Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Water

Is 'Mother Nature' Really To Blame for the Midwest Floods?

By Georgianne Nienaber, Huffington Post. Posted June 17, 2008.


What or who is behind a water management policy in the United States that allowed our infrastructure to crumble?
Advertisement

Near the Mississippi Headwaters, June 11, 2008 -- I am writing this an hour's drive from the Mississippi Headwaters -- you know, that place where you can walk across the Mississippi by stepping from stone to stone -- and it is raining cats and dogs, thunder and lightning galore, four inches or more expected today, and parts of Minnesota to the east are under flash flood warnings.

New Orleans is not alone. Catastrophic dam failures are occurring up and down the Mississippi watershed today in the "Flood of 2008," which has the potential to eclipse the Midwest flood of 1993 in tragic consequences. In Lake Delton, Wisconsin, an Army Corps of Engineers' embankment failed, emptied a 267 acre lake that was the centerpiece of a recreation area, and the torrent of water destroyed homes while carving a new channel into the Wisconsin River. Underground sewer lines were shredded and raw sewage isn't seeping, it is poring out of the broken system and entering the watershed. Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle said the Federal Emergency Management Agency would have teams in the state Wednesday to help assess flood damage. Given FEMA's track record in New Orleans, Wisconsin should not rest easy.

All of the water from where I sit at my desk ends up here on the Mississippi Delta.

"No Idea" What the Corps is Doing

In Cedar Falls Iowa, spokeswoman Susan Staudt said earlier Wednesday that volunteers and sandbags appear to be holding back the waters of the Cedar River.

If the makeshift barriers fail, downtown Cedar Falls (population 35,000) will be under "several feet of water," Staudt said. The flood stage is 88 feet. At 5 a.m. the river gauge read 101.8 feet. As of 9:30 a.m. the reading was 101.24, Staudt added.

Staudt spoke from a cell phone in Cedar Falls City Hall at 10 a.m. She said the skies "looked ominous," and that it was raining. "Quite frankly, the only forces keeping the water from breaching the barriers are the thousands of volunteers who are sandbagging," she said.

Staudt's biggest concerns now are the boils which are cropping up all along the levee. What about the Army Corps of Engineers? "Are they helping you?" we asked.

Staudt replied tersely that she had "no idea what the Corps was doing," but that the National Guard was out in force to assist her crews. What Staudt did not say spoke volumes.

But there is more. Lots more.

In Iowa City, waters topped the spillway at the Coralville Reservoir. Residents in the flooded center of town were told to evacuate and news footage last night showed volunteers hauling boxes of documents from a newly built government building.

Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, on John McCain's short list for Vice-president, signed an executive order Tuesday declaring a state of emergency in two counties hit by flooding in Minnesota's southeast corner. Pawlenty is the same guy who vetoed infrastructure funding in the spring before the Interstate 35 bridge collapse last August. But no one talks about that anymore, either.

In Lawrenceville, Illinois a Corps of Engineers-built levee failed along the Wabash River on Tuesday.

Embarrassing Use of Words

The Embarras (one "s") River in east central Illinois embarrassed the Corps when one of their levees crumbled on Tuesday. The press said "broke," but that implies that it was an act of nature and nature alone that caused the failure. When something breaks, it is no one's fault. Use the word "failed," or crumbled," and you start looking around for who designed and managed the thing to begin with.

Local press again used the lexicon of understatement. "Officials say levee breaks in the area are forcing some evacuations." Breaks forcing evacuations, indeed.

The language used in the local press is telling. After interviews with the Army Corps of Engineers in city after city along the broken embankments, dams, and levees, the language blamed "Mother Nature." People were told simply "to evacuate."

The Iowa City Press Citizen glossed it all over with the comment, "but as is usually the case, the river goes on its own schedule." The phrases "uncontrolled waters" and rivers that "threatened" to breach levees and rush over spillways are the journalistic voodoo of the flood of 2008.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: water, midwest, army corps, floods

Georgianne Nienaber is an investigative environmental writer. She lives in rural northern Minnesota and New Orleans.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You can't control mother nature!
Posted by: carbon-based on Jun 17, 2008 5:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm amused at times how people think they can control nature. Build a major city below sea level, build all along a major river bank prone to flooding, build multi million$ homes on the beach, build on a mountain side - what a great view!

Then everyone is shocked when a major storm hits and they no longer have a home.. on one hand we want to conserve nature then on the other we want it to conform to our needs!

It just seems mother nature will defeat any effort to control it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You can't control mother nature! Posted by: matthewpaul93
» RE: You can't control mother nature! Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: You can't control mother nature! Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: You can't control mother nature! Posted by: carbon-based
» More Examples Posted by: Romans1
» The common source Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: The common source Posted by: Romans1
Eroding infrastructure: well, Duh!
Posted by: supercrisp on Jun 17, 2008 5:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The U.S. hasn't been spending very much at all on infrastructure upkeep. I first starting noticing this when I went to college: the highways down to Memphis were in bad shape. Later I noticed the state of the north-south interstate alongside the Mississippi: full of potholes and dips. Then the bridge over the Hatchie collapsed, just because it hadn't been inspected for scour. Then we get all these levees failing, still more bridges collapsing.

Take a look at aerial photos of Iowa City. The university buildings--EPB, the art buildings, the Gehry building, and so on—wouldn't be flooding if the roller dam at Burlington Street were gone. That dam hasn't done anything but drown drunk college kids for decades, but no money is spent to remove it. So it's sitting there backing up water to flood the campus of a major university as well as a new, expensive housing development.

Of course, this begs the question of why we allow development of floodplains anyway. The priorities are on profit. The money just isn't being spent on this; priorities are elsewhere. Money that could be better spent on our civil infrastructure instead vanishes down military and intelligence service rat holes, not to mention umpteen other boondoggles, like the War on Drugs or the War on Corporate Taxation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You guys are crazy
Posted by: New Orleans News Ladder on Jun 17, 2008 1:00 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone live everywhere. The only problem with that appears to be the the US Army Corps of Engineers is everywhere you want to be.
We are all rats on this sinking ship.
However it is written into our founding genes that we have the right to mutiny before it is too late.
Wake up America.

Thank you, Ms. Nienaber.
You are right on top of it.

Edidilla O'rilla d'Aphasia
http://noladder.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You are very courteous
Posted by: nienaber on Jun 17, 2008 8:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and it is appreciated. I have been writing about this for almost a year, having taken a break from reportage in Africa and thinking issues would be "easier" here. I have discovered the same amount of government cover-ups and corporate greed as exists in the third world.

For another take on this issue, please consider what the folks at this website have to say:

http://www.voiceofthewetlands.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» This comment Posted by: nienaber
» RE: This comment Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: This comment/Comparisons Posted by: nienaber
» RE: This comment/Comparisons Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: This comment/Comparisons Posted by: nienaber
» RE: This comment/Comparisons Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: This comment/Comparisons Posted by: nienaber
» RE: You are very courteous Posted by: bornxeyed
The Floods in Iowa, Nebraska Are Punishment
Posted by: Mexitli on Jun 18, 2008 4:36 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Spirits are angry over the use of Maize as fuel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Usually nothing Posted by: Mexitli
» RE: Usually nothing Posted by: bornxeyed
» Those are your words. Posted by: Mexitli
» RE: Those are your words. Posted by: bornxeyed
» Still, those are your words Posted by: Mexitli
What is the thesis here?
Posted by: scheherezade on Jun 18, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"What is the real water policy of the United States Congress and why are they not taking this policy to the people...

"Real deal is the U.S. is running out of water...There is a need to get more water downstream for development in places like Atlanta which are running out of drinking water..."The plan is to take water from the north and send it south in a controlled manner,"...

"It is a reasonable idea to try to bring to bring flow rates to pre-settlement rates, but over-engineering in developments such as curb and gutter installations, cause fast run-off because of the impervious surface."...at local levels engineering firms rule city councils who grant permits for developments. Engineering firms over-engineer for the dollars. So, the developments have unnatural runoff and at the same time farms to the north don't want standing water in their fields.


...failing water containment infrastructure has been the focus instead of policy making. The biggest aquifers in the United States' heartland are drying up because of the reduction of porous and permeable surfaces which would ordinarily allow water to seep into the vast underground reservoirs which provide drinking water. The Colorado River is at a fraction of its historic flow rates, schemes abound to pipe drinking water from the Great Lakes, and the heartland's main aquifer is vanishing. Meanwhile, in a total intellectual and engineering disconnect, communities are drowning...The bottom line is that 100 year rain event plans are not being implemented.

I read this article twice and I still am not getting the connection.

Is the author suggesting corporate engineering firms and Federal government planners are encouraging runoff instead of permeation, to redirect water southward?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What is the thesis here? Posted by: nienaber
» RE: What is the thesis here? Posted by: scheherezade
» RE: What is the thesis here? Posted by: nienaber
» RE: What is the thesis here? Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: What is the thesis here? Posted by: nienaber
» RE: What is the thesis here? Posted by: bornxeyed
Nature raw!
Posted by: fdgsr on Jun 18, 2008 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is nature a 'mother'? Nature is a beast! When we tame nature with dams, cages, chains, and bridges, we harness the power in greater energy than when nature is free to seek its own equilibrium. We do not populate the sea bottom, though we visit the bottom of the sea. We should be able to visit the river bottom, without building houses and grain elevators there. We should be able to send a man to the moon without selling moon estate for housing.

I used to marvel at Holland where people live below sea level safe behind dikes that could fail in any hurricane. The first time I visited New Orleans, I included it in the list of unique cities in America. When I saw San Francisco, I was impressed to add it to the list of special places. San Antonio, Boston, and New York qualify. Then I visited Montana, Wyoming, North and South Dakota, and wondered why some of the sky scrappers of New York could not have been built there spread out over miles of land rather than vertical death traps. I wondered why we could not have a true mass transit system to replace much of the highway traffic, or special highways for huge trucks and transports. Why do railroads have to go into downtown Kansas City?

Human nature raw!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its Bush's fault
Posted by: Romans1 on Jun 18, 2008 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First he caused AIDS. Then he planned 9/11. Then he directed Hurricane Katrina to hit the New Orleans. High gas prices are his fault. Now he has caused a flood. What will he think of next?

I heard he is going to cause an asteroid to hit. His grand finale.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Its Bush's fault Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Its Bush's fault Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Its Bush's fault Posted by: bornxeyed
It will get worse,
Posted by: Last Chance on Jun 18, 2008 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as the planet overheats from relentless industrial growth and its factory and machine-generated heat and pollution, there will be more violent weather as the living biosphere tries to heal itself. In case you didn't know, the living biosphere is planet Earth, where we live -- If Saving the Earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It will get worse, Posted by: Romans1
» RE: It will get worse, Posted by: bornxeyed
» You could be right Posted by: Last Chance
Systems and Education
Posted by: EJW on Jun 18, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article brings up two points that should scare everyone in the United States of Short and Narrow Minds. One, that our science education, which used to be admired world wide, is now a joke. Two, that our educational systems don't teach about 'Systems'. Yes, we have the occasional 'Systems' class for specialists but where are the introductory and primary curriculums?

Those two 'Systemic' faults are symptoms of the vast tunnel vision in planning, engineering and maintenance held in our contemporary society. Only a true 'systems' perspective can and will create an environment where we can renew, update and build any sort of 'sustainable' infrastructure. Yes, the various pieces must be fixed but only within the context and understanding of the greater system. Everyone needs to hold this 'system' view from the Janitor at the local primary school to the President of this and other countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A fedral goverment you can drown in a bathtub.
Posted by: SteveO on Jun 18, 2008 9:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet another example of what you get when you follow Grover Norquist's ideals for 30 years.

I wonder how many of those folks who are asking for federal government help voted to "starve the beast" during the last 30 years.

A terrible situation made more so by our own short sightedness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember, we just had TWO 500 year floods
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Jun 18, 2008 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the past 15 years. I'm sure what carbon-based and others said about trying to over-rule nature may be true, but we seem to be in a new ball game. Climate change is radically changing the rules. That means a radical change in thinking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Actually, this is preventable...
Posted by: vangogh69 on Jun 18, 2008 10:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both London in the UK and the Netherlands sit below sea level and have to be protected from inundation 24/7. This isn't an impossible feat, but a very difficult one if the political will isn't there. Instead of spending money on social services, education, and infrastructure the gov diverts money to war, which has the consequence of driving up prices (oil), benefitting multinationals. The point is, if you live somewhere where nature could potentially kill you, consider your escape options because the gov. won't help you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mick3
Posted by: mick3 on Jun 18, 2008 12:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Love it. Whenever a destructive storm hits, it's Mother Nature, not the god of the religiosos who write about it. Oh, of course! Their god is male, while Mother Nature is female. Tradition, after all, demands that we blame the female for the ills suffered by mankind, rather than the males who perpetrate them. Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.

I'd like, for a change, to hear those folks saying, "God is sure socking it to the Midwest," or whatever. Never happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nature is not god and god is not Nature.
Posted by: nightgaunt on Jun 18, 2008 12:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Flooding in places previously without it can tell you several things. 1) New construction in the area regardless of the hydrology. 2) Increase in population so increased usage for drink, bath, wash, and sewer. 3) Formally permeable soils replaced by near impermeable concrete and asphault which also creates zones of heat sinks further changing the natural dynamics of the areas further altering the whole dynamics of the atmosphere and biosphere.

I saw similar occurences here in Texas when we had floods in 500 year flood plains happening annually or in less than half a century now. Why? For the reasons given above. Humans are the only species that can change the geography of the earth. We are in fact a force of Nature ourselves. Actions of a Type Zero civilization on the cusp of us reaching another level but is at great risk of extinguishing itself. A Type 1 could alter the earth without hurting themselves or the biosphere they live in.

It is our choice if we are to sink into neo-barbarism or create a true "Golden Age" for all of humanity. Not just for the few.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

recommended reading
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Jun 18, 2008 1:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
--The Control of Nature, John McPhee
--Bayou Farewell: The Rich Life and Tragic Death of Louisiana's Cajun Coast, Mike Tidwell
--Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How It Changed America, John M. Barry

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MAIZE is a food, not a fuel
Posted by: Mexitli on Jun 18, 2008 4:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MAIZE is a food, not a fuel.

Let me make one thing clear. Although I do believe that the floods in Iowa and Nebraska are/were caused by the Great Spirits, I do not believe it was done in an vindictive manner.

Why floods that hurt families? The floods are hurting families, but that is not the intent. The floods are not vindictive "punishment."

But the floods are, in my opinion, the work of the Great Spirits who are sending a signal that they are unhappy that MAIZE is being used as a fuel.

MAIZE is a food. Not a fuel. Millions of children and families have suffered because of decisions that were made to convert MAIZE into fuel.

Entire societies were created by MAIZE. BILLIONS of people depend and have depended on MAIZE for their bare subsistence.

MAIZE is not to be converted into a fuel for automobiles of any kind. MAIZE is not to be used for anything but food.

MAIZE is food.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: MAIZE is a food, not a fuel Posted by: countingdaisies
» Hey, thanks for the link Posted by: Mexitli
The US Government
Posted by: jc1234 on Jun 18, 2008 5:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
doesn't allocate jack to infrastructure because then the money is all decentralized across the nation and the politicians can't buy stock in the companies like they can in the military industrial complex and play the revolving door game that they do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I would just like to know why...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Jun 19, 2008 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...god is punishing these god fearing, good Christian, pro-life, red states? Why does He not answer their prayers?

I understood why the decadent, gay loving, sex craved, New Orleans was destroyed, because many preachers like Pat Robinson explained it to me, but this is a puzzle. You would even think that the Shrub could use his connections with the Almighty to help these poor people.

I know climate change cannot be a contributer to this situation so maybe that damned Mother Nature person is doing something wrong, but don't you think that god would tell her that she is not being nice.

Hey, you get the leadership that was bought and paid for, and as this group of criminals continues to "bleed the beast" we are on our own in times of disaster.

Our solutions to problems have been short sighted and profit driven. Just to give a recent example: the Shrub proposed yesterday to drill off shore to help solve our energy problems. This would amount to about 18 billion barrels, at best, a two year supply at our current use. Of course this would not even be in the pipeline for three years if we started drilling today.

Gotta love this cannot do anything anymore country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the Corp
Posted by: nahikurain@mac.com on Jun 19, 2008 4:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
fear the Corp
they seem to have no regulators, no board of appeals, no stops barred
they do more damage before 10 am than most people do in a lifetime

I think the Corp needs to be audited- and put to trial, as soon as possible

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Throwing Away our National Treasures
Posted by: memary10 on Jun 19, 2008 9:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in California, former land of massive over development and still trying. What a mess. This state has a fragile ecology and a serious water problem,along with producing 50% of America's fruits and vegetables. Common sense would tell us that such a national agricultural treasure should not be paved over and tract-homed into oblivion or sold off to foreign investors. Not so here in America's garden. It's an unregulated free-for-all with plenty of illegal immigration thrown in. Even animals know not to mess in their own nest. Not so Americans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]