COMMENTS: 45
Welcome to the Food Revolution
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Water headlines via email.
I'd rather go to a Woodstock for garden gnomes, myself -- at least those Lilliputian lawn ornaments share my fondness for front yard farming. Gastro gnomes, on the other hand, sound like elitist elves who are overly fond of artisanal cheeses and grass-fed beef. Do we really need a celebration of such highfalutin culinary novelties at a time when high fuel and food costs are making it harder for people to keep their pantries stocked with even the most basic staples?
Well, yes, we do, because we need to remember that the fresh, unadulterated, minimally processed, locally produced foods that Slow Food Nation is showcasing were our pantry staples, before the military-industrial complex annexed our food chain a half a century or so ago in the name of progress.
Our great-grandparents would be flabbergasted to learn that grass-fed milk in glass bottles bearing the local dairy farm's logo is now a rare luxury item available to only the affluent few who are willing to pay $4 for a half-gallon of milk.
Back in the day, our breads were fresh-baked and free of high fructose corn syrup, and our eggs and bacon came from chickens and hogs that rolled around in the dirt and saw the light of day. The word "farm" still evokes nostalgic pastoral images for most Americans, but there's nothing even remotely benign or bucolic about the fetid, brutal factory farms that supply us with most of our meat, poultry, eggs and dairy products today. And unmasking this unsavory reality is as much a part of Slow Food Nation's agrarian agenda as dishing out local delicacies.
So don't be distracted by the aroma of wood-fired focaccia wafting from the Fort Mason Center "Taste Pavilions"; Slow Food Nation has the potential to spark a crucial dialogue about where our food comes from, how it's grown, and why all that matters. With forums featuring the good food movement's marquee names, including Wendell Berry, Vandana Shiva, Michael Pollan, Marion Nestle and Eric Schlosser, this Alice Waters-sponsored shindig could be the watershed event that puts America's foodsheds on the map.
Don't know what a "foodshed" is? Don't worry, nobody else does, either -- the word is still so obscure it hasn't earned an entry on Wikipedia. It means, essentially, the area through which food travels to get from the farm to your plate. That would have been a pretty short trip a few generations ago, but in this era of globalization, our foodshed now encompasses the whole world, more or less.
This far-flung food chain has enslaved us with a false sense of abundance, turning the produce aisles of our supermarkets into a seasonless place where you can find berries and bell peppers all year round. But this apparent bounty diverts us from the fact that industrial agriculture has actually drastically reduced the diversity of the foods that our farmers grow.
As small and mid-size farms got swallowed up by the massive monoculture operations we now call "conventional," the varieties of fruits and vegetables grown on those farms got whittled down to just those few that shipped the best and had the longest shelf life. Breeders chose to focus on species of livestock and poultry that fatten up the fastest, such as big-breasted but bland Butterball turkeys so top-heavy they can't reproduce naturally and have to be artificially inseminated. For this we give thanks each November?
This focus on economies of scale, and the illusory "efficiency" of a food system dependent on cheap fossil fuels and perpetual subsidies, gave us, the richest nation in the world, the cheapest food. And we are all the poorer for it.
Along the way, we lost hundreds of different kinds of plants and animals; currently, "at least 1,060 food varieties unique to North America are threatened, endangered or functionally extinct in the marketplaces of the United States, Canada, and northern Mexico," Gary Paul Nabhan writes in Renewing America's Food Traditions, a new book that celebrates the distinctive culinary regions of our country that Agribiz almost obliterated in recent decades.
But Renewing America's Food Traditions is not just a book; it's an alliance: Called RAFT for short, it's a collaborative effort from Slow Food USA and six other sustainably minded organizations. RAFT's mission is to inspire what the folks at Slow Foods USA call "eater-based conservation" by preserving and promoting the culinary heritage and extraordinary biodiversity that blessed this country for centuries before we shifted gears and became a fast food nation.
Nabhan is participating in a Slow Food Nation forum, "Re-Localizing Food," along with Pollan, Dan Barber and Winona LaDuke, but this powerhouse panel is, alas, already sold out, along with most of the other forums featuring the rock stars of the real food movement.
Thankfully, the Slow Food Nation folks are offering some free events and exhibits, too, including the Marketplace, which promises "to transform San Francisco's Civic Center Plaza into an urban garden, farmers market, outdoor food bazaar and soapbox," and the Slow Food Nation Victory Garden in front of City Hall, whose impressive array of organic heirloom vegetables is being donated to local food banks.
In keeping with its goal to promote all things sustainable, Slow Food Nation aspires to be a "zero waste event:" In addition to recycling and composting food waste, plates, flatware and packaging, Slow Food Nation is joining forces with Food and Water Watch to banish bottled water from the four-day festival. Echoing Food and Water Watch's Take Back the Tap campaign, the event will instead offer five tap water stations where folks can refill their water bottles -- or, if you didn't bring your own, you can buy a reusable, eco-friendly stainless steel canteen.
Not content to just spare us the spectacle of 50,000 good food fanatics washing down all those sustainable snacks with bottled water, Food and Water Watch has posted a much-needed guide on its Web site for the rest of us on how to "Free Your Event From Bottled Water." Pair this with Slow Food Nation's Declaration for Healthy Food and Agriculture, to be unveiled on Aug. 28 at San Francisco's City Hall, and you've got a virtual road map to a real revolution, even if you're not going to San Francisco.
Stay up to date with the latest Water headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dboy on Aug 25, 2008 1:00 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The COW is grass-fed, not the milk. They SAY "grass-fed milk" hoping that people will forget how wrong it is to be drinking the stuff. Cow milk is for baby cows, not for people. Would you drink a glass of monkey milk? No? Why not? Think about milk. Think about DRINKING it..you are drinking the juice from a hairy cow's titty. It's really disgusting when you think about it.
dboy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Milk
Posted by: Allstar Cookie
» RE: Milk
Posted by: svlaws
» agree with dboy and svlaws-milk is for baby cows.
Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: Milk
Posted by: Allstar Cookie
» People aren't cows...
Posted by: brunowe
» there are quite a few flaws in that logic
Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Milk
Posted by: sunnywater
» hairy cow!
Posted by: Iconoclast421
» totally disgusting.
Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: totally disgusting.
Posted by: Allstar Cookie
» RE: totally disgusting.
Posted by: Dboy
» there are easier ways to kill cows
Posted by: AdamG
» RE: totally disgusting.
Posted by: wal55
» I don't mean to nitpick but I will
Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Milk
Posted by: BobKincaid
» yum...cows tits.
Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Milk
Posted by: vasumurti
» RE: Milk
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rtdrury on Aug 25, 2008 2:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: heavy mineral content in water
Posted by: stellabloo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Last Chance on Aug 25, 2008 3:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Money talks, and some people plant.
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Money talks, and some people plant.
Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Money talks, and some people plant.
Posted by: AndyF
» RE: Money talks, and some people plant.
Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Money talks, and some people plant.
Posted by: mr. joshua
» Agri-business destroyed all the small farms thanks to both parties of BIG GOVERNMENT.
Posted by: jwverez
» RE: Agri-business destroyed all the small farms thanks to both parties of BIG GOVERNMENT.
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» Correction, most of them in the USA. Where do you live anyway?
Posted by: jwverez
» RE: Correction, most of them in the USA. Where do you live anyway?
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Correction, most of them in the USA. Where do you live anyway?
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nightowl on Aug 25, 2008 3:52 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Tap water vs bottled water
Posted by: zhine
» RE: Tap water vs bottled water
Posted by: BigElectricCat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 25, 2008 4:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RD
Ultimate Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 25, 2008 5:15 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 25, 2008 5:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that we need to stop supporting Agri-biz with subsidies and tax breaks. It started off as a good idea during the dust-bowl, but like too many other things it is something that needs to be cut out(think: "free-market" time)!
Lastly, when was the last time the author went to the store, milk in the grocery store also costs $4 for a half-gallon!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Farmertim on Aug 25, 2008 7:13 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The movement of consolidation and market share protection dwarfs the local/organic/sustainable movement even though one does not here much about it.
Our representatives here form them daily, and until we speak up to them as well they will think the industrialization of food for the sake of the common good is the only option.
Yes we can vote with our pocket books, but that option will soon pass with out even so much as a wimper.
I thank each and every consumer who purchases local and or sustainable..but it isn't enough, we all must be involved to stem the tide of reduced choices, and poorer health because of it.
Go to www.farmtoconsumer.org or www.westonaprice.org
Farmertim
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Amen Farmertim. Also, government that governs the LEAST governs the BEST.
Posted by: jwverez
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 25, 2008 9:33 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vasumurti on Aug 25, 2008 10:29 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To mass produce cow's milk on a large scale via factory farming, cows have to be kept continually pregnant, giving birth, and lactating. The cows are genetically bred to produce excess cow's milk for humans. Male cows (bulls) are useless to the dairy industry, so they become veal. By supporting the dairy industry, one indirectly supports cow killing.
One of the first books I read on the subject of vegetarianism while in college was A Vegetarian Sourcebook by Keith Akers (1983). Describing the environmental damage caused by raising animals for food: topsoil erosion, deforestization, loss of groundwater, etc. as well as the economic inefficiency and waste of energy and resources in raising animals for food in an age of exploding human population growth, Keith Akers foreshadowed John Robbins' Diet for a New America (1987), which was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize.
In A Vegetarian Sourcebook, Keith Akers writes:
"Using grasslands for livestock agriculture creates great environmental problems, which greatly limit its usefulness. Grazing systems require ten times more land than feedlot agriculture, in which animals are simply given feed grown on cropland. Grazing systems have to be extensive in order to avoid the catastrophic consequences of overgrazing--which renders a piece of land unsuitable for any purpose.
"Overgrazing and the consequent soil erosion are extremely serious problems worldwide. By the most conservative estimates, 60% of all U.S. rangelands are overgrazed, with billions of tons of soil lost each year. Overgrazing has also been the greatest cause of man-made deserts.
"Even if we grant grazing a role in a resource-efficient, ecologically stable agriculture, milk should be the end result, not beef. Milk provides over 50% of the protein and nearly four times the calories of beef, per unit of forage resources from grazing.
"'When only forage is available, then egg, broiler and pork production are eliminated and only milk, beef, and lamb production are viable systems,' state David and Marcia Pimentel, scientists and authors of Food, Energy and Society. 'Of these three, milk production is the most efficient.'
"An ecologically stable, resource-efficient system of grazing animals for human food could not be anything faintly resembling today's livestock agriculture. It would be a smaller, decentralized, less intensive system of animal husbandry devoted to milk production."
So it may be possible to have animal agriculture (devoted solely to milk production) on a small scale--like the Amish. But the rest of humanity, with an exploding population in the billions, will have to be vegan.
According to the editors of World Watch, July/August 2004: "The human appetite for animal flesh is a driving force behind virtually every major category of environmental damage now threatening the human future--deforestization, topsoil erosion, fresh water scarcity, air and water pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, social injustice, the destabilization of communities and the spread of disease."
Brother David Steindl-Rast, a Benedictine monk, similarly says: "...the survival of our planet depends on our sense of belonging--to all other humans, to dolphins caught in dragnets to pigs and chickens and calves raised in animal concentration camps, to redwoods and rainforests, to kelp beds in our oceans, and to the ozone layer."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» you forgot about ants!
Posted by: AdamG
Comments are closed-
Posted by: east bay on Aug 25, 2008 9:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm celebrating at home, cheers!
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dboy on Aug 25, 2008 1:00 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The COW is grass-fed, not the milk. They SAY "grass-fed milk" hoping that people will forget how wrong it is to be drinking the stuff. Cow milk is for baby cows, not for people. Would you drink a glass of monkey milk? No? Why not? Think about milk. Think about DRINKING it..you are drinking the juice from a hairy cow's titty. It's really disgusting when you think about it.
dboy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Milk
Posted by: Allstar Cookie
» RE: Milk
Posted by: svlaws
» agree with dboy and svlaws-milk is for baby cows.
Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: Milk
Posted by: Allstar Cookie
» People aren't cows...
Posted by: brunowe
» there are quite a few flaws in that logic
Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Milk
Posted by: sunnywater
» hairy cow!
Posted by: Iconoclast421
» totally disgusting.
Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: totally disgusting.
Posted by: Allstar Cookie
» RE: totally disgusting.
Posted by: Dboy
» there are easier ways to kill cows
Posted by: AdamG
» RE: totally disgusting.
Posted by: wal55
» I don't mean to nitpick but I will
Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Milk
Posted by: BobKincaid
» yum...cows tits.
Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Milk
Posted by: vasumurti
» RE: Milk
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rtdrury on Aug 25, 2008 2:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: heavy mineral content in water
Posted by: stellabloo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Last Chance on Aug 25, 2008 3:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Money talks, and some people plant.
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Money talks, and some people plant.
Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Money talks, and some people plant.
Posted by: AndyF
» RE: Money talks, and some people plant.
Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Money talks, and some people plant.
Posted by: mr. joshua
» Agri-business destroyed all the small farms thanks to both parties of BIG GOVERNMENT.
Posted by: jwverez
» RE: Agri-business destroyed all the small farms thanks to both parties of BIG GOVERNMENT.
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» Correction, most of them in the USA. Where do you live anyway?
Posted by: jwverez
» RE: Correction, most of them in the USA. Where do you live anyway?
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Correction, most of them in the USA. Where do you live anyway?
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nightowl on Aug 25, 2008 3:52 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Tap water vs bottled water
Posted by: zhine
» RE: Tap water vs bottled water
Posted by: BigElectricCat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 25, 2008 4:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RD
Ultimate Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 25, 2008 5:15 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 25, 2008 5:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that we need to stop supporting Agri-biz with subsidies and tax breaks. It started off as a good idea during the dust-bowl, but like too many other things it is something that needs to be cut out(think: "free-market" time)!
Lastly, when was the last time the author went to the store, milk in the grocery store also costs $4 for a half-gallon!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Farmertim on Aug 25, 2008 7:13 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The movement of consolidation and market share protection dwarfs the local/organic/sustainable movement even though one does not here much about it.
Our representatives here form them daily, and until we speak up to them as well they will think the industrialization of food for the sake of the common good is the only option.
Yes we can vote with our pocket books, but that option will soon pass with out even so much as a wimper.
I thank each and every consumer who purchases local and or sustainable..but it isn't enough, we all must be involved to stem the tide of reduced choices, and poorer health because of it.
Go to www.farmtoconsumer.org or www.westonaprice.org
Farmertim
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Amen Farmertim. Also, government that governs the LEAST governs the BEST.
Posted by: jwverez
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 25, 2008 9:33 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vasumurti on Aug 25, 2008 10:29 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To mass produce cow's milk on a large scale via factory farming, cows have to be kept continually pregnant, giving birth, and lactating. The cows are genetically bred to produce excess cow's milk for humans. Male cows (bulls) are useless to the dairy industry, so they become veal. By supporting the dairy industry, one indirectly supports cow killing.
One of the first books I read on the subject of vegetarianism while in college was A Vegetarian Sourcebook by Keith Akers (1983). Describing the environmental damage caused by raising animals for food: topsoil erosion, deforestization, loss of groundwater, etc. as well as the economic inefficiency and waste of energy and resources in raising animals for food in an age of exploding human population growth, Keith Akers foreshadowed John Robbins' Diet for a New America (1987), which was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize.
In A Vegetarian Sourcebook, Keith Akers writes:
"Using grasslands for livestock agriculture creates great environmental problems, which greatly limit its usefulness. Grazing systems require ten times more land than feedlot agriculture, in which animals are simply given feed grown on cropland. Grazing systems have to be extensive in order to avoid the catastrophic consequences of overgrazing--which renders a piece of land unsuitable for any purpose.
"Overgrazing and the consequent soil erosion are extremely serious problems worldwide. By the most conservative estimates, 60% of all U.S. rangelands are overgrazed, with billions of tons of soil lost each year. Overgrazing has also been the greatest cause of man-made deserts.
"Even if we grant grazing a role in a resource-efficient, ecologically stable agriculture, milk should be the end result, not beef. Milk provides over 50% of the protein and nearly four times the calories of beef, per unit of forage resources from grazing.
"'When only forage is available, then egg, broiler and pork production are eliminated and only milk, beef, and lamb production are viable systems,' state David and Marcia Pimentel, scientists and authors of Food, Energy and Society. 'Of these three, milk production is the most efficient.'
"An ecologically stable, resource-efficient system of grazing animals for human food could not be anything faintly resembling today's livestock agriculture. It would be a smaller, decentralized, less intensive system of animal husbandry devoted to milk production."
So it may be possible to have animal agriculture (devoted solely to milk production) on a small scale--like the Amish. But the rest of humanity, with an exploding population in the billions, will have to be vegan.
According to the editors of World Watch, July/August 2004: "The human appetite for animal flesh is a driving force behind virtually every major category of environmental damage now threatening the human future--deforestization, topsoil erosion, fresh water scarcity, air and water pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, social injustice, the destabilization of communities and the spread of disease."
Brother David Steindl-Rast, a Benedictine monk, similarly says: "...the survival of our planet depends on our sense of belonging--to all other humans, to dolphins caught in dragnets to pigs and chickens and calves raised in animal concentration camps, to redwoods and rainforests, to kelp beds in our oceans, and to the ozone layer."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» you forgot about ants!
Posted by: AdamG
Comments are closed-
Posted by: east bay on Aug 25, 2008 9:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm celebrating at home, cheers!
Posted by: Dboy
Water Heist: Corporations Are Targeting Cash-Strapped Cities for Control of Their Public Water
Is Schwarzenegger's Big Drought Over?
Is New York's Budget Deficit Leading it to Adopt Natural Gas Drilling Practices That Threaten Drinking Water?




