Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Water

Leaving Las Vegas: Are Americans Ready to Put Cataclysmic Consumption and Hedonism Behind Them?

By David Sirota, AlterNet. Posted December 27, 2008.


Will we finally accept the public policy and lifestyle changes that the real world now requires? Or will "Viva Las Vegas" always be America's motto?
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

There is something especially unsettling about visiting Las Vegas these days -- and it is not the town's lascivious culture. A voyage to Sin City in this moment of ecological and economic crisis is a journey to a giant concave mirror reflecting back the magnified -- and ugly -- truths about this epoch of cataclysmic consumption and hubristic hedonism.

Like most flights into Vegas, mine last week soared over a shrinking Lake Mead. Visually, the white strip around the manmade reservoir is beautiful -- the bright chalk line separating the blue water from the red-brown desert evokes memories of a Bob Ross pastel painting minus "happy trees." But it is a menacing harbinger of depletion. This water source for 22 million people is at its lowest level since the 1960s. Strained by the Southwest's population explosion and by drought-accelerating climate change, the lake now stands a 50 percent chance of running dry by 2021, according to scientists.

As the plane descends, Vegas comes up on the horizon faster than ever. As one of the country's quickest growing locales, it has become a massive blob suffocating a fragile ecosystem. Sans urban planning in the libertarian West, that unbridled growth encourages more roads, cars and smog.

At least McCarran Airport is only a short ride to the city's core, but that is the most troubling area of all. Recently recast as a family-friendly Disneyland, downtown Vegas nonetheless retains its identity as the place where a recession-plagued country gambles away its dwindling paycheck.

Vegas's colorful lights are supposed to be the "enjoyment" for those who inevitably lose at the slot machines. But with each twinkle the atmosphere warms. Despite advances in clean energy, electricity is still primarily produced with carbon-emitting sources that drive global warming. Indeed, the blinding Strip that prompts tourists' drunken cheers is a monument to the same gluttony that helped make Nevada the fastest-growing emitter of carbon dioxide in the country.

Sure, Vegas boasts of renewable power investments and energy-saving light bulbs. But bragging about such efforts rather than simply shutting stuff off is as silly as Arnold Schwarzenegger trumpeting his supposed commitment to environmentalism by pledging to make one of his Hummers more fuel efficient.

But that's always been the American way, hasn't it? We don't stop driving Hummers around a warming planet just like we don't stop building population centers in deserts, just like we don't stop gambling when wages drop just like we don't stop wasting energy on casino signs. Why? Because it's fun to drive tanks, live in desert climates, double-down on 11 and gape at bright lights in the big city. And during the years of cheap energy, income growth and seemingly endless water supplies, fun always trumped pragmatism.

That period, of course, has been supplanted by the Age of the Finite. And to its (few) sober visitors, Vegas implicitly asks whether our whole society is genuinely ready for that new reality.

Whether hanging Christmas lights in Toledo, buying SUVs in Boulder, taking long showers in Atlanta, residing in sprawly suburbs near Chicago, or overspending anywhere, we are all Las Vegans now. And because we have become so environmentally and economically interconnected, what happens in our own Vegas no longer stays in our own Vegas -- it affects everyone.

Knowing that, are we ready to turn off some lights in our homes? Is it possible for Americans to forfeit McMansion dreams, drive smaller cars, take public transit, embrace water restrictions, or live in more sustainable geographies? Can we resist materialism, halt the bone-crushing stampedes to Wal-Mart, and stop needlessly spending beyond our means?

In other words, will we finally accept the public policy and lifestyle changes that the real world now requires? Or will "Viva Las Vegas" always be America's motto?

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: environment, economy, climate change, waste, crisis, sustainability, sirota, law vegas

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, "The Uprising," was just released this month. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network -- both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Are Americans Ready to Put Cataclysmic Consumption and Hedonism Behind Them?
Posted by: pelican beak on Dec 27, 2008 12:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cataclysmic consumerism is very expensive.
Hedonism is free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'll serve Mammon
Posted by: Honkie the Nihilist on Dec 27, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am me. You are not. In my mind: I > You.

I mentioned serving Mammon in a post below without reading yours. Funny how that worked out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I am a god?` Posted by: Honkie the Nihilist
RE: CHOOSE
Posted by: Unapologetic Liberal on Dec 28, 2008 4:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmmm... I'll take the unmentioned third option: Serve neither artifice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nanotech is (most likely) the solution to our current mess..
Posted by: nerd1024 on Dec 27, 2008 4:32 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The solution to the current enviro/greed mess, is to re-define ourselves into the 21st century where nanotech will give everybody unprecedented access to advanced computerized nano-replicators (to make and recycle everything, exchanging designs on the internet) so everybody will eventually not need this artificial scarcity that current capitalism creates.

If everybody can manufacture/recycle their stuff, greed becomes a thing of the past. If people are still greedy beyond all measure (like robber barrons), advanced tech will eventually find out ways to fix the genetic/brain screwed up wiring and give us the options of at least tuning them to be more normal and not such jerks (same for war mongers too).

Face it, the genetic/cultural drives served us well earlier times, but giving super advanced 21st century tech to greedy 20th century power types/warmongers etc, is asking for trouble. (certain aspects of star treck culture are cool, but the warmonger part of it is certainly exciting, but reflects too much of our greed/warmonger reality and can be detrimental to advanced culture).

We really need to really push the (allready massive) current nanotech advancements as essentially small nanotech computers and nanotech atomic assemblers can provide us with, the best solar cell tech, the best space vehicle tech (grow your own buildings/spaceships, space elevators), the best medical life-extenstion (reverse aging) tech, the best tech for restoring the natual eviroment, essentially, you can exchange and download the latest open sourced car, house, building, the best human health etc, (also, nano dissasemblers will recycle anything, such as old garbage dumps).

Essentialy, we gain complete control over the positioning of all matter (and computerize it like a cad file).

A saying (in the nano life extension circles), is that aging, is the wrong atoms/molecules in the wrong spot, simply develop advanced nano to re-arrange the offending atoms.

Also, it may be recommended, if you are going to use advanced nano, better kick all the war-mongers/corporate greed/power mongers in the ass and keep their little immature minds away from nano as they probably will screw that up too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gambling industry bailout?
Posted by: socialpsych on Dec 27, 2008 5:01 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The gambling industry around the U.S. is huge. If/when people wake up to the fact that they can no longer afford to gamble, those casinos will go down, but not without asking state and federal governments for a handout, a la the investment industry and the autmobile industry. Won't that be the bottom of the barrel for American culture?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I not willing to make any changes.
Posted by: Honkie the Nihilist on Dec 27, 2008 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should I? So La Raza can laugh about their Reconquesta (even though Mexico was an artificial creation by European imperialists)?

Where in this article was it mentioned to stop having kids? The theist will not stop having litters of children because Jesus or Allah, their sky gods, demand fresh meat for the grinder. Well guess what, I have recently found god. His name is Mammon and in order to appease him, I must consume.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe the writer's list of questions is not quite complete
Posted by: Beck on Dec 27, 2008 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"But that's always been the American way, hasn't it? We don't stop driving Hummers around a warming planet just like we don't stop building population centers in deserts, just like we don't stop gambling when wages drop just like we don't stop wasting energy on casino signs. Why? Because it's fun to drive tanks, live in desert climates, double-down on 11 and gape at bright lights in the big city. And during the years of cheap energy, income growth and seemingly endless water supplies, fun always trumped pragmatism."

Fun still trumps pragmatism. We don't want to stop flying (mainlining carbon into the atmosphere) either. I've come to marvel at those who mock Hummers right after mentioning flying. No one has to fly to Vegas. Why did this author do so? Why? Because it's fun to fly to other places.

"Whether hanging Christmas lights in Toledo, buying SUVs in Boulder, taking long showers in Atlanta, residing in sprawly suburbs near Chicago, or overspending anywhere, we are all Las Vegans now. And because we have become so environmentally and economically interconnected, what happens in our own Vegas no longer stays in our own Vegas -- it affects everyone." Add flying.

"Knowing that, are we ready to turn off some lights in our homes? [Or reconsider our right to go anywhere at any time?] Is it possible for Americans to forfeit McMansion dreams [or travel dreams] , drive smaller cars, take public transit, embrace water restrictions, or live in more sustainable geographies [or STAY in their geographies] ? Can we resist materialism, halt the bone-crushing stampedes to Wal-Mart, and stop needlessly spending beyond our means?"

"In other words, will we finally accept the public policy and lifestyle changes that the real world now requires? Or will "Viva Las Vegas" always be America's motto?"

Flying seems like the new and absolutely justifiable consumerism, the legitimate way to keep up with the Jones. I'm always amazed at the negativity you encounter if you mention this to a group of environmentalists. And I'm equally amazed that mentioning a trip abroad gets you as much gushing praise as if you graduated with a new degree, or welcomed a grandchild into the world. We have a really weird attitude towards travel. It is seen as an absolute right, and the right to disconnect it from any effects it has is also seen as absolute.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Word from Las Vegas
Posted by: djnoll on Dec 27, 2008 5:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just a word for those who think that Las Vegas is a fun place to be or that the citizens here are hypocrites. We have to live here many of us (I live just about 35 miles NW of Vegas) because our former employers transferred us here, then laid us off without warning. For every job that now comes open hundreds of people apply. In my case, the little community where I live was less than a 10 minute drive for my husband to his job, but is over 45 minutes from the nearest grocery store or bank or doctor. There are about 25 such communities in Clark County and ALL the county commissioners live in Vegas or its suburb of Henderson. The senior senator from this state lives in Searchlight, NV, and is one of the biggest jerks in this nation - Senator Harry Reid. If you want something done in any town or community except these three you need to go through the county commissioners and they block everything except that which supports Vegas, Searchlight, Henderson, or the community of Anthem where all the slumlords live.

Come to Vegas and see how the government of this county works to prevent such things as water conservation, energy independence, education improvement projects, and then look at the fact that except for a very small percentage of the people of power, the rest of us want to address the needs that face us. Many of us would like to create jobs, but the county commissioners block us. We would like to practice water conservation, reclamation, recharging, and recycling, but the county commissioners block us. We would like to work with NV Energy to create green power projects in our communities, but both the BLM and the county block our efforts, thanks to Harry Reid and his love of Yucca Mountain (and make no mistake, this two-faced idiot does want this here in Nevada, even though the citizens do not. He even went so far as to try to prevent the extension of energy tax credits to block the building of a solar facility in neighboring Arizona, just to prove it could not be done here!)

The citizens, the average citizens, know that we have lots of problems. We know that there are solutions, but when you have a state that is going bankrupt, a state government that is controlled by mining and gambling interests, and state senators with personal agendas, you can get frustrated pretty quickly. I know of many people in my community who have been beaten down so many times over these issues that they have given up trying. It is why I have joined with four housewives to establish a community foundation that will rely on private donations and grants to make our community ecologically sound, retain its small-ness and carbon footprint on the desert, and will maybe be able to lead the way for the other outlying communities to solve the problems we face here. Then maybe, Vegas will turn off its lights and people will stop coming to this town of insane dreams so that the rest of us can live out our lives in sanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some of us already have
Posted by: BlueTigress on Dec 27, 2008 11:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of us have never been into the materialist lifestyle.

The trick will be to convince everyone else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good luck Posted by: bizeeb
» RE: Good luck Posted by: lissajayne
Good Luck
Posted by: bizeeb on Dec 28, 2008 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree BlueTigress (above post) in theory, but it will never happen. I sometimes get the impression that a lot of alternet posters are way out of touch with "average " Americans and mainstream opinion/values. Reading many of the posts here I get a sense of optimism and hope that is completely unrealistic. For example, in the main article, it closes with the rhetorical question(s):

"...are we ready to turn off some lights in our homes? Is it possible for Americans to forfeit McMansion dreams, drive smaller cars, take public transit, embrace water restrictions, or live in more sustainable geographies? Can we resist materialism, halt the bone-crushing stampedes to Wal-Mart, and stop needlessly spending beyond our means?"

If the writer were talking about/to alternet writers/posters (in general) I think it is possible. But if you're posing these questions to "Joe Six-Pack", the average American, the 47% of the (voting) population that pulled the lever for McCain/Palin, and most of my co-workers, the answer is a resounding "HELL NO!"

I think "sirios" is right when he says "people will not change until there is nothing left to consume." Unfortunately, I think long term planning is not one of homo-sapiens strong points; there are very real darwinian reasons for this.

I urge people to read Dan Gilbert's (semi-related) piece 'If Only Gay Sex Caused Global Warmming', linked below:

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0702-26.htm

I think it touches on some of the reasons humans are slow to change behaviors, especially if it's not going to be a lot of fun.

I'm quite pessimistic about our future, Obama notwithstanding, and frankly, I'm not impressed with humanity in general; we are capable of extraordinary compassion, sensitivity, beauty, art, innovation, etc. yet, as any glance at human history (or daily headlines from every corner of the world) will show: Humanity is overrated. Sad but true.

P.S. Someone please convince me I'm wrong!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good Luck Posted by: dockboy
notyou2
Posted by: notyou2 on Dec 28, 2008 12:29 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For years so called pundits and "visionaries" have been saying the requiem for Las Vegas. In the last fifty years gambling has flourished in this country. It is in many states and gambling like liquor is recession proof. Yes Vegas is off from its highs because they had some amount of family entertainment in the crowds that came. Half of Vegas traffic comes from Calif. and its economy is in the tank because of misguided liberals like Sirota. Somehow if we just all say chill and love, then the world will conform to our view of how life should be lived.
Get a life and get real. In the 73-74 time frame the world was going to end . Jerry Brown said we had hit the era of limits (another brain dead moron) In 81-82 we had 10% unemployment and pundits said Americans would have a permanently unemployable segment of the workforce. In the late 1990s we were in a new era where intrinsic value in stocks didn't matter-it was the internet era-the world of investing had changed- yeah right! All of these visions were just as stupid as the author's is now.
people who don't learn from history are destined to repeat it and this is what we do best.

Don't worry about Vegas or gambling or consumerism or hedonism or decadence or whatever. Worry instead that when all the liberal policies lead to no water , no gas , no food, no jobs then those with weapons roam the streets to protect their own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The New World is not the whole world
Posted by: richholland on Dec 28, 2008 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the tragic is the American Way of life is exported all over the world.
In Cambodia we see workers for$ 2, per day and also big Hummers.....
But gambling is very populair, sending your kids to an"" üniversity""
looking for big houses etc.
Instead of building a strong social network as people did in the European Union.
Free Market means exploiting the poor...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's See If I Have This Right
Posted by: dockboy on Dec 30, 2008 11:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it's during Republican administration, we call this a depriciating lifestyle. A poorer standard of living. A "tightening of the belt" for the middle class. Etc, etc.

But now that we have an incoming Democratic administration, these things are required? A needed change? Sounds to me like Obama has already been let off the hook, if he can't fix the economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement