Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

A Return to the Tap: Why Bottled Water Is on the Way Out

By Melissa Knopper, E Magazine. Posted May 6, 2008.


Environmental concerns are sending people back to their taps and putting bottled water companies on the defensive.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Jennifer Phillips always felt guilty that her large Nashville law firm didn't recycle. So after big client meetings, she collected all the empty plastic water bottles, took them home and added them to her own curbside recycling bin. Now, she is proud to report that her firm, Bass, Berry & Sims, serves an icy pitcher of tap water during meetings. "We even have glasses with the company logo on them," she says. Phillips estimates switching to tap keeps 3,000 plastic water bottles per week out of the landfill.

It's a trend that is taking hold in the U.S., Europe and Canada: more people are switching from bottled water to tap. Call it reverse snob appeal. Bottled water once carried a certain European mystique. But these days, it's the tap water enthusiasts, concerned about the environment, who get to act self-righteous. Just like it has become cool to bring your own cloth bags to the grocery store and your own mug to the coffee shop, the reusable water bottle is the hip, new eco accessory.

It's because people like Phillips and David Wilk, a Connecticut book publisher and tap water activist, have started to connect the dots. For Wilk, it happened on the soccer field. After his sons finished their games, he noticed the grass was littered with bottled water and Gatorade empties. Pretty soon, Wilk started showing up with a huge container of tap water. Now all the kids bring their own bottles and fill up when thirsty.

"We have such a consumption mentality, which leads to our throw-away society," says Wilk, who started the website Turntotap.com to build more support for public water supplies and to cut down on the amount of plastic going into landfills. "I think the cost of our behavior should be built into the products," Wilk says.

A Gathering Revolt

In Canada, the bottled water issue has become, as Wilk says, an "uprising." College students are staging protests -- declaring "bottled water-free zones" on campus. High school activists are raising questions about why their school board members are locking them into a contract with Coke or Pepsi (makers of Aquafina and Dasani bottled water) when they have access to drinking fountains for free. Some students have jokingly started to sell bottled air for $1.

In an even bolder move, the United Church of Canada asked its three million members to consider banning bottled water during meetings and events. "We just had a lot of concerns about governance and accountability," says Julie Graham, who leads the anti-bottled water campaign for a Toronto ecumenical activist group called Kairos. "Why is it people in Canada are willing to pay twice as much for bottled water as for gasoline? We started challenging that and raising questions about billions of empty bottles going into landfills."

Others, like Richard Girard, a corporate researcher for the Ottowa-based Polaris Institute, don't like the hypocrisy they perceive in the bottled water marketing. "This movement is gaining momentum because the general public is starting to figure out bottled water is a scam," says Girard. More than half of all bottled water is simply filtered tap anyway, he argues. And some of it is actually worse in quality because bottled water companies aren't subject to the same strict oversight as public water supplies.

"We want the bottled water corporations to be held accountable for their actions," Girard says. "These companies are essentially commodifying water. We hope we can force them to change and be more environmentally responsible."

The trend away from bottled water also ties in with the Slow Food movement -- as the restaurant industry tries to support local agriculture and cut down on extravagant energy used to ship imported foods from around the world. At Berkeley's Chez Panisse, general manager Mike Kossa-Rienzi had his "a-ha" moment when he sat down and calculated how far the 25,000 bottles of sparkling Italian spring water he ordered had to travel through the air. "It really does not make sense to ship from all around the world when you have such good water in your backyard," he says. "You have to think about the carbon imprint you're making there."

Another big push for the bottled water backlash came during World Water Day 2007, when San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom declared a ban on bottled water contracts for all city departments. Instead of bottled water vending machines, he installed large dispensers in city buildings that poured out pure tap water from the Sierra mountains. Other cities, from Chicago to Salt Lake, followed suit.

Just think about a bottled water brand like Fiji, says Wilk. On the company's website, it says, "When it comes to drinking water, remote is very, very good." If you think about it, Wilk says, it's pretty arrogant to ask that Fiji water be flown 8,000 miles across the world just so North American yuppies can enjoy a slightly better taste.

Responding to rising criticism, the company launched the "Fiji Green" campaign. It partnered with Conservation International to go carbon negative, reduced packaging, committed to 100 percent recycled materials and has pledged money to protect the Sovi Basin rainforest in Fiji. A cynic would say the company is doing this because it can afford to -- marketing Fiji water is an enormously profitable enterprise.

Bottled Waste

It takes 15 million barrels of oil per year to make all of the plastic water bottles in America, according to the Container Recycling Institute. Sending those bottles by air and truck uses even more fossil fuel.

Once people drain the bottles, they rarely recycle them because they're often purchased at big concert venues or airports with no recycling bins. CRI says eight out of 10 water bottles end up in the landfill. The bottles that drift from landfills and litter streams are washing out to sea to form a huge raft of plastic debris in the center of the Pacfic that is twice the size of Texas.

It takes 1,000 years for plastic bottles to break down, CRI estimates. But when they do, they disintegrate into tiny bits. The green and blue bottles, especially, look like tasty food to fish and shorebirds. Scientists are finding these dead animals on the beach, with bellies full of plastic pellets.

If more states added deposits on bottled water bottles, it might spur recycling. Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA) has even proposed a national beverage bottle bill. But PET water bottles (short for polyethylene terephthalate) can only be recycled a few times. What about going back to refillable glass bottles? For one thing, they are heavy to ship. And Zero Waste expert Neil Seldman of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance doesn't imagine anyone could persuade the beverage industry to go that route. "They have always lobbied against it," Seldman says. "The industry does not want to deal with it after people buy their product -- they want to wash their hands of the containers." That's why it makes the most sense to avoid creating the waste in the first place by drinking tap from your own container, Seldman says.

Meanwhile, as drought spreads to North Carolina and Atlanta, residents are casting a suspicious eye on beverage companies like Coca Cola, which tap into local aquifers to fill their bottles. Nestle has been seeking environmental approval for what would be the largest water bottling plant in the U.S. -- one million square feet in McCloud, California -- against community protests. The company has had to significantly increase the amount it's paying for the water (from $26 an acre-foot to $183) and limit its draw to 520 million gallons annually. It's still battling opposition from residents concerned about the mega-plant's effects on quality of life and outdoor recreation.

Bottled water industry groups, such as the International Bottled Water Association, say they are being unfairly targeted. They argue bottled water is a healthy alternative to sugary soda. And it can also be a lifesaver when disasters, such as Hurricane Katrina, strike. "It's not really a bottled water vs. tap water world," says IBWA spokesman Steven Kay. "Most people drink both. We think bottled water provides a good healthy choice."

But industry marketing firms have had to do an about-face. "What's interesting about the backlash," says CRI Executive Director Betty McLaughlin, "is that the companies say 'drink our water, not tap water.' Now people are going back to tap and they've got to reposition themselves." Companies are trying every angle, from claims of superior filtration to adding antioxidants (Snapple) and fruity flavors (Dasani and others).

Don't Refill that Bottle!

The IBWA argues that bottled water companies are responding to environmental concerns by making lighter bottles that require less plastic in the manufacturing process. Kay says the industry does invest significant money to improve access to recycling at large public venues, such as airports and concert halls. Companies like Nalgene, Sigg and Brita are aggressively marketing their refillable bottles and home filters as a more responsible option.

When it comes to reusable bottles, however, consumers still need to do their homework. Research shows that clear bottles made of polycarbonate plastic (such as the original 32-ounce Nalgene) can leach bisphenol-A (BPA). This is an endocrine-disrupting chemical that acts like estrogen in the body. BPA essentially tricks your body into thinking it's estrogen, says Washington State University Researcher Patricia Hunt. She discovered the dangers of BPA when some of her polycarbonate mouse cages started to leach BPA, causing infertility in female mice.

Since BPA has been linked to low sperm counts and an increased risk of breast and prostate cancer, scientists like vomSaal and Hunt suggest avoiding reusable bottles made from plastic. They also raise serious concerns about the potential for other plastic chemicals to leach out of typical PET water bottles -- especially if they sit in the hot sun.

Hunt uses a stainless bottle brand called Klean Kantene, and Wilk's website sells stainless guaranteed-not-to-leach SIGG bottles made in Switzerland. The trend away from bottled water may also boost sales of home filters. Water-quality experts say most tap water is fine to drink straight from the faucet -- especially in cities like San Francisco, Seattle, New York City and Denver, where water comes from pristine mountain reservoirs. But in places that draw drinking water from lakes and rivers with sewer outfalls, it might make sense to install a filter. Sometimes rusty pipes or naturally occurring iron can also affect the taste.

It makes sense for anyone turning back to tap to become educated about the local public water supply. And since the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires frequent water quality reports, the data is easy to find. The Environmental Working Group (EWG) makes it easy with its Tap Water Database. You can plug in your zip code and find out whether your local water system is up to par.

Now that more people are trying get out of the bottled water habit, groups like Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and EWG wonder if this new awareness will translate into more support for public water supplies, and for water conservation in general.

Once you kick the bottle, they say, the next step is to get educated and get involved -- find out what your water system needs and start pushing your elected officials to bring more funds to bear on the problem. According to NRDC, the EPA has asked for billions of dollars for a public water supply needs assessment. But the Bush Administration has allocated only a small portion of that request, says NRDC attorney Mae Wu.

"People are very concerned about what's in their water because we drink so much of it," says Jane Houlihan, EWG's vice president for research. "We're advocating for more protection for the waters that are the source of what comes out of kitchen faucets."

Editors: If you are interested in reprinting this article, please contact Featurewell at: featurewell@gmail.com/212-924-2283.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, bottled water, water privatization

Melissa Knopper is a Colorado-based science writer and tap water enthusiast.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What about chlorine and PVC?
Posted by: eksommer on May 7, 2008 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with author. But I am still not convinced that the tap water system is safe. And no one is talking about chlorine anymore. That is the main reason we, years ago, switched getting spring water from a local company in five-gallon (polycarbonate) bottles, which we now need to rethink.

But the city water comes to us full of chlorine and through PVC pipes (probably the most toxic plastic there is), at least until it enters our house. So what's the solution?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What about chlorine and PVC? Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: What about chlorine and PVC? Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: What about chlorine and PVC? Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» www.fluoridealert.org Posted by: plantland
» distill your own water at home. Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: distill your own water at home. Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: What about chlorine and PVC? Posted by: Mystery Solver
And what about percolate, MTBE, fluoride, and biological contaminates due to aging piping systems?
Posted by: Rune on May 8, 2008 2:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Plastic bottles are a bust, but there is a lot more than that to be concerned about when sourcing drinking water in the U.S.

And to think we used to warn each other not to drink the water when we left the safe and reliable taps of our country for a trip to a less developed nation -- which is what we are becoming, bit by bit, drip by drip.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sure, bottled water can be convenient but ...
Posted by: harryf200 on May 8, 2008 3:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... as for its use at home, in my judgment it's a Con! And they know it is! For example, take the first brand of bottled water in the UK: Evian. Spell that backwards and see what word you get ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boycott Nestle
Posted by: socialpsych on May 8, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very nice article.

It's worth adding that the environmental harm at the extraction end of bottled water production can be considerable. I live one mile downstream from an extraction facility owned by Nestle Waters. They take 3 million gallons per week from this tiny spring-fed stream and bottle the water as Deer Park Spring Water. The water level of the creek is so low that all of the native brown trout have disappeared and the streambed is covered with algae. Nestle has killed our public waterway and there is nothing anyone can do to stop them. The best we can do is refuse to buy their crappy products.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» http://www.nestle.com Posted by: Beck
» hopeless Posted by: socialpsych
» RE: hopeless Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
World Bank forces "privatization" of water. . .
Posted by: redceres on May 8, 2008 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . on developing countries. Our government attacks Clean Water Act provisions. The Bush Administration ok'd dumped the refuse from strip mining into Appalachian streams. A connection? Fer sure.

The corporate world is systematically trying to insert itself between people and necessities, such as food and water. If we let this happen ANYWHERE, we are complicit. We should fight every bottling plant, partner with every developing nation that is refused World Bank money because it won't give its people's water to corporations, buy ONLY from actual farmers, and insist that our families and friends join us or deal with haranguing until they do.

We cannot allow corporate forces to expand their control over food and water. In fact, we've got to reverse this trend NOW.

Pay attention. Our land and water is becoming more and more polluted so that a few people can consolidate wealth and power. Right now, a lot of ordinary Americans are going along with it because they think it's "free enterprise."

My god. It's anything but free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bottled Water- the Miracle Bra of industry
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 8, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw a film when I was in college about how industries sell US back what we already have naturally (the 'natural' Bra). It was how advertising convinces the public that the manufacturer is a far better 'creator' then a 'God ' or nature. Hysterically enlightening!
funny how running 'Fresh mountain streams' water through machines (contaminated due to lack of sanitation) is better for you than the actual stream. Of course considering the ground & water Pollution caused by such industialization they may be right. Circular logic for circluar problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And what about the other heavy metals and...
Posted by: clvngodess on May 8, 2008 6:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... medications, antibiotics and substances that have been recently discovered in tap water as well? The meds that people have been flushing down the toilet? In a recent study in Los Angeles, this crap has been found in the tap.

Or is it just more spin?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

only when absolutely necessary...
Posted by: ptown on May 8, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
please buy bottled water only when absolutely necessary... i keep a "Klean kanteen" type container around at all times.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't forget where all that plastic comes from, PETROLEUM, and it ain't gettin' cheap.
Posted by: maxpayne on May 8, 2008 7:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, even if the plastic were made of biodegradable plastic, I wouldn't buy bottled water unless I could be convinced depending on the location and water status. At work, everyone looks me very oddly for drinking tap water instead of joining their phoney "Water Club" for $10 a month for the sake of drinking bottled water. Oh, and they've just upped it to $12 a month so now I save $144 a year up from $120 a year.

With all those unnecessary pharmaceuticals in the water itself and the plastic that is formed from burning millions of barrels of oil every day even at a time when oil supplies are getting tight due to wars and increasing difficulties of finding light sweet crude and being forced to desperately refine heavy sour crude oil just to make it usable thereby aggravating the prices of oil, bottled water's exit is long overdue.

We are paying taxes and deserve to be getting what we pay for such as better drinking water from the taps, not pay taxes and instead let the water corps financially mug us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

V for Vindicated
Posted by: Elmowilcox on May 8, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can I get a show of hands from all those who cringed THE FIRST TIME you saw bottled water for "everyday use"? I could just imagine the people saying "I'm not going camping or anything I just like making as many things in my life as disposable as possible". Within a month of the first commercials, my teammates began carting giant disposable bottles of water to soccer practice rather than be bothered with filling up the reusable, insulated containers "of old". These bottles don't allow for ice, so they also had to bring along icechests, which applied across the nation probably meant a sharp rise in Igloo production...also made of plastic. That's plastic begetting plastic folks. I went to the Frio River in Concan, TX last month, a relatively unpopulated tourist attraction here, and pulled a full trashbag's worth of the vile containers from the water in about 100 yards.
So not to toot my own horn but here's to those of us who recognized this problem from the jump. This was an issue I didn't really think Americans living in the year 2000 needed to have explained to them, but I was proven wrong again. Seriously, how long had the "no more wasting" issue been around before we were sold a mountain of overpriced, convenient plastic bottles?
And healthwise, HAHA! We were scared by corporations into thinking that all of our public water was cancer-on-tap, only to find out that the bottled version came from the same source at best, and in many cases it came with added chemicals we don't get from turning on the faucet(bromines and such).

I'm going to start filtering and bottling air next week. Harvesting it from the pristine mountain peaks high in the Rockies, triple filtered, and bottled for convenient portability. Gonna call it PurAir, $2 for a 20 ounce bottle. Any takers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fluoride not removed by water filters
Posted by: eggfamilyark on May 8, 2008 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fluoride and other toxins are not removed by the water filtration systems used in most homes. Please research fluoride. I doubt you will want to consume it if you do your research.
I am ready to get rid of plastic bottles but I also want pure tap water free of toxins.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: fluoride not removed by water filters Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: fluoride not removed by water filters Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: fluoride not removed by water filters Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
Nobody lives forever
Posted by: Elmo409 on May 8, 2008 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am continually amused by the excuses people give for things. Use bottled water because your tap water might have some trace amount of something that leached out of a pipe. Fear tap water because it contains chlorine and/or fluoride. You can live in a bubble and breathe filtered air, drink bottled water, have all of your food be the purest and you're still going to die.

If you're really worried about what's in your drinking water, get a Reverse Osmosis unit for a few hundred dollars. It will pay for itself over the cost of bottled water in a year or less. But you're still going to die.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nobody lives forever Posted by: the baron
I have NEVER paid for my own water!
Posted by: The Big Raven on May 8, 2008 9:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone asked me the other day "whats happened to The Big Raven?" He used to be so kind and willing to help out any who were in need and now The Big Raven has gone angry!
About what you ask? Water Thats right WATER!
I used to think that we as humans are not as stupid as we behave pooping in or own backyards and contaminating our water and food supplies or worst yet sending OUR garbage to places like the worlds oceans just so WE can carrying on carrying on!
This greed induced society based on total lies and half truths pretending all-along that we really care and we are gonna change ANYDAY NOW!
And after being sucked in by the goverment of my youth to another FAKED WAR based on lies just like today in Iraq. After watching all the "religous" and "spiritual" "leaders" call on others to go a war more for oil so america can digg it-self a deeper hole with its mindless consumerism. After watching more young people being killed in a army they really did not want to be in the first place "if it wasnt for this frigging poor economy" more fake promisses from the worlds biggist warmonging nation.
We are mostly water and I predict there will be a time when the U.S.A. will murder people for thier water content. Heres a real gem 'fighting wars in this day and age would NEVER happen like they are happening if it was not for BOTTLE WATER. PERIOD
Peace is not for the faint hearted

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

author missed Environmental Working Group's opinion on fluoridated water
Posted by: plantland on May 8, 2008 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good steer to the EWG's Tap Water Database.

Fluoride does not show up in their contaminant list because officially, it is an additive rather than a contaminant.

Ken Cook, of the EWG, when signing the Fluoride Action Network's Professional's Statement to End Water Fluoridation, said, "It is time for the US to recognize that fluoridation has serious risks that outweigh any minor benefits, and unlike many other issues, it is as esy to end as turning off a valve at the water plant."

Water fluoridation is no longer on EWG's front page. but searching for it will bring up good information, lest anyone think FAN is biased rather than informed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bottled water increases tooth decay too!
Posted by: DrSteve on May 8, 2008 9:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been counseling my patients for years to increase tap water consumption and pass on the bottled water. People who routinely avoided the tap predictably would see an increase in decay rates due to lack of fluoride exposure.I always found it silly to pay more per ounce than gasoline for something that came out of your tap for pennies. I've been to the developing world where the thought of drinking from the tap is pure "pipe dream" so to speak..We are fortunate most of our water in the States is potable and should take advantage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bottled water increases tooth decay too!
Posted by: DrSteve on May 8, 2008 9:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been counseling my patients for years to increase tap water consumption and pass on the bottled water. People who routinely avoided the tap predictably would see an increase in decay rates due to lack of fluoride exposure.I always found it silly to pay more per ounce than gasoline for something that came out of your tap for pennies. I've been to the developing world where the thought of drinking from the tap is pure "pipe dream" so to speak..We are fortunate most of our water in the States is potable and should take advantage.And sorry but you anti fluoride types are wrong.Dental caries has been a scourge on humanity since the development of refined sugars...the most prevalent disease in the world causing plenty of pain and suffering and yes death at times. In the developing world water fluoridation is nearly impossible but salt fluoridation is quite effective...consider the folowing program in Jamaica....
"In 1987 Jamaica initiated a comprehensive island wide salt fluoridation programme. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) provided technical assistance in the design and implementation of this programme as well as training local personnel in salt fluoridation techniques. This presentation is based on the study by Estupinan-Day and co-workers published in 2001. The changes in caries experience among school children in Jamaica between 1984 (before salt fluoridation) and 1995 (after salt fluoridation) were striking. Reduction of caries experience was 69%, 84% and 87% in the 15, 12 and 6-year-olds, respectively. The higher percentage difference in caries experience for the 12-year-olds when compared to the 15-year-olds may be due to the longer exposure of the younger children's teeth to fluorides. The 15-year-old group was already 8 years of age when fluoridation started in 1987 while the 12-year-olds were only 4 years old thus their permanent teeth were exposed to fluorides from the time of eruption.

Ninety six percent of the children were fluorosis free, 4% had 'questionable' fluorosis and less than 1% had very mild to mild fluorosis. None of the children showed moderate or severe fluorosis. "

I find it amusing how the anti fluoride types (who likely benefitted from this as youngsters) go off on some conspiracy theory while it is clear from the Jamaican Experience that much pain, suffering, disfigurement etc can be avoided by simple fluoridation.They suck down there organic double mocha latte bitchin about the man but if we did things their way many , mostly poor children would suffer needlessly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Late Realization
Posted by: meranting on May 8, 2008 11:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not really dissing the fact that the bottled water has finally been called out for what it is - a huge burden on the environment in exchange for some stupid fad. What I find most disappointing though is how far we're really behind in this country in terms of environmental awareness.

One of the only hopes I have in this country is that environmentalism will be used as a marketing tool at some point because we cannot escape the reality any longer. If i were the CEO of 'vitamin water' for example I would start a national program called "back to the roots" and I'd start selling that product in a nationwide campaign, independent from states laws and go back to glass. Why isn't anyone that creative? Does everything have to be reactive? We're so behind on all this it's a joke that we dare to criticize the chinese for what they're doing to their country.

www.meranting.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Mongoose Trick - speaking truth to tyranny & tyrants
Posted by: Spock on May 9, 2008 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, inasmuch as the water here in South Texas is radioactive (the uranium leech-miners do exactly as they please, regardless of all the niceties of law and all that anti-business nonsense), I have to spend some part of every day filter and purifying bottle water we've purchased. Survivalist sites have the equipment, it's not very expensive, and it's the price of living in the land of government by corporate capitalism. Otherwise, you'll have to do what many of my friends have done - move to another place (or country).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT'S THE TASTE... the awful, awful taste
Posted by: fredcdobbs on May 9, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I used to always have a case or two of bottled water in the house. The portability came in handy while doing yardwork, and having instant access when running to work (where drinking fountains are nowhere near properly cleansed) or heading out on a long drive was always nice.

That said, I noticed the taste becoming more and more -- how shall I put this? -- YUCKIFIED. Changing brands didn't help; the "water" tasted more like the made-from-waste-material bottles than H2O.

Now, when going for a long drive (these days a rare occurrence, thanks to Dark Lord Cheney's secret energy policies) I buy a bottle at the gas station upon starting out. Two discoveries I've made are: Cheaper, no-name brands usually taste better than the biggies; and, bottled water is often more palatable at room temperature than chilled.

Yesterday, at the outset of a two-hour trip I opted for a bottle of Aquafina (one of the most disgusting) over other brands because it was on sale. It tasted so nasty I had to dump half the bottle.

Whether or not its concept of "guaranteed purity" is a hoax, the bottom line is: On the taste scale, bottled water is only slightly ahead of urine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement