WATER  
comments_image -

New York City Calls for Drilling Ban in Watershed, Rejects State Study

New York City officials have called for a ban on natural gas drilling within the city’s 2,000-square-mile upstate watershed.
December 29, 2009  |  
 
Advertisement
 

After months of warning signs,  New York City officials have called for a ban on natural gas drilling within the city’s 2,000-square-mile upstate watershed and urged Albany to withdraw its controversial draft environmental review for drilling across the state.

The move follows the completion of a yearlong study by a private consulting firm commissioned by the city, which found that "gas drilling poses unacceptable risks to the unfiltered drinking water supply for nine million New Yorkers." It sets up a confrontation between the city, which says any degradation of its unfiltered water supply could cost upwards of $10 billion to fix, and Gov. David Paterson, who has said the drilling would be an important part of the state’s economic recovery.

The city announced its position following the release of a consultant’s report, commissioned by city’s Department of Environmental Protection, which found that the chemicals injected into the ground as part of the drilling process known as hydraulic fracturing could make their way to groundwater and contaminate water reservoirs. It cautioned that the wastewater produced from the process posed a similar risk.

Gas development, the report said, could mean 6,000 wells drilled in the watershed and brings a "risk of exposing watershed residents and potentially NYC residents to chronic low levels of toxic chemicals."

The report also found that the fracturing process, which happens under very high pressure, could spread subsurface contamination and alter the natural flow of deep groundwater. It raised concerns that the disruption from the process could damage the tunnels that bring drinking water to the five boroughs.

The city’s investigation as well as a statewide environmental review follow a lengthy investigation by ProPublica, which found that state environment officials may not be prepared to handle the effects of the drilling, and raised early questions about how drilling development could impact New York City’s water supply.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg had declined to take a firm stance on the issue until the report was completed, but has now submitted the city’s comments to the state Department of Environmental Conservation in time to meet Albany’s Dec. 31 deadline for public review of the drilling plan.

"The mayor very clearly said that if our analysis were to determine that [drilling] should be prohibited – and now it has – we would fight it," said Marc LaVorgna, a spokesman for Bloomberg.  "It’s clear that it’s a risk that cannot be taken and drilling cannot be permitted."

At a press conference held yesterday, Gov. Paterson said that his office was aware of the mayor’s position, and that his comments would be considered during public comment period for the state’s draft environmental review on drilling released in September. The public comment period was extended from November to the end of December in response to uproar from environmentalists, politicians and concerned residents, and to allow New York City the time to complete its review.  

"This is the time when the public, the mayor and any other advocate can try to persuade us that this decision needs to be reversed," said Paterson.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Water headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: oil, gas, water, new york, drilling, marcellus shale
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Report: 'Scores' of Civilians Dead in Homs as Syrian Military Attacks

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
The Washington Post Backs the GOP's Economic Voodoo

By Dean Baker | Center for Economic and Policy Research

 
 
Is the GOP Re-Segregating the South?

By Ed Kilgore | Washington Monthly

 
 
Roseanne Barr Wants Green Party's Presidential Nomination

By staff | AlterNet

 
 
'Would You Pee in the Cup?' The Daily Show Exposes Hypocrisy of Drug Testing the Poor for Benefits

By Tony Newman | AlterNet

 
 
Food Inc. Hero Carole Morison: From Perdue Agribusiness to Sustainable Farming

By Chris Hunt | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Comedian Chris Rock Explains Why He Wouldn't Mind Paying More Taxes

By Digby | Hullabaloo

 
 
Sexist Super Bowl Ad Says If You Buy a Girl a Gift, She Will Sleep With You

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Outrage: S.E.C. Lets Firms That Wrecked the Economy Get Away With Fraud

By Steven D. | Booman Tribune

 
 
Reversal or PR Stunt? Komen Statement Renews Planned Parenthood's Eligibility for Grants

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
 
Russ Baker, WhoWhatWhy.com
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]