Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

The Five Secret Billion-Dollar Companies Sucking Obscene Amounts of Taxpayer Money

By Nick Turse, Tomdispatch.com. Posted June 26, 2008.


Meet the mystery defense contractors that are raking in billions in taxpayer dollars without notice.
Advertisement

At $34 billion, you're already counting pretty high. After all, that's Harvard's endowment; it's the amount of damage the triple hurricanes -- Charley, Ivan, and Jeanne -- inflicted in 2004; it's what car crashes involving 15-to-17-year-old teenage drivers mean yearly in "medical expenses, lost work, property damage, quality of life loss and other related costs"; it's the loans the nation's largest, crippled, home lender, Countrywide Financial, holds for home-equity lines of credit and second liens; it's Citigroup's recent write-off, mainly for subprime exposure; it's what New Jersey's tourism industry is worth -- and, according to the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, it's the minimal figure for the Pentagon's "black budget" for fiscal year 2009 -- money for, among other things, "classified weapons purchases and development," money for which the Pentagon will remain unaccountable because almost no Americans will have any way of knowing what it's being spent for.

Now, imagine that, due to a little more Pentagon/Bush administration wizardry, even this black budget estimate is undoubtedly a low-ball figure. One reason is simple enough: The proposed $541 billion Pentagon 2009 budget doesn't even include money for actual wars. George W. Bush's wars are all paid for by "supplemental" bills like the $162 billion one Congress will soon pass -- so the Department of Defense's $34 billion black budget skips "war-related funding." This means that even the overall figure for that budget remains darker than we might imagine (as in "black hole"). The Pentagon not only produces stealth planes, it is, in budgetary terms, a stealth operation. If honestly accounted, the actual Pentagon yearly budget, including all the "military-related" funds salted away elsewhere, is probably now more than $1 trillion a year.

There is, however, another stealth side to the Pentagon -- the corporate side where a range of giant companies you've never heard of are gobbling up our tax dollars at phenomenal rates. Nick Turse, author of the single best account of how our lives are being militarized, our civilian economy Pentagonized, and the Pentagon privatized -- I'm talking about The Complex: How the Military Invades Our Everyday Lives -- now turns to the stealth corporate side of the Pentagon to give us a glimpse into the larger black hole into which our dollars pour. -- Intro by TomDispatch editor, Tom Engelhardt

Billion-Dollar Babies

Five Stealth Pentagon Contractors Reaping Billions of Tax Dollars
By Nick Turse

The top Pentagon contractors, like death and taxes, almost never change. In 2002, the massive arms dealers Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman ranked one, two, and three among Department of Defense contractors, taking in $17 billion, $16.6 billion, and $8.7 billion. Lockheed, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman did it again in 2003 ($21.9, $17.3, and $11.1 billion); 2004 ($20.7, $17.1, and $11.9 billion); 2005 ($19.4, $18.3, and $13.5 billion); 2006 ($26.6, $20.3, and $16.6 billion); and, not surprisingly, 2007 as well ($27.8, $22.5, and $14.6 billion). Other regulars receiving mega-tax-funded payouts in a similarly clockwork-like manner include defense giants General Dynamics, Raytheon, the British weapons maker BAE Systems, and former Halliburton subsidiary KBR, as well as BP, Shell, and other power players from the military-petroleum complex.

With the basic Pentagon budget now clocking in at roughly $541 billion per year -- before "supplemental" war funding for Iraq, Afghanistan, and the President's Global War on Terror, as well as national security spending by other agencies, are factored in -- even Lockheed's hefty $28 billion take is a small percentage of the massive total. Obviously, significant sums of money are headed to other companies. However, most of them, including some of the largest, are all but unknown even to Pentagon-watchers and antiwar critics with a good grasp of the military industrial complex.

Last year, in a piece headlined "Washington's $8 Billion Shadow," Vanity Fair published an exposé of one of the better known large stealth contractors, SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation). SAIC, however, is just one of tens of thousands of Pentagon contractors. Many of these firms receive only tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Pentagon every year. Some take home millions, tens of millions, or even hundreds of millions of dollars.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, pentagon, halliburton, coca-cola, boeing, dell, general dynamics, kbr, bp, war spending, raytheon, shell, defense contractors, northrop grumman, lockheed martin, arms dealers

Nick Turse is the associate editor and research director of Tomdispatch.com. He has written for the Los Angeles Times, the San Francisco Chronicle, the Nation, the Village Voice, and regularly for Tomdispatch.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Corporate Vampires
Posted by: bryangalt on Jun 26, 2008 2:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The feeding frenzy of corporate America at the Pentagon is no surprise. Its more of a disappointment instead. These companies and the vampires that run them really aren't too concerned about their role in our Nation's eventual downfall, they just want to make sure they get a fast buck too. After all, the government doesn't seem to concerned about their role in breaking the bank either.

Then of course, there is the public. Yep, this huge mass of blind faith and ignorance is where the problem really begins and ends. For reasons that baffle me, a vast majority of the public seems to believe that the government would never do anything to seriously against the overall good of America and if that were to happen, the media would be on it.

HA HA HA HA...

Well, the media has been shown to be complicit in their roles of helping to spread the Bush administrations propoganda by letting DOD spokesman spout out lie after lie on their networks without ever condemning the DOD for it.

As I see it, their are only a few ways this gravy train will come to an end:

1. The corporations get a soul and repent (about the same time hell freezes over).

2. Our nation goes into an economic depression (this has the highest probability)

3. Jesus returns (the Muslims will be pissed)

4. We, the public assholes who keep paying our taxes to support these moronic policies, are finally so bled out that we must resort to an uprising, potentially a full-blown war to overthrow the government. Something like this could be triggered by the government's continued penetration into everyone's business. Eventually, its going to backlash.

5. and finally, the Congress simultaneously grows a spine and a set of balls and puts their foot up the asses of the DOD operations managers to stop this nonsense. #3 has a higher probability of occuring however.

We have allowed our country to be taken over by robber barons in the name of our security, and we are less secure now than ever before. We have allowed ourselves to become a disgrace as a citizenry. Eisenhower clearly stated that an "alert and involved" citenzry would be the only defense against the "complex" taking us over. I guess we couldn't drop the bongs and the game controllers long enough to notice what the hell is really going down...too bad for us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Corporate Vampires Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: The Corporate Vampires Posted by: Lauren
» RE: The Corporate Vampires Posted by: chiefwanadubie
» RE: The Corporate Vampires Posted by: annavan1
» RE: The Corporate Vampires Posted by: mr. joshua
Even Eisenhower said...
Posted by: carolcarre on Jun 26, 2008 3:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
our worst enemy is the military-industrial complex.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Eisenhower's actual speech Posted by: fanny666
» RE: ven Eisenhower said... Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: ven Eisenhower said... Posted by: CosmoViking
John Seavers
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Jun 26, 2008 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, Isnt Government Great! No wonder the natioanl debt is so freaking outrageous.

JT
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: John Seavers Posted by: Lauren
» RE: John Seavers Posted by: Dboy
military-industrial-propaganda
Posted by: luzmejor on Jun 26, 2008 5:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We knew what was happening when the Prez started talking about God, Homeland and "evil-doers" all in the same few sentences.

The problem is that we didn't want to believe the "free" nation's leaders could actually fall for that hoary old line, especially from someone who could barely string a few sentences together in public.

Now that it is too hard to bear, nobody is even listening to our recycled Feuhrer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a surprise
Posted by: solrev on Jun 26, 2008 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does the cooperate welfare state that we live in surprise anyone. We pay taxes, the taxes are pumped back into the economy and high tech defense is a really good way to do that. There has always been a trickle down effect. Currently, I work in a town of 10,000 and we build humvee superchargers every day. In the past I worked in a town of 6,000 and we built sonobuoys, which track Russian subs. This article omits one piece of information that should be noted. How many kids are wearing shoes because of these five companies? Would we be better off putting shoes on kids’ feet with taxpayer money in a nationalized healthcare industry and a nationalized energy industry? I think that would be welfare money better spent. We could easily reduce the money required to secure the entitlement of liberty, give peace a chance. It is not corporations skimming off the top that is the problem. It is the government decisions as to which companies get to skim that is the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What a surprise Posted by: Lauren
» We Would Be Better Off Posted by: rjgwood
Can we stop the blood loss
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 26, 2008 5:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We were warned about the military industrial complex - and yet no one wanted to hear or believe it. The really sad part in all of this is that the troops aren't getting any of that money. In some areas of this country a low pay-grade (E1-E4) is eligible for food-stamps. How's that for "supporting the troops". And yet these appropriations just keep on coming, and getting passed. Does it not occur to anyone that with all of this "modern technology" that we currently have and are continuing to support the R&D for - we haven't gotten very far with the current wars that we are involved in. We are fighting in the desert against people that don't have nearly the amount of equipment and machinery that we do and we're at a standstill. The world has changed there is no longer a Soviet Union Cold War build-up that we need to be prepared for, so why are we still spending trillions? There are so many other places where that money can be used for the benefit of everyone, other than weapons systems that still haven't been proven to work.

At what point do we the people bring enough pressure to bear on Congress that funds the Pentagon for some accountability?

At what point are we the people going to realize that using the weapons systems that we have we are in a position to decimate the planet? That means no one will be alive to tell the tale!!

At what point can we say enough already!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Can we stop the blood loss Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: Can we stop the blood loss Posted by: HoboHomo
» What? No response? Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Can we stop the blood loss Posted by: HillbillyBob
The Military Industrial Complex HOAX!
Posted by: williameon on Jun 26, 2008 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Black Hole for your Tax Dollars!
Privatize and steal everything
Where did all the money go?

Flush it down the toilet.
It's
A
Bush/Chainey
Halliburton/Carlye
Stinking
WAR

There is no military
Just our Militia
Being set up and
Knocked down
for
GREED!

Keep the casualties high to justify more stealing.
Da?
Get in your Hum-V and go play sitting DUCK!
Round and round you'll go in the Iraqi shooting gallery!
Who'll get shot?
The poor Amei-con.
McPain the Hanoi candidate says things are safe
Surrounded by The Dark Army and wearing a bullet proof vest.
Escorted, handled and prodded by Resident Lieberwhore.

McPain
The (WAR)
PIMP!
Has some WMD's to sell you.

Exxon's dream and a
Grunts nightmare.
Oil $200+ a Barrel!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm a war profiteer.
Posted by: antiapathy on Jun 26, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At my place of employment there is a compulsory pension fund, and their portfolio is full of wonderful defense contractors and oil companies. Not to mentions media companies and sweatshop-using apparel corpos. Between the investments I'm forced to make through work, and the taxes I'm forced to pay, a good chunk of my income goes to corporations that I find morally repugnant.

God Bless America!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm a war profiteer. Posted by: Knot_Rich
» Make Love Not Bombs Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: Make Love Not Bombs Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: I'm a war profiteer. Posted by: Lauren
» RE: I'm a war profiteer. Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: I'm a war profiteer. Posted by: antiapathy
» RE: I'm a war profiteer. Posted by: Lauren
we have choice
Posted by: blueapples26 on Jun 26, 2008 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can quit the cystem which would kill the cystem.Quitting the cystem in mass would dry up the the military industrial congressional like a prune. Quit your job and be a part of the underground economy. Quit paying your taxes which is like cutting the head off a chicken. grow your own food make your own clothes if you can't them barter for them. The only thing keeping us from doing it is fear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're right but ... Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: You're right but ... Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: You're right but ... Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: You're right but ... Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: You're right but ... Posted by: E.H.W.
» RE: we have choice Posted by: Knot_Rich
» Valid Points Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: Valid Points Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: Valid Points Posted by: Lauren
» RE: we have choice Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: we have choice Posted by: mr. joshua
» RE: we have choice Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: we have choice Posted by: Lauren
» RE: we have choice Posted by: HillbillyBob
Funding an illegal and immoral regime
Posted by: rockpicker on Jun 26, 2008 9:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
makes you complicit in that regime's crimes.

A just God expects individual loyalty to one's conscience, and a responsible exercise of the 'gift' of free will.

Come judgement day, my guess is, your decision to refuse to pay taxes will count in your eternal favor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Lauren: Check this out Posted by: rockpicker
Democracy Under the Radar
Posted by: inspired1 on Jun 26, 2008 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Soooo,...all this spending has been going on "in the shadows," funds which will never buy a school book, pay for medical treatment, hire food inspectors for the FDA.

Money, gone into the "black hole" as you say.

But there are at least two stories here.

The REAL story are the US Representatives in Congress and our Senators who have gone into their own Black Hole when it comes to representing and protecting the people of America from these cannibals who themselves claim to be "protecting" America.

What senator or representative has brought this up in any serious fashion in Congress?

Which candidate for president has made a vow to look into this runaway madness which keeps Americans BROKE, SICK, and infinitely LESS SECURE? This whole Primary/General Election Process barely passes beyond a TV game show to distract the masses of once-citizens-now-consumers while the Real Deal[ing] goes on in obscure back rooms and back channels. OUR money, OUR currency, in the toilet to pay for technology fiefdoms and pasha lifestyles for...thugs, bullies and reprehensible low-life dregs of humanity sporting MBA's and Armani.

Your reporting on this is more than a breath of fresh air. But to discuss this without a parallel loud, harsh critical analysis of our failed political system that says NOTHING of this reality to the people, leaves us begging for a nexus and some notion of a way out.

All the hoopla about Obama, McCain (and recently Clinton), the calls for more debates, etc. that never come close to addressing more than the window dressing allowed us plebeians, makes one wonder where the complicity with, and enabling of, the New American Wehrmacht ends for our media, including the so-called "alternative" press.

As far as I can see, the only member of Congress to have ever attempted to look behind the blue curtain and tell the public what she saw was former Georgia congresswoman Cynthia McKinney who was roundly attacked and driven from office by her own party, yet who today is running for Green Party as a presidential candidate (to be determined in July).

We may not like the choices made for us by the unseen players in this this cosmetic democracy, but if alternative media are to make a deal out of revealing some of this underhanded behavior, as you have done here, you also ought to be loudly quoting the likes of McKinney and Nader who ARE (against all odds) running for the presidency and who, unlike the others, actually have some relevant things to say to the American People.

As alternative media, you can't have it both ways. When there are spokespeople for what is right and decent in our nation, you should be giving them all the space you can, supplying the soapbox and megaphone if needs be. Polls be damned. It is only the Truth that counts here.

When democracy is failing us, alternative media must not fail democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Democracy Under the Radar Posted by: willd4change
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar Posted by: inspired1
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar Posted by: inspired1
Do we want change
Posted by: mistery509 on Jun 26, 2008 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do the American people want change? If Obama and McCain are only a few votes apart in the polls taken yesterday, you can see where the country is going. More war, more money spent on so called security and more money to the contracters.

We want the same cronies in government. People do not want change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Do we want change Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Do we want change Posted by: inspired1
» RE: Do we want change Posted by: pomes
Some good sources to keep up on wasteful military spending
Posted by: fanny666 on Jun 26, 2008 11:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Winslow Wheeler of the Strauss Military Reform Project is a good source for understanding how this happens. The procurement process is out of control. The F-22 Raptor is a very good case study (link is an MP3, very worth listening to, to understand the context a bit).

more Winslow Wheeler articles

The Pentagon Money blog

I think that this is an issue upon which progressives and "conservatives" can find common ground... wasteful spending in the Department of Defense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

an unfortunate need
Posted by: willd4change on Jun 26, 2008 11:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is sad to see these companies profiteering off the soldiers back but they are the same ones that make the equipment that keeps them safer under the conditions. The administration is dragging the war out to protect our oil intrests in that part of the world. The only way any of this will change is if the US foriegn policy changes. Go back and take a history lesson starting in the mid 50's on that part of the world and you will see how involved the US is in overthrowing governments and proping up puppet governments. You see what happend when Obama made the statement about sitting down with the Iran leaders, boy he caught hell in the news. The US was actually helping Iran develope nuclear energy in the 70's before they decided to overthrow the government, where do you think they got the idea. I don't blame these companies, the US was developed by capitalism, the problem is with the leaders of this great nation. The US is every where they shouldn't be and nowhere they should.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a few nibbles
Posted by: blueapples26 on Jun 26, 2008 12:41 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wrote a few lines of thought and was looking for a few nibbles, which I got. These are not new ideas; there are many people who have focused in greater detail in many blogs and web sites of the ideas I have mentioned. I’m just tired of living under and supporting tyranny at the same time. As I write this a new paradigm is being created for us and without our consent. This is the moment we, you, me, everyone can create a new paradigm on how to live our lives. Do we want more of the same and worse or do we want to live anew. The folks who want this to happen are already doing it in various ways. Use the creativity that we were born with to solve our perceived issues in creating the world the way we want to live in. Scary isn’t it. Btw have any of you felt the squeeze in your purses and wallets when it comes to the cost of food and fuel-energy. I have and it really hurts.

I will not pay anymore wage slave taxes to the military industrial congressional complex. Let the cystem suck dry and it will die.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Absolutely beautiful! Posted by: rockpicker
And Now For Something Completely Different
Posted by: rockpicker on Jun 26, 2008 7:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ham radio operators monitoring U.S. military shortwave channels Friday, June 20, heard a 180 character emergency action message broadcast repeatedly for U.S. military strategic and tactical units reception.

"Multiple airborne commands were up echoing this message and radio traffic became hot and heavy and all pointing to something very tense going on in the Atlantic region," according to an article that was posted on www.stevequayle.com Monday.

Titled "At The Brink Of Nuclear War--U.S. vs. Russia," apparently Putin was not kidding when he told the U.S. and England to leave Iran alone.

I called Quayle, a radio talk-show host in Bozeman, Montana, this morning. He confirmed seeing a missile launched to the east of Bozeman at about 9:30 Friday night. Another witness saw the missile from a backyard in Bozeman. Quayle is scheduled to interview this witness Monday.

All witnesses concur that another vehicle was involved, and that the missile appeared to have been destroyed as the second vehicle closed on it.

As for civil defense, we are totally unprepared. They plan to let us all fry.

Author did the show today at 5:00 pm, Mountain. Shows are archived. Check it out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The right direction.
Posted by: CosmoViking on Jun 27, 2008 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is EXACTCLY the kind of stuff Alternet should follow very closely. The Pentagon spending, both official and unofficial (read: absolutely illegal, considering the roughly $2 trillion running through the Pentagon system in a way that is not traceable) is the bane of this country, and on top of that, corporations like SAIC, Lockheed and Northrop keep amazing energy and propulsion technology under lock and key because the entire military-industrial-aerospace-petrochemical cartel is so incestous. My God, the secrets anti-gravity were discovered during and after World War Two, and here we arem in 2008...totally out of sync on Planet Earth, running sophisticated computers, the Internet, lasers, SDI etc. etc. ALL powerd by coal and oil. It's a freaking tragedy!

Their sole motivation is defence (war) and protecting the position of the richest Americans (like world class criminal and asshole, David Rockefeller) and it has been since the National Security Act was signed in 1947.

There are far more places on the boards of these corporations than there are people, so they put prople from "friendly" companies on those boards and PRESTO you have an illegal, secret industry that should make evcery American feel really bad about where the country has ended up:

Pure Corporatism.

Dick Cheney, you suck in ways only the most deplorable few, like Mussolini, would understand. If I were you, I would never again walk on foreign soil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The right direction. Posted by: inspired1
» RE: The right direction. Posted by: CosmoViking
» RE: The right direction. Posted by: pomes
» RE: The right direction. Posted by: CosmoViking
Red Herring
Posted by: MisterWu on Jun 27, 2008 12:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forget the zillions of dollars keeping American strong and American corporations afloat. I want to know what Congress is doing against Welfare Queens, war orphans and freeloading widows junkie on food stamps eating my tax dollar. Of them illegal aliens too. That must the true cause of our National debt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ed Herring Posted by: CosmoViking
Blue Herring
Posted by: MisterWu on Jun 27, 2008 12:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forgot Cadillac driving welfare queens help General Motors who need to sell as many Caddies as possible nowadays.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War is a Racket-Gen'l Smedley Butler
Posted by: Israel on Jun 29, 2008 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are not new observations, but sadly, we have yet to take heed of them.
Take a look at the God-Father of the Anti-Military Industrial Complex, Gen Smedley Butler. He was the biggest hero of WW1 that you never heard of. He earned TWO Congressional Medals of Honor. There are a couple of reasons you have not heard of Gen Butler. One his book, "War is a Racket" here: http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/articles/warisaracket.htm
in which he exposes the lucrative nexus of Wall St and War.The other reason is that he blew the whistle on those plotting a Coup against our own government under FDR, including Prescott Bush, W's grand dad, EI DuPont, FW Woolworth and other corporate, fascist stars! Check it out, Smedley's testimony before Congress is still available.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I fail to see the problem
Posted by: blogbooks on Jun 29, 2008 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Without money in America you die. You are homeless and starve to death or die of a treatable disease due to outrageously high health care costs.

I recently went back into the employment of the "military industrial complex" for a contractor because none of the purely civilian employers around here would hire me at a decent wage.

A man has to eat. When you're looking at homelessness and starvation your morals quickly evaporate and a certain pragmatism takes over.

3 cheers for the military industrial complex that literally saved my life. The bigger picture doesn't matter when you're just trying to survive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]