Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Peace Activists Occupy General Dynamics Weapons Plant

By Benjamin Dangl, AlterNet. Posted May 5, 2008.


Vermont activists entered General Dynamics and locked themselves together in the firm's lobby to protest the company's war profiteering.
Advertisement

To your right is a video of the May 1st action at General Dynamics filmed and edited by Sam Mayfield.

On May 1st, International Workers' Day, ten peace activists in Burlington, Vermont entered General Dynamics and locked themselves together in the main lobby of the building in protest against the company's weapons manufacturing and war profiteering. University of Vermont student Benjamin Dube, one of the dozens of other activists present at the event, leaned out a window of the lobby, and pointed to the GD building, explaining, "This is the gas tank of the war machine, and we are the sugar."

The demonstrators entered the lobby at around 3 pm, and proceeded to lock their arms together with PVC piping, duct tape and other materials. According to a press release put out by the group, the activists were demanding that "General Dynamics stop giving campaign contributions to the politicians responsible for regulating it, stop making Gatling guns, missiles and other weapons of mass destruction and give back the $3.6 million dollars in Vermont tax breaks General Dynamics received in 2007."

While activists at GD chanted slogans such as, "Hey GD, what do you say, how many kids did you kill today" and "GD out of the Middle East, No Justice, No Peace," banners against GD and the Iraq War were set up on three major streets and highways in the area. This anti-war action in Burlington took place at the same time thousands of dockworkers at 29 major ports across on the west coast refused to go to work in protest against the Iraq War. In March, Vermonters in Brattleboro and Marlboro passed a measure in town meetings to arrest George W. Bush and Dick Cheney for crimes against the constitution if they ever arrived in either town.

Rachel Ruggles was one of the activists locked down in the GD lobby. Wearing a green bandana and glasses, this 19 year old from Vergennes, VT, and student at the University of Vermont, said "we are participating in this non-violent direct action to get attention and make a statement against the Iraq War, to say we don't support GD's war profiteering... GD is not contributing to the peace economy. The money from their tax breaks should go back to the Vermont community."

General Dynamics is a national company whose branch in Burlington produces, among other things, Hydra-70 rockets and missile launchers. Mike Ives, a journalist with VT based Seven Days, wrote in March of this year that, according to General Dynamics company spokesperson Tim Haddock, GD employees in Burlington "manufacture the "Goalkeeper Close-In Weapon System." The "Goalkeeper" is a 14,000-pound gun that's mounted to ships and can fire up to 4200 shots per minute of "missile-piercing" ammunition."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: general dynamics, civil disobedience, war profiteering

Benjamin Dangl is the author of The Price of Fire: Resource Wars and Social Movements in Bolivia (AK Press, 2007) and edits the VT-based international news website, TowardFreedom.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
To bad the "Activist" were tasered. NM
Posted by: EncinoM on May 5, 2008 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You want them to really listen?
Posted by: meetmeineleusis on May 5, 2008 12:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Start breaking their shit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Complicity of our communities
Posted by: Noah_Scape on May 5, 2008 4:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The complicity of our communities in war is a significant factor in keeping the whole big awful deadly debacle going.

There is not much doubt that the war might end, and certainly that it would make it more difficult to operate the war machinery if "nobody showed up" to do the essential labors of making war:
nobody to make the weapons, nobody to sign up for the army, nobody to drop the bombs, nobody to beat up protesters... and maybe nobody to pay the taxes that fund it all.

You are not a nobody, what you do is real, and the excuse that "someone else would just come in and take my job anyhow" assumes that you ARE nobody. Don't be a nobody.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Didn't it take years before anti-Vietnam War protests really geared up?
Posted by: Coleman on May 5, 2008 5:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First off, kudos to the kids who were brave enough to suffer the humiliation of arrest. In tough economic times, having a record is no joke (you'll always have to explain that arrest to the boss).

Strategically, they've got the right target. The government can't wage a war without weapons manufacturers, or their financial backers.

Tactically, who knows what's best? History only teaches us one thing for certain: the more people active in a movement, the stronger it's potential. The amount of stuff smashed, heads busted, hands cuffed, and blood spilled varies widely. The truth is we really don't know what it will take (tactically) to stop this Empire. I'll venture some guesses, though.

1) Warm bodies. The only people reading this message board are people interested in news and discussion, right-wing trolls, and entry-level staffers at the NSA taking the pulse of the internet left. Real, physical (as opposed to virtual) organization is needed. As easy as it is to lampoon the old-school banner-waving protests, getting a hundred, a thousand, or ten-thousand people to do the some non-everyday coordinated action is impressive.

2) Property damage, preferably clandestine vandalism. Nobody's going to be able to actually sabotage the 200 armored vehicles that GD will churn out this year. However, there's plenty of opportunity for creative vandalism right in your hometown!

3) Damage to profits. We can't exactly "boycott" arms manufacturers, but we can divest our money from the banks that fund them. If you are really serious, simplify your financial portfolio and close your accounts with the "big guys". Send them a letter telling them why. And every time you can't find an ATM because you only have an account with your friendly local credit union, you'll be reminded of how fucking right-on you are. No, seriously!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The bandana revolution Posted by: civilsociety
Vermont water
Posted by: Jeanne on May 5, 2008 5:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is it about Vermont that makes its citizens such activists? Is it their water? I think they should bottle it and ship it around the country. The rest of us could us some of their righteous indignation and activism. Maybe it's being one of the original 13 that makes Vermonters take the Constitution more seriously and to be willing to defend it so staunchly. Whatever it is, the rest of us could use some.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Vermont water Posted by: wagadog
power to the people
Posted by: cwilsondrum on May 5, 2008 8:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there are enough,nothing can stop them

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]