Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

Why Does Two-Thirds of the World's Population Still Not Have Access to Safe Drinking Water?

By Melinda Burns, Miller-McCune.com. Posted May 29, 2009.


The funds needed for water resources are miniscule compared those given to reduce carbon emissions and deal with the global financial crisis.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Despite promises made by world leaders nearly a decade ago, a new United Nations report has concluded it is still "business as usual" for 5 billion people -- about two-thirds of the world population -- who do not have access to safe drinking water, adequate sanitation or enough food to eat.

That's the grim assessment of "Water in a Changing World", the U.N.'s third triennial water development report since 2000. It was presented this spring at the World Water Forum in Istanbul, Turkey, as several hundred protesters demonstrated against large dam construction and the privatization of water supplies in the developing world.

The report called on governments and the private sector urgently to increase their investment in water resources, noting that the funds needed for water resources are miniscule compared to the funds already pledged and obtained to reduce carbon emissions and deal with the global financial crisis.

Although more than 90 percent of the world's population is expected to have access to safe drinking water by 2015, progress in basic sanitation lags far behind, the report said. Most of the sewage in developing countries is discharged without treatment, and an estimated 5,000 children die every day from diarrhea, a disease that often can be prevented by washing one's hands with soap. That's about 10 children dying in the time it will take to read this article.

Nor are the problems confined to the developing world. In the United States, the report said, it will require an investment of more than $1 trillion dollars over the next 20 years to bring aging water supply systems and sewer infrastructure up to current standards.

"This is a call for action now, before it is too late," Engin Koncagul, a coordinator for the U.N.'s water assessment program, said at a recent water forum in Santa Barbara, Calif. Many countries spend more on the military than they do on water resources and public health, he said.

"Spending on water infrastructure must be a high priority for leaders in government," Koncagul said. "We must invest in developing countries. After decades of inaction, we can always make a change, as long as there is good will."

Environmentalist and human rights advocacy groups such as International Rivers, a nonprofit organization based in Berkeley, Calif., sent representatives to Istanbul to protest what they view as the bias among water bureaucrats in the government and private sector in favor of large dams and centralized irrigation systems -- projects they say aren't cost-effective and won't bridge the water divide between rich and poor.

"You would get more bang for the buck addressing the leaks in existing water infrastructure," said Peter Bosshard, a policy director for International Rivers who helped organize the Alternative Water Forum, an event attended by 1,000 people in Istanbul.

"And if you want to strengthen the ability of Africa's poor farmers to deal with water scarcity, to do the most with water that's available, you have to adopt decentralized approaches," Bosshard said. "Centralized irrigation is not an option for the poor in many parts of the world."

Two International Rivers staff members were arrested at the March 16 opening of the World Water Forum and deported the next day for displaying a banner that read, "No Risky Dams."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, water crisis, water shortage, safe drinking water

Melinda Burns is an independent writer living in Santa Barbara, Calif. She was previously a senior writer for the Santa Barbara News-Press, covering immigration, urban planning, science and the environment.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Re: Water Is A Necessity
Posted by: SwampFox-82nd on Jun 5, 2009 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The simple reason water is scarce is because it was "privatized." We all know the word, but very few know how it was manipulated. We've known that water WAS NOT a luxury: mankind will die without water in seven days. Before we had a Republican governor, water was controlled by the state. Pete Wilson said we would have cheaper water if it was privatized. Today we all know that was a crock of GOP poop. And just whom is the benefactor? They actually call themselves a corporation. I will let you do the research, I already know the truth. ~Peace~

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re: Note
Posted by: SwampFox-82nd on Jun 5, 2009 11:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
California is the richest state in the world! Do the math before you open your mouths.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WATER IS CHEAP TODAY
Posted by: pfm on Jun 5, 2009 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we truly believe and feel that water is expensive today I invite Americans to wait until Senate Bill 787 is passed by the US Congress granting to the federal government complete and sole sovereignty over all water in these United States irrespective of its source or current reputed ownership. When this occurs and it most assuredly will unless WE choose to set to the plate and stop it, water will be sold to the highest bidder under duress imposed via the World Bank – WTO – INF – utilizing an illegally implied demand that WE shall accept all their terms and conditions without recourse. Those believing I am merely attempt to promote some cheap form of fear, I invite you to do your own research on the terms and conditions imposed when these three come calling.

In the 21st century, whoever controls – water – controls the destiny of all mankind – think about it…?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement