Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

How Much "Meddling" Is Iran Actually Doing in Iraq?

By Omid Memarian, IPS News. Posted August 14, 2008.


As the U.S keeps accusing Iran of arming Shiite militias, Iraqi officials are ignoring its claims in favor of diplomacy with neighboring governments.
Advertisement

UNITED NATIONS, Aug 13 (IPS) -- While the United States has repeatedly accused Iran of providing lethal weapons to Shiite militias, last week, U.S. officials once again failed to provide solid evidence for this charge, raising questions about the actual level of Iran's meddling in Iraq.

Last Wednesday, Alejandro Daniel Wolff, deputy permanent U.S. representative to the U.N., accused Tehran of funneling lethal weapons into Iraq. "During the recent operations in Basra, Sadr city, and Maysan, Iraqi troops uncovered convincing evidence that Iranian lethal aid has continued to flow into Iraq," he said.

Iran called the allegations "absurd" and a "routine practice" on the part of the U.S. "Whereas Iran has proved, time and again, its good intention to help Iraq's stabilization, development and prosperity through close cooperation with the Iraqi government in different fields -- as well as to help Iraqi people overcome their immense difficulties -- the U.S. government unwarrantedly insists on its unacceptable behavior in scapegoating others, including Iran, for its own wrong policies in Iraq," Mehdi Danesh Yazdi, Iran's ambassador to the U.N. responded in a statement.

Those mistakes include, "the continuation of the presence of foreign forces in the country and certain wring policies and practices on the part of foreign forces there," Yazdi explained.

Meanwhile, Iraqi officials who enjoy a close relationship with their Shiite neighbor have ignored the U.S. accusations, believing that if anything can make Iraq secure, it is diplomacy and negotiation with regional governments.

Hamid Al-Bayati, permanent representative of Iraq to the U.N., who did not specifically comment on the U.S. representative's allegations, told IPS that there are "terrorists" who are coming across the borders and Iraq's neighbors could scrutinize these people and put more control on their borders -- expanding the circle of countries who are responsible for the current security situation in Iraq.

"There is a mechanism which is agreed between Iraq and these countries, on what these countries can do through the meeting of interior ministers of these countries, through the expanded neighboring countries conferences which took place in Kuwait and anther one that is going to take place in Jordan in fall," Al-Bayati added. "We are going to continue these negotiations through diplomatic channels."

Iraq is viewed by many as a proxy for Iran-U.S. hostilities over the past four years, and Iranian officials have called the U.S. presence in Iraq the main reason for sectarian violence. Iraqis have asked both countries not to use Iraqi soil for their proxy war.

When asked whether an improvement in Iran-U.S. relations could help boost security in Iraq, Al-Bayati told IPS that Iraq facilitated three rounds of meetings between Iran and the U.S. inside Iraq and hoped that a fourth round -- which was postponed -- would take place. "We hope that any improvement in the relationship between Iran and the U.S. will help the situation in Iraq," he added.

On the Iranian side, U.S. allegations have been questioned for lack of solid evidence. "It is noteworthy that despite these groundless allegations, to date no single credible evidence has ever been presented to substantiate them," Yazdi stated in response to the recent U.S. claims of Iran's destructive role in Iraq. "To the contrary, several high ranking Iraqi officials are on record, stressing Iran's constructive role in the country and rejecting the solid allegation."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iran, iraq, surge, shiites, united nations, moqtada al-sadr, alejandro daniel wolff, mehdi danesh yazdi, hamid al-bayati

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Axis of Evil - depends on point of view!
Posted by: LionHeart on Aug 14, 2008 10:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who thinks Iran has good intentions and is trying to be a positive player where Iraq is concerned is a fool. If for no other reason than they both hated each other for decades.

Our problem is we continue to not believe the boots on the ground regarding what is going on. Washington surely doesn't know and neither do reporters.

I'd go with those that have first hand knowledge as to Iran's part in arming insurgents. It has been reported a number of times and shown that the weapons had been manufactured in Iran and fighting methods suggest Iranian training.

Assuming that all that is true, this is Iran's sphere of influence, not ours. They have every right to make life miserable for us..we'd do the same for them.

I'd support any measure to defend our troops at any cost but being in the axis of evil depends on which side of the axis you're on!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Been there, done that. Posted by: Axiom69
Axis of Evil - depends on point of view!
Posted by: LionHeart on Aug 14, 2008 10:45 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who thinks Iran has good intentions and is trying to be a positive player where Iraq is concerned is a fool. If for no other reason than they both hated each other for decades.

Our problem is we continue to not believe the boots on the ground regarding what is going on. Washington surely doesn't know and neither do reporters.

I'd go with those that have first hand knowledge as to Iran's part in arming insurgents. It has been reported a number of times and shown that the weapons had been manufactured in Iran and fighting methods suggest Iranian training.

Assuming that all that is true, this is Iran's sphere of influence, not ours. They have every right to make life miserable for us..we'd do the same for them.

I'd support any measure to defend our troops at any cost but being in the axis of evil depends on which side of the axis you're on!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

motown67
Posted by: motown67 on Aug 15, 2008 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iran as had several different, and often contradictory policies towards Iraq. After the invasion they wanted to prop up a friendly Shiite government that consisted mostly of parties that had sought refuge in Iran during the Saddam years. They also wanted to make Iraq weak so that it would never be a threat to Iran again. They worked to improve cultural and economic ties with thousands of Iranian pilgrims travelling to holy sites in Iraq each year, and increased trade to the point that Iran is amongst Iraq's top trade partners. At the same time, they wanted to attack U.S. forces and the Sunnis. That's why they supported various Shiite militias and set up the Special Groups. After the offensives in Basra and Sadr City however, they may be forced to reconsider their disruptive policies and focus upon political and economic ties. For more see: http://musingsoniraq.blogspot.com and click on "Iran" under topics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]