Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

Who Is Stealing California's Water?

By Peter Gleick, Pacific Institute. Posted November 4, 2009.


We must stop pretending that water is free and unlimited, available to anyone who can put a siphon in a river or drill another groundwater well.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Someone is stealing our water. Many someones. But who and how much? No one knows today, mostly because the agency responsible for keeping an eye on water rights and use -- the State Water Resources Control Board -- is blind, deaf, and dumb.

Blind, because they don't look. Deaf, because they don't listen to or act on most requests to investigate water rights allocations and use. Dumb, because they don't talk about these issues. “Asleep at the switch,” as a colleague describes it.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Peter Gleick
Dr. Peter Gleick is president of the Pacific Institute, an internationally recognized water expert and a MacArthur Fellow.

What do I mean by stealing water? I mean people extract water from our rivers and streams without a right to do so. Legal water rights are managed by the State Board. Water rights permit and license holders are required by the California Code of Regulations to file reports with the State Water Board on their water diversion and use amounts. Fewer than 70 percent of permit holders actually submit these reports. There is no penalty for failure to file a report and, worse, no verification of the numbers reported. Further, information is not available to compare face value of water rights to actual use. Some, perhaps many, rights holders are likely taking more than their right allows.

Moreover, the State Board does not have authority over the earliest water rights claims -- so-called Pre-1914 rights -- and the Board estimates that there are approximately 1,600 unreported Pre-1914 and riparian diversions in the Delta. How much water are these diverters taking? No one knows, or looks, or measures. The story is even worse for groundwater. Percolating groundwater is not subject to the State Water Board's permitting system (as though it was magically different from surface water. It isn't.) and, in most of the state is not regulated by any other public agency. How can we sustainably manage what we don't even measure? Where is our groundwater going? What is the effect of this groundwater use on surface flows? Who knows?

As bad as things are for understanding existing rights and use, there are thousands of water users extracting water with no rights at all. Or so we think. Why don't we know?

Water Number: Eight. There are only eight people statewide with responsibility for policing water theft and rights violations at the State Water Resources Control Board, and even they have other demands on their time. Republicans (and some Democrats), in the recent debate over water legislation, opposed increasing that number to around 30, and also opposed more stringent requirements that water uses be measured and reported.

Why? Because a small number of powerful people, though not most of us, and certainly not the environment, benefit from our ignorance on this issue. If actual water uses were limited to those allowed by water rights, some of us suspect that there would be a lot more water left in the rivers or available to junior water rights holders. Maybe a part of the problem with water in California, and part of the problem with the health of the Delta fisheries, is water theft, not just over-allocation and inefficient use. Wouldn't it be nice to know?

But this would require -- gasp! -- actually measuring and monitoring all water use, from surface sources to groundwater. And it would require enforcing water rights. What radical concepts. It is time for Californians to demand that we stop pretending that water is free and unlimited, available to anyone who can put a siphon in a river or drill another groundwater well. When these things are left unregulated, or as badly regulated as they are now, we rob current and future generations.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, california

Dr. Peter Gleick is president of the Pacific Institute, an internationally recognized water expert and a MacArthur Fellow.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
The Irony
Posted by: stellabloo on Nov 5, 2009 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... is that the California State University, Sacramento, has operator's training programs which set the standard for the ENTIRE CONTINENT.

And one of the things covered in their training manuals is the need to do a comprehensive watershed survey on a routine basis. This would apply to any city, town, county or regional district that runs a public water utility. Any potential sources of pollution or water use conflict should be examined in detail. The emphasis is on a pro-active approach.

Great advice, if only they would take it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is too idealistic
Posted by: satow on Nov 16, 2009 2:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be wonderful to monitor water use, but unfortunately, it wouldn't do much for water conservation. By creating a system of such regulations you end up hurting the end user, such as families, and putting money into the hands of politicians and corporations who will control and sell water as a commodity. Why is this bad? Because they would charge water at any price they feel they can profit at the expense of the consumer. Conservation with such as system won't be enforced. History has shown this to be true.

Corporate e.g. industrial and agricultural water use would be subsidized by families paying a premium. For example, in California, the Delta/Mendota peripheral canal takes water from the Sacramento/Stockton Delta and sells it to the corporate farmers in Bakersfield and further south. The use of this water is unregulated with no conservation controls. They can do flood irigation, the car wash business are free to use as much as they want, golf course watering their greens in 110F sun during the day. Why? Because since they are paying for it - they can do anything they want. During the 70's and 80's Southern Californians were washing their cars and watering their lawns and wasting water, while Northern Californians could not - without penalties and fines. Where did this water come from? From Northern California, primarily from the central valley and the Owens valley. Target the corporate users of water, not the families. Areas which import water should be paying the price for that water, not those areas that supply it. The people who own the water - like Northern Californians where it originates - should benefit from it, not the politicians and the corporations who will profit by selling to other areas. It has nothing to do with conservation, just profit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

there is a simple solution to a water shortage in Cali, and other places located by oceans, lakes
Posted by: eosrk on Nov 16, 2009 6:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ITS CALLED A DESALINATION PLANT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement