Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

Groups Rally to Stop Nestlé's Raid on Sacramento Water

By Dan Bacher, AlterNet. Posted October 20, 2009.


Grassroots community activists are mobilizing against the internationally boycotted corporation that is planning to bottle water in an already parched state.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Sacramento councilmember Kevin McCarty again raised the issue of the plan by Nestlé to build a new bottling plant in South Sacramento at last Tuesday night's Sacramento City Council meeting as grassroots community activists mobilized against the internationally boycotted corporation coming to the Capital City.

McCarty asked for the issue to be agendized for a future city council meeting so that an "urgency ordinance" can be passed, according to Save Our Water in Sacramento, the grassroots group fighting against Nestlé's plan to come to Sacramento after being kicked out of McCloud by massive local resistance.

"Councilmember McCarty will be asking the council to pass an urgency ordinance that would require a special permit for water bottling facilities in the city," said Evan Tucker, an activist with Save Our Water. "This would require this type of project to come before the city council and be subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act."

"We are excited about this development, but concerned about the timeline," Tucker stated. "If the council does not agendize this issue soon, it could be too late for the new law to affect Nestle. We want to make sure the ordinance would affect Nestle, not just bottling plants in the future."

Vice Mayor Lauren Hammond also said she was concerned about water bottling in this city and wanted this issue addressed by the council, noted Tucker. However, Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson supports the proposal by Nestlé to open up the plant, claiming it would bring "jobs" to Sacramento.

Nestlé claims the Sacramento plant would be a “micro-bottling plant,” bottling only 50 million gallons of water per year. However, according to the Department of Utilities, the estimated water usage is 215 thousand – 320 thousand gallons of water per day (78 – 116 millions per year). "This would make Nestlé one of the top ten water users in Sacramento at a time when we are in our third consecutive year of a drought," emphasized Tucker.

At a time when Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Senator Dianne Feinstein and California Legislators are campaigning for a peripheral canal to steal more water from the Sacramento River to supply unsustainable corporate agribusiness on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley and unsustainable development in southern California, we don't need a huge corporation such as Nestlé making immense profits off a public trust resource, Sacramento's water supply!

Human rights activists and breast feeding advocates from throughout the world have boycotted the Swiss-based Nestlé Corporation since 1977 because of the millions of deaths of infants it has caused over the decades. The boycott, coordinated by groups including Baby Milk Action, International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN) , Infant Feeding Action Coalition (INFACT) and Save the Children, was prompted by concern about the company's marketing of breast milk substitutes (infant formula), particularly in less economically developed countries, which campaigners claim contributes to the unnecessary death and suffering of babies, largely among the poor.

"Nestlé is targeted with the boycott because monitoring conducted by the International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN) finds it to be responsible for more violations of the World Health Assembly marketing requirements for baby foods than any other company," according to Baby Milk Action.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that 1.5 million infants die around the world every year because they are not breastfed. Where water is unsafe, a bottle-fed child is up to 25 times more likely to die as a result of diarrhea than a breastfed child. "Marketing practices that undermine breastfeeding are potentially hazardous wherever they are pursued," according to UNICEF.

Anti-Nestlé organizations are sponsoring this year's Nestlé-Free Week from October 26 to November 1 in an effort to raise the profile of the boycott.

Do we want a criminal corporation responsible for the deaths of millions of infants come to Sacramento to make immense profits off our water supply?

Please spend a moment to contact Kevin McCarty and Lauren Hammond and let them know that you want the urgency ordinance passed in time to apply to Nestlé. Contact Kevin McCarty at (916) 808-7006 or KMcCarty [at] cityofsacramento.org and Lauren Hammond at (916) 808-7005 or lhammond [at] cityofsacramento.org

Also, Save Our Water will be holding a screening of Tapped at the Crest Theater at 1013 K Street, Sacramento, on Wednesday, October 21. There will be screenings at 5:30 pm and 8 pm. Tickets will be regular box office prices: $9.50 for general admission, $6.00 for students & seniors. You can also purchase them online prior to the event at: http://www.tickets.com/browseother.cgi?minpid=6622428

For more information, go to http://www.SaveOurWaterSacramento.org


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, bottled water, water privatization, nestle, sacramento

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
boss man
Posted by: sopomike on Oct 23, 2009 6:29 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nestle forgit about california move to nashville georgia bring your company we need the jobs and we got more water than we know what to do with

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hear that hollow sound? Posted by: pete ess
"Stealing", Hah!
Posted by: drunkio on Oct 24, 2009 1:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Stealing" Sac's water before they dump their untreated raw sewage, that will head unabated for SF Bay is always a good idea.

The real question is, is Nestle's plant at the front or back end of Sac? I'm guessing all that untreated water will get to the mouths of the bay area elites one way or another.

Besides. The 'corporate farmers' as you call them are giving up and drilling wells anyway. Or just taking their operations south of the border which is what the bay area elites wanted anyway; that is, 'no food in my backyard.'

If Sac needs revenue why not? The water is dirty, untreated and someone will do something with it other than dump it into the SFBay. But either way, bay area elists can drink what they sow.

-Drunken Economist
http://mindtaker.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/drunk_economist

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

morgan1
Posted by: morgan1 on Oct 24, 2009 3:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This thinking is why the US is in the mess it is in. California as a whole is facing very serious water issues that have been coming down the pike for decades and ignored. Nestle is a world polluter and being confronted with a water crisis, considering allowing Nestle to set up business and steal water to sell for a few jobs, well, anyone voting for that should be fired and lose all privileges to drink water free. How do all these elected officials continue to get into office and not be held accountable? Its maddening.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHAT NESTLE ACTUALLY SUPPORTS
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Oct 24, 2009 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call this number and see which button you have to push and why~~~~

1-800-637-8534

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is just
Posted by: dadanbetty on Oct 25, 2009 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the beginning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The beginning
Posted by: osd on Oct 25, 2009 8:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of taking over the water supply. That puts corporations in the fore front of controlling the population. You won't know what they'll put in your water, or what they won't take out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement