Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

Communities Speak Out: Nestle, Stop Stealing Our Water

Corporate Accountability International. Posted April 10, 2009.


What's Nestle doing with the water in Michigan, California, Maine and other places? Hear the truth from the people who live there.
elizabeththottamsanfrancisco
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Editor's Note: In the lead-up to Nestlé's annual shareholders' meeting this April 23rd, a storm is gathering around the business practices of the world's largest water bottler. Communities across the country have long been engaged in struggles with the bottling giant over control of local water resources. Now many of these struggles are coming to a head and a national campaign called Think Outside the Bottle is using April Fools Day to call on the corporation to, "stop fooling with community water supplies."

To begin bottling in communities, Nestlé has been engaged in everything from costly public relations campaigns and legal challenges to backroom deals for water rights.

Below, is the transcript of a call where people from different communities across the country affected by Nestlé share what is happening where they live.

Deborah Lapidus:   Welcome everyone, and thanks for making the call.  My name is Deborah Lapidus, and I'm the National Organizer with the Think Outside the Bottle campaign.  The campaign is a Corporate Accountability International-led initiative to galvanize support for public water systems and expose the abuses of the bottled water industry.

At the forefront of these abuses is the fact that all across North America, Nestlé, the world's largest food and beverage corporation, is staking claim to community water resources.

In the days leading up to its annual shareholders' meeting, Nestlé is looking to increase the number of bottling facilities it owns, making yet another run at bottling Mt. Shasta water over community opposition, looking for new sites in New England despite the recent passage of local moratoriums on water bottling, securing loopholes in the Great Lakes Compact to continue to export water from Michigan, and expanding its Florida operation despite drought conditions.  
As you'll soon hear, these water grabs are ruining streams, ponds, wells and aquifers near many of the bottling facilities. Nestlé's practices are raising serious questions about who should be allowed to control water, our most essential resource, and to what end.

At a time when so many are tightening their belts, Nestlé must stop fooling people into believing its brands are something we all should be spending hard-earned dollars on.  The fact is, behind the glossy labels there's a corporation that is bent on taking a shared resource from communities and selling it at an overwhelming markup to the rest of us.  And what goes in the bottle is generally less regulated than what we can all get from the tap, without the waste and unnecessary expense.

But instead of heeding community concerns, Nestlé strikes backroom deals, runs manipulative PR campaigns to put a green veneer on its brands, and challenges residents who voice their opposition through costly legal battles.  

For years Nestlé has employed a range of tactics to wrest water rights from rural communities and downstream users, keeping its abuses out of sight and out of mind of the public.  But, affected communities are now making it clear this is a pattern that needs to stop.    

At this point I'd like to introduce today's speakers who will provide updates on the latest developments on Nestlé's incursions into communities from the communities themselves. We'll start with Arlene Kanno with Concerned Citizens of Newport, Wisconsin, then Terry Swier from Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation in Mecosta County, Michigan, then Debra Anderson of the McCloud Watershed Council in McCloud, California, and finally Anne Wentworth from Protect Our Water and Wildlife Resources in Shapleigh, Maine.  Hi, Arlene. You could ahead and tell us what you experienced with Nestlé in Wisconsin.

Arlene Kanno:    Yes.  It was about the year 2000 and I'd like to describe our experience with Nestlé at that time.  It was disbelief in our community at first then tension and then real upheaval and then we realized that we had to do a constant mad scramble to preserve our quiet lifestyle here in rural Wisconsin. 


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, bottled water, water privatization, nestle

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Where are the shareholders in this company?
Posted by: luzmejor on Apr 10, 2009 2:20 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you all recall the fracas stirred up by some Catholic nuns against Nestle's practices in the Phillipines and in India that had resulted in the death of hundreds of infants? It was called "the baby bottle disease."

Those nuns were investors in the company, but when they found out what was going on they went into battle at least twice and created such terrible publicity against Nestle that they had to stop persuading women in poverty to stop breast-feeding and start buying their formulas. This company even hired women, dressed them up in nurses uniforms and sent them into the hospitals and later into farming communities to persuade women to stop breast feeding and put the babies on their infant formulas instead.

All of the hospitals in the area had doctors and nurses who joined in the fight against the company because there were suddenly wards full of sick babies and entire cemeteries of babies who had died of starvation because of Nestle's lies. The phony nurses, no doubt brain-washed by salesmen, were telling them that their babies would have beautiful white skin if they used their formulas. Many of the women had to use local water that was contaminated when they mixed up the formula, but Nestle's salesmen did not care.

I must say that I have boycotted Nestle since that time, more than 30 years ago.
I think it is time for shareholders in this continually rapacious company to follow the example of those concerned nuns and put a stop to the stealing of community resources necessary to human life!

We should check to see if any of our investment funds are in Nestle's hands.


Start another world-wide boycott of Nestle products now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NESTLE
Posted by: pfm on Apr 10, 2009 2:45 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not condone that Nestle's activity around many, if not all of the water sources noted in the article, degrade the quality of the water and perhaps affect the quantity as well. Nestle, like all for-profit water purveyors, are just taking advantage of the "loop-holes" we allowed those we elected to reputedly "serve & protect" us to place into law which negatively impact us. Until "we" demand nothing less than full, open, honest, timely DISCLOSURE nothing will change. And moreover nothing will change until we get off our butts and make it happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not just go where the water is?
Posted by: Libsrule on Apr 10, 2009 6:43 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I realize that cost is important,but there are places where water is much more plentiful. Like northern Canada.

BUT it is important that Nestle be kept from stealing water from local communities where water is in short supply or needed.

There ARE alternatives, but apparently they are more interested in stealing from locals than in dealing with the realities of water in our future because it is going to be a serious problem and soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Welcome to how THE REST OF THE WORLD
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Apr 17, 2009 2:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has been living with this crap.

Now you know why Canadians aren't chuffed about the US corporations DEMANDING we cough up our perilously delicate water supplies to feed the slovenly & unsustainable habits of American business & culture.
The new SPP/NAFTA nonsense actually STATES THAT IF CANADIANS START SELLING AMERICANS WATER... EVEN IF WE DAMAGE OUR ECOLOGY or RUN OUT OF WATER TO NOURISH OURSELVES... that 'Free Trade' DEAL WILL NOT PERMIT US TO LESSEN THE WATER EXPORTED FOR US USE.

think about that.
clean up your act, America.

The rest of the World isn't your oyster.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

term limits
Posted by: wurlybird9 on Apr 19, 2009 4:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
100 year contracts? Would they adjust for inflation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement