He "supports" the war, won't serve, BUT. .
Posted by: Beck
» RE: There goes; Lionheart is worse than you think, Vet. He "supports" the war, won't serve, BUT. .
Posted by: donl51
» RE: There goes PussyHeart again -- spouting his old GOP bullshit. Get a fucking life, Ace!
Posted by: donl51
» Lidiot
Posted by: marid
» RE: Shara - doing vs talking!
Posted by: blurider
» Sara Palin is the elitests puppet.
Posted by: jreal
» RE: Shara - doing vs talking!
Posted by: donl51
» usterroristnation
Posted by: usterroristnation
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FMABBI on Sep 10, 2008 3:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain's "America First" slogan could not be further from the truth. For the first time in my life - I am actually AFRAID of where this country is heading. This is insane.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» cherrypicking?
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: FMAinMass
Posted by: LionHeart
» Give it up, PussyHeart. No one on AlterNet gives a shit about what you think!
Posted by: VetAgainst McCain
» RE: FMAinMass
Posted by: blurider
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whathappened on Sep 10, 2008 5:37 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But let's not focus on the hypocrisy of it all...let's just focus on her stylish eye glasses.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Her glasses are titanium and apparently cost $700
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Her glasses are titanium and apparently cost $700
Posted by: whit4brains
» A Very Big Example!
Posted by: Last Chance
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Last Chance on Sep 10, 2008 5:42 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Sep 10, 2008 6:19 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Walsh
Is your ISP watching?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lunatic
Posted by: LionHeart
» All the moms of teen moms are lunatics?
Posted by: edgar1
» O'Reilly recently said that it IS the job of parents to control their teenagers and those that didn'
Posted by: Beck
» screw O'reilly
Posted by: edgar1
» RE: O'Reilly recently said that it IS the job of parents to control their teenagers and those that didn'
Posted by: donl51
Comments are closed-
Posted by: toots on Sep 10, 2008 6:26 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vthlr on Sep 10, 2008 6:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 10, 2008 7:20 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And to you San Francisco voters ! Show that you are against this bloody war for oil in Iraq by voting for Cindy Sheehan and giving PEE-LOW-SICK a PINK SLIP for being a DUMB PAVLOV DOG !!
Until the Democrats can show that they're true environmentalists by putting solar, wind, good biofuels such as hemp and switchgrass over corn first, they have NO BUSINESS worrying about Palin. We all know that already. Alaskan pols of both parties are supposed to cave in to Big Oil ! Unlike Texas which had a Ralph Yarborough in the 1960s standing up to Big Oil, I have yet to find any D or R similar in Alaska. Anyone in Alaska know of a pro-environmentalist pol ?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» compromise only hope for energy progress and economic growth
Posted by: edgar1
» No need to destroy the environment with sour heavy crude. How about Ron Paul's legislation to
Posted by: maxpayne
» Push Obama to support Runoff Ballots
Posted by: jreal
» RE: Push Obama to support Runoff Ballots
Posted by: maxpayne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Balanchine on Sep 10, 2008 8:09 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin's interpretation of family values is the well-known "strict father" (in this case mother I guess) model in which children do whatever the hell their parents tell them to do, no questions asked. Like marry the creep in this instance.
Except that poor Bristol Palin, denied even the basics when it comes to knowledge of contraception - either at school or at home - is learning about family values the hard way. Which of course is not to say that the child won't be welcomed, well-loved and all that other crap they try and throw at us when we say that hey, all we're asking for is that the mother should get the final say in the matter.
If Sarah Palin is an advocate of "family values", Dumbya's an environmental peacemaker.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Can we stop calling her a supporter of "family values" please?
Posted by: TheGoodBus
» RE: Can we stop calling her a supporter of "family values" please?
Posted by: opmoc
» RE: Can we stop calling her a supporter of "family values" please?
Posted by: LionHeart
» Your smear campaign against Obama is getting old, PussyHeart. Give it up.
Posted by: VetAgainst McCain
» Um, there's a "dad" here too?
Posted by: edgar1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: solrev on Sep 10, 2008 8:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Sara Palin is a salesperson for oil.
Posted by: jreal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: opmoc on Sep 10, 2008 9:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whilst I thought she is a complete and utter total catastrophe - how could the Republicans have made such a disastrous mistake?...it seems the consensus is that they've scored Lara Croft
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blurider on Sep 10, 2008 10:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ms.Palin, you greedy, power hungry, superstitious & not-too-bright, oil whore, you thought your question was rhetorical and you silently wished you'd never need to hear the answer! I'm going to answer anyway for the sake of all Americans who truly understand the concept of 'family values'.
A) - He seeks to accomplish saving our planet from the greed and power lust of fake 'Christianity' - from the Armageddon you'd bring upon us and your silly fantasy of the 'rapture' - from greed and power lust, lurking behind all it's other masks too - for the REAL future of our children and grand children and many generations to come.
Understanding that you live in a fairy tale world of superstition I must explain this to you and religious wing nuts like yourself who just don't get it! Whether you and your kind wish to acknowledge it or not, you share the world with lots of rational people who live their lives and plan their futures based on reality, logic and practical, critical judgement. Those people simply do not share your superstition or the special brand of greed your fantasy life enables. Unlike you we don't imagine that the destruction of the planet can be a good thing because Jesus, the Easter Bunny or Ganesh the Elephant God is going to 'save' us or guarantee another future in some imaginary, parallel universe. That capability for critical judgement and rational behavior leaves us with a responsibility to provide for our descendants' future in the here and now.
In spite of all your fake, 'Christian' posturing about love of humanity and family values you serve only one master - a two faced master, the god of greed and power!
Fortunately for you and your mumbo-jumbo, you live in America - since you and your weirdo friends haven't yet seceded from the U S - so your freedom and your right to BELIEVE this crap is guaranteed by our Constitution.
However, among the rights you DON"T have is the right to co-opt the earth, it's wildlife and soil, it's water and it's air in the service of your hateful, power hungry greed. Justifying your transparent attempts to do so by co-opting Christianity and remaking it to serve your form of prostitution is an insult even to heathens like me - and by the way, people like you make me proud to be a heathen! It never fails, there are always enough of you so that you can just call me 'proud heathen'. I'll return the favor and address you by the moniker you've labored so hard to earn - 'greedy, oil whore'!
Face it grandma, you have successfully isolated yourself and insulated your pea brain from all the questions you're cramming for and so far you think this 'running for election' stuff is easy as shootin' fish in a barrel (from a state owned chopper) - but you have yet to face the questions of an informed and motivated American public which has that level of critical thought and that kind of genuine, reality based, family values that somehow through all your posturing, have passed you by!
Now the voters have your number and I among many would be happy to drop-kick your cute ass all the way back to Anchorage. Don't feel badly, you had a pretty good thing going, rippIng off the citizens of Alaska until your power lust ate you up, just let that be enough for now, OK?
Maybe as you grow up hopefully before you grow old you'll understand those reality based values - then and only then you might try a 'bite' at a time - maybe one of your admirers could promote you as an ambassador - maybe to the other end of the earth? Then, you'd get some stamps on that passport!
Good luck with that!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vasumurti on Sep 10, 2008 10:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Some people lament privately, others are brave enough to take their call for change into the public arena. Martin Luther King III has done his father's legacy proud...insisting that our nation's next leader do something about...poverty...I will answer his call, and tell him and the American people today that I will make the eradication of poverty a top priority of the McCain administration."
That same issue of Sojourners quotes Mike Huckabee as saying, "I'm a conservative but I'm not a nut. If my choice is a government program or a hungry kid, then give me the government program."
According to Huckabee:
"One of the things I'm frustrated about is that Republicans have been infiltrated by hardcore libertarians. Traditional Republicans don't hate all forms of government. They just want it to be efficient and effective. They recognize that it has a place and a role. Growing numbers of people in the Republican party are just short of anarchists in the sense that they basically say: 'Just cut government and cut taxes.' They don't understand that if you do that, there are certain consequences that do not help problems. It exacerbates them."
Jim Wallis says Huckabee told a "values voter" gathering in 2007, "I do not spell G-O-D...G-O-P."
However, it's business as usual in the Republican party. Rodger Schlickeisen, president of Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund, says:
“Senator McCain’s choice for a running mate is beyond belief. By choosing Sarah Palin, McCain has clearly made a decision to continue the Bush legacy of destructive environmental policies.
“Sarah Palin, whose husband works for BP (formerly British Petroleum), has repeatedly put special interests first when it comes to the environment. In her scant two years as governor, she has lobbied aggressively to open up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling, pushed for more drilling off of Alaska’s coasts, and put special interests above science. Ms. Palin has made it clear through her actions that she is unwilling to do even as much as the Bush administration to address the impacts of global warming.
"Her most recent effort has been to sue the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to remove the polar bear from the endangered species list, putting Big Oil before sound science. As unbelievable as this may sound, this actually puts her to the right of the Bush administration.
“This is Senator McCain’s first significant choice in building his executive team and it’s a bad one. It has to raise serious doubts in the minds of voters about John McCain’s commitment to conservation, to addressing the impacts of global warming and to ensuring our country ends its dependency on oil.”
In the early '90s, George Bush Sr. referred to environmentalists as "the spotted owl crowd," making it clear Republicans don't understand environmentalism. "And (yet) they call themselves 'pro-life'," mused Fox News' token liberal commentator Alan Colmes a few years ago.
I am disheartened by Sarah Palin's record on the environment, ties to Big Oil, her being an avid hunter and fisher, but not surprised. She is, after all, a conservative, running for VP on a Republican ticket.
I wonder if Sarah Palin still believes in abstinence-only sex education, now that her daughter faces an unplanned pregnancy.
To her credit, Sarah Palin is a member of Feminists For Life, an organization that is pro-woman AND pro-life. I wish pro-life Dems (a political minority) had the kind of visibility within their own Party that pro-choice Republicans (also a minority) have in theirs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Pro-women = pro-life
Posted by: akbirdwm
» RE: Sarah Palin
Posted by: opmoc
» RE: Sarah Palin
Posted by: Shankari46
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 10, 2008 10:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frankly, I may not ever go to Alaska (too d-mn cold), yet that doesn't mean that I think we should just destroy it for the animals that live there!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: akbirdwm on Sep 10, 2008 10:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And our Governor believes this State is the "refuge" place for the "end times" and we must prepare for them, and fight our "holy" war in Iraq and across the middle east to stamp out Islam and take their resources for our own. She doesn't believe that global climate change has anything to do with man, but is more than willing to help it on its way with her destructive and willful policies.
Is it too much to ask for a leader that will take science and logic into account. Who will work for the good of all people and the planet, and not for just their religous or personal agenda?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Alaska's melting
Posted by: opmoc
» RE: Alaska's melting
Posted by: blurider
» RE: Alaska's melting
Posted by: opmoc
» RE: Alaska's melting
Posted by: blurider
» RE: Alaska's melting
Posted by: opmoc
» RE: Alaska's melting
Posted by: blurider
» RE: Alaska's melting
Posted by: blurider
» I'm sorry to hear the tragic nature of Alaska.
Posted by: GrantBurkeVT
» RE: I'm sorry-- . Guess they're 'done' with Louisianna
Posted by: blurider
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Shankari46 on Sep 10, 2008 11:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Do Women Really Want to Vote for Palin?
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Do Women Really Want to Vote for Palin?- SHRILL SHILL.
Posted by: blurider
» RE: Do Women Really Want to Vote for Palin?
Posted by: Shankari46
» Dr Freud Explained it All
Posted by: edgar1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: opmoc on Sep 10, 2008 12:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Yam on Sep 10, 2008 12:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://tinyurl.com/65qxee
Sunday, September 07, 2008
10 Ways in Which, For Women, Sarah Palin Is *Exactly* Like George W. Bush
1) Like Bush, she is completely against a woman's right to choose (in fact, she exceeds Bush in that she is against a woman's right to choose even in cases of rape or incest;
2) Like Bush, she opposes stem cell research to prevent fatal diseases in men, women and children;
3) Like Bush, supports the teaching of Creationism alongside Evolution in public schools;
4) Like Bush, does not believe that Global Warming is man made;
5) Like Bush, has supported abstinence-only sex education methods that have proven ineffective;
6) Like Bush, has virtually no foreign policy experience prior to running for national office--(in Palin's case, despite a 72-year old, chronically ill running mate)
7) Like Bush, has engaged in conduct that has resulted in current government investigation of her actions;
8) Like Bush, has made statements which indicate lack of knowledge of basic elements of the office they are running for (Palin, July 2008: "What exactly does the Vice President do everyday?");
9) Like Bush, has been sequestered to prevent her being asked questions that she has not yet been prepared to answer;
10) Like Bush, talks like a reformer--yet in her actions (i.e., relying on lobbying, supporting the Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it) acts in the most typical, all-too-familiar fashion.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mexitli on Sep 10, 2008 1:21 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK. Well, my take on Palin is that she is a lady doing the best that she can and is successful.
Eff the haters!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And she'll finish killing America.
Posted by: GrantBurkeVT
» Usually the bar for VP is set quite a bit higher than "lady doing the best she can"
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 10, 2008 2:31 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: THE WRONG PARTY FOR TREE HUGGING
Posted by: edgar1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: opmoc on Sep 10, 2008 3:41 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We Think AMERICA is a Complete ABOMINATION
If You Elect a BLACK MAN - The Rest Of The PLANET Will Think YOu Have Changed and are
NICE
Come on - we all like others to think we are nice
And we think Barack Obama is NICE
What The Fuck Are You Doing Shagging Lara Croft
Come on
Be Serious
For FUCKS SAKE
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Sarah Palin is no Lara Croft
Posted by: jreal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulC on Sep 10, 2008 4:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is all basic marketing strategy and has absolutely nothing to do with truth or what is best for America, but everything to do with winning at any cost, which is what Rove and the Rethugs are all about, whether it means assassinating someone or their character, it doesn't matter because the winner controls the press and can squash any investigation.
This is what they have been doing with Bush from day one and now they are doing exactly the same thing with Palin. This has Rove's dirty hands all over it.
Here we go again...damn this Idiot Nation.
peace,
Paul
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The introduction of Palin to America was a critical defining moment
Posted by: jonestown kool-aid
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Christie on Sep 10, 2008 5:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let us count the ways.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlackbirdHighway on Sep 10, 2008 7:54 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1) There will be generations that follow us. While there are other things we use to power most of our vehicles, there are some uses of oil that are extremely difficult to impossible to do with any replacement.
Someday our great-great-grandchildren will find that they need some oil too. While they curse our generation, who greedily pumped out and burned up every last drop of the stuff? Or will the be grateful that we had the foresight to leave some in the ground for the future?
2) We are altering the climate in the most fundamental way since the first photosynthesis began filling the air with oxygen. It's not nice to fool with mother nature, and the result will certainly not turn out well. Just the fact that we can't predict exactly what is going to happen is reason enough to slow down our carbon emissions.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oxheadone on Sep 10, 2008 8:46 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: oxheadone
Posted by: orwellturns
Comments are closed-
Posted by: orwellturns on Sep 10, 2008 10:23 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
maneuvers she will not succeed. IF HILLARY DOESN'T DO SOMETHING MORE AND OBAMA LOOSES, SHE WILL NOT GET MY SUPPORT WHEN SHE DOES RUN AGAIN.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zipoka on Sep 11, 2008 11:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Greg2008 on Sep 13, 2008 12:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Advertising professionals know that negative publicity from opponents is often better than, and always as good as, good publicity from friends.
Let's lay off, because that way she'll fade out and we can get to the issues!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Buckshot00 on Sep 14, 2008 12:02 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She wants to block US moves to list the polar bear as an endangered species. And she has allowed big game hunters to shoot Alaska's bears and wolves from low-flying planes.
The Polar bear is today at the highest record numbers and history but gullible people pressured the USFWS to list the bear as endangered. Wake up.
Hundreds of spills involving tens of thousands of gallons of crude oil and other petroleum products occur in the area each year. Decades-old spills are still a problem and 17,000 acres of wildlife and marine habitat have already been destroyed.
I really want to see the proof of this statement sound like a scare tactic for some groups that ends with send more money.
Big game hunters are happy to pay lots of money to shoot wolves and bears from the air. They also chase them across the snow to the point of exhaustion and then land the planes on skis, shooting them from point-blank range. The animals are considered endangered across the "lower 48" states of America, but not Alaska. The hunters keep and sell the animals' pelts.
Do you have any clue about the over population of wolves in Alaska? Do you have clue about all the beloved dogs killed by wolves. There is too many wolves this is not hunting but predator control and the Alaskan voter said yes go do it. Grow up. Do you cry about the 10 million dogs being killed each year in shelters or PETA killing dogs? Wake up.
They also chase them across the snow to the point of exhaustion and then land the planes on skis, shooting them from point-blank range. This line appears to be a complete LIE. Alaska has no hunting for 24 hours after flying in. the wolves and bear control is for predator control there is a difference and a real reporter would have bother to tell you the other side of the story.
But anything to stop America from collecting our own oil keep protesting as more Americans go out of work and struggle to pay for high gas and food cost. Thanks to people who believe in the propaganda of Center for Biological diversity. Sierra Club's and Defenders of wildlife. Send more money to them so you can put more Americans out of work good job you caring people.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
L.A.'s New Scheme to Plunder Owens Valley Water, This Time with Solar Panels
New Signs the Tide May Be Shifting Against Water Privatization
The Resnicks Manipulate Water Policy with Big Campaign Contributions




