New Remarkable Numbers Released: Water Use in the US Has Dropped Per Person by 30 Percent Since 1975
Also in Water
Revealed: Astroturf Groups Planning Massive California Water Grab to Benefit Big Ag and SoCal
Dan Bacher
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick
How Limousine Liberals, Water Oligarchs and Even Sean Hannity Are Hijacking Our Water Supply
Yasha Levine
Is California's New Water Legislation Better Than Nothing?
Peter Gleick
Mystery of World's Worst Mass Arsenic Poisoning Finally Solved
A Very Good Week for the World's Rivers and a Bad Week for Dams
Lori Pottinger
New numbers on total water use in the United States in 2005 have just been released by the U.S. Geological Survey, which does an assessment of water use every five years. We have been tracking these numbers for many years. The new numbers are the latest evidence for a remarkable change in U.S. water use toward more efficient use -- a change the Pacific Institute has been calling for since our founding 22 years ago.
Water Number: 410 billion gallons per day in 2005 compared to 413 billion gallons per day in 2000. This is the total amount of water withdrawn in the U.S. for all purposes (residential, commercial, agricultural, industrial, and power plant cooling). Despite continuing population growth, despite continued economic growth, total water use in the United States is effectively unchanged from five years ago (see the Figure, below). Even more remarkable? Water use today is lower than it was 30 years ago, in 1975. And on a per-capita basis, the drop is dramatic: Water use per person in the U.S. is nearly 30 percent lower than in 1975.
This is stunning news, as we describe in a new Pacific Institute analysis. Water planners are trained to assume that as population and economies grow, water use must inevitably grow. This assumption is why we hear the drumbeat of calls for new supply, new supply, new supply. We argue that this is false -- it is possible to improve the efficiency of water use, as our studies repeatedly show, and such improvements eliminate the need for expensive and environmentally damaging new supply. And the newest data continue to back us up. The remarkable changes in water use in this country over the past 30 years are the result of two major factors: improvements in efficiency and changes in the industrial character of our water use. But the first factor is by far the most important. We are growing more food with less water, and irrigation demand is down. We are producing more goods and services with less water, and industrial demand is down. It used to take 200 tons of water to make a ton of steel. Now steel plants in the U.S. use less than 20 tons of water to make a ton of steel. That is a 90% reduction.

If each American today still used 1,940 gallons per day (as we did in 1975), population growth would have caused the U.S. to use an additional 165 billion gallons per day. That's equal to more than 12 new Colorado Rivers -- or enough water for everyone in California, New York, Florida, Texas, Illinois, and Michigan. We could never have supplied that much more water without destroying our remaining rivers, lakes, aquifers, and aquatic ecosystems. Conservation and efficiency improvements have saved our butts.
We must not get complacent. While total water use in the U.S. has, for now, leveled off, it can go back up if we stop working to improve efficiency. And as populations shift from water abundant regions of the U.S. to water-short regions, our local problems often get worse. And ultimately, water is a local problem. We must work harder to improve efficiency in these arid and semi-arid regions. And we must work harder to address population growth and distribution given our regional resource constraints.
See more stories tagged with: water, conservation, efficiency, water use
Dr. Peter Gleick is president of the Pacific Institute, an internationally recognized water expert and a MacArthur Fellow.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.