Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

Are Policy Makers Exacerbating Drought Scares? That's What It Looks Like in California

By Tara Lohan, AlterNet. Posted May 8, 2009.


Like much of the West, the state has serious water issues, but Mother Nature is only partly to blame.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Take shorter showers, wash only full loads of laundry, sweep instead of hose your driveway.

These are the messages that Californians are getting as part of the state's new "Save Our Water" campaign. Just weeks ago, 19 million Southern Californians were told they would be seeing mandatory restrictions, and at the same time, thousands of farmworkers marched to protest water cuts in the agricultural San Joaquin Valley in the central part of the state.

All this seems to fit with a February proclamation from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger that California is facing a drought emergency that director of the Department of Water Resources Lester Snow compared at one point this winter to the worst drought in modern history of the state.

But not everyone is convinced about how dire the situation is and why. In a controversial story in the Stockton Record, columnist Michael Fitzgerald wrote, "California's 'drought' is overblown. The alarmists calling it a historic disaster are trying to pull a fast one."

Responding in kind, an op-ed from fisherman Dan Bacher began, "Lester Snow, the director of the state Department of Water Resources, tried to 'snow' the public by making false claims of a 'drought' scenario in California in an announcement on April 2."

So what gives? Are these guys fringe extremists, or is there any truth to their words?

According to the Department of Water Resources, the monthly readings for April showed that reservoirs were at 80 percent of their historic average. Statewide precipitation was also around 80 percent of average, and total runoff for the year is likely to be around 70 percent.

Critics, like Bacher and Fitzgerald contend that this doesn't hardly constitute an emergency. But DWR explains that the problem is compounded by this being the third dry year in a row for California.

"The last two years, we were riding around 70 percent of normal," for precipitation said Elissa Lynn of DWR.

Sounds bad, but not the makings for an emergency proclamation that are usually reserved for times of disaster -- like earthquakes, right? All this gets a little fuzzy because, according David Carle's seminal book, Introduction to Water in California, "No simple criteria define a drought."

But to give some context to the latest numbers, "The driest recorded water year spanned the winter of 1976 to 1977; statewide runoff was only 21 percent of average," wrote Carle. The most recent drought that Californians reference was from 1987 to 1992 when runoff was between 47 and 56 percent of average in different parts of the state.

So in light of these numbers, is there really reason to be concerned?

The answer is yes. But not for the exact reasons Snow or Schwarzenegger are announcing in their press releases. Regardless of how much precipitation the state got this year, the water situation in California is bad and will likely get worse.

But, Mother Nature is only one player. The real architects of the state -- the governor, various elected officials and big water users like wholesalers and agribusiness have a political agenda that many worry is being fast-tracked under the cover of a scary "drought emergency."

Just to be clear, Californians should be concerned about their water, but the amount of rain and snow received by California only tells part of the story of why the water situation should be ringing alarm bells.

How the water is managed and who is controlling its allocation is another factor.

But first, it helps to understand the complexity of the state's water system.

Where Has All the Water Gone?

California has been called one of the most hydrologically altered landmasses on the planet.

"California has remade its landscape on an unprecedented scale," reported the Water Education Foundation on its blog, Aquafornia. "There are reservoirs where there once was desert, desert where there once was cropland, and cropland where there once was a swampy marsh.

"Some rivers have been dried up; some rivers flow through mountains into other rivers' beds; and some rivers even flow backwards at times."

To achieve these feats, 1,200 major dams were built, two of the world's largest irrigation projects and some of the biggest reservoirs, WEF reports. There are also thousands of miles of canals and aqueducts.

One of the main reasons for the massive replumbing of California's hydrology is that 75 percent of the state's precipitation falls north of Sacramento, but the major population centers and agricultural areas are south of the capital.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, schwarzenegger, california, drought, water scarcity, water shortage, delta

Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Water Should Be Made a Public Good ...
Posted by: mmckinl on May 8, 2009 4:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is, water should be managed as a common resource and not considered a "right" as in owned property ... We have reached the limits of our natural resources and only by careful and considered management for the benefit of both man and nature will we survive as a species ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» yes and we should all volunteer as workers in the local water atty Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
The Great Lakes
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on May 8, 2009 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
haha we got fresh water, even more cleaner since we drove away the smoke stack industries but now China makes all of our stuff so why me worry. California's lack of water is one of the many reason why I would never, ever, ever move there. Too bad there economic problems are fixing to go nation wide however here in Buffalo and other Great Lake Cities (you Progressive for some reason love Chicago and well Detroit is just an Progressive tear jerker) we have WATER! We also have four seasons but that is why we have a thing called "coats" so what do you do? You can't tap into Lake Erie and pipe our water all the way West and plus really ECO moonbats won't let you anyway. An't there a way to run water from the Mountains or do i have to go a winter w/o fresh strawberries?

You can leave Cali but leave your Politics behind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Great Lakes Posted by: toddcory
» RE: The Great Lakes...great idea! Posted by: greenPuker
spray more chemtrails....create the drought crisis
Posted by: TrollTreason on May 8, 2009 4:28 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arnold, the Rothschild agent, is water grabber/privatizer

Check out your liberal hero, Russ Feingolds new water siezure bill. The feds to sieze ALL water in the US ... Slavery is freedom, you vile sheep.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqHaUadsapc

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Milwaukee is awash in water!!
Posted by: AJR Journal on May 8, 2009 4:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Move to Milwaukee!!

We have unlimited water!

We do have a brutally repressive local government though.
Trade-offs

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The problem with California is not water
Posted by: xvictor on May 8, 2009 6:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are too many dirty cars in California that demands washing. There are too many thirsty communities that insanely live in hot deserts and likes to keep their nice, big pools topped off. Their wasteful irrigation processes for agriculture is also a problem.

It's those examples that helps exacerbates California's glaring water problems.

But the overpowering real estate, agriculture, and auto interests that AHnold bows to says nonsense to that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not to worry...
Posted by: Gisele on May 8, 2009 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he has his good buddy Gordon Campbell way up in British Columbia looking for ways to solve his water, and electrical generation problems!

That it's destroying our rivers and streams in a permanent way is no issue...at least to Mr. Buffett who will be raking in about 60% of the profits from Plutonic/GE. Not sure what I'm talking about? Disaster in the making.

I sincerely wish Mr. Campbell would move to Cali...and forget to come back!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not to worry... Posted by: greenPuker
» RE: Yo Dipshit... Posted by: Gisele
Duh
Posted by: VanWinkle65 on May 8, 2009 6:42 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course they are, its what they do best.

Rual
Privacy Center

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

isn't he the same ReichWing asshole
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on May 8, 2009 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who got elected IN GREAT PART

by firing up **liberal** Hollywood voters by leading hate/fear marches shrieking headlines about how a couple of Canadian immigrants & contractors were 'stealing all the jobs like illegal immigrants'?

yeah.

I've got lots of pity & lots of anticipation of his 'liberal' reforms...

the man knows how to whip up a crowd with hate, he just picks the kind that even Hollywood Liberals can get behind.

just wait to see how he approaches the water issues...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rgd
Posted by: rgd on May 8, 2009 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a native son of California, I can tell you for a fact that there is no water shortage in California. What there is a shortage of is truly honest politicians. Our water problems are strictly political. Yes, we have our dry years and our wet years but the water problems come from one source only and that is buracracy. Politicians sold out to the developers with dumb ideas about water detention/retention. It is piecemeal at best. It is cheaper and faster to build a house on flat ground so the run-off is channeled into a detention tank or retention pond with the idea to return the water to the aquafers. The fact is that only about 10% acually goes back into the ground. The rest goes into the storm drain system, to the river and to the sea. How do I know this? I was a general contractor on a subdivsion here in Northern California that tanked. Thats how come I have the time to sit here and read Alternet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: rgd all...right! Posted by: greenPuker
The list goes on
Posted by: wagner on May 8, 2009 9:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After Bin Laden - Saddam connection, Saddam's wmd, orange alerts, chatters on Internet, global warming, climate change, killer bees, bird flu, swine flu, etc., now water shortage and more to come!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The list goes on Posted by: richholland
» RE: The list goes on? Posted by: greenPuker
Too many people!
Posted by: vertical on May 8, 2009 10:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
California adds about a half million people to its population every year, and it is destroying this state. If you are thinking about moving out here don't because we really do not need you!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Too many people! Posted by: greenPuker
SF based Bechtel..
Posted by: KAvatar on May 8, 2009 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heard San Fransisco based Bechtel tried to Privatizes water in Bolivia, even rain water ??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blame America's recent wars for SoCal's water plight
Posted by: sausage on May 8, 2009 11:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Southern California was always dry, at least in recent human memory, so perpetual drought and wild fires should come as no surprise to the citizens of the U.S.'s most populous state.

For most of its "white" history southern California was an afterthought. The Spanish imperial government fairly well ignored it until the 18th Century, nearly two hundred years after Hernan Cortes claimed it for his Catholic Majesty Carlos I. And when the Americans kicked out the Mexicans in 1848 it was for the mineral riches of the northern part of the nascent state. Even when Midwestern farmers discovered that with a little irrigation agriculture was easy and Eastern film makers arrived for all the free sunshine, southern California was still relatively sparsely populated.

It was World War II and the growth of the defense industry which spurred the tremendous grow of southern California into the dessicated, over crowed hellhole we know today. And since the United States has never gotten off a war footing since, southern California remains one of the centers of the military-industrial complex.

The hard, cold fact of the matter is that the Department of Defense bears much of the responsibility for the water and population problems of an area of the country which, by all ecological rights, should have a very low population density. Not only is southern California in dire straits vis-a-vis water but all of the southwestern states, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico mainly because due to large military installations left over from World War II and the Cold War which in turn encouraged civilian development and population growth. The rapid growth in large urban centers in a climate with its attendant environment that evolution never designed for large human populations lead to ecological instability.

Despite all efforts by the federal government and the individual states to fend off their mummified fate, such as constructing a grand canal to steal water from the Great Lakes, the megalopolises of Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix and Las Vegas are fucked. The only thing that may save the region from further ecological disaster will be the rapid depopulation of the cities of southern California and Phoenix and Las Vegas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I live in the Midwest... Posted by: sausage
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Charge heavy users more for water
Posted by: LeonBNJ on May 8, 2009 5:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the best ways to control a resource is to charge more for it. Water is a necessity but we waste too much of it. Perhaps a basic rate should be charged per household, and if you use more than a reasonable amount, you pay progressively more. Have a pool? Maybe you have to pay $500 more than the basic rate. Have a mega house with a big fancy lawn, pay proportionaly more than one in a condo. For farmers, encourage water conservation methods (drip, not farming excessivly dry land) by charging much more per acre-feet above a certain benchmark. Bottlers of beer, water, soda and beverages would also pay a much higher rate as well paying 1/100 of 1 cent for 12 ozs of water and reselling it for $1.00 or more suggests that there is a lot more room to charge and not effect the resold price.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People
Posted by: willymack on May 9, 2009 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pollute
Defile
Degrade
Destroy
Every place they infest. It stands to reason that the more people, the more of all the above. Unless we get a handle on the population, and change our very nature (we're the ONLY species on Earth with this ability), Nature will set things right, with dreadful consequences for humanity. As long as we continue worshiping greedy bastards who place the acquisition of wealth above all else, we'll continue Californicating the whole world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BA
Posted by: mnstra on May 9, 2009 1:21 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My brother who lives out there said in all seriousness that they must look for a way to pipe in water from the great lakes for So.Cal needs
while lawn sprinklers send excess water down the street.
People in Calif actually feel entitled to any water they can get and from any source.Yet the climate is dessert like.He went on to say that the city mandates green watered lawns or you get a fine.Now how moronic is that? I bet that just stopping the practice of unrecycled watering of lawns and golf courses will make a big dent in the water crisis ..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Other People's Money
Posted by: davidzet on May 11, 2009 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great post! Some people want an excuse to get more of others' money. I'd say no to that and yes to markets to reallocate the water that is still around. (I am NOT a fan of rejigging all water rights; that's a constitutional mess.) People need to live to learn within their means -- even when their means are reduced.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement