Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

Unquenchable: America's Water Crisis and What We Can Do About It

By Robert Glennon, Island Press. Posted March 21, 2009.


Our water crisis should occasion grave concern but not panic. We have solutions available; now we need a national commitment to pursue them.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The following is an excerpt from "Unquenchable: American's Water Crisis and What We Can Do About It" by Robert Glennon. Copyright 2009 Robert Glennon. Reproduced by permission of Island Press, Washington DC.

Editor's Note: This excerpt is from the introduction of Glennon's new book and follows a narrative about the water profligacy of Las Vegas. The timing of this excerpt is perfect for World Water Day, but the timing of the book in terms of the water issues facing American and the rest of the world is also incredibly important.

"When the well's dry, we know the worth of water," observed Benjamin Franklin in 1774. But he was wrong. In the United States, we utterly fail to appreciate the value of water, even as we are running out. We Americans are spoiled. When we turn on the tap, out comes a limitless quantity of high-quality water for less money than we pay for our cell phone service or cable television. But as we'll see, what is happening in Vegas is not staying in Vegas. It's becoming a national epidemic.

Ignorance is bliss when it comes to water. In almost every state in the country, a landowner can drill a domestic well anywhere, anytime-no questions asked. Many states don't even require permits for commercial wells unless the pumping will exceed 100,000 gallons a day (that's 36 million gallons annually). For each well. We know so little about this pumping that the federal government cannot even estimate the total number of these wells across the country. In many agricultural regions where the government does know the number of wells, such as California's Central Valley, it is still clueless as to how much water farmers pump out of those wells, because they're unmetered.

Water is a valuable, exhaustible resource, but as Las Vegas did until just a few years ago, we treat it as valueless and inexhaustible. Just as the energy crisis brought to the nation's consciousness an acute awareness of energy consumption, global warming, and carbon footprints, so too the impending national water crisis will inspire us to rethink how and why we use water.

My aim in this book is to explore the crisis and to stimulate that rethinking. Part of the problem is that water shortages in many parts of the country, lacking the exhibitionist tendencies of Las Vegas, are often hidden. This book will illustrate the true dimensions of the crisis and offer solutions to it. Alas, the dimensions are immense.

Water lubricates the American economy just as oil does. It is intimately linked to energy because it takes water to make energy, and it takes energy to divert, pump, move, and cleanse water. Water plays a critical role in virtually every segment of the economy, from heavy industry to food production, from making semiconductors to providing Internet service. A prosperous future depends on a secure and reliable water supply. And we don't have it. To be sure, water still flows from taps, but we're draining our reserves like gamblers at the craps table.

We tend to look at Las Vegas and think it's a unique case, perhaps a cautionary tale but barely relevant to where the rest of us live. But the truth is, when it comes to water, Vegas offers us a glimpse of our own future. The evidence is everywhere-though if it is noticed, it is forgotten with the next drenching rain. Consider the following events that have occurred since 2007:

  • Colorado farmers watched their crops wither because of a lack of irrigation water.
  • Atlanta, Georgia, came within three months of running out, so it banned watering lawns, washing cars, and filling swimming pools.
  • Orme, Tennessee, did run out and was forced to truck water in from Alabama.
  • Scientists at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography predicted that Lake Mead, which supplies water to Los Angeles and Phoenix, could dry up by 2021.
  • Hundreds of workers lost their jobs at Bowater, a South Carolina paper company, because low river flows prevented the plant from discharging its wastewater.
  • Lack of adequate water prompted the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to rebuff Southern Nuclear Operating Company's request to build two new reactors in Georgia.
  • Water shortages caused California farmers to cut the tops off hundreds of healthy, mature avocado trees in a desperate attempt to keep them alive.
  • Lake Superior, the earth's largest freshwater body, was too shallow to float fully loaded cargo ships.
  • Decimated salmon runs prompted cancellation of the commercial fishing season off the coasts of California and Oregon.
  • A lack of adequate water led regulators in Idaho, Arizona, and Montana to deny permits for new coal-fired power plants.
  • In Riverside County, California, water shortages forced a water district to put on hold seven proposed commercial and residential developments.

To understand the depth of the water crisis, consider that more than thirty-five of the lower forty-eight states are fighting with their neighbors over water.

Our existing supplies are stretched to the limit, yet demographers expect the U.S. population to grow by 120 million by midcentury. Before the crisis becomes a catastrophe, we must embark in a fundamentally new direction. Business as usual just won't cut it. We have traditionally engineered our way out of water shortages by building dams, diverting rivers, and drilling wells. But proposals for new dams engender immense political and environmental opposition, diversions have already dried up many rivers and reduced the flow in others to a trickle, and groundwater tables are plummeting around the United States. Meanwhile, the environment suffers as excessive water use causes springs, creeks, rivers, and wetlands to go dry, salt water to contaminate potable supplies, the ground to collapse, and sinkholes to appear. Even lakes are not immune. Dozens in Florida have already gone dry.

Are there alternatives to business as usual? Some dreamers offer grandiose plans that include seeding clouds and towing icebergs from Alaska, but these are not viable options. We can expand the supply by reusing municipal effluent and by desalinating ocean water, but neither of these choices is a panacea. On the demand side, we can encourage water conservation. In some water-wasteful regions, conservation has great potential; however, many water-stressed communities have already implemented ambitious conservation programs but need to reduce demand even more. The reality is that reusing, desalinating, and conserving water may help to alleviate our crisis but will not solve it. We must find other ways to free up water. Las Vegas has pioneered very expensive solutions, but they can succeed only by taking water from other places. Is this sustainable?

In his 2005 book Collapse, Pulitzer Prize-winning author Jared Diamond describes how flourishing societies have precipitously collapsed. Examining spatially and temporally diverse cultures, such as those of Easter Island in the South Pacific, Norse settlements in Scandinavia, and the Anasazi in North America, Diamond finds a disturbing pattern, one that resembles contemporary conditions in the United States. As these societies grew and flourished, they mismanaged natural resources, eventually stretching the resources' carrying capacity to the breaking point. Still, the societies continued on in their customary practices, assuming that what they were familiar with was the norm. Then something happened-environmental damage, climate change, hostile neighbors, loss of trading partners, or the culture's own response to its environmental problems-to change the familiar, but it was too late for the society to correct course and avert a catastrophe. With the Anasazi, a growing population depended on ever-increasing use of water and firewood. When a sustained drought hit in the twelfth century and lasted more than fifty years, the society collapsed.

We, however, still control our destiny. The United States is entering an era of water reallocation, when water for new uses will come from existing users who have incentives to use less. Sounds good, but how will this happen? One possible approach is for the government to target wasteful practices by simply prohibiting current water users from using so much. However, heavy-handed government mandates would generate bitter political controversy and endless litigation. What we can do, yet haven't done, in the United States is encourage water conservation by using price signals and market forces. Pricing water appropriately would stimulate all users to reexamine their uses and decide for themselves, on the basis of their own pocketbooks, which uses to curtail and which to continue. The government should encourage a voluntary reallocation of water between current and new users. The alternative is to fight over the water. Which do we prefer?

Water nourishes our bodies and our souls. Our lives are impoverished without the sight, sound, smell, and touch of bubbling brooks, cascading waterfalls, and quiet ponds. The terrifying future depicted in science fiction doomsday novels conspicuously features barren landscapes. Our future needn't be so bleak. Our water crisis should occasion grave concern but not panic. We have solutions available; now we need a national commitment to pursue them.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, water crisis, water shortage, robert glennon, unquenchable

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
we could stop manufacturing non-necessities, close all the banks and insurance companies
Posted by: Suzon on Mar 21, 2009 4:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
give everyone the secure possession of their primary residence and grow our own food. Plenty of water to go around then.

Why do we work? To pay the rent or mortgage and (in some cases) for the health insurance. Isn't capitalism great!

I would like some inkling of what the author recommends to solve the problem of water shortages.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Or we could MAKE water out of salt water....
Posted by: rickiey on Mar 21, 2009 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ya know, a nuclear power plant in the middle of the country, uses up water.

But one on the coast with access to seawater, can create a new river of drinking water out of salt water. (When you use the salt water as tertiary cooling to the secondary water, it turns the salt water to steam, purifying it for drinking. The navy has been doing it for over half a century).

Its time to acknowledge the crisis, and make more water.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Location, Location, Location
Posted by: Birdland on Mar 21, 2009 10:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do we have large cities and farms in the driest areas of the country? They require large diversions of water to exist. And diverting water through pipes and aqueducts results in a great loss of water through evaporation and leakage. Shouldn't we have those big cities closer to a water source and large farms in wet areas? Some irrigation is for hay and grass...for livestock. What a waste! Places like Las Vegas and Phoenix should not be allowed to grow any larger. I doubt they pay the true cost of water and water loss in those areas. Intelligent planning would not allow these areas to be developed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Desalination plants???
Posted by: MobileSucks on Mar 21, 2009 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So what's the difficulty here? Desalination is expensive now.

Well I can't believe crafty creative human beings can't figure out how to do it cost effectively. What the hell is the hold up?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Desalination plants??? Posted by: Wayne Etheridge
» RE: Desalination plants??? Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: Desalination plants??? Posted by: puf_almighty
» RE: Desalination plants??? Posted by: MobileSucks
Water, water everywhere but...
Posted by: Archie1954 on Mar 21, 2009 4:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of this article's points are well taken but I still believe that moving water from plentiful areas to depleted areas can also be considered. The conjunction of the requirements of the economy, climate change and the state of deteriorated infrastructure should give rise to ideas to tackle all these problems with one solution. What about embarking on what would be the largest continental public works project in the last hundred years, a water pipeline or canal from Canada's water abundant areas to the US south and southwest? This may not solve the problem for ever but it certainly would alleviate the worst of it for the next 50 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Water, water everywhere but... Posted by: 24&somuchmore
America's screaming for Canada to 'commodify' eco-critical water...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Mar 21, 2009 4:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
& it will be a grotesque disaster if we let them convince our Harper, NeoCon gov't to do so...

a horrible, grotesque unsustainable ecological disaster on par with the TarSands.





perspective, people.


Perspective.

The Jeff Farias Show: streams FREE & LIVE Mon-Fri, 6-9pmEST

FREE podcast

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Carrying capacity
Posted by: phindrup on Mar 21, 2009 5:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
‘Our existing supplies are stretched to the limit, yet demographers expect the U.S. population to grow by 120 million by midcentury.’
‘They mismanaged natural resources, eventually stretching the resources' carrying capacity to the breaking point.’

Says it all really. First population world wide must be stabilised, and then reduced.
Carrying capacity, all long term successful farmers know and understand the meaning of ‘carrying capacity’. The number of mature stock your farm will feed, and their replacements — year in and year out, in good times and bad.

The earth passed that point long ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The sky is falling Posted by: TheLimit
A THOUGHTFUL AMERICAN
Posted by: foxxx on Mar 21, 2009 9:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ACCORDING TO STATISTICS LAST YEAR, 27 STATES WILL BE SHORT OF FRESHWATER, BUT WHO LISTENS TO THE PEOPLE. I SUGGESTED THAT A SALTWATER CHANNEL BE PUT THROUGH EACH STATE WITH A CUL-DA-SAK FOR HOLDING SALTWATER AND MAKING FRESHWATER OUT OF SALTWATER. MY URL HAS YOUR ANSWER FOR FRESHWATER +. http://www.inventube.com/ooojay/blog/ ITS PROBLEY YOUR ONLY WAY FOR FRESHWATER ON A NATURAL BASIS. BUT THIS IS SPRING AND THE SPRING THAWS WILL BE FLOODING ALMOST ALL RIVERS, BUT I WAS THINKING IF YOU DUG CHANNELS INTO EACH RIVER, YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO STOP THE INCOMING FLOODS AND SAVE ALOT OF WATER FOR ALL TREATMENT PLANTS. HERE WHERE I LIVE IN SOUTH BEND, WA. I ASKED FOR A LICENSE TO EXTRACT 15 FEET OFF THE BOTTOM OF THE WALLAPA RIVER, I WAS TOLD I'D HAVE TO WAIT 2 YEARS FROM THE ARMY ENGINEERS. RECENTLY PEOPLE WERE PULLING OUT LOGS TO SELL FOR FOOD AND LOWER THE RIVERS, BUT WERE FINED BY THE ARMY ENGINEERS AND WERE TOLD BY THE ARMY ENGINEERS ON TELEVISION TO BUY FLOOD INSURANCE. WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO SAVE OURSELVES FROM FLOODS AND THE ARMY ENGINEERS REFUSE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. I EMAILED THE WHITEHOUSE ABOUT THIS PROBLEM AND WAS TOLD THERE ARE MANY EMAILS BEFORE MINE. I ALSO ASKED THAT THE ARMY ENGINEERS BE DISBANDED BECAUSE THEY WONT ALLOW US TO SAVE OUR HOMES AND FAMILIES. THEY REFUSE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT THIS PROBLEM OTHER THAN TELL US TO BUY FLOOD INSURANCE. SO WE'LL BE FLOODED. THE OCEANS ARE RISING AND THE ONLY AREA FOR THE HIGH RIVERS TO GO IS ON DRY LAND. EACH STATE NEEDS A CHANNEL BEING FED BY THE OCEANS THROUGHOUT AMERICA THROUGH ALL STATES AND ALOT OF CITIES FOR THE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE AND THE FARMS AND RANCHES AT SEA LEVEL NOW IF YOUR INTERESTED IN FRESHWATER. HAVE A NICE DAY. MIKE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Water From Thin (humid) Air
Posted by: rdsanchez1966 on Mar 22, 2009 4:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the possible solutions along with desalinazation, conversation, and the like could be Atmospheric Water Generators which takes the moisture out of humid air and turns it into liquid water.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_water_generator

This isn't the only answer but one possible among others. It would work well in the more humid regions of the East and South.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Exponential Growth Capped by Limited Resources
Posted by: mcgoo on Mar 22, 2009 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chris Martenson ties together the three E's, Economy, Energy, and Environment, in his course.

Crash Course

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rjs0
Posted by: rjs0 on Mar 23, 2009 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
all the cities around lake erie have plenty of water, and all have declining populations... cleveland alone has declined from nearly a million in the '50s to below 440,000 now...maybe all that migration to the sun belt the last half of the last century will have to be reversed in the next...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wasted water
Posted by: m_doles on Mar 23, 2009 2:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
93% of all fresh water use in montana goes to raise hay for cattle. In todays news there is an article about red meat causing cancer and heart attacks. Get rid of the cows and Montana has no water problem.
Lake Superior is NOT the biggest fresh water resouce in the world. It is number two in Lakes. Baikal in Russia is bigger and so are many glaciers. Desalinization is another environmental catastrophy waiting to happen. Not to mention the problems associated with building nukes. Saying that what the navy does on a scale for a few 1000 people and saying it is good for the country is a bit of a stretch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's a better idea
Posted by: TheLimit on Mar 23, 2009 7:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Start taxing lawns. Elminate lawns and you save billions of gallons of potable water all over the country.

I think the guy just upthread of me is saying that in Montana they are *irrigating* hay crops, and I have to agree that's a disgrace. But you can save a lot more water by getting rid of lawns than by getting rid of meat, *and* grow a lot more food into the bargain. The problem with getting rid of meat is that the only way it's going to happen is for vegans to buy enough government to ram it down the majority's throat, because the majority, a huge majority in NA is omniverous, and even if you think it's a relevant idea to saving water and soil, pursuing that idea is impractical, because the vast majority here is going to continue to eat meat. It is not unhealthy to eat meat, but it is decidedly risky to go the vegan route. And the politics that are targeting meat are going to make lacto vegetarianism and other realistic vegetarian options very difficult.

Developers are a more realistic target. They need to be curbed; developers are the ones who behave as if water is an infinite resource. Once they build whatever it is they are building, people will use those buildings. Until the water runs out, of course.

Industrial agriculture needs to be curbed, too, BigAg is one of the biggest water wasters we have. Whether they are growing heavily irrigated crops (and some of those use more than traditional, sound, livestock husbandry) or meat, which they do very badly all across the board, they are resource abusers.

We need to stop using billions of gallons to 'manage' sewage disposal too. By now we should have figured out that this is not only wasteful but impractical. Some sort of composting is preferable and should be practical, though I can already hear the screaming. Our rivers are being trashed because we persist in using water for sewage management; there has to be a better way.

We're not going to find it, though, unless we approach it in a rational manner, not in a state of hysteria.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here's a better idea Posted by: Archie1954
» RE: Here's a better idea Posted by: wurlybird9
» RE: Here's a better idea Posted by: TheLimit
“The Little Things” to help us save water
Posted by: BeWaterWiseRep on Mar 26, 2009 4:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It’s very important to spread the word on water conservation. It’s necessary to make people aware of the dozens of little things we can all do to save water and combat the water shortage situation we are facing in Southern California. If you go to http://www.bewaterwise.com/tips01.html you will see a water saving tips page that lists Indoor and Outdoor tips and how much water is saved with each one. You would be amazed at how simple these actions are yet how impactful they can be. Things like turning off the water when you brush your teeth can save 3 gallons per day, taking shorter showers saves 5 gallons a day, and installing a smart sprinkler controller saves 40 gallons per day! Check out all the tips on the site and pass it on to fellow Southern Californians!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement