Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Water

The Must-Drill Mentality Is Threatening NYC's Water

By David Sassoon, Huffington Post. Posted August 13, 2008.


Trapped within the rocks of New York's famed watershed is a trillion dollars worth of natural gas.
Advertisement

More than half the residents of New York State -- those who live in the Big Apple -- rely on a fabled watershed for their supply of pure, fresh water. Dotted with reservoirs, the watershed is so well protected that none of the water needs to be filtered -- it just cascades through aqueducts, gigantic underground tunnels, a network of mains and pipes and out of the faucets of the nine million residents in the city. That water supply is now in danger of contamination.

It turns out that a big chunk of something called the Marcellus Shale formation sits underneath the 2000 square mile watershed, and trapped inside the formation is a trillion dollars worth of natural gas. Farmers who used to lease the mineral rights to their land for a dollar an acre saw the price rise to $200 an acre, and then over the last year to $2500 an acre. With permits in hand from the state, energy companies are drilling the first wells in New York.

Thank goodness New York City Councilman James F. Gennaro is raising a ruckus with help from Riverkeeper and the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The bad news is that only four reporters showed up to a press conference they held recently. The good news is that one of them was Peter Applebome of the New York Times. His latest story on "the biggest environmental issue almost no one in New York is paying attention to" ran in the Sunday metro section.

It's unclear why editors aren't running the story on the front page. It's national news. The Marcellus formation is not the only fossil fuel deposit being eyed for massive exploitation in these times of soaring fuel prices. And the forces at work and the dire consequences which await if the rush to an endless fossil future isn't stopped can already be witnessed all over the American West.

That's why landowners from Wyoming and Colorado are touring the Catskills, warning landowners there what will come quickly on the heels of fat royalty checks. Here's how Applebome described what they had to say to New Yorkers:

They said those royalty checks came at a huge cost: polluted air and water, industrial noise, well blowouts, toxic chemicals leaching into groundwater and wells and a fracturing of communities. Of paramount importance, many said, would be protecting the New York City watershed, an issue that could touch off regulatory and environmental disputes.

And here's Jill Morrison of the Powder River Basin Resource Council of Sheridan, Wyo., in her own words:

There are problems and challenges that people haven't even conceived of. And I can tell you that those of us who have gone through it know it has consumed the last 10 or 15 years of people's lives. I can't express enough the profound impacts this will have on people's lives, on land, water, air, wildlife. You need to do an enormous amount of planning to get out in front of it, because this is the richest industry in the world, and they're going to come whether you want them or not.

So why is it that the only one raising a ruckus is a City Councilman from Queens? He's calling for a moratorium on drilling, and is asking the US EPA if pollution from gas drilling would require the city to start filtering its water for the first time in history. A filtration plant would cost taxpayers a mere $10 or $12 billion. Upstate communities are desperate for new economic activity, and right under their feet is a tempting answer to their economic prayers. But Applebome describes the trade-off this way:

Sophisticated new wells using hydraulic fracturing use a million gallons of chemically treated water to break up subterranean shale and release the gas inside. Over the next two decades, there could be thousands of wells upstate.

As for Gennaro, he's making noise on an issue that has only been a topic of low-profile, back-room talk.

This is an activity that is completely and utterly inconsistent with a drinking water supply. This cannot happen. This would destroy the New York City watershed, and for what? For short-term gains on natural gas?

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: energy, water, natural gas, nyc, drilling, watershed

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I Knew it was too good to last...
Posted by: Jayzer on Aug 14, 2008 2:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, I knew that it was too good to last---sorta. Living here in NYC, we do have some of the best water of any large city in the country. But I figured that it was only a matter of time before some wowzer would figure out a way (or even several ways) to fuck things up. After all, our air is actually pretty polluted and the infrastructure of pretty much everything that supports life tends to break down on a pretty regular basis. Here, we lurch from crisis to crisis, but the one thing we could usually depend on was a good water supply---not that kept people from buying bottled water. I mean, water from Fiji, fer chrissakes?

Much as I also love the State of Maine, buying Poland Spring water also seems ludicrous, although I've done it myself, but mainly to get the bottle which I refill with tap water after I've drained the purchased water. (Note to self: drag your lazy ass into an Army/Navy surplus store and buy a friggin' canteen!) But people in NYC (myself included) abound in contradictions.

While I can concede some necessity for exploring natural gas (after all, I do use it to cook---and I have no other options in my apartment), I don't really think it's worth sacrificing our watersheds.

What really concerns me about how this will develop in that I foresee a PR campaign in which people from Upstate will be pitted against people in NYC in terms of economic interests (employment possibilities and high energy costs vs. clean drinking water and possible high filtering costs) and environmental concerns.

Clean drinking water in NYC used to seem to be a birthright, but now it just seems too good to last.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Buying GI canteen has problems. Posted by: 8 nontheist