Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Water

Damming Patagonia's Rivers: A Dirty Energy Business

By Aaron Sanger, International Relations Center. Posted May 27, 2008.


A consortium of gigantic transnational companies is hoping to turn one of the most pristine rivers in the world into three "hydropower" lakes.
Advertisement

The Pascua River, in Chilean Patagonia, has many qualities that have kept its stunning, rugged beauty intact and virtually unknown -- so far. Only one road leads anywhere near the Pascua, and that's a rough road that takes you to the end of the river's course.

To get to the head of the Pascua, because of the impassable terrain along both its sides, you have to backtrack up that lonely road and travel away from the river and into the town of Villa O'Higgins, located near Chile's border with Argentina. There you catch a ride on a boat and journey six hours across Lago O'Higgins -- South America's deepest lake. First you'll motor south along the full length of one of the lake's fingers, which is split by the Chile-Argentina border. Then you'll turn north to follow another far finger of the vast lake all the way to its tip.

There you'll find the cascading source of the Pascua River. The river literally jumps out of Lago O'Higgins into a series of class-6+ rapids and waterfalls that make it one of the fastest, wildest rivers on the planet. From Lago O'Higgins, it churns its way down through a maze of canyons that for thousands of years have delivered pristine freshwater into the Pascua from the jagged, snow-capped peaks and glaciers of the two largest ice fields on earth outside Antarctica and Greenland.

"Clean" Energy, Dirty Business

Unfortunately, if you have the money you can also get there by helicopter. That's how a consortium of gigantic transnational companies has been dropping its engineers into the Pascua's wilderness for the past several years. The consortium and its engineers are not there to enjoy the wild beauty of the river, or to learn about the fragile ecosystems that depend on the Pascua's continuing to run free. These engineers have been hired to advance plans for three mega dams that would turn the 40-mile long Pascua into three "hydropower" lakes.

The consortium -- known as "HidroAysen" -- hopes that these dam-created "reservoirs" will generate abundant electricity for Chile's largest cities and growing mining industry. HidroAysen is owned by Chile's two biggest wood and pulp producers, the Matte Group and the Angelini Group, and also by two of Europe's biggest utility companies, Enel from Italy and Acciona from Spain.

These global profit-seekers also want to put two mega-dams on Chile's picturesque Baker River, located to the north of the Pascua. The Baker has just begun to support local tourism businesses that would be virtually wiped out by the dam development. Worse yet, according to HidroAysen's plans, all the electricity from the Baker and Pascua rivers would be sent north through 1,500 miles of transmission lines, requiring one of the world's longest clearcuts -- a long nasty scar through ancient temperate rainforests. The objective is to supply Chile's growing industry and large cities. Current estimates for the cost of the dams and transmission lines together exceed four billion dollars.

HidroAysen's most vocal owner-advocate, the Matte Group, claims that its plans will bring "clean" energy to Chile. But it turns out that Matte's definition of "clean" ignores the many dirty environmental and social impacts of the proposed dams and transmission lines.

These include scores of displaced families, disrupted traditional livelihoods such as farming and ranching, spoiled local tourism, and destroyed forests. The transmission lines alone would require clearcutting thousands of acres of forest types found nowhere outside of Patagonia, dividing many Chilean communities, and irreversibly damaging several national parks, including some of earth's most scenic, such as Hornopirén National Park and Corcovado National Park. Victims of these dams would include critically endangered species such as the huemul deer, of which only 3,000 survive today.

Choosing Patagonia over Private Profits

Fortunately, there is a powerful grassroots campaign against HidroAysen. As a result, in Chile, according to the most recent credible survey, most Chileans oppose these plans because of the environmental damage they would cause. The campaign in Chile includes over 40 environmental groups united for a "Patagonia without dams." Internationally, thousands of activists have joined the campaign by writing personal letters to Eliodoro Matte (leader of the Matte Group) or by taking action online against Home Depot (Matte's biggest U.S. customer for wood products).


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: dams, rivers, pascua, patagonia

Aaron Sanger is Patagonia campaign coordinator of the International Rivers Network and an analyst with the CIP Americas Policy Program (www.americaspolicy.org). He worked previously with ForestEthics and was founder of the Chile Native Forest Campaign.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Clean Energy
Posted by: terryhallinan on May 27, 2008 9:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Truly clean energy, such as that from the sun, the wind, the tides, and underground heat -- all abundant in Chile -- can fulfill human needs while leaving Patagonia's rivers to flow freely through their canyons as they have for millennia.

Green energy includes run of river, which would not require dams.

All of those noted above as "clean energy," aswell as run of river hydro, will require transmission lines. The transmission lines are described as a "long, nasty scar."

Life is often hard.

Good luck to you BTW.

Best, Terry

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The delimmas that must be solved. The nature and human factors.
Posted by: nightgaunt on May 29, 2008 1:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Such transmission lines could be better located than in pristine forests. A great deal of planning and ecological impact statements made in relation to what and where the power stations will be located. It would actually take some deep thought and clear understanding of the parameters of construction and the terrain even wind direction and how animal populations migrate will figure in.
It will be interesting to see if the Chilean gov't supports the HidroAvsen consortium or its people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If they don't build dams, they will build COAL fired power plants
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Jun 1, 2008 12:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dreamers!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Renewable energy could 'rape' nature
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Jun 1, 2008 12:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Downloaded from: NewScientist.com news service
http://environment.newscientist.com/
article/dn12346-renewable-
energy-could-rape-nature.html

http://www.newscientist.com/
blog/environment/2007/07/
renewable-energy-bad-
nuclear-power-good.html

Phil McKenna
Ramping up the use of renewable energy would lead to the "rape of
nature", meaning nuclear power should be developed instead.
http://www.inderscience.com/
search/index.php?action=record
&rec_id=14671&prevQuery=&
ps=10&m=or
So argues noted conservation biologist and climate change researcher
Jesse Ausubel in an opinion piece based on his and others' research.
http://www.newscientist.com/
channel/opinion/mg18925361.
500-interview-be-
green-think-big.html
Ausubel (who New Scientist interviewed in 2006) says the key renewable
energy sources, including sun, wind, and biomass, would all require vast
amounts of land if developed up to large scale production – unlike nuclear
power. That land would be far better left alone, he says.
Renewables are "boutique fuels" says Ausubel, of Rockefeller University in
New York, US. "They look attractive when they are quite small. But if we
start producing renewable energy on a large scale, the fallout is going to be
horrible."
Instead, Ausubel argues for renewed development of nuclear. "If we want
to minimise the rape of nature, the best energy solution is increased
efficiency, natural gas with carbon capture, and nuclear power."
'Massive infrastructure'
Ausubel draws his conclusions by analysing the amount of energy
renewables, natural gas, and nuclear can produce in terms of power per
square metre of land used. Moreover, he claims that as renewable energy
use increases, this measure of efficiency will decrease as the best land for
wind, biomass, and solar power gets used up.
Using biofuels to obtain the same amount of energy as a 1000 megawatt
nuclear power plant would require 2500 square kilometres of prime
Midwestern farm land, Ausubel says. "We should be sparing land for
nature, not using it as pasture for cars and trucks," he adds.
Solar power is much more efficient than biofuel in terms of the area of land
used, but it would still require 150 square kilometres of photovoltaic cells
to match the energy production of the 1000 MW nuclear plant. In another
example, he says meeting the 2005 US electricity demand via wind power
alone would need 780,000 square kilometres, an area the size of Texas.
Part of the land used in Ausubel's calculations is for storage and
transportation: "Any renewable energy supply needs a massive
infrastructure, including steel, metal, pipes, cables, concrete, and access
roads."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]