Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

Conservative Government Destroys Atlanta Like Gen. Sherman Never Could

By Rick Perlstein, Blog for Our Future. Posted June 23, 2008.


The colossal mismanagement of water in Georgia has produced an urban crisis with no clear solution other than a return to smart government.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg


Most our media have been far too busy following the news of what kind of fist bumps terrorists favor, and Luke Russert's exceptional poise under pressure, to notice -- well, much of anything. Least of all, the Biblically proportioned drought in one of our nation's fastest growing regions, which is only getting worse, and more civilizationally consequential, by the day.


Atlanta magazine could no longer ignore it. The cover of their "The Water Issue," which I picked up on a recent swing thorugh Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, is graced by a water glass that's one-quarter full -- scratch that, three-quarters empty. The entire magazine is a fascinating document, a potsherd for future archeologists seeking answers to the kind of neuroses that allowed a civilization let itself be run according to an ideology -- conservatism -- so singularly unfit to govern a complex, modern society. Amidst all the schmancy department store and Cartier watch ads, the columns on "Scent marketing" ("among Advertising Age's top ten trends to watch in 2007") and enticements to purchase property at marquee destinations like The Inn At Palmetto Bluff ("50 beautifully appointed waterfront cottages, full-service spa, inspired Lowcountry, cuisine, exlusive Jack Nicklaus Signature golf course...") -- the landscaping ad featuring the gushing backyard waterfall alongside the furnished stone gazebo was an especially decadent touch, directly across fro a full page ad for "Brookhaven Retreat, treating both addiction and mental health challenges" -- these 176 pages document a narcissistic metropolis on the verge of a nervous breakdown, but not quite able to admit it.



In a letter to subscribers, the editor describes what it was like growing up in the Third World, as a child of missionaries: "In one of the places we stayed, water was piped in only one hour a day -- we had to run around with buckets and pots to catch every drop. in another, water that collected in rooftop tanks would turn scalding int he midday tropical heat. No matter where we traveled, flush toilets were a rarity." That's what she's been thinking of, walking into all the Atlanta bathrooms with "empty buckets near the tub": Atlantans, you see, have begun flushing their toilets with recycled bath water.


The fashion shoot, lithesome models swaddled in this summer's "bright colors and bold lines," is apocalyptically staged in an empty swimming pool. Equally apocalyptic is the comic-book style feature about Atlanta ca. 2050 as a civilization straight out of Soylent Green ("Inevitably, water thieves find a way to get around the system, but penalties are draconian. The water corps has the legal authority to SHOOT TO KILL"). The accompanying features on what happened and why are exemplary -- save for the absence of one concept Atlanta (which on page 26 endorses, tongue only half in cheek, libertarian presidential candidate Bob Barr) can't quite bring itself to utter: conservatism.


One phrase they do manage to use: states rights. Portentously, in 1990, Governor Hunt of Alabama, joined by the governor of Florida, sued Georgia, "with its endless development" and "unquenchable thirst for water," to keep the Army Corps of Engineer from sharing "their" water resources. All told over the entire United States, the Army Corps of Engineers built and runs 464 lakes in 43 states, one of them Atlatna's life-giving Lake Lanier; but the notion of the federal government actually coordinating all these resources for the common good would just be too, too un-American to contemplate. Instead, this civil war has ratcheted up to Israel-Palestine levels. "In March, U.S. Interior Secretary Dirk Kepthorne finally put the bickering governors in a collective time-out after they missed a deadline to come up with a tri-state agreement." There hasn't been any agreement yet. Southerners are a prideful pack, after all, loath to take dictation from pointy-headed bureaucrats in Washington.



States rights: that fetish of generations of Southern politicians desperate for a rhetorically innocent way to institutionalize their rage at federal demands for equal racial justice. It has come back now to bite Dixie rather soundly in the ass. Actually, the ideology is more pathological than mere states rights: the zero-sum war of all against all has descended to the level of the localities, with Augusta's blessing. "To Perdue, water is a local issue. 'The state can be there to help...but we should not be in the business of directing and instructing communities on how to do their business," [press secretary Bert] Brantley says.... Last year, Alabama went to court to stop the city of Canton and the Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority's (CCMWA) construction of the Hickory Log Creek Reservoir in Cherokee County -- four weeks shy of the dam's projected completion." One of the package's articles narrates the Hatfield-and-McCoy-like feud between the counties of Douglas and Cobb, when an administrator in the former had the forsight to plan for a possible drought, building a new reservoir, banning outdoor watering -- only to see the Cobb connive in the state legislature, like Daniel Day Lewis in There Will Be Blood, to siphon off Douglas's suddenly flush water resources.



Missed opportunity after missed opportunity are adumbrated therein. Yet the magazine blames not ideology but "bureaucracy." That's all right for our purposes, because the ideology hides in plain sight. Atlanta boomed in the wake of the monster capital investments made in anticipation of the 1996 Olympics, the magazine reports; "In 1990, the Atlanta area was projected to draw 800,000 new residents over the next twenty years; in the ten years following the Olympics, the total population increased by almost 1.4 million.... But in that same ten-year period, the reservoirs that supply our most vital resource grew not a bit."



Nobody could have anticipated the breach in the infrastructure: "In 1969, a study by the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission...determined that significant infrastructure changes would be required to avoid critical water shortages when the metro area's population soared to between 3 million (reached in 1993) an 5 million (2006). In the 1980s, water planners mapped out a proposed network of reservoirs throughout North Georgia to shore up water for inevitable droughts. Yet the reservoirs never got off paper. By the nineties, the projects were not only deemed to costly to pursue once rainfall returned in abundance, but they also threatened to further antagonize Alabama and Florida in the tri-state water dispute." What did the Atlanta metropolitan area do instead? Issue building permits -- 48,262 in 1996; 68,240 in 2006. That's the free-market way. The conservative way.


"The drought of 2002 was another wake up call, and then-Govenror Roy Barnes said 2003 would be the 'Year of Water.' Would his plan to build reservoirs and aid municipalities in fixing leaks have worked? No one knows. That year's gubernatorial election came down to Confederate stripes on the state flag."


Like I said, the magazine tells this story well, as far as it goe; but again, what Atlanta magazine can't bring itself to probe is the reason for the season -- the ideology that made it all possible, even inevitable. [Why no planning? Why no commitment of resources? Why did politics in Georgia at the most crucial possible juncture come down to the images on a flag? "Eighteen years, fourteen governors, and endless posturing and finger-pointing" brought on his "tri-state water war," we learn; what we don't learn is that Roy Barnes, the guy who actually stuck his neck out to solve the problem, was a Democrat, and the man who replaced him was the Confederate Flag-baiting Republican; and that besides Barnes, eight of these eleven governors were Republicans; and that the remaining three Democrats were either conservatives or hobbled in whatever enlightened reforms they might have proposed by conservative and/or Republican legislatures. That when Roy Barnes was governor, 61 of Georgia's state legislators, about a quarter -- Georgian readers, help me out: is that enough to stymie a tax reform in your state? -- signed Grover Norquist's pledge never, ever to support a tax increase, no matter what civilizational collapse might befall the Peachtree State as a consequence (the numbers are now 34 percent of Georgian senators and 30 percent of Georgian house members). And that, by the time the Olympics might have inspired them to reasonably call on the nation's collective coffers to shore up their infrastructure the House was being run by Cobb County's own anti-public investment zealot, Plank Seven of whose "Contract With America" demanded a three-fifths congressional majority to pass any tax increase, and "A balanced budget/tax limitation amendment and a legislative line-item veto to restore fiscal responsibility to an out-of-control congress." Who promptly shut down the federal government when he didn't get his budgetary way. Newt Gingrich used to love to talk about saving "civilization." Well, Newt: thanks to you and your boys, in Atlanta, we are beginning to see how civilizations begin to die.



Can you imagine having to go back in time to 1969 -- the year before the Nixon Administration bid for permanent conservative allegiance from Georgia by sending Vice President Agnew to dedicate a Confederate Memorial (the Atlanta Constitution was insulted when Kent State kept President Nixon himself from keeping the appointment -- and trying to explain to the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission's planners that their Confederacy-addled conservative state elites would prove so feckless as to utterly ignore their urgent, wise counsel? To do, simply, nothing but nothing?


Nobody could have anticipated the breach in the infrastructure


Metaphors of babies and bath water, bathtubs not even full enough to drown a government in (we have to save the water to make the toilets work), a dynamic regional economy spiraling down a drain proliferate at my fingertips, all too cheaply. They'll keep proliferating, in Atlanta and everywhere, until we defeat conservatism, and economic individualism, and "free market" madness," as "governing" philosophies.



Atlanta magazine can't make itself understand this; such are the powers that be, the broken right-wing culture within which it aspires to civic leadership, and in which it is, ultimately, complicit. The package's tone will be familiar to any student of the city's history. It is the cry of the "enlightened" business-boosterism class against the bubbas at the State Capitol in Augusta who cramp downtown's mojo with their silly wingnut ways: "Last fall, Sonny Perdue prayed publicly for rain. In February, he gave the okay for area pools to open -- an interesting and perhaps foolhardy decision given that Lake Lanier at the time was only two feet above its lowest level ever and adequate summer rainfall is unlikely." Perforce, the editors can't quite bring themselves to implicate the region's ür-Booster Business, Coca-Cola: did you know that the bottled water branded by Coke as "Dasani" ("Purified water enhanded with minerals for a pure, fresh taste") is actually pumped from Atlanta's municipal water supply (and is chemically indistinguishable from it); that Coke's flagship plant's monthly water bill from the city is only $27,000; but that, not to fearthe plant is working stalwartly to cut its water consumption by ten percent, and doesn't use as much water as the nearby chicken-processing plants, and has pledged to "replace every drop of water used in its beverages and their production"?



Apparently they're only replacing it in America. To its credit, Atlanta magazine points out the moral evasions in such claims: the "offsetting" is happening "in places such as India, where in the last few years more than fifty communities have complained of water shortages due to nearby Dasani bottling." In the end Atlanta magazine is far too busy to hate Coca-Cola Inc. The market made them do it: "In a way, though, we may all be to blame for how much of our water Coca-Cola is bottling and selling right back to us. It's a simple matter of supply and demand. Look around -- at the food court, at the ALTA match, at the Dogwood Festival, even here in Atlanta magazine's vending machines. It's perhaps pointless to build a case for Coca-Cola rethinking its Dasani production in a time of drought when we're the ones swallowing, literally, the idea that we can't live without the bottle."


And for all their mockery of crazy old Governor Perdue and his misplaced affection for swimming pools, they do coo sympathetically of his new allowance for the hand-watering of lawns "to alleviate the $2 billion-plus [sic!] hit the local landscaping industry took last year because of the draught."


Those poor, poor landscapers. But no worries: another feature in the package, "Ripple Effect," reminds Atlantans that there's money to be made in them thar empty reservoirs; "In the economics of water, some win and some lose." The landscape and timber businesses gets downward arrows, but things are looking up, no joke, for "rain barrel merchants," "rain recyclers," "roofers, "arborists," "car warshers" (at-home car washing has been banned), "stump grinders" and, yes, "golfers": "When a golf ball lands on hard, dry ground, you can get an extra thirty to forty yards off the tee with the bounce. Sweet!"

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, conservatism, georgia, atlanta

Rick Perlstein is the author of "Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fall of the American Consensus" (Scribner, 2008). Read more at Rick Perlstein's site.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Where Is The Editor?
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jun 23, 2008 12:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Spelling and fact-checking, please.
The seat of power in Georgia is ATLANTA- not Augusta. Atlanta has been the seat of government for a long time (1868).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where Is The Editor? Posted by: troutfan
Well-done
Posted by: Urstrly on Jun 23, 2008 3:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure most Georgians would be shocked, SHOCKED to hear that this has anything to do with ideology. Corporatism has joined hands with racism to create perfect stranglehold on Georgia. When Bob Barr, the adulterer who started the Clinton impeachment while serving as a Republican in Congress, becomes a symbol for resistance to all this, you know they can't be serious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Burn Atlanta to the ground and start over.
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Jun 23, 2008 4:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If its already worse than what Sherman did then it is the only real solution left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Atlanta's water woes
Posted by: raine1 on Jun 23, 2008 5:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Misuse of land and water resources is not a Southern issue brought about by "states rights" advocates. It is almost entirely a Federal issue wrought by bureaucrats who vehemently deny communities the ability to limit growth by developers under the guise of interfering with interstate commerce. As an old city planner from way back when and a biologist of forty plus years, I can tell you that there have been long, hard looks at the need to LIMIT growth to sustainable levels for decades. We planners have been thwarted at every turn by the federal government whose members have made laws that WILL NOT ALLOW cities to limit construction other than through huge hits on developers to provide their own roads or sewer pipes..called "impact fees." Sure there are "enviromental impact studies," but I by gosh guarantee that the all mighty buck gets past many of them through the legislative branch due to bankand developer lobbying. NOLA is a grand expample of such things. Building in marshes and watersheds, vastly reducing the natural system of water storage and storm protection is but one example of such frippery. The continued draining of shallow aquifers for dubious high water need crops of cotton and corn in the texas panhandle (high plains desert)is yet another gross misuse of resources, coupled with a housing/commercial boom a few years ago, leaving perhaps a ten year water supply to cities like Amarillo (catching the eye of developer and oil tycoon T Booone Pickens, who was trying mightily to buy up water rights wherever he could to supply to places like San Antonio later from thin resources in the north)...all problems easily solved by limiting populations and industrial growth. PLANNING and ZONING are NOT BAD IDEAS when they promote conservation and proper land/resource use. Getting the Feds to recognoze this in more than a cursory way would go a long way toward NOT having water issues like Atlanta's, Denver's, or any other large city so overblown it can't take care of its own needs with its own local resources. Take note, the more resource use from somebody else's back yard, the more expensive those resources become, tying up funds that could be better used for enhancement of living conditions...or better, left in the pockets of community residents to use as THEY need.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Atlanta's water woes Posted by: wonkywriter
unhelpful invective here
Posted by: Drclaw on Jun 23, 2008 5:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Live in ATl for about 12 years now. This is a rather poorly thought out article (screed, really) on a complicated issue. Look-I am no fan of the GA government (never voted for a winner in the legislature or capital), but ideology is only part of the problem. Corrupt local governments permitting sprawl, poor landuse policies, out and out incompetance at all levels (Atl sewer systems have been inviolation of clean water act for years, and are only now being rectified) all have contributed to this problem. Why is this important? We could have had a ideologically more begnign government and the above problems would still have helped to create the current crisis. If we don't understand the underlying causes, we won't find a good solution and this simplisitic take is not an accurate diagnosis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Incisive Commentary - Not
Posted by: redbird30328 on Jun 23, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the author picks up a magazine while walking through the Atlanta airport and is now an expert on a decades-old complex policy issue?? No doubt he spent the previous night at a Holiday Inn Express. This article is not about water policy vis-a-vis development; otherwise, there would have been discussion about Los Angeles, Phoenix, Las Vegas, etc. - cities all facing the same problems. This article is nothing more than South slamming. Anyone who more than once identifies the state capitol as Augusta has no credibility. The government of Atlanta is famously liberal and let the city's water infrastructure lapse into utter disrepair. The tremendous growth in Atlanta and other southeastern cities is driven by migration from the northeast and upper midwest - people fleeing all of the problems that the author would dictate upon the region's residents. There are good reasons why the South does not want to be like the rest of the country. In a seemingly endless series of idiotic AlterNet articles, this one now tops the list.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kind of fun but not helpful
Posted by: Gregory Kruse on Jun 23, 2008 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I bring up Phil Gramm to my brother, he says, "What about Chris Dodd?". As if they were comparable. Articles like this one (aside from the annoying typo's) are so over the top that "conservatives" have no trouble laughing it off. The water crisis in the Southeast and other crises to come in other places are not really political but natural. They take us one step deeper into the well of our true nature. We will kill each other for water, or food, or even gasoline. The question for liberals will change from "How can we best provide for the general welfare", to "How can we avoid becoming ever more savage?". The conservatives are much more comfortable with savagery and have the advantage in any crisis. Liberals are simply a product of prosperity and plenty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dictatorship
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Jun 23, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yep. Welcome to the new Regime and the Bush Dictatorship.

JT
http://www.ULtimate-Anonymity.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ideology does count though
Posted by: JohnJlws on Jun 23, 2008 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are some obvious problems with this article (spelling, spatial arguments, inaccurate facts, apparently limited research), but there is merit as well. Ideology plays an important role in the predicaments we find ourselves entangled in. I’m not sure “conservative” is the right term; “corporative” would seem what conservative has become—“look at the profits the private sector makes as they’re so successful at things, so let the private sector handle everything” has become their rallying cry.

Problem is the private sector sees as much bust as it does boom and without government support many industries wouldn’t be “so successful.” What the conservatives have done is discovered the magic of language. “Tax” has become a four-letter word. In my town, which is in a conservative area, we have codes that allow only a minimal tax increase each year. This is great except when you need revenue. The conservatives have been so good at defining tax as a four letter word that now our city is screwed.

We’ve cut city departments to the bone, so the much touted “waste in government” is out of the equation. Roads, schools, basic services are all in need of capital. The conservative answer however is not to increase revenues by raising taxes. The conservative answer is to privatize.

An example. We, too, have water woes. Years ago we decided to build a lake (need water? Build a lake—good thought process so far). We found a site 45 miles out of town and started digging. Oops, forgot to get mineral rights from the landowners. Then, the problem of pumping water uphill (yes uphill) 45 miles became an issue. The pipeline, overseen by the mega-wealthy land developer who owns much of the property with the nice, big luxury homes surrounding the new lake (how did he buy that land around the lake when the rest of us never even heard of the lake), will run tens of millions and rights to the property it will cross will have to be negotiated as this wasn’t done before the lake was filled (expensive!).

The lake’s water supply will feed the City’s current needs for 3 days.

The preceding is a conservative, “we’ve solved the problem by private industry partnering with government,” solution. The key aspect of this deal is a bunch, and I mean a bunch, of conservatives, who already had a ton of money, have made a ton more money, so all is good.

See, “taxes” in conservative language are a redistribution of wealth: taking from those who “through their sweat earned it,” the rich, and “giving to the lazy sons-a-bitches on welfare” (mostly single moms). Unlike privatization, which is reverse redistribution of wealth: taking from those less fortunate and giving to the more fortunate. Think about it: mega-farms with mega-farm supports; war; CHIP (health insurance coverage for children which is a boom to private insurance companies); energy industries (oil); corporate foundations (which are generally paid for by our taxes) all are just this sort of redistributions of wealth

But this plan is okay, so long as Robin Hood drives a Lexus and the folks he steals from can’t afford gas for their ‘78 VW and the people Hood gives to make decisions like “should I wear the Cartier or the Rolex?”

There’s a difference how ideologies govern and I haven’t any idea what has caused Atlanta’s water problems, but I bet the ideology driving how decisions were made played a role.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ideology does count though Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Ideology does count though Posted by: BigRedTarget
» RE: Ideology does count though Posted by: Cybershaman
They flushed another one down the toilet
Posted by: warble on Jun 23, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republicans have totally destroyed America and Atlanta is the least of the problems we face. Being a republican state, the conservative brotherhood of the KKK still rules to everyone's ruin and the basic rule started by Reagan was that good government was no government telling Georgia what to do. In other words, State's Rights rules the day. They got what they asked for now the people need to shut up and flush them all down the drain.

The rule of law and the fabric of laws that were developed from Roosevelt on down have all been ignored because Republicans are basically criminals in Business suits who want to take advantage of the people and hate it when government fines them for any little infraction. When that happens, they cry communism. But, ignoring the public; that is capitalism.

As we see the infrastructure collapse all around us, we can only say, thank you Republicans. Thank you for your lies; Thank you for your genuine attempts to mislead; thank you for the dissimilation of information; thank you for the Radio that tells us how wonderful you are and how rotten your opponents are; and thank you Media for keeping us all ignorant. They couldn't have done it without you. And, I forgot, thank you politicians for your greed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Selling away futures on the public trust
Posted by: PaulK on Jun 23, 2008 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Water futures were sold many years ago, when populations were small and often when water flows were high. Water was cheap then. Also, the water rights were typically sold as if every lake or river had a fixed amount of water.

Now some farmers have huge amounts of water to waste because their grandfathers bought the rights when cities didn't existand water flow was high, and some city dwellers have little or no water some years. The financial discrepancies will only get worse. This isn't fair. Water is part of the public trust, and it belongs to all of us.

We need fundamental water rights reform in this country based on need, when the water is low or when extended droughts hit. State lines also should be no excuse for depriving the needy to pay off the few.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ivan Allen - The Last Good Mayor of Atlanta
Posted by: Sons on Jun 23, 2008 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ivan Allen was the last good, sane, progressive (yet helpful to business) mayor of Atlanta in the late 60's

Allen was a sensible man, driven by logic and love for Georgia and Atlanta which became a jewel under him.

But other forces took over. The fast buck developers won out, aided and abetted by conservative politics.

The people of Atlanta and Georgia need to clearly understand how they got to the miserable place they are today. Norquist, Gingrich and the rest of the propagandists need to be called out by NAME.

Maybe it will never happen and Georgians will go down to ruin, still listening to pseudo patriots wrap their pro-rich agenda in rants about saving the Confederate flag, anti-abortion, anti-government and the rest.

It happened in Germany - right to the bitter end.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lost Atlanta?
Posted by: sunlakedude on Jun 23, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I think of Atlanta, I think of the way it was in the mid-70s when I visited it for the first time. It was growing, yes, but it was much smaller than it is now. MARTA had just been approved and construction had begun, the traffic was heavy, but in a "busy" kind of way. The hills and ever-present trees enchanted me and I vowed that I would, one day, move to Atlanta. It never happened and now I'm glad it never did. It's so big now people who live in one part of "Metropolitan Atlanta" rarely venture into the other parts and most avoid going downtown at all, if they can help it. Controlled, planned growth would have been much more preferable to what actually took place and now it has become a behemoth so large and far-flung it is losing it's cohesiveness. The pretense that it was "too busy to hate" has come full circle and we now realize it was all boosterism and PR anyway. Atlantans can be just as bigoted as anyone else. And it's about to implode due to lack of water!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lost Atlanta? Posted by: maude21
Old movie: the cattlemen and the sheep herders are still at it?
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 23, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Been a while since I've been to Atlanta, but I spent enough time in Dixie to have developed a sense of who runs it.

The ones who already have it all don't want anything to change--change is bad. That is the conservative mantra. It gets carried out by making the same mistakes over and over.

In the case of water, where upthread someone mentions State lines get in the way, we need watershed management. Will the locals ever be able to see beyond their fenced-in habits?

Population growth is surely a contributing factor. It will change, as it did during the Great Depression when birth levels fell dramatically. But change will not come before enormous waste and suffering ensues.

Try telling Dixie that there were no good old days. Confederate money runs the governments.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Old woes, new foes
Posted by: dbatterman on Jun 23, 2008 2:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having been an Atlanta resident for 13 years, and growing up just south of it, I've seen my city change immensely in what seems like so little time. The water problems are stupendous, but they are one in a litany of short-sighted decisions that have plagued our government for years.
Development has definitely been at the forefront of this issue; even now there are innumerable condos springing up all over Midtown and Buckhead, and as I drive by, all I can think of is how each one of these behemoths is going to use the same 100-year-old sewer infrastructure that we have now. Not to mention, that each of these towers will be filled with people who still drive to their jobs, because our public transportation system is an absolute joke, and yet another example of bad city planning.
As far as the conservative ideology behind this, I think it's partly true and partly not. The Gold Dome is filled with conservatives from outlying counties, both rural and semi-urban, who spend more time thinking about Jesus and legislating morality than actually doing anything to help their state. However, we had Bill Campbell, who is a Democrat, to contend with for years, a man so crooked that the last time I saw him in the airport, he scuttled away like a dog hoping not to be recognized. Shirley Franklin has done an admirable job trying to clean the mess that he made, but it's a long road to plow.
Bad planning, bad implementation, and submission to developers are killing our infrastructure. Repairing them is not "sexy" enough politically, and we can't depend on our local sacred cow businesses to do anything about it. And those water issues, in addition to our fights with Alabama and Florida, are all tied into these critical areas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Old woes, new foes Posted by: dmb8762
I like the thesis
Posted by: JonTalton on Jun 23, 2008 2:42 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and it could be expanded to the conservative, Southern-influenced places such as Arizona. I do lament the typos and error (Augusta) that marred an otherwise great piece. Conservatism is indeed unequipped to govern a complex civilization, but superbly equipped to destroy it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hard to find legitimate
Posted by: kindmuse on Jun 23, 2008 6:18 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an important article and I'm sure most of it is true, but it's really difficult to believe it's legitimate with all the grammer errors. Your editor must not have had their coffee or is on vacation, or something. Let's wake up over there and create some legitimate grammer free news stories.

Thanks, and peace

~V

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

REMEMBER MAX CLELLAN
Posted by: master09 on Jun 23, 2008 9:10 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always hated the state of Georgia for what they did to a brave american. Iam sure all of you GOD faring christian conservatives know who said" vengeance is mine"you should and will be made to suffer and its not over yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

blah blah blah
Posted by: BigRedTarget on Jun 23, 2008 9:23 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a handy form letter you can use to rant against conservatives for the next problem that some community faces. You'll find it just as fact filled as this article.

Because of the recent (insert natural disaster), it's clear that (Conservatism/Republicans) have destroyed (insert state). Because people cannot be trusted to run their own (lives/local government), we must immediately transfer more (power/money) to the federal government and away from local communities and states.

Because Republicans are (evil/baby killers/ religious nuts) and Democrats are (messiahs/ divinely appointed/well intentioned) they are the only ones fit to run (your bank account/ your personal habits/your leisure time), and if you insure they are in power (insert next election date), they will provide a solution to both (insert natural disaster) as well as the problems affecting you personally. And if they don't, it is surely the fault of (George Bush/ (your local Republican governor)/all Republicans).

Peace

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: blah blah blah Posted by: vivachavez
» RE: blah blah blah Posted by: lamar
» RE: blah blah blah Posted by: indepentent
» RE: blah blah blah Posted by: BigRedTarget
» RE: blah blah blah Posted by: wankervon
» RE: blah blah blah Posted by: Cybershaman
Shoddy writing & facts loses the important issues
Posted by: sjm30741 on Jun 24, 2008 3:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a former resident of Atlanta, and a GA resident for 42 years (before there was a boom in Atlanta), when I read the following, I was baffled: ""Eighteen years, fourteen governors, and endless posturing and finger-pointing" brought on his "tri-state water war," we learn; what we don't learn is that Roy Barnes, the guy who actually stuck his neck out to solve the problem, was a Democrat, and the man who replaced him was the Confederate Flag-baiting Republican; and that besides Barnes, eight of these eleven governors were Republicans;"

Our governor serves for 4 years so 18 years have could only be 4 1/2 terms; Sonny is midway through his second term (6 yrs), Barnes served 1 term, and Zell Miller served two terms before that- and in THOSE days he really was mostly a Democrat instead of the traitor he later became. Perdue is the first GOP governor since Reconstruction.

While I detest what has been done by over-development of our state, our cause in combating this is not served by such a poorly written article. I would like to see Perlstein re-write this as a serious article that could be used as a reference piece.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reverse that
Posted by: BigRedTarget on Jun 24, 2008 10:02 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dude, you have it backwards...the Dems control congress. The tax rebate was a Democratic initiative.

If you believe one party is less corrupt than the other, you're living with your head in the sand. Seriously. I may vote Republican, but I have no illusions about their corruption. But I'm also not naive enough to ignore the corruption that runs through Democratic leadership either.

People in power, like to stay in power. Democrat, Republican, whatever. Buying your vote with a rebate check appeals to both of them equally. Don't believe for a second that Democrats in power did that reluctantly. They've been buying votes with government programs for decades.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

North American Water Facts
Posted by: thornwolf on Jun 25, 2008 4:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many people know that the first 25 years of the 20th Century were the wettest years in the past 4,000, or that the 20th Century was the wettest century in a very long time? Or that the Colorado river, now at half it's 20th-Century high-water mark and dropping steadily, is still at twice it's normal level over the past several millennia? Or that while wet times have lasted up to a hundred years but usually much less, droughts ordinarily last hundreds of years, and that a drought is just beginning now?

How ironic is it that, just as we were learning the technological wizardry necessary to make large-scale desert living possible in the 20th Century, the water level was the highest it had been in thousands of years and would soon start dropping back, although we had no way of knowing it yet? But now, after an almost century-long building boom, we realize the water is running out. How ironic is that!?!?

Political conservatism will never be able to solve problems like this because conservatism is rooted in the status quo. Only progressive politics will have any chance of breaking new ground, if we're lucky. The overriding concern of politicians has to become the wellbeing of society, not the wealth of the individual -- everyone must prosper, not just the elite. We will survive together or perish apart. Which will it be?

BTW, people who don't have enough water to subsist won't give a crap about the price of gasoline.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More study
Posted by: riley on Jun 26, 2008 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems I remember that Atlanta turned their water/sewer system over to a private corporation who collected money but did no maintenance and repair. They are now having to spend billions to rework the city system. Lake Lanier has been receding big time, and area lakes are drying up. However, the interstate water rivalry has been going on for years, involving Alabama,Tennessee, and Florida at a minimum. Pulling from the Chattahoochee River basin involves too much. I don't think NC or SC has been too involved in this, but I could be wrong. Atlanta is very much overdeveloped, and, as manufacturing elsewhere in the state has plummeted, scores of new urban dwellers are descending on the area and overstressing the system. In South Georgia, the huge aquifer underlying the Albany area is being drained and wells are beginning to run dry even as large farmers irrigate 24 a day. It's getting serious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

leftbank
Posted by: markw4786 on Jun 26, 2008 6:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This third world state always goes Republican, Christ, even the Dems are far right of center.
The supply-side, privatize everything mantra has come back to bite them in their ignorant asses. Milton Friedman blesses you!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

unit price to low
Posted by: billwald on Jun 28, 2008 12:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Georgia is running out of water then the unit price is to low. There should be sliding scale for scarce utilities like water.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement