Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Water

Fishermen Hit Hard by Closure of West Coast Salmon Fishing

By Brad Knickerbocker, Christian Science Monitor. Posted April 22, 2008.


Drastic federal action to try to save chinook salmon is latest move in an ongoing battle.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

These are dark days for a Pacific icon. Up and down the coast of the United States, from Mexico to Canada, wild salmon are dwindling -- steadily and, in some cases, precipitously.

Federal officials this month canceled the salmon fishing season from southern California to Cape Falcon in northern Oregon. The cause: an "unprecedented collapse" in adult chinook ("king" salmon) returning from the ocean to their spawning grounds in the Sacramento River and its tributaries.

Farther north, salmon in the Klamath River, which angles northeast through California and Oregon to high desert ranch country, are barely holding on as well. Multiparty talks about removing four small hydropower dams, which prevent migrating fish from reaching much of their traditional habitat, have dragged on for years with no resolution in sight.

And up in the Columbia River Basin, an area the size of central Europe, annual salmon runs that once reached an estimated 16 million fish now total fewer than 1 million. Thirteen evolutionary-specific salmon populations are listed under the federal Endangered Species Act there. US District Judge James Redden has rejected plan after plan for Columbia Basin salmon recovery put forth by federal agencies, and he threatens to order stricter measures for dam operations as he waits for yet another recovery plan due next month.

Regarding the recent news about the Sacramento River salmon fishery closure, Zeke Grader puts it starkly:

"It's going to be devastating," says Mr. Grader, executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations in San Francisco. "We're going to be asking for federal assistance and looking for alternatives to keep our fishermen afloat for the next year or two until we get a chance to fix salmon problems."

The economic impact of the California and Oregon coastal commercial and sport salmon fishery varies. According to the Pacific Fishery Management Council, it averaged $103 million per year between 1979 and 2004, then dropped to $61 million in recent years due to declining fish runs. Many commercial fishermen can get income from other seafood species, but the number of commercially licensed fishing boats along the West Coast has declined in recent decades from the thousands to the hundreds.

The governors of Oregon, Washington, and California are seeking federal disaster assistance for idled fishermen. Like the northern spotted owl, another controversial and threatened species in the region, salmon face a multitude of challenges -- many more, in fact, than the hapless owl that's been pitted politically against loggers and millworkers.

Among those challenges and competing interests: farm irrigators, developers, industries that pollute rivers and streams, commercial and sport fishermen, and native American tribes that fished these waters long before European-Americans pushed West seeking fur, land, and gold.

But most of all, it's dams -- hundreds of them, from small ones to the eight mammoth concrete "mainstem" dams that turned the free-flowing Columbia and Snake Rivers into a series of slack-water reservoirs producing electrical power and irrigation and allowing oceangoing ships to sail upriver to Lewiston, Idaho.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: global warming, fish, climate change, salmon, fishermen

Brad Knickerbocker is a staff writer at the Christian Science Monitor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Oh, Man. This Should Be Fun...
Posted by: grumble-bum on Apr 22, 2008 9:10 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my capacity as the "meat guy" at the co-op I work for, I can say without exaggeration that the annual wild salmon season is a big deal. Traditionally, we've added an extra fish delivery each week, just to keep up with demand (primarily Sockeye).

I had heard some rumors already about falling numbers, but as is often the case when dealing with the sometimes murky business of wild fish sourcing, I'd also heard assurances that everything would be fine.

So, it looks like I may have to make a decision; to sell or not to sell? I have a good, clean source of frozen Sockeye that I sell year-round. They should have a decent amount of reserves, so I'll probably be able to meet the need for this popular specimen, but not in the gorgeous, fresh-caught state that so many customers have come to expect over the years.

As far as I'm concerned, this is a no-brainer. If, in fact, the salmon we usually sell is in peril, we should simply stop selling the fresh stuff altogether. But I am very, very interested to see the reaction of the average customer.

Something I've noticed about people that shop at my co-op is that while some do so on principle & with a commitment to the core ideas we represent (sustainability being key), far too many approach it as they would a trip to Whole Foods. They expect the things they want to buy (regardless of real cost to the environment, or other humans, or true animal welfare) to be available, & now, dammit! In other words, some of these folks want the rosy feeling of "doing the right thing" without having to make any changes or sacrifices.

& I have a funny feeling that I will hear from this contingent in no uncertain terms, should I "cancel" wild salmon this year.

But mostly, I'm anticipating this as a real test of how serious our customers (who happen to be a fairly good cross-section of America, if an overly White & well-off one) really are about the issues they claim to be. Fact is, we will be going through a rough period in terms of food prices & availability, across the board. In some ways, this rough period will be permanent.

Will Progressive-types be willing to put their money where their mouth is, or more accurately, not put their money there? Or will they, in denial of the general looming food crisis (which may indeed be for the best, in the long run, if we react properly), just slink off to a so-called "natural" mega-store that carries what they want?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Salmon need spawning habitat
Posted by: edgeofnowhere on Apr 24, 2008 10:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and yet we continue to waste water by washing our cars, watering our decorative lawns and golf courses. Population is increasing in the Pacific Northwest and so is water demand. If we continue to divert water from the rivers for agricultural, industrial and personal use without strict controls, the spawning habitat for salmon will be increasingly diminished. The Murkin people are too stupid to restrict their water usage and the political dimwits are chained to their corporate handlers who demand more and more water for their clients. Unless their is some real leadership that can initiate emergency conservation and control measures, things will continue in a downward spiral until a fresh caught salmon is a thing of legend.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]