David v. Goliath: Help Michigan Citizens Protect Their Water from Nestle's Bottling Operations
Also in Water
Al Gore: A Billion People's Water at Risk From Melting Ice
Damning New Evidence Raises Concerns About Threats to New York's Water from Gas Drilling
Byard Duncan
Heartbreaking Stories Warn New Yorkers of What May Be in Store if the State OKs Controversial Gas Drilling
Maura Stephens
What the Frack? Poisoning our Water in the Name of Energy Profits
Peter Gleick
Meet Stewart Resnick, Corporate Farming Billionaire and One-Man Environmental Wrecking Crew
Lance Williams
Time is ticking. It's been nine years now since Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation first went to court to stop Nestlé from pumping millions of gallons from a rural Michigan wildlife preserve. And the outcome of a court hearing on July 6 will determine whether our judicial system can work to protect community water rights.
There are two things at stake:
The first is the outcome of the case, which will determine whether or not Nestlé can continue to drain large quantities of water from rural Michigan, narrowing streams, exposing mud flats, and reducing flow levels. A Nestlé victory guarantees the world's largest bottler access to water at the expense of local ecosystems and businesses, such as tourism, that depend on the watershed's long-term viability.
The second is whether Nestlé will win merely on the basis of financial might rather than on the basis of what's right. Going to court is expensive, especially against Nestlé, a massive global corporation that can easily pour millions into defending its profits. The Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation have dug deep, running bake sales and raffles to garner the resources needed to stand up to Nestlé in court through several rounds of Nestlé appeals. Now, as the community is heading into the most crucial round of the Nestlé battle, they are in urgent need of additional funds to keep them in the courtroom through the close of the summer hearing -- the legal fees are no joke, amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The case could have been over in 2003, when a judge determined that Nestlé's withdrawal of 400 gallons of water a minute was having a negative impact on several local streams and ponds, and called a halt to the pumping. But the pumping never stopped. Nestlé appealed and hired its own scientists to produce studies that validated its operations. To counter Nestlé's efforts, the community has had to continue to hire lawyers and experts and the fees are piling up. Nestlé has run the community dry in more ways than one.
This case underscores the importance of water resources remaining in public control and decisions about water being made locally and democratically...water is too precious to hand over to Goliath.
For more information or to help the Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation get into the courtroom, click here.
See more stories tagged with: water, bottled water, water privatization, nestle
Leslie Samuelrich is deputy director of Corporate Accountability International.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.