Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Water

Welcome to the Food Revolution

By Kerry Trueman, AlterNet. Posted August 25, 2008.


The Slow Food Nation gathering promises to be a Woodstock for food lovers and enviros concerned with our food system.
Advertisement

A swarm of 40,000 to 50,000 locavores will descend on San Francisco this Labor Day weekend to attend Slow Food Nation, a four-day extravaganza of teach-ins and tastings that's being billed as a kind of "Woodstock for gastronomes."

I'd rather go to a Woodstock for garden gnomes, myself -- at least those Lilliputian lawn ornaments share my fondness for front yard farming. Gastro gnomes, on the other hand, sound like elitist elves who are overly fond of artisanal cheeses and grass-fed beef. Do we really need a celebration of such highfalutin culinary novelties at a time when high fuel and food costs are making it harder for people to keep their pantries stocked with even the most basic staples?

Well, yes, we do, because we need to remember that the fresh, unadulterated, minimally processed, locally produced foods that Slow Food Nation is showcasing were our pantry staples, before the military-industrial complex annexed our food chain a half a century or so ago in the name of progress.

Our great-grandparents would be flabbergasted to learn that grass-fed milk in glass bottles bearing the local dairy farm's logo is now a rare luxury item available to only the affluent few who are willing to pay $4 for a half-gallon of milk.

Back in the day, our breads were fresh-baked and free of high fructose corn syrup, and our eggs and bacon came from chickens and hogs that rolled around in the dirt and saw the light of day. The word "farm" still evokes nostalgic pastoral images for most Americans, but there's nothing even remotely benign or bucolic about the fetid, brutal factory farms that supply us with most of our meat, poultry, eggs and dairy products today. And unmasking this unsavory reality is as much a part of Slow Food Nation's agrarian agenda as dishing out local delicacies.

So don't be distracted by the aroma of wood-fired focaccia wafting from the Fort Mason Center "Taste Pavilions"; Slow Food Nation has the potential to spark a crucial dialogue about where our food comes from, how it's grown, and why all that matters. With forums featuring the good food movement's marquee names, including Wendell Berry, Vandana Shiva, Michael Pollan, Marion Nestle and Eric Schlosser, this Alice Waters-sponsored shindig could be the watershed event that puts America's foodsheds on the map.

Don't know what a "foodshed" is? Don't worry, nobody else does, either -- the word is still so obscure it hasn't earned an entry on Wikipedia. It means, essentially, the area through which food travels to get from the farm to your plate. That would have been a pretty short trip a few generations ago, but in this era of globalization, our foodshed now encompasses the whole world, more or less.

This far-flung food chain has enslaved us with a false sense of abundance, turning the produce aisles of our supermarkets into a seasonless place where you can find berries and bell peppers all year round. But this apparent bounty diverts us from the fact that industrial agriculture has actually drastically reduced the diversity of the foods that our farmers grow.

As small and mid-size farms got swallowed up by the massive monoculture operations we now call "conventional," the varieties of fruits and vegetables grown on those farms got whittled down to just those few that shipped the best and had the longest shelf life. Breeders chose to focus on species of livestock and poultry that fatten up the fastest, such as big-breasted but bland Butterball turkeys so top-heavy they can't reproduce naturally and have to be artificially inseminated. For this we give thanks each November?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: slow food, slow food nation

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Milk
Posted by: Dboy on Aug 25, 2008 1:00 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
grass-fed milk in glass bottles

The COW is grass-fed, not the milk. They SAY "grass-fed milk" hoping that people will forget how wrong it is to be drinking the stuff. Cow milk is for baby cows, not for people. Would you drink a glass of monkey milk? No? Why not? Think about milk. Think about DRINKING it..you are drinking the juice from a hairy cow's titty. It's really disgusting when you think about it.

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Milk Posted by: Allstar Cookie
» RE: Milk Posted by: svlaws
» RE: Milk Posted by: Allstar Cookie
» People aren't cows... Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Milk Posted by: sunnywater
» hairy cow! Posted by: Iconoclast421
» totally disgusting. Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: totally disgusting. Posted by: Allstar Cookie
» RE: totally disgusting. Posted by: Dboy
» RE: totally disgusting. Posted by: wal55
» RE: Milk Posted by: BobKincaid
» yum...cows tits. Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Milk Posted by: vasumurti
» RE: Milk Posted by: Dboy
water
Posted by: rtdrury on Aug 25, 2008 2:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet another campaign for change with little to no explanation. In promoting tap water, Food and Water Watch has not addressed the heavy mineral content in tap water, nor has it addressed the additives (chlorine, flouride) in tap water, nor has it addressed the leached chemical contaminants in tap water. If these are really non-issues, can we have a clear statement with a convincing explanation? The independent approach for drinking water is either to collect/filter rainwater, or solar distillation which works for any water source. A solar still six ft square can distill up to 2 gallons of water per day for drinking/cooking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Money talks, and some people plant.
Posted by: Last Chance on Aug 25, 2008 3:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heard the big food corporations are buying up the little organic producers. If so, the organic label may soon mean nothing, unless you grow it yourself for your family and friends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Money talks, and some people plant. Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Tap water vs bottled water
Posted by: Nightowl on Aug 25, 2008 3:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't drink tap water, it makes me nauseated. I've tried the tap water in other areas, and have the same result. I wonder how many people have this problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tap water vs bottled water Posted by: BigElectricCat
Coolness
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 25, 2008 4:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More pie in the sky pipe dreams no doubt!

RD
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Until you stop supporting pols who will stop supporting Big Gubbmint subsidization of Big Agri/Corn,
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 25, 2008 5:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Slow Food will be framed as and painted as "elitist". Does anyone not remember how Ronnie Raygun followed by KILLton's support of NAFTA and phony "Freedom To Farm Act" bill messed up everything? Slow Food may look nice and European but we'd be better off cutting down on Big Gubbmint's subsidization of Big Agri and especially Big Corn first and foremost. And for God's sake, get rid of that phony "war on drugs" and let hemp compete with fossil fuels in the market.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not slow food, it's real food....
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 25, 2008 5:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having lived in Europe many years ago, I realized when I got back to the USA that Americans have no concept of what "real food" tastes like. I support local because I've found that it tastes better!

I think that we need to stop supporting Agri-biz with subsidies and tax breaks. It started off as a good idea during the dust-bowl, but like too many other things it is something that needs to be cut out(think: "free-market" time)!

Lastly, when was the last time the author went to the store, milk in the grocery store also costs $4 for a half-gallon!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just as Slow Food and others
Posted by: Farmertim on Aug 25, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
regain a foot hold on people perceptions of what food is...the trist between Government Agribusiness and the Food Saftey Industry is nearing completion of how, what and where you eat.
The movement of consolidation and market share protection dwarfs the local/organic/sustainable movement even though one does not here much about it.
Our representatives here form them daily, and until we speak up to them as well they will think the industrialization of food for the sake of the common good is the only option.
Yes we can vote with our pocket books, but that option will soon pass with out even so much as a wimper.
I thank each and every consumer who purchases local and or sustainable..but it isn't enough, we all must be involved to stem the tide of reduced choices, and poorer health because of it.
Go to www.farmtoconsumer.org or www.westonaprice.org
Farmertim

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TURNING BACK THE CLOCK
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 25, 2008 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK we can't do that. But it's in our best interest to pay close attention to the food we buy. The high fructose corn syrup alone I is a major problem. Suddenly everyone is fat and diabetic? We can't all grow our own food but we sure can do the slow food thing by reading labels. The prepared foods are the worst. Meals need not be elaborate just tasty and easy to prepare. It's also cheaper. Old habits die hard but we're eating alot of the wrong stuff quite by accident. Well it's profitable for the corporations. Does the CEO of Burger King really eath that stuff. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

using grasslands for livestock agriculture creates great environmental problems
Posted by: vasumurti on Aug 25, 2008 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regarding veganism vs. vegetarianism, man is the only species that drinks the milk of another species. All other species drink the milk of the mothers of their own species until they are weaned. Cow's milk is the perfect food--IF you're a baby calf!

To mass produce cow's milk on a large scale via factory farming, cows have to be kept continually pregnant, giving birth, and lactating. The cows are genetically bred to produce excess cow's milk for humans. Male cows (bulls) are useless to the dairy industry, so they become veal. By supporting the dairy industry, one indirectly supports cow killing.

One of the first books I read on the subject of vegetarianism while in college was A Vegetarian Sourcebook by Keith Akers (1983). Describing the environmental damage caused by raising animals for food: topsoil erosion, deforestization, loss of groundwater, etc. as well as the economic inefficiency and waste of energy and resources in raising animals for food in an age of exploding human population growth, Keith Akers foreshadowed John Robbins' Diet for a New America (1987), which was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize.

In A Vegetarian Sourcebook, Keith Akers writes:

"Using grasslands for livestock agriculture creates great environmental problems, which greatly limit its usefulness. Grazing systems require ten times more land than feedlot agriculture, in which animals are simply given feed grown on cropland. Grazing systems have to be extensive in order to avoid the catastrophic consequences of overgrazing--which renders a piece of land unsuitable for any purpose.

"Overgrazing and the consequent soil erosion are extremely serious problems worldwide. By the most conservative estimates, 60% of all U.S. rangelands are overgrazed, with billions of tons of soil lost each year. Overgrazing has also been the greatest cause of man-made deserts.

"Even if we grant grazing a role in a resource-efficient, ecologically stable agriculture, milk should be the end result, not beef. Milk provides over 50% of the protein and nearly four times the calories of beef, per unit of forage resources from grazing.

"'When only forage is available, then egg, broiler and pork production are eliminated and only milk, beef, and lamb production are viable systems,' state David and Marcia Pimentel, scientists and authors of Food, Energy and Society. 'Of these three, milk production is the most efficient.'

"An ecologically stable, resource-efficient system of grazing animals for human food could not be anything faintly resembling today's livestock agriculture. It would be a smaller, decentralized, less intensive system of animal husbandry devoted to milk production."

So it may be possible to have animal agriculture (devoted solely to milk production) on a small scale--like the Amish. But the rest of humanity, with an exploding population in the billions, will have to be vegan.

According to the editors of World Watch, July/August 2004: "The human appetite for animal flesh is a driving force behind virtually every major category of environmental damage now threatening the human future--deforestization, topsoil erosion, fresh water scarcity, air and water pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, social injustice, the destabilization of communities and the spread of disease."

Brother David Steindl-Rast, a Benedictine monk, similarly says: "...the survival of our planet depends on our sense of belonging--to all other humans, to dolphins caught in dragnets to pigs and chickens and calves raised in animal concentration camps, to redwoods and rainforests, to kelp beds in our oceans, and to the ozone layer."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» you forgot about ants! Posted by: AdamG
I'm celebrating at home, cheers!
Posted by: east bay on Aug 25, 2008 9:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish I was going. I am into the whole slow food movement. I Make my own ice cream, pizza, and even grind my own beef. I Never eat fast food and am a big fan of Alice Waters. But alas buying all the best food stuffs around the Bay Area, leaves me with little disposable income to attend. Thought I'd at least go see Phil Lesh and Friends on Sunday, but at $69., I'll take a pass. I'll be at the Berkeley farmer's market, maybe it won't be as crowded as usual.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]