WATER  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 1

A Very Good Week for the World's Rivers and a Bad Week for Dams

Thanks to grassroots advocacy and new legislation, important ecosystems across the globe will be guarded from harmful damming projects.
November 16, 2009  |  
 
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Water headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

It’s been a bad week for dams – and a very good one for the world’s rivers.

In Queensland, Australia, river protectors thrilled to the news today that their long fight to Save the Mary River from the ravages of a large dam is, finally, over. The nation’s Environment Minister announced the rejection of the proposed Traveston Dam due to its ''unacceptable impacts on matters of national environment significance.''

The river-endangering dam would likely have killed off a few endangered species (including a lungfish species that has been around since the dinosaurs roamed the earth), flooded farmland, and dewatered the river for miles. The Sydney Morning Herald said, “By stopping the dam, experts said, [Peter] Garrett had made the biggest decision by an environment minister in 10 years of national environment laws.” Residents of the Mary Valley, 160 kilometres north of Brisbane, had for three years fought the dam with everything they had – from horseback protests to long-distance canoe trips to a widespread grassroots PR campaign that saw every fence post and farm building in the Mary River valley sporting signs to Save the Mary.

These dogged and inspiring activists succeeded in creating a national debate on the dam, and shone a bright spotlight on the project’s flaws. Valley residents had been on edge for three years; now, they can get on with their lives – and take immense pride in their accomplishment to save a critical watershed.

Halfway around the world, in Mexico, equally inspiring community activists have prevailed in their fight to prevent a bad dam project planned near Guadalajara, the second largest city in Mexico. In late October, the governor of Jalisco State announced the cancellation of the Arcediano Dam. The dam was expected to bring serious health risks for the three million people who would drink its water, since its source – the highly polluted Santiago River – is the recipient of large amounts of untreated domestic and industrial wastewater. In 2001, the National Water Commission called the Santiago unsuitable to supply drinking water.

It’s the second such announcement in Mexico this year; in May the Mexican press reported that another big dam – this one near Acapulco – is being postponed. Since 2004, thousands of local farmers have been fighting the construction of La Parota Dam in Guerrero state. They staged blockades, protests and legal actions, and often faced violent police repression in return.

Further south, Brazil, now on the verge of massive damming of the Amazon, may be slowing its dam boom down a bit as well. This week, a judge suspended the licensing process for Brazil’s biggest dam, the huge Belo Monte hydropower project, and ordered new public hearings on the project. Past public hearings on the contested project broke down in protests in September after it became clear the process was a sham. The judgement buys some time for activists working to raise concerns about the dam’s true costs, and its huge impacts on one of the world’s most important river systems.


Lori Pottinger is the editor of International Rivers' quarterly publication, World Rivers Review and of the annual Dams, Rivers and People reports. She also works on International Rivers' Africa program.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Water headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: water, dams, brazil, australia, damming, sydney


Comments are closed-

Our dams are nice
Posted by: FreeAmerica on Nov 17, 2009 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not all dams are bad, Pavlov. We have a couple here in northern WI that not only produce cheap clean power for thousands of people, they gave us about 5,000 acres of pristine lakes. Around those 5,000 acres we have another 12,000 acres of now preserved land that is wild and untouched.

It was such a nice area that the state bought it and turned it into a state park & forest with a preservation and silent sports mission with the full blessing of the environmental community. I co-wrote the petition to do that, and gathered almost 15,000 signatures in a couple of weeks. Only one river alliance kook opposed it.

The dams did not cover any unusual land or river, no threatened or endangered species, or archeological sites of value. They did keep the rivers alive in recent severe droughts though. The lakes have also become a nature playground with eagles, wolves, cougars, osprey, otters and a whole palette of wildlife digging the sanctuary.

You can hate dams because that is what you get paid to do, but not all are bad.

I will also point out that the state has taken to blowing up tens of thousands of beaver dams in our great forests. Viola! Guess what? Hundreds of thousands of acres of wetlands are now drained, the forests are drying up, and now our precipitation patterns have changed to the point that the composition of the forests are changing from old growth to early succession trees and scrub.

I am a whitewater paddler of over 20 years. Generally we like our rivers free flowing and undeveloped. We also like to play on dam controlled rivers when the DNR's annual summer drought dries up the previously free flowing rivers.

Certainly a lot of dams are destructive. Not all of them are. They are as natural as the beavers that gave man the idea, if done right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Our dams are nice
Posted by: FreeAmerica on Nov 17, 2009 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not all dams are bad, Pavlov. We have a couple here in northern WI that not only produce cheap clean power for thousands of people, they gave us about 5,000 acres of pristine lakes. Around those 5,000 acres we have another 12,000 acres of now preserved land that is wild and untouched.

It was such a nice area that the state bought it and turned it into a state park & forest with a preservation and silent sports mission with the full blessing of the environmental community. I co-wrote the petition to do that, and gathered almost 15,000 signatures in a couple of weeks. Only one river alliance kook opposed it.

The dams did not cover any unusual land or river, no threatened or endangered species, or archeological sites of value. They did keep the rivers alive in recent severe droughts though. The lakes have also become a nature playground with eagles, wolves, cougars, osprey, otters and a whole palette of wildlife digging the sanctuary.

You can hate dams because that is what you get paid to do, but not all are bad.

I will also point out that the state has taken to blowing up tens of thousands of beaver dams in our great forests. Viola! Guess what? Hundreds of thousands of acres of wetlands are now drained, the forests are drying up, and now our precipitation patterns have changed to the point that the composition of the forests are changing from old growth to early succession trees and scrub.

I am a whitewater paddler of over 20 years. Generally we like our rivers free flowing and undeveloped. We also like to play on dam controlled rivers when the DNR's annual summer drought dries up the previously free flowing rivers.

Certainly a lot of dams are destructive. Not all of them are. They are as natural as the beavers that gave man the idea, if done right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS