Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

Southeast Water Scarcity Blamed on Overpopulation

Environment News Service. Posted October 23, 2009.


The population is still growing with many people migrating into the region, but little has been done to increase water storage or reduce consumption.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The most recent drought in the southeastern United States destroyed billions of dollars worth of crops, drained reservoirs and touched off legal wars among a half-dozen states, but the havoc came not from exceptional dryness but from booming population and bad planning, says a new Columbia University study.

Researchers from Columbia's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory have showed that the 2005-2007 drought was mild compared to many others and was no worse than one just a decade ago.

The study finds that climate change has played no detectable role in the frequency or severity of droughts in the region, and its future effects there are uncertain; but droughts there are essentially unpredictable, and could strike again at any time. The study appears in the October edition of the "Journal of Climate."

"The drought that caused so much trouble was pathetically normal and short, far less than what the climate system is capable of generating," said lead author Richard Seager, a climate modeler at Lamont-Doherty.

"People were saying that this was a 100-year drought, but it was pretty run-of-the-mill," he said. "The problem is, in the last 10 years population has grown phenomenally, and hardly anyone, including the politicians, has been paying any attention."

Region wide, the drought ran from late 2005 to winter 2007-2008, though many areas in the south were still dry until September, when the weather turned and flooding killed at least eight people.

Shrunken Lake Lanier, November 2007. (Photo by Robert Lz)

During the height of the dry period, Atlanta's main reservoir, Lake Lanier, sank more than 14 feet, usage restrictions were declared, and states sued each other and the federal government over use of water in rivers and reservoirs.

Seager and his coauthors Alexandrina Tzanova and Jennifer Nakamura put the period in context by comparing it with instrumental weather records from the last century and studies of tree-growth rings, which vary according to rainfall, for the last 1,000 years.

These records show that more severe, extended region-wide droughts came in 1555-1574, 1798-1826 and 1834-1861.

The 1500s drought, which ran into the 1600s in some areas, has been linked by other studies to the destruction of early Spanish and English New World colonies, including Jamestown, Virginia, where 80 percent of settlers died in a short time.

The 20th century was relatively wet, but the study showed that even the 1998-2002 drought was worse than that in 2005-2007.

The factor that has changed is population. In 1990, Georgia, which uses a quarter of the region's water, had 6.5 million people. By 2007, there were 9.5 million - a rise of almost 50 percent in 17 years.

The population is still growing with many people migrating into the region, but little has been done to increase water storage or reduce consumption, the study finds. There has been increased sewage discharge near water supplies, and lands have been covered with impermeable roofs, roads and parking lots, which allow rainfall to run off instead of storing it.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, population

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Source of potable water
Posted by: grh20 on Oct 23, 2009 7:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there was a source of water in the south and southeast that if only 25 percent was collected and the amounts would equal 4.2 billion gallons of potable water, which does not deplete ground water sources and is collected in 6 months, would this help offset some of the water demands?
Since it is a new source, costs to start would be greater then what is available now but with the right research and managment it might be feasible, and coverable of cost over time could be realized since it is a source that will increase and be available for years to come.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

@#%&!!!!! Sensationalism Rules The Day - AGAIN
Posted by: stellabloo on Oct 26, 2009 12:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If a lifeboat is full of shipwreck survivors and they discover that someone has eaten all the food rations and used most of the water to take a shower - is the problem still overpopulation?

Is it because blaming OVERCONSUMPTION for water scarcity is not provocative enough? Must we always use xenophobia as the prime catalyst for change?

Myth #1 - Other countries use less water because their standard of living is lower.

Fact: Out of 29 developed countries, the US is #29th when it comes to water conservation. Figures peg US consumption at 151 gallons per person per day. That is a HUGE number, 6x what the chinese use, 4x what the swedes use, and 8x what the danish use. The standard of living in scandanavian countries can be considered the same as in North America, or better.

Myth #2: We use so much water because we like hot showers and dishwashers - and who doesn't?

Fact: Most of our water goes to: watering the lawn, washing the car or hosing down the driveway.

Myth #3: Water metering and chlorination are the tools of the corporate antichrist.

Fact: Water metering has been proven to reduce water consumption. Chlorination is a good alternative to cholera, dysentry, ghiardia and e. coli.

Myth #4: "Toilet to Tap" is a new technology used in California despite much public resistance.

Fact: Toilet to Tap is a reality for most people in the world, unless you live in a pristine wilderness. Every wastewater treatment plant, if it's not discharging into the ocean, is discharging into somebody else's water supply. Shallow aquifers are not immune. Do you know where YOUR water comes from?

Myth #5: Out of sight, out of mind. Not my problem.

Fact: We do have the technology to clean even the dirtiest water. We have the technology to extract the waste from sewage and turn it into odorless fertilizer pellets, ready for commercial use. HOWEVER, most current water treatment and especially most wastewater treatment is woefully inadequate to remove the hundreds of manmade pollutants we add.
Your prescription pills? Straight through the sewage treatment plant and into the river. Your household cleaner? Straight through the plant and into the river. Your bodywash, hairspray and wrinkle cream? Ditto.

Myth #6: We use too much water because we have too many people.

Fact: People use water but so does agriculture and industry. Human waste is infinitely easier to treat than industrial wastewater or landfill leachate. The cattle industry may be directly responsible for both the Walkerton e. coli and Milwaukee cryptosporidium outbreaks.

Better industry controls are required to reduce water consumption and protect the environment. Agriculture should be switching to sustainable methods anyway: organic mulch, drip irrigation, crop rotation, and use of drought-resistant hemp instead of corn for animal feed and ethanol production!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement