Dammed Crazy: What Do California's Water Woes Teach Us?
Also in Water
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick
How Limousine Liberals, Water Oligarchs and Even Sean Hannity Are Hijacking Our Water Supply
Yasha Levine
Is California's New Water Legislation Better Than Nothing?
Peter Gleick
Mystery of World's Worst Mass Arsenic Poisoning Finally Solved
A Very Good Week for the World's Rivers and a Bad Week for Dams
Lori Pottinger
California's Water Crisis Is Just the Beginning for Water Woes in the U.S.
Susan J. Marks
California is schizophrenic when it comes to water.
In the past week, we Californians have been bombarded with news about our troubled water system, good and bad.
The most encouraging news comes from the northern part of the state, where a deal has finally been struck to remove four very destructive dams on the Klamath. The river once supported the state’s second biggest salmon run. This will be the world’s biggest dam-removal project.
Just days before, the San Francisco Chronicle reported on the brewing water war over the Governor’s plans to spend $3.7 billion to build new dams. California already has more than 1,000 dams, many of which – like those on the Klamath – are at the heart of our current problems with dying deltas, sinking land, costly levee repairs, and devastated fisheries.
Water conservation expert Peter Gleick says the proposed new dams will bring only a marginal improvement in water reliability, and aren’t worth the economic and environmental costs. His Pacific Institute has produced plans for saving large amounts of water in agriculture and cities, which would make the dams unnecessary.
Meanwhile, in an effort to resurrect California's second largest river system, the Feds will soon begin releasing more water out of the Friant Dam into the parched San Joaquin River and its dying delta. The project is an experiment in the new science of “environmental flows” from dams, and the goal here is to try to restore another major fishery that dried up 60 years ago. At the same time, in hearings described by the San Francisco Chronicle as resembling the water wars of the 1920s, Senator Dianne Feinstein called for a National Academy of Science study of federal water rulings aimed at saving the fisheries of the San Joaquin, and possibly suspending the Endangered Species Act during the current drought.
It almost makes our national health care debate look reasoned.
The world has long looked to California's massively engineered water system as "advanced" and worth emulating. "Where would you be without all your dams?" I was asked on my first trip to South Africa, which then was building a huge dam system to transfer water from its poor, landlocked neighbor of Lesotho. It's been a familiar refrain in my years of travel to various African nations for International Rivers, where we team up with people working to save their rivers and protect their communities from big dams.
See more stories tagged with: water, california, drought, dams, bay delta, peripheral canal
Lori Pottinger is the editor of International Rivers' quarterly publication, World Rivers Review and of the annual Dams, Rivers and People reports. She also works on International Rivers' Africa program.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.