Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Water

Why Floods Are Getting Worse

By Richard Mertens , Christian Science Monitor. Posted June 25, 2008.


Climate change has recently cast a new and disturbing uncertainty over flood-management questions.
Advertisement

Up and down the flood-ravaged river valleys of the upper Midwest, high water has inflicted billions of dollars of damage to homes, businesses, and crops. It has displaced tens of thousands of families and brought immeasurable suffering. It has also brought a new concern for the region's river towns and cities: Flooding in the Midwest seems to be getting worse.

Researchers and other observers say such episodes are likely to worsen as efforts to protect vulnerable communities are outpaced by factors that increase the risk of flooding, including the ongoing practice of building on river flood plains.

"We're probably more at risk than we've ever been," says Larry Larson, executive director of the Association of State Floodplain Managers, based in Madison, Wis.

Most cities and towns in the Midwest lie along rivers and streams. Hydrologists and planners say that the cumulative effects of decades of land-use choices have gradually increased the likelihood of flooding. Throughout Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana, for example, much farmland is drained by buried tiles that carry rainwater quickly away from the fields into streams and rivers. Population growth, bringing new highways and subdivisions, increases runoff. And communities keep building on flood plains, which not only puts new development at risk but also reduces the amount of flood plain available to absorb floodwater.

In many communities, levees protect low-lying neighborhoods and farmland. "America has had a love affair with levees since the 1800s," says Marceto Garcia, professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana. But levees cause new problems by confining rivers and increasing flooding in other stretches.

"The water has to go somewhere," says Douglas Johnston, chairman of the community and regional planning department at Iowa State University in Ames. "It will go higher and faster downstream. Any defensive measure taken upstream will only heighten the problem downstream."

Levees also leave some people with a false sense of security. In some cases, experts say, homeowners don't know that their houses are at risk of flooding.

Experts also fault poor local planning. They say that economic and political pressures in many cases cause communities to slight flood-plain management for fear of hurting economic growth. In addition, they say, communities typically plan for present conditions without taking into account future growth and developments upstream that may create worse flooding -- and worse damage -- in the future.

"We have as a nation spent increasing amounts of money on preventing floods, and yet the cost of flooding continues to rise dramatically," says Andrew Fahlund, vice president for conservation at American Rivers, an environmental advocacy group based in Washington. "Clearly we're not doing something right. Certain kinds of flooding are going to be pretty much unavoidable. When water levels get to a certain point it's pretty difficult to prevent damage. Our hearts go out to people who have been impacted by all this. The fact is that we have reduced the capacity our rivers have to absorb these floods significantly."

Climate change has recently cast a new and disturbing uncertainty over flood-management questions by suggesting that history may be an unreliable guide to the future. Kenneth Potter, a civil and environmental engineer at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, says many scientists agree that climate change is likely to increase the occurrence and severity of storms as well as droughts, and thus increase the likelihood of flooding.

"The question is, are you going to face that once a century or once every 10 years?" he asks.

Ten months ago, Gays Mills, Wis., suffered what was then the biggest flood in memory. Then, a week and a half ago, monsoon-like rains lashed the region, and an even worse flood washed through town.

Now, as the mud dries and local businesses like Mickelson's grocery store reopen, residents are feeling vulnerable.

"After last year, we all kind of relaxed," says village president Larry McCarn. "We all figured it would be a while before it happened again. Now people are saying it could happen next week."

After the last major Midwest flood in 1993, some lessons were learned, experts say. In Iowa, Johnston said, some communities raised their levees, which helped them survive this year's flood.

Other lessons went unheeded. The Clinton administration commissioned a major study of the flooding that, among other things, recommended an overhaul of flood management and closer coordination of state, local, and national efforts. "In terms of national policy since 1993, there has not been significant change," says Mr. Larson.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: water, midwest, levees, floods

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why: the forgotten W
Posted by: Bottle Rocket on Jun 25, 2008 3:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've read about a million flood stories in the news this year, but rarely do they hint at why flooding problems appear to be getting worse. It's great to see articles get at the one W that is most often missed by journalists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only arrogant fools bet against a proven prophet...
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Jun 25, 2008 4:02 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now you can better understand the events of the last several years. The Vatican and Bush admin have been actively fighting against the Messiah (and all others who speak truth to power). Their efforts to stifle and then to kill me have failed and now they know their end is nigh !!!

The following symbolic narrative (prophecy) was included at the end of the Cease and Desist order that I posted worldwide in April-May of 2006. Here's more stunning proof that scoffing in the face of profundity is great folly.

As Tempests Rage Before Balances False...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Relocation offers opportunities for sustainable development
Posted by: adlucem on Jun 25, 2008 9:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in southwest Wisconsin, near some of the areas that were flooded. It might be pertinent to note the case of Soldiers Grove, Wisconsin, a village just upstream from Gays Mills, the repeatedly flooded town mentioned in the article. The two communities are roughly equal in size and just a few miles apart on the same river, but Soldiers Grove escaped most damage during the recent floods because of a relocation project in the 1970s and 80s.

Prior to its relocation, Soldiers Grove was often flooded with the same severity that Gays Mills has faced recently. After a flood in the 1970s, however, Soldiers Grove elected to move its vulnerable business district from the floodplain to higher ground. What makes this really interesting is that, since the relocation began during the 1979 energy crisis, Soldiers Grove also mandated that as the businesses were rebuilt, they had to make use of solar energy to supply at least half of their heating needs. As a result, Soldiers Grove today is (relatively) free from disastrous floods, and its businesses have been saving money on energy costs in addition to maintaining the local environment.

Wikipedia has a brief summary of the Soldiers Grove relocation at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soldiers_Grove%2C_Wisconsin

With energy prices soaring again and "green" becoming a buzzword, it would be interesting to see other communities around the nation affected by disaster focus on sustainable development and renewable energy during the rebuilding process.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Read This
Posted by: mindtrvlr on Jun 26, 2008 10:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.haarp.net/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]