Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Water

Why Big Banks May Be Trying to Buy up Your Public Water System

By Jo-Shing Yang, AlterNet. Posted October 31, 2008.


In uncertain economic and environmental times, big banks and financial groups are buying public water systems as safe investments.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Water is the new oil for global financial powerhouses and water is being commoditized and traded in global stock exchanges.

Today in addition to being able to buy water rights and purchase lakes on private land, an individual or a corporation can invest in water-targeted hedge funds, index funds and exchange-traded funds (EFTs), water certificates, shares of water engineering and technology companies, shares of multinational private water utilities, shares of multinational banks and investment banks that own water companies, and a host of other newfangled water investments in this U.S.$425 billion industry which is expected to become a U.S.$1 trillion industry within five years. And if one happens to be a tycoon, one can also create his or her own private water districts and water utilities.  

The recent media coverage on water has centered on individual corporations and super-investors seeking to control water by buying up water rights and water utilities. But paradoxically the hidden story is a far more complicated one. The real story of the global water sector is a convoluted one involving "interlocking globalized capital": Wall Street and global investment firms, banks, and other elite private-equity firms -- often transcending national boundaries to partner with each other, with banks and hedge funds, with technology corporations and insurance giants, with regional public-sector pension funds, and with sovereign wealth funds -- are moving rapidly into the water sector to buy up not only water rights and water-treatment technologies, but also to privatize public water utilities and infrastructure.  

"Water" and "water sector" are used broadly to refer to water rights (i.e., the right to tap groundwater, aquifers, and rivers), land with bodies of water on it or under it (i.e., lakes, ponds, and natural springs on the surface, or groundwater underneath), water-purification and treatment technologies (e.g., desalination, treatment chemicals and equipment), irrigation and well-drilling technologies, water and sanitation services and utilities, water infrastructure maintenance and construction (from pipes and distribution to all scales of treatment plants for residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal uses), water engineering services (e.g., those involved in the design and construction of water-related facilities), and retail water sector (such as those involved in the production, operation, and sales of bottled water, water vending machines, bottled water subscription and delivery services, water trucks, and water tankers).  

The story is multifaceted: In the midst of a recessionary economy with a blistering financial and economic crisis, declining employment, and a shrinking tax base, many financially strapped and debt-ridden local governments are beginning to relinquish public infrastructure (including water) and municipal services (including water and sewage utilities) to privatization by Wall Street and other global investors.

At the same time, Wall Street and multinational banks are seeing water, food, energy, and public infrastructure as safe investment havens with stable returns and financially liquid assets. Simultaneously, they are waking up to the golden opportunity presented by the current reality of a thirstier, water-scarcer world caused by global climate change (and its extreme weather), rapidly depleting groundwater and aquifers, increasing water pollution, soaring water demand exerted by population increases, fast-rising agricultural and industrial uses, and crumbling water infrastructure worldwide requiring billions of dollars annually in maintenance and upgrade.  

Often, the picture painted by mainstream media and water-rights activists is too simple -- that of a single corporation (such as Coca-Cola in India or Bechtel in Bolivia) "corporatizing water;" the real story is not just of flamboyant tycoons (such as U.S.'s billionaire and former oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens, or more recently, Hong Kong's real-estate billionaire Li Kai-shing, or Britain's magnate Vincent Tchenguiz) single-handedly grabbing water rights or individual corporations (e.g., Coca-Cola and Nestlé) sucking dry springs and groundwater to the detriment of poor subsistence farmers or slum-dwellers, but vastly complex global networks and partnerships of investment banks and private-equity firms linking together with other institutions (such as public-sector pension funds in Australia, Canada, and Europe; and sovereign wealth funds in the Middle East and Asia) and multinational corporations elsewhere to buy up and control water worldwide.  

Not only are individual corporations buying up water but a deluge of globalized capital are also rapidly buying up water and consolidating their foothold in the water sector; these capital entities are investment powerhouses such as Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Merrill Lynch (before it was sold to Bank of America), Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank, Credit Suisse, Macquarie Bank, Allianz SE, UBS AG, HSBC Bank, Alinda Capital, The Carlyle Group, Barclays Bank, Nomura Holdings, and many others. In fact, Wall Street and their global banking and corporate partners are aggressively buying up water all over the world.   


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, wall street, water privatization

Jo-Shing Yang is the author of Ecological Planning, Design, & Engineering, Solving Global Water Crises: New Paradigms in Wastewater and Water Treatment, Small and On-Site Systems for Water Self-Sufficiency and Sustainability and can be reached at jsyang@alum.mit.edu.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
GIS Services and Water Rights Consultant
Posted by: EBT on Nov 3, 2008 2:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A provocative take on the commoditization of fresh water. After spending the better part of ten years working on water rights in the Rocky Mountain region, an interesting twist, that comes with the times, is the growing discrepancy between paper water (water rights) and real water. Water rights can, in fact, decline in value in a period of water shortage if the real water behind the water right is declining in quantity or quality, and/or is saddled with use restrictions (See the Cherokee Metro District case going on in Colorado Springs as a good example). There is a growing shell game with water rights being employed by a variety of groups of people, some of which are mentioned in this article, to maintain or inflate the value of water that is often no longer there. Bond issues are being written on these type "securities", for major infrastructure improvements. Sound familiar? What I found alarming was not so much the commoditization of water, but the legislation that increasingly makes water rights less and less distinguishable from water ownership.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This piece is a disaster....
Posted by: davidzet on Nov 9, 2008 5:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's redundant (could be 50% of current length) and confounds many ideas (e.g., "demand for water is inelastic... for crop production"). Further, it misses the BIG point -- no municipality is FORCED to privatize.

David (aguanomics.com)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whoa...
Posted by: adp3d on Nov 17, 2008 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...just saw the new Bond movie, "Quantum of Solice"...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Whoa... Posted by: TheNamelessCity
Don't tell that to the Malthusian zombies !
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 17, 2008 6:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of correctly pointing out that it's monied elites such as Big Banks, they'll blame the population for everything. I can understand if this is San Francisco and NYC but there are places with population decreases or at least very slow population growth so blaming the population there is just plain wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The rich companies continue their ripoff
Posted by: beeden on Nov 17, 2008 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems to me that a lot of the companies who have sucked and sucked massive amounts from the government trough, and who are now seeking further assistance on non-liquid assets, are racing to grab control of this essential asset. Not only have these companies ripped off the US public, its Treasury and other international institutions( and the people who invested with them), they now have the gall to take control over the very infrastructures their thievery enabled to fall into disrepair. We have seen the manner in which Halliburton and its co-companies treated the troops with less than perfect equipment/supplies/cost estimates, can this leopard of the business jungle change its spots when it comes to water, hardly.
Any water and business agreements must remain the responsibility of the government as a major 90 + % shareholder. Let the business people help, as a civic responsibility ( they don't want to pay their fair share of taxes, like the rest of the public have to ), with the reconstruction necessary, and view water as a very long term reliable investment return ( as they already do) , not some "quickie" profit turnover investment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OMG!
Posted by: GrannyBgood on Nov 17, 2008 7:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are forced to fork over 800 Billion to them and THIS is what they do with it?!>???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

madregal
Posted by: madregal on Nov 17, 2008 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is something to think about: There are six elements essential for human life to continue to exist.

1. Air to breathe. 2. Water to drink. 3. Food for energy. 4. Cover for the body. 5. Shelter from the elements. and 6. Health care.

Of these six, only air to breathe is not sold as a "privilege" rather than a right, and there is probably some nitwit somewhere trying to figure out how to sell that.

The economy should fit the needs of the people rather than the people having to fit the needs of the economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: madregal Posted by: Mel H.
Selling the water supply earns big money...
Posted by: PaulK on Nov 17, 2008 11:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the current politicians in power. They get the cash to spend immediately.

Then the new owner has a monopoly and can triple the homeowners' water rates. Within five years or so the homeowners (and their renters) have paid in full for the sale of the water supply, through higher costs. A new set of politicians comes to power, but the windfall money was already spent. Too bad.

We need local governments that can handle credit cards, not children in office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]