Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

China's Unquenchable Thirst

By Sandra Postel, World Watch. Posted January 24, 2008.


Freshwater is the resource most strained by China's staggering growth over the last 20 years.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In June 8, 1988, I boarded a midnight train bound for Zhengzhou from Beijing, where my trip to research China's land and water challenges had begun just three days before. My senses were already brimming with the sights and sounds of the capital city and its surroundings -- horse-drawn carts piled high with bricks, waves of wheat awaiting harvest, bustling markets along dirt roads, and bicycles, bicycles everywhere.

Under China's "responsibility system," farmers were now allowed to sell whatever they harvested above their quota to the state. Colorful roadside stands laden with melons, fruits, vegetables, and meats were sprouting like weeds after a long winter. Many farmers suddenly had money to build new houses, and signs of a construction mini-boom were unmistakable.

This, of course, was just the tip of the iceberg: soon enough China's cities would catch the market-economy wave and ride it head-long into the globalized world of the 21st century. It was clear even then, nearly 20 years ago, that the availability of freshwater posed a major challenge to China's future. China was home to 21 percent of the world's people but only 8 percent of its renewable water supply. Most of that water was in the south, making the north even more water-short than the national figures suggested.

Water tables were already dropping as much as a meter a year in parts of the North China Plain, a major grain-producing region. The over-pumping of groundwater in Beijing's eastern suburbs was causing the land itself to subside as much as 10 centimeters annually. So as the train left the Beijing station and rolled past the Great Hall of the People, brightly lit in the dark of night, I was already wondering what China's water officials would do.

Two days before, I'd met Dr. Li Xuinfa, director of the Institute for Research on Environmental Protection, who stunned me by presenting me with a Chinese version of my 1984 Worldwatch paper, Water: Rethinking Management in an Age of Scarcity. The 60-page paper,which Dr. Li had translated and was planning to have published in China, called for a fundamental shift away from big, ecologically destructive water supply projects and toward conservation and efficiency improvements -- not a popular idea back then. But I wondered how much traction it would get in China.

I fell asleep quickly, lulled by the sound and motion of the train. I intended to awaken early so as not to miss a main attraction (at least for me), the crossing of the Yellow River. And it was that sight -- of China's second largest river, the cradle of its civilization -- that has most stuck with me for the last 20 years. I was amazed at how little water was in the channel. Such a paltry flow couldn't possibly sustain a major expansion of irrigated agriculture, industrial production, and urbanization, much less the fisheries and diversity of freshwater species that depended on those flows.

Some numbers confirm the impression. Chinese scientists first recorded zero flow in the lower reaches of the Yellow River in 1972, and between then and 1999, the river ran dry for a portion of all but six years. By the mid-1990s, about seven years after I returned from my trip and wrote in World Watch about how north China was exceeding its water budget, the average length of dry riverbed had expanded to 700 kilometers, up from 130 kilometers in the 1970s. In 1997, the lower reaches of the Yellow went dry for a record 226 days, causing US $1.6 billion in economic damage to Shandong Province, last in line for the river's water.

The disappearance of wetlands, harm to aquatic life, and other downstream ecological effects have led the Yellow River Conservancy Commission to restore some minimum flows to the river in recent years. But the overall health of the Yellow remains in serious decline.

In mid-January 2007, Chinese officials announced that one-third of the fish species in the river have disappeared. "The Yellow River used to be host to more than 130 species of fish, "an official from the agriculture ministry told the People's Daily newspaper, "but a third of them are now extinct, including precious ones."

China is now moving on all fronts to try to prevent water shortages from reining in its unparalleled economic expansion. Construction is under way on the central and eastern routes of an ambitious engineering scheme (first conceived in the 1950s) to transfer water more than 2,900 kilometers from the Yangtze River basin in the south to the thirsty cities and farm- lands of the Yellow, Huai, and Hai river basins in the north. With Beijing hosting the 2008 Olympic Games, officials have recently said that 400 million cubic meters of water from the central route would reach the capital before the games begin.

The most controversial and technically challenging route of the $62.5 billion mega-project would divert headwaters in Tibet to western portions of the Yellow River. According to Liu Changming, a hydrologist with the Chinese Academy of Sciences, construction on that western route could begin by 2010. With so much of China's population and economic activity located along its eastern coast, officials are also eyeing desalination as a major supply source.

Ten desalting plants have already been built, and China is investing $7 billion more to quickly expand capacity. The aim is to have desalinated seawater accounting for 37 percent of the water supply in coastal areas by 2020.

"Success" on this front, however, will almost inevitably be double-edged for China, as desalination facilities and their toxic briny wastes further stress coastal fisheries and marine ecosystems, and, if powered by fossil fuels, indirectly add to the risks of floods, droughts, and other harmful impacts of climate change.

China's efforts on the demand side have also advanced, but less ambitiously. In April 2005, China's National Development and Reform Commission announced a "China Water Conservation Technology Policy" that embraces more effective water pricing, conservation targets, and technologies such as drip irrigation to improve water efficiency.

Over the last two decades, the area of cropland under drip and other micro-irrigation techniques has expanded more than 14-fold, but still accounts for less than 1 percent of the nation's total irrigated area. As supplies tighten, water will continue to shift out of agriculture to industrial and urban uses,where a liter brings in 60 times more income than it does in farming.

As competition for water grows keener in China, the social and political stability needed for sustained economic progress will increasingly be threatened. Today,China has more economic power, technological capability, and global influence than anyone imagined in 1988. But I still wonder now, just as I wondered on that train 20 years ago, whether China will succeed in building an economy that can thrive within the ecological limits of its overtaxed freshwater ecosystems.

This piece was originally published by Worldwatch Institute, World Watch Magazine, © 2007.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: china, water, water scarcity

Sandra Postel is the Leslie and Sarah Miller Director of the Center for the Environment at Mount Holyoke College and director of the western Massachusetts-based Global Water Policy Project.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Eastern Siberia will be one of the tension focus for the next years
Posted by: saltoafronteira on Jan 24, 2008 2:47 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The chinese are turning north and south.
Indochina is already being drained of water.
Chinese immigration in eastern siberia is already creating great strain both between russian populations there and between governments.
The water resources there seem to be enough for chinese needs for some decades and the country is under-populated.
The issue here will be: can the russians and the chinese manage some terms of agreement there?
I risk to say that the answer to that question will be the key for another war (or not) in the next 30/40 years.
One thing is certain. We cannot be much too soft with the chinese, but we cant be too hard neither.
Isolating them will be a real highway to hell, as weel as kneeling before them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A WORLD CRISIS
Posted by: Candleinheart on Jan 24, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
looms regarding water. There are prophecies by various people that water will be more valuable than gold and silver and wars will be fought over it, not land or oil. We are so WASTEFUL!!! Native people were speaking in the Nineteeth Century that all we do is take from the land, we never give back. It has been said on a documentary that in 25 years life may be unsustainable on this planet. we have polluted the waters of the world beyond repair, our beautiful creatures on Earth, Butterflies, birds, fowl, fish poisoned, plastics in their systems. Birth defects attributed to pesticides, our drug companies continue to make pills to have known side effects and cause deaths!!! I've used Alternative Methods all my life and I'm healthy today at age 71 and take no pills. Clean up your bodies and you help clean up this planet. Eat nutitionally but simply. Live simply. I personally have never met a happy wealthy person, but I have met a host of happy 'poor' people from all walks of life. In order to save life and our beautiful planet people have GOT to stop buying plastic, pills, junk, and demand fresh, wholesome food. Grow your own if possible. Take charge of your ownbodies/health. Ben Franklin stopped school at second grade. George Bernard Shaw proclaimed his education began after school. (so true). This is our Mother Earth. Please, please, everyone, rethink your life styles. Get high on Nature. Protect it! We are all under the same Great Spirit. Never before in our history have we faced such destructive occurances, pollution, etc. 30,000 chemicals float around in our foods, water, Earth, etc? No wonder people are predicted in another 40 years to not live their full life cycle. Wake up! THINK! ACT! WRITE TO YOUR CONGRESSMEN. Too much apathy! The sad fact people only change through pain. But by then it will be too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Cleaner water! Grow Hemp! Posted by: garry minor
Pointless article.
Posted by: abbadon2007 on Jan 24, 2008 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There have been many articles on the water shortage recently. Most of them have perfectly well illustrated the China problem: billion people, rapidly rising standard of living, increasing demand for resources.

But this article just leaps out and screams at me: China is "the problem."

No. They aren't. We, the American people, continue to be "the problem" with an overconsumption so vast and so tied to our economy that the only thing we can do, it seems, is point fingers at other people.

The chinese have a right to every bit as much clean water as everybody else in the world, and for the moment they still get less.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pointless article. Posted by: Libsrule
» Funny you mention that Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» RE: Pointless article. I persist. Posted by: abbadon2007
whatever befalls china befalls the USA
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jan 24, 2008 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
whatever befalls china befalls the USA. STOP BREEDING.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Global warming and melting glaciers, wars over fossil fuel reserves...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jan 24, 2008 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Odd that this article doesn't mention the central issue tha makes China's water outlook somewhat bleak:

Himalayan glaciers melting fast, BBC 2005

China glaciers melting at alarming rate, AFP 2007

"Massive glaciers in northwest China have melted at an alarming rate over the past 40 years, with global warming believed to be the culprit, scientists said in comments published Friday.

China's remote Xinjiang region is home to nearly half of the nation's glaciers that supply the rest of the country and other parts of Asia with water.

However they have shrunk by 20 percent and snow lines there have receded by about 60 metres (200 feet) since 1964, the Chinese Academy of Sciences said in a report, according to the official Xinhua news agency.

Global warming is believed to be to blame, with the internal temperature of the glaciers rising by 10 percent over the past two decades, the academy said.


At the same time, China is facing an energy crisis of massive proportions:

Winter saps China energy supplies, AJ, 2008

"China is facing its worst-ever power shortage as winter weather puts pressure on dwindling coal supplies. Officials say reserves are down to emergency levels with only enough coal to power the entire country for another eight days...

...Coal provides 78 per cent of China's energy needs, and the country is the world's biggest producer and consumer of coal.

In recent years the soaring demand for coal energy and the potential profits available has driven many mine owners to reopen illegal or unsafe mines, making China's mining industry the deadliest in the world."


There's only one way out - renewable energy, energy conservation, and water conservation strategies. The world's energy barons are fighting as hard as they can to prevent that from happening - because once it does, all those oil and gas and coal reserves will be worthless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Tibet. Ravaged by China. Posted by: veggiegrrrl
Growing Pains
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Jan 24, 2008 3:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I enjoyed reading this piece and I withheld my judgment on a place I've never visited. The article had a lot of fact and firsthand accounts of her assessment of China's water crisis.
Her observations were keen and insightful and reminded me of America's current water woes. As both nations know, a country cannnot grow without water.
Water is power. The American West cannot function without access to this vital resource.
Riparian rights will soon pit the southern Chinese against their northern friends. We see this drama unfold in California and the seven states which use the Colorado as a drinking source.
Growth will bring propserity to some, misery to others. And as the Colorado and the Yellow shrink due to ever increasing consumption, a tug-of-war will ensue and the government will have to take a side. I don't know what will the Chinese government will do.
I know in this country "agribusiness" gets its share. Factor in weather and drought and things will get testy in both areas.
But I hope China can solve their water probolems. It won't be easy. Both countries have to find a way to limit growth along vital waterways.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Limit growth...period. Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: Limit growth...period. Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
America is China's Bitch, So She Will Never Encourage China to Conserve
Posted by: sofla100 on Jan 24, 2008 4:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since America is China's bitch, by virtue of consuming most all her exports and putting up with a currency system rigged vastly in favor of China's economy and exports, America will do nothing when it comes to encouraging China on conservation. A few American's, wealthy business elites who have set-up shop in China in cahoots with local Communist Party cadres, will continue to benefit and donate millions to American politicians so "free trade" and this system continues. Meanwhile, China will continue to hold American currency, already estimated in excess of $1.5 trillion. A fraction of which, if let loose on manipulating the markets, would crush the American economy and society despite all of America's soldiers and nuclear bombs. Finally, America will and has done what China wants. Human rights and environmental concerns mean nothing. Therefore, China will continue her wasteful ways with wasting water and environmental destruction on a massive scale, and America won't dare open her mouth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I moved to Jiujiang, Jiangxi Province 4 years ago
Posted by: drfun on Jan 24, 2008 6:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to retell my family story as missionary doctors from 1866-1915.
Being on the Yangtze River, I could see first hand how the Chinese are trashing their environment, for the sake of "catching up " to the west.
The greed that flows through the veins of the policy makers in cahoots with developers, leaves the average Chinese person in circumstances that are dire indeed.
It be-hooves me as I have watched the disregard of the Chinese dispose of rubbish, and how fowl the downstream conditions are multiplied. I can remember when U.S. highways and rivers looked like linear trash dumps.
The minuscule effort towards cleanup will eventually overwhelm their GDP, to offset any surpluses they now enjoy.
The fault lies in how much the Chinese want to emulate the West, and they are busy with accumulating the possessions most westerners can "live" without. It saddens me to see the Chinese are willing to make the same mistakes, the west has made, and it angers me that the west is unwilling to make standard of living concessions, so more could be shared.
The world does not contain enough resources for the developing BRIC (Brazil, India, India, China) for their people to have the creature comforts enjoyed presently by developed countries.
I have heard talk of building a pipeline to Lake Baykal in Russia, to help satisfy northern China's thirst.
Just like a culture dish of e-coli, that will cannibalize itself to survive,before all are dead. Humanity seems to be willing to experience the same.
The earth spent billions of years stocking up on carbon resources, that humans have spent just a few hundred years in depleting. The earth will soon in its time frame, rid the parasite, and renew the cycle it has performed since its ability to sustain life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kennedy warns Canadians: water is not a viable commodity
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jan 28, 2008 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact is. Waste is *waste*

its time we ALL clean up our acts & stop treating WATER as a privatized commodity that can be exploited by BigSugar...
as a *control* against the Peoples of Earth.

think about it.

Why should the World pay obscene amounts for water, when the real Future is learning to CONSERVE & treat respectfully to maintain a sustainable economy & ecology?

??

Drain Canada, The American Prospect: Prepare For U.S.-Canadian Water War - CBS News

Antonia Juhasz: The Bush Agenda: Water and Corporate Globalization / Bechtel in Cochabamba, Bolivia

===
Kennedy urges Canada not to sell water to America

January 18, 2008, Posted by Susan Howatt

Robert Kennedy Jr. came to Canada this week with a strong message -- don’t sell your water to the United States.

Water has fast become an issue of national security and geopolitical power, as crucial to national interests as energy. Drought in areas such as Atlanta and North Carolina is part of a much larger crisis in the United States where vast regions are suffering water shortages and demand is outstripping supply.

The Edmonton Journal reported today that Kennedy predicts that the U.S. water crisis will have huge implications for this country.

"Canada is going to find tremendous pressure from the U.S. to sell or share water as a commodity," he told a Waterkeeper Alliance meeting and fundraiser in Banff that was supported by celebrities Alec Baldwin, Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins, Christie Brinkley, Daryl Hannah, Kelsey Grammer, Jason Priestly and Canada’s own Justin Trudeau. "But sharing water would lead to an environmental catastrophe in Canada."

Bulk water exports are touted as a quick fix to water shortages and the obvious place the U.S. would look for new sources of drinking water is Canada.

Prime Minister Harper has dismissed concerns that there have been discussions on bulk water exports. Kennedy disagrees. “If you talk to government officials, everybody says they are looking for Canada to bail them out," he told the Waterkeeper meeting in Banff.

Leaked documents from a project established to guide the Security and Prosperity Partnership clearly put water exports on the table. The North American Future 2025 project, an iniative of the U.S. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in collaboration with the Conference Board of Canada and the Centro do Investigacion y Decencia Economicas (CIDE), convened several meetings last spring, one of which discussed “water consumption, water transfers and artificial diversions of bulk water.""


~~~
Spread Love...


BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
"ThisCanadian
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Market forces vs. environmental forces: not even a contest.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 28, 2008 3:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
China, with its BILLION people who lust after the over-consumptive, incredibly wasteful lifestyle that we have so efficiently exported through our media, may well end up becoming the tipping point that sends this planet "over the edge" into a non-recoverable environmental tailspin – if it hasn't tipped already.

I do not believe that anyone – and certainly not our own near-sighted "leaders," let alone the equally near-sighted leadership of the most overpopulated nation on Earth, have anything even close to an idea of how bad a future we possibly face, if drastic action, worldwide, is not undertaken soon.

We want to believe that the past is prologue to the future because, up until now, that has been our reality; within the past few generations, environmental changes have happened fairly slowly. But we also have evidence, through the stored history of ice cores, that this has not always been the case; that in the past, Earth has gone from a temperate climate to an ice age in less than one decade. Could we adapt to climate change of that magnitude, hotter or colder or wetter or drier, or to 300mph hurricanes and 5-mile wide tornados, in less than 10 years? Not a chance.

We must act, and act fast, if we are not to drastically increase the odds that one of these bleak scenarios will occur; and to do that will require that we take the less-drastic step of divorcing ourselves from our obsession with market economies. What will be necessary to save this planet, for ourselves and much of its other life, will require a level of cooperation not possible in a competitive, capitalistic economic system which depends on constant growth for its very survival. It should be obvious that infinite growth in a finite system, like Earth, is impossible; so the system will eventually collapse anyway. Are we to hold on to our delusion that this is the only workable system until that collapse, which will occur as WE collapse? To maintain that mind set in the face of our rapidly-deteriorating future is, quite simply, suicide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Answer is...
Posted by: Artemis3 on Feb 4, 2008 4:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the only thing that will pull the earth out of its downward spiral is a mass human extinction-the Native Americans are correct-we take and take and do not put back; the Great Mother will not put up with it forever.

It will be only one of perhaps many human mass extinctions in the history of the earth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement