Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Five Years of Suicide Bombings in Iraq

By Robert Fisk, The Independent UK. Posted March 20, 2008.


An account of the most widespread campaign of self-liquidation in human history.
Advertisement

Khaled looked at me with a broad smile. He was almost laughing. At one point, when I told him that he should abandon all thoughts of being a suicide bomber -- that he could influence more people in this world by becoming a journalist -- he put his head back and shot me a grin, world-weary for a man in his teens. "You have your mission," he said. "And I have mine." His sisters looked at him in awe. He was their hero, their amanuensis and their teacher, their representative and their soon-to-be-martyred brother. Yes, he was handsome, young -- just 18 -- he was dressed in a black Giorgio Armani T-shirt, a small, carefully trimmed Spanish conquistador's beard, gelled hair. And he was ready to immolate himself.

A sinister surprise. I had traveled to Khaled's home to speak to his mother. I had already written about his brother Hassan and wanted to introduce a Canadian journalist colleague, Nelofer Pazira, to the family. When Khaled walked on to the porch of the house, Nelofer and I both realized -- at the same moment -- that he was next, the next to die, the next "martyr". It was his smile. I've come across these young men before, but never one who so obviously declared his calling.

His family sat around us on the porch of their home above the Lebanese city of Sidon, the sitting room adorned with colored photographs of Hassan, already gone to the paradise -- so they assured me -- for which Khaled clearly thought he was destined. Hassan had driven his explosives-laden car into an American military convoy at Tal Afar in north-western Iraq, his body (or what was left of it) buried "in situ" -- or so his mother was informed.

It's easy to find the families of the newly dead in Lebanon. Their names are read from the minarets of Sidon's mosques (most are Palestinian) and in Tripoli, in northern Lebanon, the Sunni "Tawhid" movement boasts "hundreds" of suiciders among its supporters. Every night, the population of Lebanon watches the brutal war in Iraq on television. "It's difficult to reach 'Palestine' these days," Khaled's uncle informed me. "Iraq is easier."

Too true. No one doubts that the road to Baghdad -- or Tal Afar or Fallujah or Mosul -- lies through Syria, and that the movement of suicide bombers from the Mediterranean coasts to the deserts of Iraq is a planned if not particularly sophisticated affair. What is astonishing -- what is not mentioned by the Americans or the Iraqi "government" or the British authorities or indeed by many journalists -- is the sheer scale of the suicide campaign, the vast numbers of young men (only occasionally women), who willfully destroy themselves amid the American convoys, outside the Iraqi police stations, in markets and around mosques and in shopping streets and on lonely roads beside remote checkpoints across the huge cities and vast deserts of Iraq. Never have the true figures for this astonishing and unprecedented campaign of self-liquidation been calculated.

But a month-long investigation by The Independent, culling four Arabic-language newspapers, official Iraqi statistics, two Beirut news agencies and Western reports, shows that an incredible 1,121 Muslim suicide bombers have blown themselves up in Iraq. This is a very conservative figure and -- given the propensity of the authorities (and of journalists) to report only those suicide bombings that kill dozens of people -- the true estimate may be double this number. On several days, six -- even nine -- suicide bombers have exploded themselves in Iraq in a display of almost Wal-Mart availability. If life in Iraq is cheap, death is cheaper.

This is perhaps the most frightening and ghoulish legacy of George Bush's invasion of Iraq five years ago. Suicide bombers in Iraq have killed at least 13,000 men, women and children -- our most conservative estimate gives a total figure of 13,132 -- and wounded a minimum of 16,112 people. If we include the dead and wounded in the mass stampede at the Baghdad Tigris river bridge in the summer of 2005 -- caused by fear of suicide bombers -- the figures rise to 14,132 and 16,612 respectively. Again, it must be emphasized that these statistics are minimums. For 529 of the suicide bombings in Iraq, no figures for wounded are available. Where wounded have been listed in news reports as "several", we have made no addition to the figures. And the number of critically injured who later died remains unknown. Set against a possible death toll of half a million Iraqis since the March 2003 invasion, the suicide bombers' victims may appear insignificant; but the killers' ability to terrorize civilians, militiamen and Western troops and mercenaries is incalculable.

Never before has the Arab world witnessed a phenomenon of suicide-death on this scale. During Israel's occupation of Lebanon after 1982, one Hizbollah suicide-bombing a month was considered remarkable. During the Palestinian intifadas of the 1980s and 1990s, four per month was regarded as unprecedented. But suicide bombers in Iraq have been attacking at the average rate of two every three days since the 2003 Anglo-American invasion.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, suicide bombers, syria, iraq war

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Fundamentalists vs. the Sane Majority
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Mar 20, 2008 1:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is surely something deeply, profoundly wrong with people who believe that God wants them to shed innocent blood and will reward them eternally for killing creatures made in his image. Whether Islamic fundamentalists or their unacknowledged ideological cousins, Christian and Jewish fundamentalists, all share this belief, along with common ideas about sexual morality, women's roles in society, child rearing practices, government intrusion into private matters, abortion, contraception, crime and punishment, and the rights of dissidents. The real divide isn't between faiths, but between the sane majority drawn from all faiths and the fanatical minority within each faith. George W Bush and Osama bin Laden both invoke divine instructions to justify their bloody agenda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Been to Basra lately, Mr. Fisk?
Posted by: LeftWright on Mar 20, 2008 2:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not everything is as it appears on the surface, take this report from 2005:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php ?context=viewArticle&code=20050920&articleId=972

(please close the space following .php)

Perhaps you should also consider a trip to Samarra as well:

http://www.uruknet.info/?s1=1&p=20891&s2=23

As these articles suggest, it is quite likely that many, if not most, of these "suicide" bombings are actually covert ops perpetrated by western special forces and intelligence agents using drugged and/or mentally diminished patsies and attaching bombs to the bottoms of cars while their owners are detained.

What better way to incite and fuel a "civil war" between Shi'a and Sunni.

Just more false flag events from the creators of 9/11.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Been to Basra lately, Mr. Fisk? Posted by: carbon-based
» I beg to differ, leafsong1 Posted by: LeftWright
» RE: I beg to differ, leafsong1 Posted by: leafsong1
» It should also be noted... Posted by: leafsong1
» Duh Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: Duh Posted by: leafsong1
» tc - there IS honor in retreat Posted by: LeftWright
Fundamentally crazy: Religion as lunacy
Posted by: Moonray on Mar 20, 2008 2:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You don't need religious faith to be a suicide bomber -- but it helps. Fanatical acts such as suicide bombing are spurred mainly by peer pressure -- the same incentive that drives suburban Western kids to take insane risks in their own communities -- but the irrational arguments of religion splash gasoline on the egotistical flame that fuels homicidal attacks.

When a Western kid murders his fellow students with an assault rifle he's really throwing a tantrum to demand attention and respect. When an Islamic suicide bomber does the same thing he's acting out in search of that same attention and respect, and his fellow jihadists have assured him he'll receive it.

Both acts are fundamentally crazy. Reason has been subverted by the Western kid's fantasies of macho glory and by the jihadist's fantasies of winning the eternal blessing of Allah.

But religion is all about lack of reason. In fact, lack of reason is a prerequisite for "faith," which is just another word for believing something with no evidence to support that belief. That makes religion very dangerous and destructive for individuals and societies. Once you abandon objective evidence you open the door to all kinds of nonsensical belief, including Islamic extremism. (Religionists argue that all knowledge is subjective, but that's a cop-out. That's like arguing that no one else exists in the universe except you.) If it hopes to survive, humanity must abandon the madness of religion and learn to live as rational beings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We called them doughboys
Posted by: PaulK on Mar 20, 2008 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Christians by the millions would fling themselves across fields of mud, into the teeth of Gatling guns, for the purpose of killing others. There were the English Christians, the French, the Germans and the Americans. Many carried grenades. Some had cans of gasoline on them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We called them doughboys Posted by: harryf200
Compare and constrast: the suicide and aerial bomber
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Mar 20, 2008 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason that suicide bombers use that tactic is that they don't have access to an air force - if they did, I'm sure those eager young suicide bombers would happily morph into eager fighter-bomber pilots.

We can be sure that U.S. fighter pilots and Iraqi suicide bombers both feel a strong sense of nationalism - but it must be pointed out that the U.S. fighter pilots are in someone else's backyard, waging a war of aggression against a sovereign nation so that U.S. and British corporate interests can seize control of Iraq's oilfields, and so that the U.S. can establish a permanent military presence in this oil-rich region.

Unfortunately, none of the current U.S. presidential candidates has a plan to leave Iraq. None have been asked to specify when the last U.S. troop will leave Iraq. The Iraqis want the U.S. out - they believe it will end the violence. The Iraqis are now far closer to Iran than they were before the invasion, which is an outcome that does much to strengthen Iran in the region and which makes the U.S. military-civilian planners, i.e. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Petraeus, etc. look like idiotic jackasses puffed up on their own propaganda, doesn't it?

Just for comparison, how many people have been killed by U.S. air strikes in Iraq? This is a hard number to come up with. The air strikes have been escalating in Iraq (echoes of Vietnam, again):

Massive US Air Attack South of Baghdad, Jan 10 2008

The numbers of dead? Hard to say, as nothing coming out of the Petraeus propaganda cell is trustworthy - but the U.N. has been keeping track:

"The recent increase in U.S. air operations in Iraq has brought a spate of reports of more such incidents. On the day the UNAMI report was released, six women, nine children and 19 men were killed in air strikes near Lake Tharthar, north of Baghdad. The Centcom press office immediately declared that the 19 men were "terrorists" but similar claims regarding previous air strikes have been contradicted by local residents and officials, and they beg the question as to how you know that 19 men were "terrorists" after you've blown them off the face of the earth. An air strike on September 25 in Mussayyib, 30 miles south of Baghdad, killed five women and four children; and one on September 28 on the al-Saha district of Baghdad killed seven men, two women and four children. Once again, I must stress that these incidents just happen to have been reported and that they are probably only the tip of the iceberg of civilians being killed by U.S. air strikes"

Of course, the strongest connection between suicide bombers and aerial bombers is that every time the U.S. kills someone's family member in an aerial assault, a new suicide bomber is created.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm all for it!
Posted by: jstuv on Mar 20, 2008 8:16 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, I’m all it! The more that people kill them selves, the better off the rest of us are.
I’ve never tried to dissuade anyone from dying. First, it’s their decision. Second, if their mind is so disturbed, the better off they are, to rid themselves of their pain. It’s the same superstition that rationalizes for you to try to value their life, as they fanaticize that they will be rewarded for their act. “Nothing is good or bad. Thinking makes it so.”

Socrates noted that the unexamined life is not worth living. And so it is.
(http://www.granpawayne.com/courses/EXAMLIFE.HTM)

My only concern is that suicide fanatics should do their acts in isolation.
Perhaps gather them in the midst of the desert on in a large stadium and let them kill each other to their heart’s content. (That’s what we do in civilized societies.)

As General George Patten reportedly said: “You don’t win wars by dieing for your country. You win wars by having the other feller die for their country.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Actually, that was a Hitler quote. Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: I'm all for it! Posted by: leafsong1
What else can the Iraqi's do -----
Posted by: symcokid on Mar 20, 2008 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They never had much of an Army to speak of and a Navy and Air Force never existed, there were no weapons of Mass Destruction and they had no connection to Al Quaida or the Taliban. They were open prey for this mighty USofA and once we have their oil they don't really have much to live for - we'll finish off the ones surviving after there is no longer any self destruction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

eye for an eye until we are all blind...
Posted by: tbone on Mar 20, 2008 9:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of us cannot understand why, but the reality is they live in a nightmare, every day they see violence and death, that its easy to believe in martyrdom should come as no surprise...if you understand war. I have no personal experience with the type of violence they see everyday, but I had a dream last night that I was in Israel (after watching a show about Israeli weapons technology), and on a tour bus with a small boy who turned out to be working with "the enemy", I chastised the boy for not using his head, and we were promptly booted off the bus...after basically crapping myself, running around and seeing everyone with guns, I awoke with a slightly better understanding of this madness. We americans are shielded from the horrors of these violent acts, sure we get the hollywood version, and while they can be a small window into that reality (The Kingdom), we cannot possibly understand the full magnitude of the death and destruction they see daily. The terror I felt from a bad dream is enough to make me want to do something drastic, that these people take up such desparate measures as suicide bombing is truly a sign of the times...if people can't stop killing each other innocent or not, we are all doomed. Its good to see some real numbers associated with this new type of "warfare", maybe someone in charge will listen...

not holding my breath

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

**READ CAREFULLY: NUMBERS DON"T ADD UP**
Posted by: maribelle on Mar 20, 2008 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The numbers are not matching up to the hyperbole:

An account of the most widespread campaign of self-liquidation in human history.

A month-long investigation...shows that an incredible 1,121 Muslim suicide bombers have blown themselves up in Iraq.

But then:

Japan -- facing the imminent collapse of its entire society at the hands of a superpower -- could only mobilize 4,615 "kamikazes".

1121 in 5 years of war (Iraq)
vs
4615 in 3+ years of war (WWII)

I get the uncomfortable feeling the author is trying to inflate the problem and/or uniqueness of this phenomenon, as soldiers committing suicidal raids are regrettably common in war. (Picket's Charge, "running amok", etc.)

But why would the author do this--just to write about something, or is the motive more sinister?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Apples and oranges Posted by: brunowe
Iraqis themselves aren't always the source of it
Posted by: deang on Mar 20, 2008 11:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both Fisk and Dahr Jamail have mentioned that there are accounts of Americans and their British accomplices planting car bombs in the vehicles of unsuspecting drivers. That also needs to be mentioned, especially since so many Americans already seem to think Arabs are just congenitally violent. And Negroponte's "Salvador Option" promoted by the US also needs to be mentioned, as sowing discord and destruction was and is its only aim, with the demise of Iraq its goal. And that is not the fault of suicide bombers but of the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Disposable American Soldiers: Suicides by the Hundreds and That's Not Even Counting the Vets
Posted by: sofla100 on Mar 20, 2008 3:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American soldiers have been killing themselves by the hundreds:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/
washington/2007-08-15-army-suicides_N.htm

Not only that, how many Iraqi vets are killing themselves? It's said tens of thousands of them suffer from PTSD, much of it undiagnosed. How many will take their own lives? The bottom line, Iraq has its suicide bombers, but this war is causing American Troops to kill themselves, not as some kind of suicide bombers hoping for some kind of glorious after-life. But, in pathetic isolation, uncared for by the American government and cast aside after or while fighting in Iraq. American soldiers, ordered to fight, and often unwittingly killing women and children, are traumatized by what they see for life. Then, they realize the lies they have been fed by the Bush administration. That this war is senseless and useless, and they are just being used as cannon fodder. That knowledge and disillusionment even makes them more depressed. Next, the US government and Veterans Administration just casts them aside, even if PTSD is diagnosed. Not enough money to pay for therapists and help. So, they kill themselves, either here in America or in Iraq. Is this so much different, except for being more pathetic, then the actions of the Iraqi suicide bombers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

World of shit
Posted by: vertical on Mar 20, 2008 7:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I was living in abject poverty and I did not have a hope of ever comming out of it. I would blow myself up and take some rich shithead like Donald trump out with me. When the desparity of wealth gets too great in this country we'll see this happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How do we know they are suicide bombers?
Posted by: Adler Berriman Seal on Mar 20, 2008 8:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Something blows up in a crowded market place, and the MSM tells us it was a "suicide bomber". Why should we believe it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A War For Israel
Posted by: higginslads on Mar 21, 2008 10:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At this point, let's be very clear about one thing: the people plotting the Iraq war from inside the OSP were not colluding with oil executives or any other corporate interests at that time - they were in collusion with Sharon's Likud government. In fact, everyone who worked to create the case for war against Iraq shared one common interest: an undying loyalty to the state of Israel.

# Neocon lackey Ahmed Chalabi, the lying criminal [69] who was convicted and sentenced by the Jordanian authorities for embezzlement and bank fraud in his absence (he fled the country before the police got their hands on him), and who provided most of the information that the ziocons used as "evidence" of Saddam having 'links-to-Al-Qaeda' and WMDs [70], was a long-time friend of 10th Dan Grandmaster ziocon Richard Perle [71], co-author of A Clean Break which cited the removal of Saddam Hussein as the key to the beginning of a securer Israel;

# The Niger documents [72] forged to make it look like Saddam's regime had tried to acquire yellowcake uranium from Africa came from Israeli dual national ziocon Michael Ledeen [73] [74] who came under the scrutiny of the FBI for that very reason but will probably (definitely) get away with it;

# Paul Wolfowitz, "architect" of the Iraq war and the man who pushed hardest for it is an Israeli dual national and a spy for Israel, having forwarded to an Israeli government official a classified US document back in 1978, and has a sister living in Israel; [75] From The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy, a scholarly paper authored by Stephen Walt of Harvard University and John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago:

Wolfowitz is equally committed to Israel. The Forward once described him as "the most hawkishly pro‐Israel voice in the Administration," and selected him in 2002 as the first among fifty notables who "have consciously pursued Jewish activism." At about the same time, JINSA gave Wolfowitz its Henry M. Jackson Distinguished Service Award for promoting a strong partnership between Israel and the United States, and the Jerusalem Post, describing him as "devoutly pro‐Israel," named him "Man of the Year" in 2003. [76] (Not surprising, considering Richard Perle is director of it)

# Lewis "Scooter" Libby, another OSP operative, Cheney's chief of staff, and Israeli dual national, credited with pushing Cheney to go public about Saddam's supposed ties to Al Qaeda and 9/11 and pushing Colin Powell to include the fake reports about Mohammed Atta's ties to Iraqi intelligence in his famous 2003 speech to the UN [77], was responsible for the outing of Valerie Plame as a CIA agent to punish her husband, Joseph Wilson, for exposing the Niger documents as fraudulent [78]. He was sentenced to 2 and a half years in prison but was later pardoned by Bush; [79]

# Douglas Feith, dual citizenship ziocon who worked out of both the OSP and PCTEG to bring us the Iraq war was also investigated by the FBI for spying for Israel and forced to leave the National Security Council (NSC) for his double-dealing [80]

# Larry Franklin, Feith's deputy who worked under him at the OSP in the Pentagon [81] was sentenced to more than 12 years in prison [82] for leaking documents to Israel in the AIPAC spy scandal; [83]

# Harold Rhode [84], Feith's Middle East Specialist and Undersecretary of Defense for Policy was investigated by the FBI over passing on classified information to Israel:

An UPI report said another under-investigation official Mr Rhode "practically lived out of (Ahmad) Chalabi's office". Intelligence sources said that CIA operatives observed Mr Rhode as being constantly on his cell phone to Israel, discussing US plans, military deployments, political projects and a discussion of Iraq assets. [85]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A War For Israel (continued)
Posted by: higginslads on Mar 21, 2008 10:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
# William (or Bill) Luti [86], Chief of the OSP and another of Feith's men, having worked under Feith and Cheney before Bush wasn't elected, was subject to the same FBI investigation, for the same reason.


Thus, the casus belli for the Iraq war was put together by Israeli spies and zionist agents, and derived from what's come to be known as "Feith-based intelligence" [87], or in other words, complete bullshit from the bowels of the ziocon Lie Factory [88], served on the silver platter of mainstream media to the American public and the people of the world who swallowed it whole for Eretz Israel [89]. Even so, most of the treachery that led to the Iraq war will go unpunished. It's usually a pretty sure thing that if you're a senior official in the US government and you're caught spying for Israel, your treason will be dealt with leniently, or not at all. From an article by Laura Rozen and Jason Vest:

Since the Pollard case [90], U.S. intelligence and law-enforcement sources have revealed to the Prospect that at least six sealed indictments have been issued against individuals for espionage on Israel's behalf. It's a testament to the unique relationship between the United States and Israel that those cases were never prosecuted; according to the same sources, both governments ultimately addressed them through diplomatic and intelligence channels rather than air the dirty laundry. A number of career Justice Department and intelligence officials who have worked on Israeli counterespionage told the Prospect of long-standing frustration among investigators and prosecutors who feel that cases that could have been made successfully against Israeli spies were never brought to trial, or that the investigations were shut down prematurely. [91]

Dying For Zion

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More on Israel
Posted by: higginslads on Mar 21, 2008 10:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A month before the war, the Forward's Ami Eden, commenting on Kinsley's piece, noted that what was "once only whispered in back rooms... [was] lately splashed in bold characters across the mainstream media, over Jewish and Israeli influence in shaping American foreign policy."

"In recent weeks," he wrote, "the Israeli-Jewish elephant has been on a rampage, trampling across the airwaves and front pages of respected media outlets, including the Washington Post, The New York Times, the American Prospect, the Washington Times, the Economist, the New York Review of Books, CNN and MSNBC.

"For its encore," he added, "the proverbial pachyderm plopped itself... smack in the middle of "Meet the Press," NBC's top-rated Sunday morning news program."[28]

It occurred on February 23, when host Tim Russert read from a February 14 column by veteran journalist Arnaud de Borchgrave, editor at large of the Washington Times, who argued that the "strategic objective" of senior Bush administration officials was to secure Israel's borders by launching a crusade against its enemies in the Arab world.

One of Russert's guests was Richard Perle, at the time chairman of the Defense Policy Board, a key advisory panel to the Pentagon, as well as a fellow of the influential pro-Israel American Enterprise Institute. Of, perhaps, even more significance, Perle had been a founder of JINSA, the Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs, a little known neo-con think tank that will be examined later in the article.

Russert turned to Perle and addressed the question: "Can you assure American viewers across our country that we're in this situation against Saddam Hussein and his removal for American security interests?" And then came the bombshell: "And what would be the link in terms of Israel?"

Both Perle and Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, who has family in Israel, have been routinely described in the press as the "architects" of the war on Iraq, so the question was addressed to the right person.

Clearly Perle was not prepared. Squirming slightly he replied: "Well, first of all, the answer is absolutely yes. Those of us who believe that we should take this action if Saddam doesn't disarm - and I doubt that he's going to - believe it's in the best interests of the United States. I don't see what would be wrong with surrounding Israel with democracies; indeed, if the whole world were democratic, we'd live in a much safer international security system because democracies do not wage aggressive wars."

I'll leave that contradiction for another time and note, as did the Forward's Eden, that:

...it was a startling question, especially when directed at Perle, the poster boy - along with Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Under Secretary of Defense Douglas Feith - for anti-semitic critics who insist the United States is being pulled into war by pro-Likud Jewish advisers, on orders from Jerusalem.

But Russert is no David Duke, nor even a Patrick Buchanan. If Russert is asking the question on national television, then the toothpaste is out of the tube: The question has entered the discourse in elite Washington circles and is now a legitimate query to be floated in polite company. [29]

In a lengthy front page story, the Washington Post's Robert Kaiser described what appeared to be an unprecedented political partnership between Ariel Sharon and George W. Bush, headlined, "Bush and Sharon Nearly Identical On Mideast Policy."

"Over the past dozen years or more," Kaiser wrote, "supporters of Sharon's Likud Party have moved into leadership roles in most of the American-Jewish organizations that provide financial and political support for Israel."A War For Israel

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]