Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

Water Scarcity: The Real Food Crisis

By Fred Pearce, Yale Environment 360. Posted June 9, 2008.


In the discussion of the global food emergency, one underlying factor is barely mentioned: The world is running out of freshwater.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

After decades in the doldrums, food prices have been soaring this year, causing more misery for the world's poor than any credit crunch. The geopolitical shockwaves have spread round the world, with food riots in Haiti, strikes over rice shortages in Bangladesh, tortilla wars in Mexico, and protests over bread prices in Egypt.

The immediate cause is declining grain stocks, which have encouraged speculators, hoarders, and panic-buyers. But what are the underlying trends that have sown the seeds for this perfect food storm?

Biofuels are part of it, clearly. A quarter of U.S. corn is now converted to ethanol, powering vehicles rather than filling stomachs or fattening livestock. And the rising oil prices that encouraged the biofuels boom are also raising food prices by making fertilizer, pesticides, and transport more expensive.

But there is something else going on that has hardly been mentioned, and that some believe is the great slow-burning, and hopelessly underreported, resource crisis of the 21st century: water.

Climate change, overconsumption and the alarmingly inefficient use of this most basic raw material are all to blame. I wrote a book three years ago titled When The Rivers Run Dry. It probed why the Yellow River in China, the Rio Grande and Colorado in the United States, the Nile in Egypt, the Indus in Pakistan, the Amu Darya in Central Asia, and many others are all running on empty. The confident blue lines in a million atlases simply do not tell the truth about rivers sucked dry, for the most part, to irrigate food crops.

We are using these rivers to death. And we are also pumping out underground water reserves almost everywhere in the world. With two-thirds of the water abstracted from nature going to irrigate crops -- a figure that rises above 90 percent in many arid countries -- water shortages equal food shortages.

Consider the two underlying causes of the current crisis over world food prices: falling supplies from some of the major agricultural regions that supply world markets, and rising demand in booming economies like China and India.

Why falling supplies? Farm yields per hectare have been stagnating in many countries for a while now. The green revolution that caused yields to soar 20 years ago may be faltering. But the immediate trigger, according to most analysts, has been droughts, particularly in Australia, one of the world's largest grain exporters, but also in some other major suppliers, like Ukraine. Australia's wheat exports were 60 percent down last year; its rice exports were 90 percent down.

Why rising demand? China has received most of the blame here -- its growing wealth is certainly raising demand, especially as richer citizens eat more meat. But China traditionally has always fed itself -- what's different now is that the world's most populous country is no longer able to produce all its own food.

A few years ago, the American agronomist and environmentalist Lester Brown wrote a book called Who Will Feed China?: Wake Up Call for a Small Planet. It predicted just this. China can no longer feed itself largely because demand is rising sharply at a time when every last drop of water in the north of the country, its major breadbasket, is already taken. The Yellow River, which drains most of the region, now rarely reaches the sea, except for the short monsoon season.

Some press reports have recently suggested that China is being sucked dry to provide water for the Beijing Olympics. Would that it were so simple. The Olympics will require only trivial amounts of water. China's water shortages are deep-seated, escalating, and tied to agriculture. Even hugely expensive plans to bring water from the wetter south to the arid north will only provide marginal relief.

The same is true of India, the world's second most populous country. Forty years ago, India was a basket case. Millions died in famines. The green revolution then turned India into a food exporter. Its neighbor Bangladesh came to rely on India for rice. But Indian food production has stagnated recently, even as demand from richer residents has soared. And the main reason is water.

With river water fully used, Indian farmers have been trying to increase supplies by tapping underground reserves. In the last 15 years, they have bought a staggering 20 million Yamaha pumps to suck water from beneath their fields. Tushaar Shah, director of the International Water Management Institute's groundwater research station in Gujarat, estimates those farmers are pumping annually to the surface 100 cubic kilometers more water than the monsoon rains replace. Water tables are plunging, and in many places water supplies are giving out.

"We are living hand-to-mouth," says D.P. Singh, president of the All India Grain Exporters Association, who blames water shortages for faltering grain production. Last year India began to import rice, notably from Australia. This year, it stopped supplying its densely populated neighbor Bangladesh, triggering a crisis there too.

More and more countries are up against the limits of food production because they are up against the limits of water supply. Most of the Middle East reached this point years ago. In Egypt, where bread riots occurred this spring, the Nile River no longer reaches the sea because all its water is taken for irrigation.

A map of world food trade increasingly looks like a map of the water haves and have-nots, because in recent years the global food trade has become almost a proxy trade in water -- or rather, the water needed to grow food. "Virtual water," some economists call it. The trade has kept the hungry in dry lands fed. But now that system is breaking down, because there are too many buyers and not enough sellers.

According to estimates by UNESCO's hydrology institute, the world's largest net supplier of virtual water until recently was Australia. It exported a staggering 70 cubic kilometers of water a year in the form of crops, mainly food. With the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia's main farming zone, virtually dry for the past two years, that figure has been cut in half.

The largest gross exporter of virtual water is the United States, but its exports have also slumped as corn is diverted to domestic biofuels, and because of continuing drought in the American West.

The current water shortages should not mark an absolute limit to food production around the world. But it should do three things. It should encourage a rethinking of biofuels, which are themselves major water guzzlers. It should prompt an expanding trade in food exported from countries that remain in water surplus, such as Brazil. And it should trigger much greater efforts everywhere to use water more efficiently.

On a trip to Australia in the midst of the 2006 drought, I was staggered to see that farmers even in the most arid areas still irrigate their fields mostly by flooding them. Until the water runs out, that is. Few have adopted much more efficient drip irrigation systems, where water is delivered down pipes and discharged close to roots. And, while many farmers are expert at collecting any rain that falls on their land, they sometimes allow half of that water to evaporate from the surfaces of their farm reservoirs.

For too long, we have seen water as a cheap and unlimited resource. Those days are coming to an end -- not just in dry places, but everywhere. For if the current world food crisis shows anything, it is that in an era of global trade in "virtual water," local water shortages can reverberate throughout the world -- creating higher food prices and food shortages everywhere.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: food, water, water scarcity, water shortage

Fred Pearce is a freelance author and journalist based in the UK. He is an environment consultant for New Scientist magazine and author of recent books "When The Rivers Run Dry" and "With Speed and Violence" (Beacon Press).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Should the world wait until its too late?
Posted by: dustdevil on Jun 10, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until the rapidly expanding world population
is brought under control, none of the issues
such as water shortage, food shortage and global warming can be effectively addressed.
Childbirth will have to be limited in some way. In my opinion this be much better than using wars to reduce populations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Till-less agriculture, Terminator genes and Franken seeds =’s DISASTER!
Posted by: williameon on Jun 10, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Three days food and counting.
Tap Water $2 Dollars a Bottle.
Put a Taco in your tank!
When will the next disaster strike?
It already has.
The What me Worry Resident battens down the hatches
As The Titanic sinks
Job One well done
Destroy the American people.
Dead Eye grins as The Chump dances.
Poor people and emigrants to the hold!
Go down with the ship.
The thrill ride has only begun.
If you rely on the Corpirates for anything
You are in deep do doo.
One Conglomerate owns and runs everything.
It’s a shell game.
Monkey in the middle and
Who is the Monkey?
Greed is the motivator and you are the victim.
Privatize everything under Corporate Control
They run the Government.
They count the Votes.
They control the Programming
They spew endless repetitive conditioning.
They write History
The Monster rears its ugly head
Revealing itself
There is no Knight in shining armor.
It is a fairy tale.
Get over it.
Take control of your own life and future.
Supply your families, neighbors and communities needs.
Declare energy and economic independence from the Corpirate Nation.
The Corpirate model is a complete and utter failure.
Divest now.
Survive
Join the
Micro-Democracy Revolution.
A renewable, sustainable alternative is available now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Flavor of the Weak
Posted by: Moore Hognutz on Jun 10, 2008 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Second article in a week about water disappearance. Not apparently of much interest to your readers. Too hard to follow? Not happening here? Never heard of the Ogallala Aquifer? No? How about the Colorado River? What about all that flooding in Indiana? Hasn't much to do with Cheneybush? or Bill O'Reilly? Toilets turn you off? I know. This is extremely difficult. Connecting the dots...

Wake up, children. Water is the big one. Each of you reading this is 90% water.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wondered when this one would rear its ugly head......
Posted by: Prophit on Jun 10, 2008 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.... been following this and researching it for a year now. Almost ready to write an article on it. You will be shocked at the manipulation of this water issue that has been going on at the highest international levels.

He who controls the "food and water" controls the population and can do anything to us they wish. I will send anyone who wants a copy of the article with links and all..... when its completed.

Just like oil, water will go for $5 a gallon and you will pay cause you need it to survive. But there are options on this one. Just don't buy everything you read, find out who the players are, how are they going to control the water? Where is the new "food belt" in the world???? Many questions, who owns the land over the water? Lots to digest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» well, get on with it, man Posted by: Moore Hognutz
» RE: WaterBoy of Doom Posted by: johnnyfarout
Water is a renewable resource so let's get our facts STRAIGHT.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 10, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unlike oil, water does not come from the ground alone. It is part of the atmosphere in the form of air. Freshwater can be obtained but we're not giving ourselves the chance. As a matter of fact, for the last 3 decades, America has allowed science to actually languish leaving other countries to do our homework which is why everything is outsourced.

It's bad enough that for the last 3 decades, growth and innovations in science has been killed thanks to religious, corrupt business, and political hacks on both sides successfully persecuting non-monied individuals who discover something truly new and innovating and then go out on a limb to kill the competition. For example, Big Auto killing the electric car, Big Oil killing the growth of solar technologies, political and religious fundies teaming up with vested interests to keep Cannabis outlawed by fudging the data from time to time every time it is proven that Cannabis is harmless unlike the petro-manufactured pharmaceutical poison pills heavily advertized as "safe", corrupted schools and universities giving failing grades or even arrests to students who present truly new findings in their science fairs all the while giving first place to students who present piss poor bullshit simply parroting an already known theory and relying on parents to spoonfeed them, etc ... There are plenty of good people in this country and around the world who want a chance in letting their scientific discoveries get a voice. Einstein would never get a chance in this world. Hell, even Galileo had a chance to prove his points. Let's stand up and give the non-monied a chance even if they do prove a major scientific law wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

By the way, for all the talk about water shortages, no attention is being given to the
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 10, 2008 7:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
religious fanatics, both Muslim and Christian, who made this happen and yes they are sadly supported by the US and the uber-corrupt UN. For example, in India, China, and Russia and even the rest of Asia, the Christo/Islamo fundies are the ones responsible for cooperating with the business crooks in convincing people to discard their frugal and happy ways of life and resort to greed, glutton, this "I gotta have more mentality", etc ... This in return has caused them to join America in sapping out more water and oil resources as well as worsen the caste systems in some of these countries.

Amazingly, both the Far Right and the Far Left are ready to show their hostility against Vedic Studies but will go out on a limb to "defend" the Christo and Islam fundies respectively. Thank god for George Lakoff !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We need to phase out some water uses
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jun 10, 2008 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Large scale beef cattle production and microchip manufacture would be a good start.
We also have to look at how the water system replensihed itseld in the past.
The Ogalala aquafer cover nearly five states. In the old days buffalo provided the feeding ponds for the Ogalala by wallowing in the dirt. This made small ponds on the prairie.
Millions of them. These ponds seeped in to the Ogalala refilling it for thousands of years.
Nowadays we have none of these prairie ponds but mass factory farms and landfills. Neither store water but rather,they drain the Ogalala.
We must start restricting large feed cattle farms and dairy farms. Restrict usage by golf courses and microchip manufacturing.
We have to look at creating prairie ponds and other methods of capturing rainwater. If needed make them programs of the state where set aside acres could become water collection areas.
We need to create more forest farms,farms of diverse forest crops will help retain moisture and help restore the functionality of the ecosystem.
If we fail to do all we can to restore water collection systems and restrict water usage by industry and agriculture we will,in a short period of time,push humanity to restrict water usage just to survive and being pushed that far,history shows,the human response can be quite ugly.
So the real question is 'Do we do what we must now or stay the course and face certain calamity.
Draft Jeffrey7 for Prez in '08

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But think how much commodity dealers will make! Isn't it glorious?
Posted by: non-person on Jun 10, 2008 8:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As water grows more scarce, the ownership of water will become ever more important - since we are now an "ownership society" divided between the haves, loyal to the American oligarchic order, and the have-nots, who we don't need to worry about, other than to make sure we have enough prison space to hold all the disaffected (bonus! cheap labor!).

Water is not a right, it is a privilege, and if you can't pay the water owners, you should die of thirst, as you are obviously a "useless person."

It's the new commodity, and it will be very profitable to those who get in on the ground floor.

It's no wonder that the philanthropic-funded left-wing media outlets refuse to say anything that would upset global financial sharks like George Soros, isn't it?

From marketwatch:
"Soros: Index traders "superimpose" bubble
Soros, who made his fortune speculating on currencies, advised lawmakers to use caution when considering regulations designed to reduce speculation."

Of course he would say that. How much money does Soros dump into "the left-wing press'? Huge amounts. Why? So that he can control the left-wing message, and make sure that bans on financial speculation and hot money transfers are never implemented.

Soros would have hated FDR with a passion, wouldn't he have?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah - So?
Posted by: thehousedog on Jun 10, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, what do we do about it? What is your suggestion? Should people just get up and die? Should we all start eating algae? Thanks for putting us all on notice about stuff that, if we are paying attention, we've already figured out.

WE NEED TO START READING ABOUT THE SOLUTIONS INSTEAD OF READING ABOUT PEOPLE COMPLAINING ABOUT THE PROBLEMS.

SOME OF US WANT TO SOLVE THE PROBLEMS IF TOLD HOW - so tell us

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kudos to dustdevil,,,
Posted by: John Rice on Jun 10, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For exposing the real threat to our planet--our unsustainable population--already at an estimated 800% over planetary carrying capacity.
The lack of water, food, energy, minerals etc. and the problems associated with them, are merely symptoms of the over-population disease, and until the over-population root cause is addressed, we will continue ever-rapidly toward the abyss.
Our planetary human population will be reduced whether we like it or not. The only remaining question is how--through voluntary means or the other ways--like wars, mass starvation and the total destruction of our planet through pollution and over-exploitation of our natural resources.
Wake up folks. It is past time to make those decisions--time is running out--and either we take corrective actions, or mother nature will do it for us, after we are gone.
Regards,,,John

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One More Time, Malthus is DEAD
Posted by: stellabloo on Jun 10, 2008 11:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every time we start talking about povery, scarcity, disease or pollution, some wag will tell us that that we simply have too many people, that those poor people "over there" must simply stop having babies, and everyone else will nod their addle-pated head in agreement.

Please - Malthus was some white guy in Victorian England, holding aloft his observances (made at a comfortable distance of course) on the naturally enlightened state of the English in contrast to all those poor colonial populations "over there" who obviously NEED to be be taught a better way.

See: http://ieas.berkeley.edu/shorenstein/1998.05.html
A strong case is made here for the fact that the Chinese historically practiced population control ANYWAY, even before the imposition of state-mandated controls. State-enforced control was brought about by the desire to bring the country closer to western standards of living. Admirable, yes, but now the Chinese are one of the worst offenders on a world-wide scale when it comes to pollution and environmental degradation. So much for Malthus.

In a nutshell, greed is killing us all. Plain and simple. Plastic surgery is "in" and dieting is a billion dollar industry while babies die by the thousands for lack of a few pennies for vitamins or common medicine.

Yes, people have babies. Other than your mother. Get over it. Rich people can afford children, and poor people get to watch their babies die of preventable causes. Only the very rich and the most impoverished mothers get to stay home with their children anyway. When are YOU going to be accountable for foisting YOUR unsustainable lifestyle onto the planet? Every time we're reminded that it is not our ordained right to crap all over the face of the earth, some people simply MUST jump on the Malthus bandwagon One More Time and pontificate in their beards, rather than actually lift a finger to work for change (other than the middle one, of course).

Enjoy your latte :(

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is no shortage of water
Posted by: zorba1 on Jun 10, 2008 3:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fresh water were we want it yes, but our planet has plenty of water.
The technology to desalinate sea water was discovered over Two Thousand five hundred years ago (2,500).
Humans just refuse to spend the money needed to build and operate desalination plants.
Not only of sea water but reclaimation of grey water to drinking water.
A simple desalination plant was built in Peru two hundred years ago, flood a basin with sea water, trap it there, allow the sun to do the work.
Inverted glass forming a V was put over the basin, a half pipe collected the water which condensed on the glass and ran down to it.
Very simple and it continues to work after two hundred years.
Instead of spending money on wars why not build big solar distilleries in our deserts to desalinate thousands of acre feet of sea water evey day?
Using our Sun instead of reverse osmosis which is expensive. Then us purification after solar desalination.
We need commitment to build these big solar desalination operations along with senseible water use.
We also need commitment to use our existing pipelines which criss cross America to move huge amounts of water from areas which have abundance to areas which have to little.
Our priorities are all screwed up.
Huge water pipelines could be built along our interstate system to move water from the flooding Ohio, Misouri and Mississippi and our smaller rivers to the southeast and west in these flood years.
Huge flood basins could be built to replenish the Aquifers and hold water in dry-desert areas.
The same could be done worldwide with the expediture of huge amounts of money now to build for the future.
The technology is here and waiting to be used.
The same can be said for other technologies which have been around for over one hundred years.
Garbage and wood wastes to ethanol and electricity instead of foodstocks to ethanol.
Manure to methane and electicity instead of petroleum to propane and electricity.
We bury, dump at sea, burn or leave in the open billions of tons of garbage, manure, sewage and other wastes daily worldwide, fouling our air, waters and earth.
When will people learn?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There is no shortage of water Posted by: opalescentscales
UN's Codex Alimentarius and the Food Shortage
Posted by: securacom-wtc on Jun 11, 2008 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Codex Alimentarius P1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmrF9KjlGsc
Part 1of5 Codex Alimentarius is an attempt to overturn existing US laws in favor of pharma-friendly international trade rules. Codex is a threat to human health, human rights, democracy and national sovereignty.


Free Documentary on www.video.google.com 'One Nation Under Siege'(1.4hrs). Through the research and personal testimony of over a dozen internationally distinguished authors, journalists, doctors, and military experts (Major General Albert Stubblebine) you will understand the massive and ceaseless control projected onto an unsuspecting populace by a government that may have finally crossed the line from a representative republic to a fascist empire. From the USA PATRIOT Act and the blatant disregard for the Bill of Rights to the outright tracking of every human being on the planet earth, you will be stunned by what U.S. government documents describe for the future of America. http://www.undersiegemovie.com/
USA’s Constitution and currency are being destroyed from within. How? Videos free on www.video.google.com 1) America: Freedom to Fascism, 2 hrs; 2)911 Justice, 18min; 3) The Clinton Chronicles, 1.7 hrs; 4) Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement, 2 hrs, 5) Terrorstorm: A History of False Flag Terror, 2 hrs 6) 911 Mysteries, 2 hrs; 7)The Creature from Jekyll Island, 1hr; 8)Orwell Rolls in His Grave, 2hrs; 9) The War on Democracy, 1.5 hrs; 10) The Energy Non-Crisis, 1 hr; 11)Iraq for Sale 1.2 hr; 12) Zeitgeist, 2 hrs; 13)Ring of Power, 2.5 hrs; 14)Bush link to JFK, 1.5 hrs; 15) The Century of the Self, 4 hrs; 16) Loose Change (2nd ed & Final cut) 2hrs each; 17)John Pilger: The New Rulers of the World; 18) The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of America, 3.5 hrs 19) Barack Obama CFR info 20) Global Warming or Global Governance 21) The Great Global Warming Swindle 22) Mercury, Autism and The Global Vaccine Agenda 23) The CIA, Mind Control and Satanism 24)George Hunt: UN UNCED Earth Summit 1992 (Population Reduction) 25) End of NAtions - EU Takeover 26) Washington, You're Fired 27) Blackwater: America's Private Army 28) Esoteric Agenda 29) Fiat Empire: Why the Federal Reserve Violates the U.S. COnstitution 30) The Revolution Will not be Televised [USA overthrow of Hugo Chavez] 31) One Nation Under Siege 32)Breaking The Silence - Truth and Lies in the War on Terror, by John Pilger(and all his documentaries) 33)Beyond Treason 1.5hrs

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

opalescentscales
Posted by: opalescentscales on Jun 12, 2008 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree wholeheartedly with the idea that religions can be blamed to some extent for contributing to the food crisis with their disastrous encouragement of big families in order to populate the world with more (religion of choice) adherents. I hardly need to point out the poster child of this philosophy is the Pope (and the Church). "Go forth and multiply" must have seemed like sound logic when the global population was much smaller. It also cheats animals, the very things that humans are "supposed" to "govern" because people keep edging them out of their habitats or over-hunting 'til the local animal population is driven to extinction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement