COMMENTS: 28
Small Town Overthrows Corporate Giant for Control of Water
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Water headlines via email.
Many of the 3,000 adult residents of the Felton Water District had been organizing for nearly six years to buy the community's water system from California American Water. Cal-Am is a subsidiary of American Water, which, despite an ongoing sell-off, remains under the ownership of German multinational energy and water titan RWE.
Surprisingly, less than a week before an eminent domain trial to decide the value of the water system, the announcement came that the San Lorenzo Valley Water District would pay Cal-Am $10.5 million in cash for the system. Of course, Cal-Am went for the deal to settle the eminent domain suit against it and avoid a jury trial, said Jim Mosher, who heads up the legal committee for Felton FLOW -- Friends of Locally Owned Water.
This is a great victory for the citizens of Felton and should inspire other communities to challenge private water utilities that are extorting huge, unjustified rate increases and failing to protect sensitive watershed properties. The SLV Water District has done an excellent job representing us and we look forward to having them manage the Felton water system."In addition, the agreement states that Cal-Am will donate the 250 acres of forested watershed land in hopes of getting a tax break. Mosher questions whether the land transfer is a donation, however, since it appears to be an integral part of the deal and the price.
How it all happened
In 2001, American Water purchased Felton's water system, which has been privately owned since the late 1800s, as part of its larger acquisition of Citizen's Utilities. Shortly after that, Essen-based RWE gobbled up American Water.
The trouble started in November 2002 when California American Water ignited furor in the Felton community, nestled amongst coastal redwood trees, with a 74 percent rate hike. In response, the Friends of Locally Owned Water was born and flew into action. FLOW fought to reduce the amount of the rate hike, urged Santa Cruz County to create a public agency to control the water system and opposed the company's plan to merge the Felton and Monterey water districts.
The push for public water in Felton found its first success in July 2005 when FLOW spearheaded passage of Measure W, despite Cal-Am's deep-pocketed opposition. With their lopsided 3-to-1 approval of the $11 million bond issue, residents agreed to higher taxes and authorized the SLV Water District to use the bond proceeds to buy the water system.
The district offered California American $7.6 million, but Cal-Am refused. Its leadership stated, flatly, that the system was not for sale at any price and expressed its determination to oppose all public acquisition efforts so that Felton did not start a domino effect of citizens taking control of their water resources. Felton's petition to the California Public Utilities Commission to approve the proposed public buyout failed after the commission succumbed to heavy CalAm lobbying pressure.
Four months later, RWE announced it would sell its stake in American Water, including the Cal-Am division. The reason was supposedly to focus on European energy investments.
But that likely was just an excuse. Leaked minutes from an RWE board meeting reveal that "the German company was taken aback at the difficulties of turning a profit in the American water market, and that its initial estimates of efficiencies and rate increases were overly optimistic." It also cited "considerable political resistance to privatization of the water sector" as a reason to exit the U.S. water market.
Indeed, after more than two years of delays because of investors running scared, the company finally managed to offer up American Water in an April 2008 initial public stock offering. The results were disappointing: "RWE planned to offer shares for $24-$26, but at the last minute dropped the offering price to $22-$23. That still wasn't enough of a cut and on opening day shares sold at $21.50 and the company only sold 36 percent of its shares...As stock analyst Bill Simpson summed it up: '...this IPO is nothing more than an exit strategy for parent company RWE.'"
Meanwhile, back in Felton, there was no backing down. Its purchase offer brushed off, the community turned to eminent domain to force a buyout. Cal-Am responded by doing all it could to make the system seem more expensive. Its appraisal valued the system at $25 million, far more than Felton's $7. 6 million offer. This was based in large part on Cal-Am's assertion that the 250 acres of watershed land should be valued based on the revenue that would be generated from selling the timber and the land for commercial development, a position the community hotly disputed.
Eminent domain proceedings in California have two parts -- the "right to take" hearing before a judge to determine whether the purchase serves the public interest, and a "valuation" trial in which a jury decides how much the property is worth. In both cases, Cal-Am's legal tactics caused delays and increased expenses for the SLV Water District. Finally, the company conceded the public's right to take the water system and settled the acquisition price without a trial.
"We fought off every one of Cal-Am's tactics to derail the process," Mosher said. "But in the end, our position was completely vindicated."
In their successful six-year crusade for their water, the good people of Felton have helped lead the way for numerous other U.S. communities fighting the forces of corporate control of water.
Stay up to date with the latest Water headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Susan Kipping on Jun 5, 2008 12:57 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The county let the initial protest to the buyout get lost in their offices twice, the media was terrible (except for the Alarm), the PUC was totally for the corporation, but despite all challenges, the Felton residents kept going with one goal in mind, to protect their water.
Thanks to all of you that helped get this accomplished. This is truly a fantastic story.
Congratulations Felton.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueGorilla on Jun 5, 2008 4:46 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This case,proves that with guile,guts and principle,the people can win.
Well done ,all who fought and won this hard and historic battle,you've shown the way.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kriggs on Jun 6, 2008 4:55 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Precious things, like water, ought not be held for profit. The law of supply and demand, the holy grail of capitalism, means higher profits through shortages.
Within this system, there is no incentive to conserve nor preserve. The community good prevailed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: huricane on Jun 7, 2008 12:19 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: socialpsych on Jun 7, 2008 3:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cathyc on Jun 7, 2008 5:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WELL DONE FELTON!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: warble on Jun 7, 2008 6:22 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, the arguement that Public this or Public that is socialism or communism is being used to take away a public good, our road. I'd love to be able to throw up a toll in front of my house and make everybody pay me for the use of the road but that would be in restraint of free travel.
Behind the deal was a campaign payment, unknown amount, which was probably a pittance compared to the investment of billions that Pennsylvanians have paid for the road and its upkeep in the 1900's. Now, just like that, he's claiming that it would be easier for the state to rent the roads, then sell them probably.
Governor Rendel is another rat that sold out.
Tomorrow, he will sell the Philadelphia Water works to a private company.
Once in the hands of a firm like ATT, they will have thousands of charges and fees and penalties and God knows what else. We will all be screwed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Governor Rendel of Pennsylvania is trying to sell off our Turnpike
Posted by: TJAlex
» RE: This is where I am at a loss
Posted by: warble
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jun 7, 2008 8:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Look What Privatization Has Wrought
Posted by: TJAlex
» Privatized America = Communist Russia - ala Stalin
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Privatized America = Communist Russia - ala Stalin
Posted by: richholland
» RE: Privatized America = Communist Russia - ala Stalin
Posted by: warble
Comments are closed-
Posted by: solangel on Jun 7, 2008 8:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I only hope it encourages the communities who are in the cross hairs of The Carlyle Group. These "business men" are targeting community sewer systems, road infrastructure, and other public use avenues to continue the Bush dynasty nation wide!
As the bumper sticker says, " If you are not angry yet, you are not paying attention".
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: sol angel
Posted by: TJAlex
» It depends on what you do with your anger...
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelectnoone on Jun 7, 2008 8:52 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the control of a natural resource like water should not be under corporate control, this would not apply in all cases to other utilities such as electric power.
I just moved out of a city that has it's own utilities including power. They buy most of their power wholesale from the private nuclear plant and resell it at a higher rate than our neighbors pay outside city limits.
They took the power and turned it into a profit center, inflating the cost beyond the normal rate charged to outer non-city users.
In this case the utilities cost more than others pay because of the city.
You have to keep an eye on politicians !
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Good...however there are pitfalls.
Posted by: Drume
» RE: Good...however there are pitfalls.
Posted by: gustafgrapple
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Marlena on Jun 7, 2008 10:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "Our nation"?
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TERRIROBSON on Jun 7, 2008 10:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zepher on Jun 7, 2008 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Happiness and peace to the residents of this wonderful little town snugged away in redwoods and beautiful gardens. I have happy memories of Felton.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 7, 2008 3:52 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is nice to see that the good guys eventually won this, but at what cost?
Just look and see how this court action shows us how the legal system actually works...
and who it actually serves!
MONEY! and those that can afford it!
I'm thinking that a single desk legal service sector is long overdue... or maybe something else...
JUSTICE IS JUST A WORD FOR THOSE THAT CAN AFFORD IT AND MEANS NOTHING IN REALITY WHEN LAWS EXECUTE THE INNOCENT AND MENTALLY HANDICAPPED AND INCARCERATE THE MOST PER CAPITA IN THE WORLD INTO AN INDUSTRIAL PRISON COMPLEX FOR PROFIT!
OPEN YOUR EYES PEOPLE!
When will you all wake up and realize that your freedoms have been usurped
by GRAFT GREED & CORRUPTION through your own political processes!
so disturbing in so many ways!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MisterWu on Jun 7, 2008 10:17 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Marscrumbs
Posted by: gustafgrapple
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gulliver on Jun 11, 2008 11:24 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Susan Kipping on Jun 5, 2008 12:57 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The county let the initial protest to the buyout get lost in their offices twice, the media was terrible (except for the Alarm), the PUC was totally for the corporation, but despite all challenges, the Felton residents kept going with one goal in mind, to protect their water.
Thanks to all of you that helped get this accomplished. This is truly a fantastic story.
Congratulations Felton.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueGorilla on Jun 5, 2008 4:46 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This case,proves that with guile,guts and principle,the people can win.
Well done ,all who fought and won this hard and historic battle,you've shown the way.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kriggs on Jun 6, 2008 4:55 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Precious things, like water, ought not be held for profit. The law of supply and demand, the holy grail of capitalism, means higher profits through shortages.
Within this system, there is no incentive to conserve nor preserve. The community good prevailed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: huricane on Jun 7, 2008 12:19 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: socialpsych on Jun 7, 2008 3:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cathyc on Jun 7, 2008 5:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WELL DONE FELTON!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: warble on Jun 7, 2008 6:22 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, the arguement that Public this or Public that is socialism or communism is being used to take away a public good, our road. I'd love to be able to throw up a toll in front of my house and make everybody pay me for the use of the road but that would be in restraint of free travel.
Behind the deal was a campaign payment, unknown amount, which was probably a pittance compared to the investment of billions that Pennsylvanians have paid for the road and its upkeep in the 1900's. Now, just like that, he's claiming that it would be easier for the state to rent the roads, then sell them probably.
Governor Rendel is another rat that sold out.
Tomorrow, he will sell the Philadelphia Water works to a private company.
Once in the hands of a firm like ATT, they will have thousands of charges and fees and penalties and God knows what else. We will all be screwed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Governor Rendel of Pennsylvania is trying to sell off our Turnpike
Posted by: TJAlex
» RE: This is where I am at a loss
Posted by: warble
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jun 7, 2008 8:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Look What Privatization Has Wrought
Posted by: TJAlex
» Privatized America = Communist Russia - ala Stalin
Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Privatized America = Communist Russia - ala Stalin
Posted by: richholland
» RE: Privatized America = Communist Russia - ala Stalin
Posted by: warble
Comments are closed-
Posted by: solangel on Jun 7, 2008 8:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I only hope it encourages the communities who are in the cross hairs of The Carlyle Group. These "business men" are targeting community sewer systems, road infrastructure, and other public use avenues to continue the Bush dynasty nation wide!
As the bumper sticker says, " If you are not angry yet, you are not paying attention".
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: sol angel
Posted by: TJAlex
» It depends on what you do with your anger...
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelectnoone on Jun 7, 2008 8:52 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the control of a natural resource like water should not be under corporate control, this would not apply in all cases to other utilities such as electric power.
I just moved out of a city that has it's own utilities including power. They buy most of their power wholesale from the private nuclear plant and resell it at a higher rate than our neighbors pay outside city limits.
They took the power and turned it into a profit center, inflating the cost beyond the normal rate charged to outer non-city users.
In this case the utilities cost more than others pay because of the city.
You have to keep an eye on politicians !
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Good...however there are pitfalls.
Posted by: Drume
» RE: Good...however there are pitfalls.
Posted by: gustafgrapple
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Marlena on Jun 7, 2008 10:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "Our nation"?
Posted by: Cathyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TERRIROBSON on Jun 7, 2008 10:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zepher on Jun 7, 2008 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Happiness and peace to the residents of this wonderful little town snugged away in redwoods and beautiful gardens. I have happy memories of Felton.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 7, 2008 3:52 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is nice to see that the good guys eventually won this, but at what cost?
Just look and see how this court action shows us how the legal system actually works...
and who it actually serves!
MONEY! and those that can afford it!
I'm thinking that a single desk legal service sector is long overdue... or maybe something else...
JUSTICE IS JUST A WORD FOR THOSE THAT CAN AFFORD IT AND MEANS NOTHING IN REALITY WHEN LAWS EXECUTE THE INNOCENT AND MENTALLY HANDICAPPED AND INCARCERATE THE MOST PER CAPITA IN THE WORLD INTO AN INDUSTRIAL PRISON COMPLEX FOR PROFIT!
OPEN YOUR EYES PEOPLE!
When will you all wake up and realize that your freedoms have been usurped
by GRAFT GREED & CORRUPTION through your own political processes!
so disturbing in so many ways!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MisterWu on Jun 7, 2008 10:17 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Marscrumbs
Posted by: gustafgrapple
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gulliver on Jun 11, 2008 11:24 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Water Heist: Corporations Are Targeting Cash-Strapped Cities for Control of Their Public Water
Is Schwarzenegger's Big Drought Over?
Is New York's Budget Deficit Leading it to Adopt Natural Gas Drilling Practices That Threaten Drinking Water?




