Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

Is the American Southwest Running Dry?

By Tara Lohan, AlterNet. Posted January 23, 2009.


Filmmaker Jim Thebaut talks about the precarious future of the Southwest and the call for a national water plan.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Twisting through seven states before reaching Mexico, the Colorado River is the lifeline of the American Southwest. But with increasing population, thoughtless development and the added pressures of climate change, the river -- and the region -- are in dire straights.

In the documentary The American Southwest: Are We Running Dry?, filmmaker Jim Thebaut looks at the state of the Southwest's water and if there will be enough to go around. He examines stressed water sources like the Colorado River, the Rio Grande and the Sacramento-San Joaquin river system in California, as well as Lake Powell, which straddles Utah and Arizona on the Colorado River, and Lake Mead, also on the Colorado, between Nevada and Arizona.

With interviews from policymakers, congressional members, scientists and water experts, Thebaut issues a wake-up call for not just the Southwest, but the whole country. The film takes a critical eye to cities like Los Angeles, Phoenix, Las Vegas, Albuquerque and Palm Springs, Calif. There is also a special focus on Native American communities, which are particularly hard hit by our country's poor water management and environmental oversight. Lacking political leverage, many Native American communities lack adequate clean, safe drinking water.

The film was inspired by the book, Tapped Out: The Coming World Crisis in Water and What We Can Do About It, published by the late Sen. Paul Simon in 1998. And Thebaut attempts to not just paint a grim picture of reality, but to offer some solutions. Thebaut is a veteran filmmaker who produced the film Running Dry about the global water crisis. He has a background in planning and therefore pays close attention to development and the ways in which water policy should be intertwined with our plans for growth.

Thebaut is a strong advocate for a comprehensive national water policy that brings all parties to the table. And he has called the Bush administration's approach to water management "borderline immoral."

Tara Lohan: So what inspired you to do this?

Jim Thebaut: It goes way back. I have a degree in landscape architecture and planning. And for a few years I was a planner in the Northwest, and I used to do environmental impact statements for planning studies. I also used to produce environmental documentaries in Seattle. When I first became aware of Sen. Paul Simon's work and read his book, Tapped Out, it just seemed like a natural for me to put something together. It is an overall project to educate everyone about the global, humanitarian water crises. That's why I've gone about as I have, with two different documentaries and versions of each.

TL: What was one of the most shocking things you learned about water in the Southwest while working on this?

JT: The gravity of the problem. The fact that the Colorado is the lowest level it has ever been, and that chances are there is not going to be enough water to generate energy at the Hoover Dam. The ramifications of that are pretty profound. Just imagine that the water is so low in the Colorado that it cannot support our agriculture community, that it cannot support our energy systems, and just suppose that, like in some developing countries, that water is only available every two or three days. And just imagine there would be communities that will not get any water all. And I'm really worried about the Native American community.

And then the other big deal is our depletion of groundwater. That is the reason I did this documentary. I did Running Dry, which was to alert the world to the global water crisis. But as I was rolling it out across the U.S., I became quickly aware that the American public have an odd way of looking at the rest of the world. They don't relate to it as being part of their world. And when I present the reality that every 15 seconds a child dies from a lack of water or water-related diseases, they always think, "that's over there, it doesn't have anything to do with us."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, drought, water scarcity, southwest, running dry

Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Cadillac Desert
Posted by: Artkansas on Jan 23, 2009 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I used to live in Mary Bono's district. I remember one 15 month period where not a single drop of rain fell there. But the citizens went on watering their lawns and golf courses as usual. Water conservation wasn't even a topic of conversation.

That's part of the reason I moved out of there. I understood that the aquifer below the Coachella Valley wouldn't last long at the rate that the water table was dropping.

One book everyone should read is a 1986 book called "Cadillac Desert" by Marc Reisner. It details how we got into this mess, and the rise of Los Angeles. It's also on video and in my mind, the video is even better.

It's a big problem and is starting to hurt, and will likely get much worse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dangit, Prophit Posted by: Menopausal Mick
Milwaukee has a lot of water!
Posted by: AJR Journal on Jan 23, 2009 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You want lots of water? Move to Milwaukee!! We don't know what to do with all of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid Posted by: Artkansas
Face up to it
Posted by: bobtr900 on Jan 23, 2009 5:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The southeast is a dry region. The southwest is a desert region.

These people have got to stop filling their swimming pools and stop trying to grow grass via heavy/extensive watering. Also they must stop or at least discourage all industries that are heavy or medium water users. They must discourage heavy water intensive farming or livestock raising. Even migration(retirees) and immigration(illegals) to those regions may have to be either stopped or at least heavily discouraged because these lands cannot sustain ever increasing population pressures. Or, whitey should move out and let the peoples who know how to live in harmony with those regions remain.

If they choose to do those things there would be enough water for the drinking and bathing purposes that are normal to everyday living. Should they choose not to face up to the exigencies and vagaries of their regions they will dry up their rivers and aquifers to the tipping point, the point of no return in the near and mid term futures. In the mid to long term futures nature would recover, normally. But though the Bushie Repubs continue to and adamantly deny it, climate change is already upon us and that does not bode well for the future of these arid and even the semi arid regions, of the southwest and the southeast.

The native American peoples and the native Mexicans have lived, for many centuries, under minimal water conditions because they lived in harmony with their lands. Given that they did it, that proves it can be done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Capitalism is, inherently, predatory .
Posted by: arnoldinup on Jan 23, 2009 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We, here in the Good 'ole USA are living a life of ease largely at the expense of third-world peoples and the biosphere.
America has got a really, really rude awakening for itself when it realizes that the 'party' isn't going to last.
We can't keep brutalizing the living organism we call earth without consequence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scary
Posted by: beandang on Jan 23, 2009 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always said that at the rate we are going, one day water will be worth more than gasoline. Looks like it might be coming sooner than I thought!

RT
Is your ISP watching?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It Already Does Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
This is why we need the "New Agenda for America"
Posted by: bcainw on Jan 23, 2009 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel compelled to expose the underpinnings of Alternet, which is heavily financed by the Ford Foundation: a foundation that is heartily behind further Legal and Illegal Immigration. In order to achieve a sustainable future for all Legal American Citizens both forms of immigration must be stopped immediately. And if Obama thinks he can Obama-boozle us on this one, he's got another thing coming. We cannot achieve sustainability without an immediate stop to further immigration!!!

The "New Agenda for America" addresses this issue and many more. Sign up and get involved. This is the beginning of the 2nd American Revolution:

www.newagecitizen.com

NEW AGENDA FOR AMERICA: Preliminary Planks
==========================================
[Video: http://www.newagecitizen.com/NAA.htm]

(1) Universal Health Care for All American Citizens
(2) A 20-year moratorium on all immigration into the United States
(3) Legal Marijuana for all Adults and Medical Patients
(4) An immediate reversal to the Offshoring and Inshoring of American Jobs
(5) A strict enforcement on issues of Separation of Church and State
(6) An immediate move from so-called Free Trade Agreements to Bilateral Trade agreements
(7) A major R&D project to bring energy independence to the United States and the World through recycling, reuse, ending hyper-consumerism and investing in the development of sustainable energy sources (e.g., solar, photovoltaic, wind, geothermal)
(8) No further ownership of US Assets (businesses, homes, ports, stock exchanges) by foreign governments or individuals!
(9) Replace the Federal Reserve with a People's Reserve which allows public oversight
(10) Absolute support for Net Neutrality
==========================================

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nature Magazine, 2007:
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Jan 23, 2009 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Human-Induced Changes in the Hydrology of the Western United States

Tim P. Barnett,1* David W. Pierce,1 Hugo G. Hidalgo,1 Celine Bonfils,2
Benjamin D. Santer,2 Tapash Das,1 Govindasamy Bala,2 Andrew W. Wood,3
Toru Nozawa,4 Arthur A. Mirin,2 Daniel R. Cayan,1,5 Michael D. Dettinger1,5

Observations have shown that the hydrological cycle of the western United States changed
significantly over the last half of the 20th century.

We present a regional, multivariable climate change detection and attribution study, using a high-resolution hydrologic model forced by global climate models, focusing on the changes that have already affected this primarily arid region with a large and growing population. The results show that up to 60% of the climate-related trends of river flow, winter air temperature, and snow pack between 1950 and 1999 are human-induced.

These results are robust to perturbation of study variates and methods. They portend, in
conjunction with previous work, a coming crisis in water supply for the western United States.

http://tenaya.ucsd.edu/~dettinge/barnett08.pdf

I don't see any realistic plans to shut down coal-fired power plants or to replace crude oil with clean energy sources, on a global basis - and that means that permanent drought across the U.S. southwest is about as likely as rapid polar melting - which is already happening.

Then, look at the California fire situation - worst ever for several years in a row - and that's also linked to temperature increases due to fossil fuel use.

The Iraqis, however, don't even have clean drinking water at all - so I guess we should be thankful, huh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Water
Posted by: gandolfshep on Jan 23, 2009 10:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Living in Texas I have seen in the last few years water wells that have been pumping good clean water for 80 years suddenly going dry or else pumping filthy nauseous water that can't be drank.

I see boats at the lake setting in the mud each summer.

Is the Southwest running out of water... damn right it is and water will end up being our Governments next justification for war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Water Plan
Posted by: Archie1954 on Jan 23, 2009 10:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A national plan will only be able to deal with the water resources of the US and I believe that in the very near future because of US population and industry growth you will have no further water resources to bring onstream (no pun intended). You need a North American plan, a way of utilizing the water resources of the whole continent to supply the water where it is needed from where it is bountiful and unused. NAFTA that everyone seems to love to hate may be a way of introducing the question of water exports to the US from Canada. Fully 90% of the fresh water in Canada runs into the oceans unused, and with Canada owning 20% of the world's fresh water, there has to be a lot of built in reserves there. Why not negotiate in good faith to use some of that water? Why wait until the problem is so bad that communities are dying because of lack of water? Shouldn't private industry and the government show some leadership in tryng to solve the problem? Start sooner rather than later.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Water Plan Posted by: gandolfshep
Livestock production is the true culprit
Posted by: vegsister on Jan 23, 2009 10:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In most arid western states, agriculture is responsible for 80-90% of all water consumption and the vast majority of that agricultural use is for alfalfa and other crops grown for livestock. In New Mexico, alfalfa has overtaken green chile as the number one export crop.

Expansive lawns, golf courses, swimming pools and urban sprawl are dramatic and infuriating images but represent a drop in the bucket of western water use. Far more to the point would be a critique of the western rancher, who guzzles a dwindling resource with the help of federal subsidies and widespread public sympathy while generally abstemious urban users are asked to conserve even more. See http://www.publiclandsranching.org/ htmlres/wr_guzzling_water.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If they want Great Lakes water...
Posted by: Spaghetty on Jan 23, 2009 1:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They can move up here! The idea that you can live in a dry place that's always warm and never rained on and still have golf courses, pools, and lawns is ludicrous. If you live in a desert, live dry and eat peyote for recreation. If you live in a wet region, then swim & mow `til your heart's content.
I would hope that every good person in the Great Lakes' watershed would lay down in front of trucks and bulldozers constructing a pipeline to the Southwest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Every resource overuse article and the comments miss the obvious
Posted by: Greg2008 on Jan 23, 2009 4:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do no environmental organizations dare address the ROOT OF ALL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS: human over-population?
Population, population, population. We HAVE to address this, if we love the natural earth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Name one place where
Posted by: willymack on Jan 23, 2009 6:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Humans have gone and not screwed it up in some way. Considering the scarce (life sustaining) resources in the Southwest, that area is grossly overpopulated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US navy got it right....
Posted by: eosrk on Jan 24, 2009 1:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they called evaporators....they take seawater, and using vacum and heat and steam, make potable water and the brine goes back to the sea, helping to replace it saltiness....and we can build many of them off the costs, including the Gulf of Mexico, using an combination of solar, wind, and steam power...to me it's not hard, but we're talking about the United States here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the use of
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jan 25, 2009 4:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
an interrogatory statement in this title is somewhat comic.

STOP WASTING WATER.

STOP BUILDING HOUSES WHERE THERE IS NONE.

STOP THE COMMODIFICATION OF A HUMAN RIGHT: water.

STOP THE SPP before you destroy more than your own regions with ignorance.


think about it: you are actually in control... so stop enabling asinine culture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Saving Water
Posted by: TomOfMaine on Jan 29, 2009 4:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the easiest and most effective ways to save water is to choose vegan food options. The amount of water wasted when being cycled through animals for meat and dairy production, as well as the water being used to grow the unthinkable amount of crops that are also cycled through animals for meat and dairy production, is beyond the farthest stretch of our imagination. Eliminating the meat and dairy industries, large and small, would most likely eliminate our impending water crisis. Until that happens, it is up to each of us to collectively do our part, and choosing vegetarian or vegan is the easiest, most effective choice we can immediately make. Not to mention all the other far-reaching positive benefits of making that simple choice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement