Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Surging Towards Gaza: How the U.S. is Reproducing Israel's Flawed Occupation Strategies in Iraq

By Steve Niva, Foreign Policy in Focus. Posted April 23, 2008.


Through its awful Iraq strategy, the U.S. is re-creating itself in the image of a country permanently at war with the Arab and Muslim world.
Advertisement

The new "surge" strategy in Iraq, led by General David Petreaus, has been heavily marketed as an example of the U.S. military's application of the "lessons of history" from previous counterinsurgencies to Iraq, foremost among them the need to win the population over from insurgents through cultivating human relationships, addressing popular grievances and providing security.

Yet one glance at the realities on the ground in Iraq today reveal that the cornerstone of current U.S. military strategy is less about cultivating human relationships than about limiting them, primarily through concrete walls and checkpoints. And it has been less about minimizing violence than containing Iraq's population and redirecting the battlefield from the streets to the skies above Iraq.

While the coffee klatches between Marine commanders and Sunni tribal sheikhs may garner all the publicity, the real story on the ground in Iraq is that from Baghdad to Mosul, the U.S. military has been busy constructing scores of concrete walls and barriers between and around Iraqi neighborhoods, which it terms "Gated Communities." In Baghdad alone, 12-foot-high walls now separate and surround at least eleven Sunni and Shiite enclaves. Broken by narrow checkpoints where soldiers monitor traffic via newly issued ID cards, these walls have turned Baghdad into dozens of replica Green Zones, dividing neighbor from neighbor and choking off normal commerce and communications. Similar walls are being erected in other Iraqi cities, while the entire city of Falluja remains surrounded by a razor-wire barrier, with only one point of entry into the city. Moreover, the U.S. military has doubled its use of unmanned aerial drones and increasingly relies upon aerial strikes to quell insurgent activities, often through bombings and targeted assassinations.

While there is no question that overall levels of violence have temporarily decreased, Iraq has become virtually caged in a carapace of concrete walls and razor wire, reinforced by an aerial occupation from the sky. Reporting from a recent visit to the Dora neighborhood of Baghdad, the seasoned journalist Nir Rosen noted in Rolling Stone that:

Looming over the homes are twelve-foot-high security walls built by the Americans to separate warring factions and confine people to their own neighborhood. Emptied and destroyed by civil war, walled off by President Bush's much-heralded "surge," Dora feels more like a desolate, post-apocalyptic maze of concrete tunnels than a living, inhabited neighborhood.

The Israeli Laboratory

The explosion of walls and enclaves reinforced by aerial violence across Iraq suggest that the primary counterinsurgency lessons being followed by the U.S. military in Iraq today derive less from the lessons of "Lawrence of Arabia" than from Israel's experiences in the Occupied Palestinian Territories over the past decade.

Over the past decade, Israel has developed a pacification strategy against Palestinian resistance to its military occupation by erecting separation walls and checkpoints across Palestinian territory that has enclosed Palestinians within a proliferating archipelago of ethnic enclaves to separate them from each other and from illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land. This wall and enclave strategy is maintained under a blanket of aerial Israeli surveillance and deadly unmanned drones, which target the frequent airborne assassinations and strikes. This strategy reached its apotheosis in Gaza following Israel's withdrawal of its soldiers and settlements in 2005. In Gaza, 1.5 million Palestinians are now living within an enclosed cage, while Israel controls access to the essentials of life through high-tech border terminals and unleashes "penetration raids" and airborne "targeted killings" when resistance is offered.

Iraq, it seems, is surging towards Gaza.

This fact is not missed by average Iraqis. Visiting the Sunni bastion of Amriya in Baghdad, Nir Rosen in The Nation recounts how his Iraqi driver pointed to a gap in the concrete walls with which the U.S. occupation forces have surrounded Amriya: "We call it the Rafah Crossing." He was referring to the one gate from besieged Gaza to Egypt that the Israeli army occasionally allows to open.

The U.S. military's virtual reproduction of distinctively Israeli counterinsurgency tactics in Iraq reveals that claims about applying the "lessons of history" of counterinsurgent warfare to Iraq are largely beside the point. The actual application of counterinsurgency on the ground in Iraq has a distinctly Israeli DNA, born of very recent lessons from Israel's own urban warfare laboratory in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

This should not be surprising. The Israeli DNA in the new "surge" strategy is only the latest manifestation of a widely overlooked but unmistakable American predilection to increasingly draw from Israel's urban warfare laboratory and its flawed efforts to devise fresh tactics in the service of rebooting its own military occupation of Palestinian lands. What we are seeing in Iraq today has much less to do with the declared shift in U.S. military doctrine than with a deeper and more far-reaching "Israelization" of U.S. military strategy and tactics over the past two decades that was only heightened by America's misadventures in the Middle East after September 11, 2001. In the search for new means to confront urban insurgencies in predominately Arab and Muslim lands, there has been a complex institutional and cultural harmonization between these two militaries under the banner of fighting "the war on terror," though the traffic is mostly in one direction. In light of the real lessons of counterinsurgency history, however, mimicking Israel is a recipe for failure.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: occupation, petraeus, palestinians, israel, robert fisk, nir rosen, green zone, ariel sharon, israel, surge, iraq

Dr. Steve Niva is a professor of Middle East Studies and International Politics at The Evergreen State College in Olympia, WA and is a contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus. He is currently writing a book on the relationship between Israeli military violence and Palestinian suicide bombings.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Well done
Posted by: crazy carlos on Apr 23, 2008 9:41 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and to the point. Good anaylsis of U.S. and Israel and tactics> Why is it that about 100 years apart the world gets blessed wiith one giant nincompoop and serval lesser nitwits to turn the world upside down. Sorry the rest of the century, your turn has been used already.

Crazy carlos

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does Dr. Niva also think that Israel has no right to exist?
Posted by: paula.c on Apr 25, 2008 3:28 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the Palestinian terrorists stop murdering and bombing maybe there will be a Palestinian state. It is time that Palestinian mothers stopped their children from becoming suicide bombers. Israel is defending itself. Maybe Jimmy Carter can stop the terrorism from Hamas and all the rest of the Islamic fundamentalists, although it will likely be a cold day in Hell before he can see straight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same tactics - Same enemy
Posted by: ossiechic on Apr 27, 2008 10:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course the US would be forced to use the same tactics to repel the aggression of the Arab militant factions, whose agenda is more closely aligned to a Jihad, than any real movement towards the peaceful equilibrium of autonomous statehood for either Palestine or Iraq.
Similarities aside, building walls to keep the fueding factions and Jihadists out and apart is a temporary, but necessary separation to reduce the violent incidences.
I was also lead to believe that Israel had made peace with Jordan and Egypt. It is irresponsible journalism to make such bold statements that amount to lies about the Arab world in general being at war with Israel.
Perhaps it is more the fundamentalist Muslims (Jihadists) and the feuding Muslim factions (Sunnis and Shi'ites) that makes it appear as if Israel is the main or only enemy of the Arab nations.
There has to be a 'divide and conquer' approach to the Arab world as it is largely divided amongst itself anyway, with Sunni v. Shi'ite, religious v. secular etc..
However, the main difference in the parallels between the two situations is, that while Iraq was once a fully functioning nation with a Constitution, a legal system with a judiciary, police and military forces, Palestine has never been a nation as yet and needs a lot of help (from other Arab nations) to learn how to form a nation properly.
And as far as the Jewish Israeli- Palestinian - Muslim/Christian problems, there needs to be a look at the core aspirations of all parties, especially where the Temple Mount/Al Aksa Mosque is concerned, as it is the 'hot spot' that reflects the core religious differences between the Israelis and the Palestinians and the main reason why East Jerusalem is so important to the Palestinians to be its capitol.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]