Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Why Iraq Could Blow up in John McCain's Face

By Patrick Cockburn, CounterPunch. Posted March 8, 2008.


The "surge" in Iraq isn't working, but the PR for it has -- the truth is that Iraq could return to a bloodbath at a moment's notice.
Advertisement

In Baghdad the Iraqi government is eager to give the impression that peace is returning. "Not a single sectarian murder or displacement was reported in over a month," claimed Brigadier Qasim Ata, the spokesman for the security plan for the capital. In the US, the Surge, the dispatch of 30,000 extra American troops in the first half of 2007, is portrayed as having turned the tide in Iraq. Democrats in Congress no longer call aggressively for a withdrawal of American troops. The supposed military success in Iraq has been brandished by Senator John McCain as vindication of his prowar stance.

Seldom has the official Iraqi and American perception of what is happening in Iraq felt so different from the reality. Cocooned behind the walls of the Green Zone, defended by everybody from US soldiers to Peruvian and Ugandan mercenaries, the government of prime minister Nouri al-Maliki pumps out alluring tales of life returning to normal that border on fantasy. For instance, Brigadier Ata made his claim that there had been no sectarian murders or expulsions in the capital over the previous month on February 15, but two weeks earlier, on February 1, suicide bombers, whom the government said were al-Qa'ida, had blown themselves up killing 99 people in two bird markets in Baghdad, both situated in largely Shia districts.

So keen are the authorities to show that Sunni and Shia have stopped killing each other and overall violence is down that many deaths with an obvious sectarian motive are no longer recorded. "I think the real figure for the number of people being killed is about twice what the government says it is," said one local politician. He had just sent the death certificates of the victims of sectarian killers to the military authorities, who were steadfastly refusing to admit that anybody had died at the time and place that the bodies were discovered.

One day after Brigadier Ata claimed that there had been no sectarian killings or abductions over the previous month, prime minister Maliki himself went on a walk about in central Baghdad to demonstrate just how safe things have become. But it was the precautions taken by Maliki's bodyguards which were more revealing about the real state of security in the city.

Maliki's brief venture onto the streets and out of the Green Zone took place in the al-Mansur district of west Baghdad. This is an area of big houses and many embassies, but has been heavily fought over by Sunni and Shia in the past year. "I was in Mansur on Saturday afternoon," an Iraqi friend told me, "when, at about 3.15pm, I noticed a strange movement in the street, which was suddenly flooded by soldiers in green uniforms, led by generals and colonels, who were checking parked cars and all the buildings." Minutes later a large convoy of vehicles appeared, with three US army Humvees in front and behind, and, in the middle, five black armoured four wheel drives They stopped in front of a famous ice cream shop called al-Ruwaad, but for fifteen minutes nobody got out of the vehicles as soldiers searched all the shops nearby. When officials and their guards did begin to emerge Maliki was in the middle of them and began to walk around.

"Everybody was scared when they saw him because they thought his presence might lead to an attack," reported my friend. "Some women began to run away and I thought it was too dangerous for me to stay. I heard that Maliki gave 500,000 Iraqi dinars [200] each to a woman who said her husband had been killed in a bomb explosion and a blind beggar." Maliki also bought two suits from a well-known shop called Mario Zengotti, which promptly shut down, the owner presumably calculating that Baghdad is full of people who might kill him for selling clothes to the prime minister.

Baghdad is 'better' than it was, but the improvement is only in comparison to the bloodbath of 2006 when 3,000 people were being killed every month. People stay inside their own Sunni or Shia ghettoes. I drove one night through west Baghdad at 8 pm, sitting in the back of a police car with a second military vehicle full of heavily armed soldiers and police behind. Though I was driving in the heart of the capital I saw only three civilian cars during a three or four mile journey through a maze of military checkpoints and fortifications. In Shia-dominated east Baghdad, where there has been less fighting, there are more shops open but few customers. Overall the city the city is still frozen in fear. The growth in the number of checkpoints is not entirely good news because it has always been a favorite tactic of kidnappers and death squads to set up fake checkpoints to stop and identify potential victims. More reassuring is the knowledge that the Mehdi Army militiamen, the military wing of Shia clerics Muqtada al-Sadr's movement, who killed so many Sunni at the height of the slaughter, are still abiding by a strictly-enforced six month ceasefire on the orders of their leader. The killings have not stopped but there are less of them.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, john mccain

Patrick Cockburn is the author of 'The Occupation: War, resistance and daily life in Iraq', a finalist for the National Book Critics' Circle Award for best non-fiction book of 2006. His forthcoming book 'Muqtada! Muqtada al-Sadr, the Shia revival and the struggle for Iraq' is published by Scribner in April.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A sadistic, sick political game
Posted by: thelostsailor on Mar 8, 2008 1:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'Showboating' the war is effectively 'chanting' for our troops to be bombed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The true object of the Surge is political
Posted by: brunowe on Mar 8, 2008 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The greatest success of the Surge has been in terms of public relations. Suddenly there is a perception in the US that 'things are getting better in Iraq', though they are better only in terms of the mass killings of 2006.

I think this last bit hits the nail on the head. The transient success puts Iraq off the political radar until the election without actually resolving anything.

Not only is the reduction in violence due to factors that aren't connected with it, such as Sadr laying low to reassert control over his militia and Sunnis taking Takfiri jihadis, it also doesn't take into account other developments.

The tension between Kurds and non-Kurds over Kirkuk isn't going away anytime soon. The political benchmarks aren't being met. The Presidency vetoed the bill regarding provincial elections, the de-Ba'athification measure arguably removes Sunnis from the security ministries. The tension between Shi'ite factions.

But Bush can say apres moi, la deluge

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bush can say THAT? Posted by: jackl2400
» RE: Bush can say THAT? Posted by: Quannah
I will be shocked
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 8, 2008 8:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if everything holds in Iraq until the election. I've been saying here for months that this is going to erupt. But, as usual, the MSM is so overly focused on the presidential primaries that they don't have time to do a story on what's happening in Iraq. When was the last time you saw a story on Iraq on a newscast? I've read stories on Iraq, but only because I sought them out, and usually they are buried in the back of the newspaper, or I read them in my trusty "lefty" magazines, but not MSM. No way.

While America has been snoozing, we have been arming all sides in Iraq and the shit is gonna hit the fan. Al Sadr continued his cease-fire for another 6 months, but that can be rescinded at any time. This is the "elephant in the room" - the thing nobody wants to talk about. But Patrick Cockburn, who knows what he's talking about, is absolutely right about this thing being very volatile. And when it blows up, it will be a full-scale, all-out civil war and our troops will be in the middle of it. The government in Baghdad is very weak, and the factions have not even come close to working out their differences, and that will come to a head, sooner rather than later, I presume. Perhaps before the election.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I will be shocked Posted by: john mont
"Victory"
Posted by: motamanx on Mar 8, 2008 8:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is when the oil starts flowing into Exxon tankers. Not until then.
As long as that hasn't happened, our brave troops will be stationed in Iraq.

The Iraq War was started with lies, and that fact should always be remembered, and always preface every discussion of the War.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MCCAIN AND IRAQ
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 8, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iraq probably will blow up in his face but the American people won't even notice. Neither will he. It's become a permanent state of affairs. It just goes on and on. When the new president reinstates a military draft, in some form or other it will become real. That's what it's been all along. People just chose to ignore it. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, but the surge IS working, Marines I know there tell me
Posted by: japrime on Mar 8, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to totally disagree with the idea that the surge isn't working in Iraq. Two years ago, around 150 local Marines who were in al Ramadi felt like they were in a blender every time they went out on patrol. Now, their former commander tells me, they are complaining to him that they are BORED. I cover the military here for a major paper and know most of these guys, and they have strong opinions on the war, and were not averse to complain when they needed more body armor, etc. They are not just blowing smoke out their butts to please some bureaucrat in the Green Zone.

You know, the occasional and now-infrequent bombing aside, more people die on any given day in California than in Iraq. Perhaps we should send troops there to restore order.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pardon me, but
Posted by: willymack on Mar 8, 2008 11:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hasn't Iraq ALREADY blown up in everybody's face? It's easy to see who's to blame for all this. It's the bush crime family, plain & simple. They're solely responsible for the needless deaths of some 4000 Americans and ruining the lives of tens of thousands of the same. Then, there are the Iraqi casualities. Some put them at a MILLION. True to their evil nature, the bushies and their lackies in "congress" are ignoring the plight of our returning veterans, shorting them on badly needed medical and mental health care, and reneging on virtually every promise made by the recruiters. This is a national disgrace that has yet to be addressed by our phony press.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mission Accomplished
Posted by: realveive on Mar 8, 2008 2:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, another triumph for our wonderful prez. The mission was to get rid of Saddam Hussein, you know, a bad guy who was making life miserable in Iraq. Now that he's gone things are "wonderfuler" than ever over there and it's only cost us a couple, three trillion dollars. We should be thankful that our tax dollars helped get rid of that guy. Of course, more people have died in Iraq since Saddam's "left office" than all the time he was in office but, hey, that's the kind of bang one expects for a $2,000,000,000,000 or $3,000,000,000,000 expenditure.

God bless you, George W. Bush. Why don't you hop over to Iraq and parade down Main St. Baghdad with your Iraqi counterpart to bask in the glow of America's triumph. I'm sure the Iraqi citizenry will cheer you on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is our Mission?
Posted by: ronheri on Mar 9, 2008 3:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush administration which had plans on the table to invade Iraq soon after taking office (according to Paul O'Neil his then Secretary of Treasury); then set about searching for a pretex to justify an invasion. Let's try "WMD", "Ties to Terrorists Organisations", or "Rid the area of a brutal dictator and give Iraq democracy", one or a combination of these should be a good sell to the American people. The consequences of these lies have been enormous. Four thousand dead American soldiers, untold injured, and who knows how many returning men and women coming home with long term physical and mental problems. The cost to the American taxpayer for this unjustified empire building, using money borrowed from China and else where is staggering. Then there is the enormous loss of life to innocent Iraqi civilians, their homes, the entire country. President Bush once stood on an aircraft carrier years ago and proclaimed "Mission Accomplished". I have one question Mr. President, what was our mission?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What is their Mission? Posted by: sasquuatch55
the mission, get cheap oil.
Posted by: richholland on Mar 9, 2008 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Europe was jealouis about the law price of gasoline in the USA.
We pay about $ 10, a gallon.
Now USA has access in Souad Arabia, Koewait and IRAQ to the worlds biggest oilstocks.

Because the mission is accomplised we might expect the price will go down??????????????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thats news?
Posted by: carbon-based on Mar 9, 2008 5:00 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The "surge" in Iraq isn't working"" - it isn't? You mean the ENTIRE government, republicans and democrats alike agree that it is working but this writer has inside information that says it isnt?

Why read any further - the opening line seems to suggest what the rest of the article will provide -nothing

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oxheadone
Posted by: oxheadone on Mar 9, 2008 10:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whatever. All I see is that we are spending 12 billion dollars a month to produce more enemies for the US. I wish someone would define what there is to win and what we are losing by leaving. Anyway, we cannot afford it. There are many serious problems in the US that could use that 12 billions. There is or will be a civil war in Iraq to define the next power structure; we cannot influence it; it will likely be very unfriendly to the US the longer we stay. We have destroyed Iraq; we have further destabilized the middle east; we have increased Iran's influence and further endangered our only ally in the area(Israel) and troubled our semi-friends; we have reduced our world-wide reputation; we have weakened the dollar and our economy. What more damage does our government wish to do? This is not even safeguarding our supply of oil, which the arabs have to sell on the open market; they have little else to sell and they cannot drink or eat it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excellent article!
Posted by: PaulC on Mar 10, 2008 1:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally someone is talking about the real reasons why casualties are down - ethnic cleansing, massive outflows of refugees and a short term armistice between the Sunni's and Americans to provide a tactical advantage to the Sunnis. And the Americans have walled off whole sections of Baghdad much like Berlin during the cold war.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is very scary to me that so many people in the United
Posted by: kentigereyes@yahoo.com on Mar 12, 2008 1:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
States of Arrogance believe the BS about progress in Iraq. This is why that way-too-old warmonger has a chance to be elected. I don't have any love for hrc/slick willy or BO but there is a chance one of these jerks will bring the troops home the day after taking office. Yeah, I know, I'm dreaming again. Ken

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I see Barack Obama as the only ray of hope
Posted by: paula.c on Mar 13, 2008 3:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
out of this mess. But he has to win the presidency first. So get out and work for his election and maybe say a few prayers that the Clintons get lost. And that McCain gets trounced overwhelmingly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]