Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

Water-Energy Dependency May Put a Damper on Water Banking in California

By Meaghan Daly, Water Matters @ Columbia. Posted June 16, 2009.


The interwoven nature of water and energy in California will undoubtedly grow more complex -- and strained -- in the years to come.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

We've been following some of the issues related to the drought in California. In response to water shortages, a "water bank" has been implemented to allow users who do not use all of their water to sell it to other users. In theory, such a system allows water to be used in an efficient manner, with higher priority users gaining the ability to purchase water when there are shortages.

In looking at the reality of implementing such a system, however, it becomes clear that there are challenges on many levels. This is evidenced by the fact that despite the state's efforts, it will likely only promote the trade of 82,000 acre feet of water this year -- less than 15% of what it had been hoping for.

One major challenge is related to the price of food crops, which have risen drastically in the last year, making the sale of water less appealing to farmers.  Additionally, there is the fundamental challenge of getting the water where it needs to be once it has been purchased, a task that requires vast amounts of energy.

In many places, where water-energy dependency is already an issue, this may detract from the potential benefit that could be derived from systems like water banking.

In California, this is a particularly serious problem.  A study conducted by the California Energy Commission in 2005 found that 19% of the state's energy use is water related, being used to pump, treat, transport, heat, cool, and recycle water.  Additionally, 30 percent of California's natural gas consumption and 88 billion gallons of diesel fuel combustion per year are tied to supplying water to municipal, agricultural, and industrial users.

This scenario is likely to be exacerbated by ever-increasing demand for water due to high rates of population growth and the likely implications of climate change. The state's water plan anticipates minimizing expected water deficits in the next 25 years through the use of desalination and water recycling. Both of these, however, are energy intensive processes. As a result, the interwoven nature of water and energy in California will undoubtedly grow more complex -- and strained -- in the years to come.

Therefore, the prospect for water banking in California in the future becomes more dubious when considered in the context of energy demand, as the whole concept of a water bank necessitates an increase in the transport of water - sometimes over great distances.  Water conveyance can have widely fluctuating energy intensity, depending on the distance and the elevation covered, and can comprise a significant portion of the water related energy use, especially in years when there are shortages.

Source: The Future is Now: An Update on Climate Change Science Impacts and Response Options for California

Source: The Future is Now: An Update on Climate Change Science Impacts and Response Options for California

As you can see from the chart, the energy intensity for water supply and conveyance can range from 0 to 14,000 kWh per million gallons. This is because in a typical hydrological year, 60% of California's water supply comes from more easily accessed surface water sources. In years of shortage, however, groundwater can account for the majority of supply, as pumping is necessary, thus increasing energy use dramatically. Water banking may only amplify this problem.

While significant precipitation events during the past month have helped to slightly ease the current water shortage crisis, 35 local water management agencies have mandated conservation measures and 94% of agricultural businesses have been impacted by drought conditions this year. (For current updates on the drought in California, click here.) But drought is not a problem that is likely to disappear any time in the near future in the state of California. Thus, any solutions should necessarily take long-term impacts into account - including increased energy use.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: energy, water, california, water banking, water bank

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
New 325,900,000,000 gallons each year ... investigate ?
Posted by: WaterSource on Jun 17, 2009 5:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All 450 CA water districts, CA agencies and the Bureau of Reclamation have been offered a confidential disclosure of a new NON-TRIBUTARY fresh water Source that can yield a million acre feet EACH YEAR and be stored/accumulated in Lake Mead which holds 28.5 million acre feet and is 50% empty. Lake Mead when reasonably FULL generates 2000 megawatts of RENEWABLE ENERGY ! With communication and cooperation the Source can be delivered WITHOUT POWER. Development of the Source will not damage the environment or the water rights of anyone, anywhere.

WaterSource/WaterBank waterrdw@yahoo.com Retired Water Rights Analyst

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Solar? Desalinization? When, if not now?
Posted by: hardwroc on Jun 19, 2009 2:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I were governator, I'd be lobbyin for a WPA like effort 24/7 making and installing solar in every logical spot available, and would be seeking a desaline plant/s ASAP rather than attempt to steal more water from the north leaving them to parch.
Lake Mead, is there, but, I'm wondering if the transport would be as costly as desal on the coast. They could even consider working with Mexico to jointly build and share water helping two countries at one time......
I know, I know, that's just too "weak" when we could be threatening them instead, because that has worked out so well the last 8 years.

Remember "Rosie the riveter"? Wouldn't now be a good time for "suzie solar tech" or "Steven"
I just mean it's time to stop sucking regions dry while NOT really addressing the problems, and a war time production effort of solar and wind while also building desaline plants would be aiming at multiple problems, and if done by a governmental project and NOT Frickin Haliburton, we could do it for probably 1/3 the cost. It would provide JOBS, and TAX revenues and Less welfare and unemployment costs, and valuable natural resources......Hello
Anybody alive at the controls anybody?????
Ahnold? Ahnold ????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BeWaterWise Rep
Posted by: BeWaterWiseRep on Jul 10, 2009 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Water is a controversial topic, however the truth of the matter is that like in many parts of the world, water levels in Southern California too are dropping and it is up to consumers to be more conscious about their use of water.
Thankfully there are numerous easy and inexpensive tips to conserve water at home, office and school.
These tips can be accessed from BeWaterWise.com, http://tr.im/rIWc Do read them and pass the word around.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement