Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

U.S. Forces to Hand Over Anbar Province to Iraqis

Middle East Online. Posted August 30, 2008.


Citing stronger domestic security forces and a need for troops in Afghanistan, a U.S. general says control will be handed over in "just a few days."
Advertisement

U.S. forces will hand over control of Anbar province to Iraqi troops in the coming days, military officials said Wednesday, touting improved security in the region.

"We believe the province could turn over to Iraqi control in just a few days," Marine General James Conway said.

"The change in the Al-Anbar province is real and perceptible," Conway said of the majority-Sunni region, which is Iraq's largest province.

"Anbar remains a dangerous place, but the ever growing ability of the Iraqi security forces continues to move us closer to seeing Iraqi control of the province," the general said.

He expressed the hope that the handover of the Anbar province to Iraqi control will allow the Pentagon to redeploy troops elsewhere.

"More U.S. forces are needed in Afghanistan," he said. "However, in order to do more in Afghanistan, our Marines have got to see relief elsewhere."

"They are doing a very good job of this nation-building business," in Anbar, but "25,000 Marines in the province are probably being in excess of the need, especially after Iraqi provincial control assumes responsibilities for security," Conway added.

"It's our view that if there is a stiffer fight going someplace else, in a much more expeditionary environment where the Marine air-ground task force really seems to have a true and enduring value, then that's where we need to be," he said about Afghanistan.

The once-restive Anbar province in western Iraq is home to former flashpoint cities of Ramadi and Fallujah, where deadly clashes between insurgents and U.S. forces often roiled after the 2003 invasion to oust Saddam Hussein.

Unrest began to taper off in late 2006 as tribal leaders joined with U.S. forces to help oust Al-Qaeda nests in their midst.

The drop in violence comes amid growing pressure to beef up the U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan, where the level of violence is higher.

About 145,000 U.S. soldiers are currently on the ground in Iraq, but those numbers could decrease in coming months.

General David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, has said he will decide in the coming days or weeks whether to continue withdrawing troops from Iraq, and at what pace.

Meanwhile, violence continued elsewhere in Iraq. Most recently, a suicide bomber thwarted a security check at a police recruiting center in Jalawla, 150 kilometers (90 miles) north of Baghdad Tuesday, killing himself and at least 25 others, police said.

Jalawla is in Diyala province, considered to be one of the most dangerous in Iraq, and sees regular attacks by Al-Qaeda-linked groups targeting "Awakening" units of Sunni former jihadists who now are cooperating with the American military.

Wednesday's announcement of the impending handover of Anbar was seen in the United States as a political boon to the administration of President George W. Bush and his hopeful Republican successor in November's election, John McCain.

Success in Iraq was likely to be a major theme when the Republicans next week hold their convention to nominate McCain as the party's candidate for the White House.

Democrat Barack Obama, who has demanded an end to the war and a rapid pullback of U.S. combat troops, could suffer politically if vehement anti-war sentiment diminishes, pundits say.

This week, Iraqi officials said Washington and Baghdad have agreed there will be no foreign forces in Iraq after 2011, setting a timeline for a U.S. withdrawal from the war-torn country.

Under the 27-point deal, all American combat troops will be withdrawn by 2011 and from Iraqi cities by next June, negotiator Mohammed al-Haj Hammoud said in Baghdad.

The White House has stressed that there is no final accord with Baghdad on the controversial troop withdrawal issue.

"These discussions continue, as we have not yet finalized an agreement," spokesman Tony Fratto said on Monday.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, afghanistan, us military, david petraeus, fallujah, anbar, james conway, mohammed al-haj hammoud, ramadi

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
U.S. hands its Sunni "allies" over to their Shi'ite enemies.
Posted by: BlueSun on Aug 30, 2008 2:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose the military and the administration aren't acknowledging that the Iraqi troops taking over in Anbar will be basically Shi'ites, even Badr Militia recruits, under control of the same Shi'ite government that has been preparing for this takeover by arresting almost 700 Awakening and Sons if Iraq leaders.

The U.S. presence has been tolerated by the Sunni groups only because our troops have been a buffer between them and the Shi'ite government, and have been providing them the arms and training they hope to use to defend themselves against their own government when the Americans leave. Now, the Americans are leaving...

I think that, under the assumption that "the Iraqis are standing up," all we've done is give up the Sunnis to their greatest enemies; the Shi'ite government leaders and the Shi'ite dominated Security and Army troops. It is no accident that the Awakening and Sons of Iran Sunnis refer to their own government and the Iraqi Shi'ite majority as "the Persians," an acknowledgment that al-Maliki, al-Hakim and their followers are, from the Sunnis' perspective, indistinguishable from the Iranians who have supported, financed, and controlled them for decades.

Say goodbye to the Awakening and to the relatively low levels of violence of the recent months, and say hello to a reignited Sunni/Shi'a civil war. McCain's only hope now is that the conflict will start slowly, with just more arrests, "disappearances" and village cleansings, and not erupt into all-out violence until after November.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sunni and Shi'a, sectarian problems not our business.
Posted by: Turiye on Aug 31, 2008 12:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sunni or Shi'a aren't our business it is and always shall be theirs. The Shi'a and Sunni will be as it has always been. Because Sadam was Sunni he kept the Shi'a majority well and with an iron fist controlled. No fighting then, was there? Of course the gassing of the Kurds, PKK are Kurds that border cross from Iraq into Turkey murdering 38,000 Turks, my relatives since '86, I understand but it is NOT OUR UNDERSTANDING It is as IT is.
As a Military might and the Murderer as a Political Hegeonimyst makes it less our concern.
Are you aware the Murderer is again trying to use fear based tactics Rovian tricks as 9/11 nears in use of a 6 point proposal to broaden what constitutes allowing for the next administration, no McInsane, he hopes the "Maverick" will be the 1, nah-ah, to assert once again the president's broad interpretation of the commander in chief's wartime powers, powers that Justice Department lawyers secretly used to justify the indefinite detention of terrorist suspects and the NSA's wiretapping of American's without court orders.
The run up in Afghanistan is proof enough that Obama DOES intend and don't kid yourselves, because he intends as all Politicos do to actively engage Troops in the run up.

4150. Iraq only. Enough sons, daughters, sisters, brothers and Moms and Dads, yet, ya' full? All war, Illegal Occupation included must END NOW!

Sorry, alternet for years has used an incorrect spelling of my username. It is Turkiye', the name of the country of Turkey in Turce, Turkish. Oh, what is turkey in Turkish? EZ, Hindi.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]