Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

Lester Brown: How to Mobilize to Save Civilization

By Lester R. Brown, Climate Progress. Posted October 14, 2009.


The world renown environmentalist writes about his new book and lays out the devastating impacts unrestricted emissions of greenhouse gases will have on food and water.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Notwithstanding the Superfreaks, a lot of good books on global warming and its solutions are coming out right now.  One of the best is Lester Brown's "Plan B 4.0:  Mobilizing to Save Civilization."  In his book, Brown lays out the too-little-discussed but devastating impacts unrestricted emissions of greenhouse gases will have on agriculture, expanding on his Scientific American piece "Could Food Shortages Bring Down Civilization?"

He also lays out one of the most comprehensive set of solutions you can find in one place, including important subjects and strategies that don't get enough attention, with a full chapter on "Eradicating Poverty and Stabilizing Population," another one on "Restoring the Earth," which focuses on regenerating forests, soils, and fisheries, and, of course, "Feeding Eight [!] Billion People Well" -- the exclamation point is mine.

I had lunch with him recently, an eye-opener even for someone who follows these issues closely.  I asked him to submit some blog posts.  What follows is his first, about his new book, which was just released September 29. -- Joseph Romm

In early 2008, Saudi Arabia announced that, after being self-sufficient in wheat for over 20 years, the non-replenishable aquifer it had been pumping for irrigation was largely depleted.

In response, officials said they would reduce their wheat harvest by one eighth each year until production would cease entirely in 2016. The Saudis would then import virtually all the grain consumed by their Canada-sized population of nearly 30 million people.

The Saudis are unique in being so wholly dependent on irrigation.  But other, far larger, grain producers such as India and China are facing irrigation water losses and could face grain production declines.

Water Shortages Undermining Food Security

Fifteen percent of India's grain harvest is produced by overpumping its groundwater. In human terms, 175 million Indians are being fed with grain produced from wells that will be going dry. The comparable number for China is 130 million. Among the many other countries facing harvest reductions from groundwater depletion are Pakistan, Iran, and Yemen.

The tripling of world wheat, rice, and corn prices between mid-2006 and mid-2008 signaled our growing vulnerability to food shortages. It took the worst economic meltdown since the Great Depression to lower grain prices.

Past decades have witnessed world grain price surges, but they were event-drive-a drought in the former Soviet Union, a monsoon failure in India, or a crop-withering heat wave in the U.S. Corn Belt. This most recent price surge was trend-driven, the result of our failure to reverse the environmental trends that are undermining world food production.

These trends include-in addition to falling water tables-eroding soils and rising temperatures from increasing greenhouse gas emissions. Rising temperatures bring crop-shrinking heat waves, melting ice sheets, rising sea level, and shrinking mountain glaciers.

With both the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets melting at an accelerating pace, sea level could rise by up to six feet during this century. Such a rise would inundate much of the Mekong Delta, which produces half of the rice in Viet Nam, the world's second-ranking rice exporter. Even a three-foot rise in sea level would cover half the riceland in Bangladesh, a country of 160 million people. And these are only two of Asia's many rice-growing river deltas.

The world's mountain glaciers have shrunk for 18 consecutive years. Many smaller glaciers have disappeared. Nowhere is the melting more alarming than in the Himalayas and on the

Tibetan plateau where the ice melt from glaciers sustains not only the dry-season flow of the Indus, Ganges, Yangtze, and Yellow rivers but also the irrigation systems that depend on them. Without these glaciers, many Asian rivers would cease to flow during the dry season.

The wheat and rice harvests of China and India would be directly affected. China is the world's leading wheat producer. India is second. (The United States is third.) With rice, China and India totally dominate the world harvest. The projected melting of these glaciers poses the most massive threat to food security the world has ever faced.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: agriculture, food, hunger, water, global warming, climate change, lester brown

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
There is no sign anyone is listening or cares
Posted by: Paul_C on Oct 14, 2009 11:49 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It will take a global catastrophe to get people concerned. Even then the fact that we are a corporate-fascist state means that the message will be spun every way but truthfully and the U.S. will balk until there is pandemonium in the streets and the last vestiges of our civilization break down.

By then it won't matter. We will be living like Mad Max at Thunderdome with Karl Rove's head being carried around by Arnie Schwartzenegger.

Stock up on water, food, bullets and gasoline! And remember, keep your gear simple - you'll need to be able to fix it yourself when it breaks fighting the roving fundie undead zombie hordes trying to eat your flesh!

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WARNING: Common Sense is in Short Supply!
Posted by: stellabloo on Oct 15, 2009 10:43 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to this video, it is possible to make hemp ethanol for about $1.40 per gallon. Hemp ethanol was used to power the original Model T's. Rockefeller made his first billion by 1910 using a waste product of the oil refining process to power his fleet of cars and trucks - gasoline. This discovery was followed shortly by Ethanol Prohibition (Rockefeller, incidentally, was a teetotaller) which, because of its ultimate impracticality, was followed by Hemp Prohibition instead.

You can call me a pie-in-the-sky granola cruncher all you want but it is unbelievable that in this time of food and fuel shortage, the US government is stalling on the legalization of a non-psychoactive plant that does not require petroleum-based fertilizer or pesticide, is drought-resistant and has the fastest growing biomass on the planet (i.e. most efficient conversion of carbon to cellulose). Unbelievable that we are not even discussing the re-introduction of this historically valuable crop back into our food chain....

You may want to at least stock up on hemp hearts (available from Canada) so you can still get your EFA's to maintain optimum health when all the fish are gone and the undead fundie zombies have eaten your doctor :.?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lester Brown rocks
Posted by: Charlow on Oct 16, 2009 4:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lester Brown has always been right, including when I was a Foreign Service Officer in Japan and Lester came in as a speaker and freaked everyone out when he said that China was going to compete for all of the world's resources, especially food! The Dept. of Ag. people at the Embassy were climbing all over themselves, saying, oh gee, he really didn't mean that, and we the USA would always have enough to feed everyone, etc. etc.

Now, we have about 10 years to do what needs to be done, to get things turned around and seriously moving in the right direction. It only took 8 years for Bush to so royally screw things up, so think just oppositely, what all we can do if we really get serious for the next 10 years about doing things right, thinking strategically, and then actually doing it!

I myself am a very cautious optimist. I decided to be an optimist many many years ago, and to always look for ways to solve problems, especially the big ones, and to not take no for an answer. This is not to say that any of this is easy -- but, we do have people who know the various pieces of science, technology, policy, humanitarianism, finance, and so on, to get this done. This is one huge systems engineering problem, and this is something we can do.

I'm with Lester Brown. It is all to easy to wring our hands and spend all our time complaining that the sky is falling and to criticize those who have gotten us into the mess we're in. That goes for the "conservatives" who now want to spend all their time complaining about the Democrats and President Obama, blaming him for everything including the federal deficit, the war in Afghanistan, and so on, with him in office less than 9 months, ignoring the fact that it is nearly 70 years of post-war government policies and human rapaciousness that have gotten us into this, especially the past 30 years of neo-con, Laffer curver economics, which has featured the reduction of the top tax bracket in the United States go from 90% down to 30% or less. Complaining is all to easy... so, when I hear a complainer on either side, I try to get them to stop and ask them what they would do to solve the problem they are complaining about.

Lester Brown is a problem solver and he is just the sort of person we need to be listening to when he tells us how we can turn this collapse of civilization in the making around.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

but...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Oct 18, 2009 2:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What no one will ask... is civilization really worth saving in the first place???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Are Even The Gurus Afraid to Mention Industrial Hemp
Posted by: robbrian on Oct 18, 2009 8:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know all elected officials have become whores for the energy and pharmacutical industry, depending upon their silver for election and re-election. But academicians? Where's the intellectual honesty?

On the eve of marijuana prohibition in the U.S., two articles about hemp appeared in major U.S. magazines. They were:

“The Most Profitable And Desireable Crop That Can Be Grown” From: Mechanical Engineering, February 26, 1937

“New Billion Dollar Crop” From: Popular Mechanics, February 1938

These articles reveal that hemp was on the verge of becoming a super crop because of new hemp processing technologies that were recently developed to produce fuel oil and cheaper by-products for medicinal use. Unfortunately, the potential of hemp was never reaped because of marijuana prohibition.

Hemp is legally grown for commercial use throughout much of Europe, India, China, Russia, Ukraine. In 1994 the Canadian government approved one experimental hemp field - its first legal hemp crop in 40 years. In 1995, there will be 11 government-approved hemp fields in Canada! If the U.S. does not legalize hemp for commercial use, a significant economic and environmental opportunity will be lost; the benefits will be reaped only by our economic competitors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement