Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

Anti-U.S. Sentiment on the Rise in Iraq

Azzaman. Posted July 14, 2008.


As the real American strategic interests in Iraq are laid bare, anger at the U.S. and Iraqi government is fueling the resistance.
Advertisement

Many Iraqi Shiites are turning against the Americans, expressing their anger and indignation at U.S. policies and practices in increasingly violent ways.

The Shiite political factions were ostensibly pleased with America's invasion of the country and its removal of former leader Saddam Hussein.

But that "marriage of convenience" did not last and the Shiites, like their Sunni brethren, have come to realize that U.S.'s strategic interests lie somewhere else.

Spearheading the anti-U.S. drive among the Shiites is the powerful movement of cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, who is in collision not only with the Americans but also with his former Shiite allies currently steering the government.

While some semblance of quiet has returned to violent areas where Sunni Arabs form the majority, Sadr's supporters and militias are reported to have turned into a destabilizing factor in numerous towns and cities in southern Iraq.

Sadr's people are not opposing the Americans only. They are opposing the Shiite-dominated government which they believe is a U.S. stooge.

Sadr's military wing is one of the most secretive militia groups in Iraq. Some analysts draw parallels between it and the military tactics the Hizbollah Party pursues in Lebanon.

It is not clear whether Sadr's armed men are as heavily equipped and efficiently trained like Hizbollah fighters. But analysts say Iraq's nascent military cannot on its own take on the Sadr movement with its popular grassroots support in mainly impoverished Shiite towns and districts.

One thing the analysts cannot say with certainty: They wonder whether the Sadrists are coordinating their anti-U.S. actions with the predominantly Sunni resistance whose attacks targeting U.S. troops have plummeted recently.

Last week Sadr's supporters organized large-scale demonstrations in the provinces of Babel and Diwayniya as well as Baghdad demanding the departure of U.S. troops.

Clashes broke out during these demonstrations with government troops arresting scores of Sadrists.

Sources say neither the U.S. nor the government have a full picture of the strength of the movement. The Sadrists, they say, have not used all their "military potential" and militarily the U.S. and the Iraqi government will have to think twice before waging a full-scale war to disarm them.

But the question troubling U.S. military strategists in Iraq is what would happen should the Sadrists openly ally themselves with Iraqi resistance -- or what the Sadrists would do in the face of a military confrontation with Iran.

Analysts say if hostilities flare up between the U.S. and Iran, the Sadrists and other heavily armed groups loyal to Tehran will enter the battle, using everything at their disposal.

Iraqi resistance groups, the Sadrists, other militias, the sleeping Iranian cells in Iraq, and the "might" of Iran's Revolutionary Guards will practically hold U.S. troops at gunpoint.

This nightmarish scenario is in the back of the minds of U.S. military planners -- and they have so far found no practical way on how to approach it.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iran, iraq, iraq war, iraq occupation, sunnis, shiites, moqtada al-sadr

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Lies and damn lies
Posted by: Skelly on Jul 14, 2008 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story can't possibly be true, because the surge is working. (New Yorker, "this" is sarcasm)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

assclowns
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Jul 14, 2008 8:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
bush and cheney will go all the way to having our entire military in Iraq under gunpoint till they think. you know,,,, think

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maliki might think he can whup Sadr
Posted by: whealeydj on Jul 15, 2008 3:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so he has asked for a timetable for withdrawl. Should the US wait for agreement between major factions before beginning drawdown? is two enough? is three? I have tended to favor drawdown sooner for the sake of our troops (more deployments means more PTSD) but when will ever know when it is safe reduce are presence without a civil war?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]