Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

California at a Crossroads, Faces Biggest Drought Year Yet

By Doug Obegi, Huffington Post. Posted January 30, 2009.


We can follow the old course toward drought, failed crops and fisheries or commit to a new, smart-water solution for the 21st century.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

California has a water crisis but, contrary to what many believe, a tiny fish is not the cause of this ongoing problem. There simply isn't enough rain and snow in a dry year, like this one, to meet projected demands for water.

We've known for years that water exports from the Bay-Delta cannot continue growing to meet California's water needs. Both the law and the science were settled awhile ago: we've diverted too much water from the Delta for too long, as the Governor's Delta Vision Task Force recently concluded. And with climate change, the ecological crisis in the Delta, the closure of California's salmon fishery, and the potential for a catastrophic levee failure, if we don't change our ways, the future looks grim for both people and fish.

That's why it isn't surprising that the California Department of Fish and Game today considered water pumping restrictions in the Bay-Delta to protect longfin smelt from being sucked into the export pumps of the state and federal water projects. The longfin smelt was historically one of the most abundant fish species in the Bay-Delta, but in the past several decades its population has been plummeting and is now at risk of extinction (joining a long list of species that are declining as a result of unsustainable actions in the estuary). This review was triggered by DFG finding the fish near the export pumps (you can see a map of where the fish currently are here). The regulatory process is designed to keep these the fish from being sucked into the pumps, which has been a significant source of mortality: DFG estimates that more than 1.5 million adult and juvenile longfin smelt, and millions more larvae, have been killed by the water projects since 1993.

We hope that the Department is right that current operations will prevent significant numbers of longfin smelt from being sucked into the pumps, and we expect that DFG will closely monitor the situation and take prompt action in future weeks if there is a problem. But whether today or a month from now, there's a good chance that restrictions will be imposed to prevent a problem from occurring, whether because of longfin smelt or because of one of the other endangered and threatened fish that the pumps put at risk. Today's action is a reminder that our water resources are fragile and we need to continue to invest in new ways to replenish our water supply without relying on the Delta.

In fact, reductions of water exports from the Delta are inevitable. In the early 2000s, water exports were at historically high levels (5 of the 6 highest levels of water exports in the history of the CVP and SWP occurred in the past 8 years). For the foreseeable future, we're likely to have to return to water export levels seen in the 1990s.

Bottom line: California is at a crossroads; it can either follow its old course toward drought, failed crops, failing fisheries, and an insufficient drinking water supply - or it can commit to a new, smart-water solution for the 21st century.

We cannot continue to meet California's water needs the way we have in the past.

Fortunately, there is a solution. We can obtain real water from a Virtual River of water efficiency, trimming water waste, recycling wastewater, and capturing rainwater in urban areas before it flows into storm drains. There's more water available from these sources than we've ever exported from the Delta.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, california, drought, water scarcity, water shortage, delta

Doug Obegi is a staff attorney with the Western Water Project at the Natural Resources Defense Council. Doug’s work at NRDC primarily focuses on efforts to protect and restore California’s Bay-Delta estuary and its imperiled wildlife.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Time to Use Water Wisely Now
Posted by: avila on Jan 30, 2009 5:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On desert islands, cisterns built under or near dwellings are the norm--catch the rainwater. Bermuda has no water company for citizens, as all new construction incorporates personal water cisterns in the design.
New construction in water starved areas can promote this. Rainwater is great for plants--better than the chlorinated-at-a-great-cost drinking water used by all now. What a waste!
Also, what gives with restrictive regulations on gray water that can be used, re-used. safely, sparing that costly drinking water for coffee, not car washing.
Give us tax credits, utility company rebates, inexpensive turn key plans--we will do it. It only makes sense!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» great idea...when it RAINS !! Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Water from Water
Posted by: JFlagg on Jan 31, 2009 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
California sits next to the largest body of water on the planet. The technology exists to take water from the Pacific ocean and make it into drinking water. Where is the American Corporations that have experience building the installations that would provide unlimited drinking water? They are in the Middle East. Building desal plants.

When you look for solutions promoted by the State government where are the proposals to develop these new water sources that have no environmental impacts? They don't exists. It is the same answers as our last drought cycle. Conserve (which is great) and pay the state for the water through the pipeline.

What a joke, if there is no water, the State doesn't have it to sell us anyway. Four desal plants along the coast would reduce the demand on inland water for the large populations of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Ventura.

Santa Barbara built a desal plant and took it down after completion. Why? Jobs and water could come out of developing water sources that do not depend on rain or snow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ba
Posted by: mnstra on Jan 31, 2009 1:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Desal plants are the answer.If the Arabs can do it so can Calif.
I was driving around lake Elsinore in Nov and saw a suburbanite watering off his already spotless sidewalk with a hose. Now I ask you-- Why does the state continue to allow such lunacy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Real Estate Falling, Budget Exploding, No Water & More
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 1, 2009 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"California is the Garden of Eden..."

Denial is not a river in Egypt- it is a city of 7 million in a location with native water resources sufficient for a population of 30,000 in California. That would be Los Angeles- the only city known to have stolen an entire river (The Owens) and was granted political cover from an 'Environmental' Republican President to do so (Theodore Roosevelt).

The state is a basket case. So many non-native speakers that the schools cannot keep up, gangs running whole sections of major cities, public universities too expensive for most to afford, a state bureaucracy that makes the Feds look efficient, in debt up to the eyeballs...
All built in a desert on land prone to earthquakes, landslides and all the rest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Desal -- Markets...
Posted by: davidzet on Feb 2, 2009 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Desalination is expensive (energy, environment, etc.), and conservation is nice, but higher prices and water markets (with the usual caveat that everyone gets "some" for free) will send the right signals to conserve, store, innovate, etc.

Read my blog (aguanomics.com) for more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

California conservation must start down on the farm
Posted by: jgogek on Feb 11, 2009 10:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see, in California, growing alfalfa uses 4 million to 5.5 million acre feet of water a year. The entire city of Los Angeles uses only about 650,000 acre feet. Agriculture uses four times more water than urban areas. The California gross domestic product for agriculture is $15 billion; for urban-based manufacturing, it's $172 billion. So, when we talk about water conservation,
let's talk about California's biggest user -- agriculture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement